
DC Residents Protest as White House Says Federal Agents Will Be on Patrol 24/7
After law enforcement set up a vehicle checkpoint along the busy 14th Street Northwest corridor, hecklers shouted, 'Go home, fascists' and other insults. Some protesters stood at the intersection before the checkpoint and urged drivers to turn away from it.
The action intensified a few days after President Donald Trump's unprecedented announcement that his administration would take over the city's police department for at least a month.
The city's Democratic mayor walked a political tightrope, referring to the takeover as an 'authoritarian push' at one point and later framing the infusion of officers as boost to public safety, though one with few specific barometers for success. The Republican president has said crime in the city was at emergency levels that only such federal intervention could fix — even as District of Columbia leaders pointed to statistics showing violent crime at a 30-year low after a sharp rise two years ago.
For two days, small groups of federal officers have been visible in scattered areas of the city. But a significant increase was expected Wednesday at the Guard's armory and troops were expected to start doing more missions in Washington on Thursday, according to a Guard spokesman who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the planning process.
On Wednesday, agents from Homeland Security Investigations patrolled the popular U Street corridor. Drug Enforcement Administration officers were seen on the National Mall, while National Guard members were parked nearby. DEA agents also joined Metropolitan Police Department officers on patrol in the Navy Yard neighborhood, while FBI agents stood along the heavily trafficked Massachusetts Avenue.
Hundreds of federal law enforcement and city police officers who patrolled the streets Tuesday night made 43 arrests, compared with about two dozen the night before.
D.C. Councilmember Christina Henderson downplayed the arrest reports as 'a bunch of traffic stops' and said the administration was seeking to disguise how unnecessary this federal intervention is.
'I'm looking at this list of arrests and they sound like a normal Saturday night in any big city,' said Henderson.
Unlike in other U.S. states and cities, the law gives Trump the power to take over Washington's police for up to 30 days. Extending his power over the city for longer would require approval from Congress, and that could be tough in the face of Democratic resistance.
Trump suggested that he could seek a longer period of control or decide to call on Congress to exercise authority over city laws his administration sees as lax on crime. 'We're gonna do this very quickly. But we're gonna want extensions. I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will,' he said.
Later, on his Truth Social site, Trump reiterated his claims about the city, writing, 'D.C. has been under siege from thugs and killers, but now, D.C. is back under Federal Control where it belongs.'
Henderson, who worked for Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York before running for the D.C. Council, said she was already in touch with 'friends on the Hill' to rally opposition for any Trump extension request. She added, 'It's Day Three and he's already saying he's going to need more time?'
Targeting a variety of infractions
The arrests made by 1,450 federal and local officers across the city included those for suspicion of driving under the influence and unlawful entry, as well as a warrant for assault with a deadly weapon, according to the White House. Seven illegal firearms were seized.
There have now been more than 100 arrests since Trump began beefing up the federal law enforcement presence in Washington last week, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said. 'President Trump is delivering on his campaign promise to clean up this city and restore American Greatness to our cherished capital,' she said.
The president has full command of the National Guard and has activated up to 800 troops to support law enforcement, though exactly what form remains to be determined.
Neither Army nor District of Columbia National Guard officials have been able to describe the training backgrounds of the troops who have so far reported for duty.
While some members are military police, others likely hold jobs that would have offered them little training in dealing with civilians or law enforcement.
The federalization push also includes clearing out encampments for people who are homeless, Trump has said. U.S. Park Police have removed dozens of tents since March, and plan to take out two more this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said. People are offered the chance to go to shelters and get addiction treatment, if needed, but those who refuse could be fined or jailed, she said.
City officials said they are making more shelter space available and increasing their outreach.
Violent crime has dropped in the district
The federal effort comes even after a drop in violent crime in the nation's capital, a trend that experts have seen in cities across the U.S. since an increase during the coronavirus pandemic.
On average, the level of violence Washington remains mostly higher than averages in three dozen cities analyzed by the nonprofit Council on Criminal Justice, said the group's president and CEO, Adam Gelb.
Police Chief Pamela Smith said during an interview with the local Fox affiliate that the city's Metro Police Department has been down nearly 800 officers. She said the increased number of federal agents on the streets would help fill that gap, at least for now.
Mayor Muriel Bowser said city officials did not get any specific goals for the surge during a meeting with Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, and other top federal law enforcement officials Tuesday. But, she said, 'I think they regard it as a success to have more presence and take more guns off the street, and we do too.'
She had previously called Trump's moves 'unsettling and unprecedented' while pointing out he was within a president's legal rights regarding the district, which is the seat of American government but is not a state.
For some residents, the increased presence of law enforcement and National Guard troops is nerve-racking.
'I've seen them right here at the subway … they had my street where I live at blocked off yesterday, actually,' Washington native Sheina Taylor said. 'It's more fearful now because even though you're a law-abiding citizen, here in D.C., you don't know, especially because I'm African American.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
17 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Approval for Ishiba Cabinet has risen to 27.3% in August, poll shows
The public approval rate for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Cabinet has increased 6.5 percentage points month on month in August, to 27.3%, a Jiji Press opinion poll showed Thursday. The disapproval rate fell 5.4 points to 49.6%. When asked whether Ishiba, also president of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, should resign to take responsibility for its major setback in last month's House of Councilors election, 39.9% of the respondents said they do not think so, slightly outpacing the 36.9% who said they do. Among supporters of the LDP, 65.9% said they think Ishiba should not step down, against 24.6% who think he should quit. Some in the LDP called for Ishiba to resign after the party took a drubbing in the July 20 Upper House election. Regarding reasons for supporting the Ishiba Cabinet, with multiple answers allowed, 13.6% of those backing it said there is no one other than Ishiba suitable to be prime minister, followed by 8.3% who said Ishiba is trustworthy and 4.3% who said it does not matter who is prime minister. On the other hand, 26.9% of those not supporting the Cabinet said they have no hopes for it, 18.9% said they cannot trust Ishiba and 18.1% said that they have a bad impression of him. Support for the LDP fell 0.7 point to 15.7%. Sanseito, which surged in the Upper House election, led opposition parties in support for the first time, at 7.6%. The Democratic Party for the People and the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan followed, with 6.8% and 5.5% respectively. Komeito, the LDP's coalition partner, came fifth, with 3.7%, followed by Nippon Ishin no Kai, with 2.4%, the Japanese Communist Party, with 1.8%, the Conservative Party of Japan, with 1.6%, Reiwa Shinsengumi, with 1.5%, Team Mirai, with 0.6% and the Social Democratic Party, with 0.5%. The share of respondents who support no particular party came to 50.0%. The interview survey, conducted over four days through Monday, covered 2,000 people age 18 or over in Japan. Valid responses were received from 56.9%.


Japan Times
24 minutes ago
- Japan Times
How a call from Trump ignited a frantic week of diplomacy by Ukraine
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine was returning from the front line last week when he joined a pivotal call with U.S. President Donald Trump. Hours earlier, Zelenskyy had visited soldiers defending Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region against Russian ground assaults. Now, stopping in the small city of Romny, he listened on a secure line with other European leaders as Trump outlined Russia's proposal to end the war. Russia, Trump told them, was ready to halt hostilities under a deal involving a territorial exchange between Russia and Ukraine, according to a Kyiv-based European diplomat and a top Ukrainian official who were briefed on the call and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information. Seeing a chance to broker peace, Trump told those on the line that he would meet one on one with President Vladimir Putin of Russia to try to seal an agreement. Trump had just brought into play two of Ukraine's deepest fears: that it would be forced to cede land to Russia as part of a peace deal and that Putin would be given a way out of his diplomatic isolation. It was a direct challenge to Ukraine's core principles that territorial issues be addressed only after a ceasefire and that no deal be concluded without Kyiv. After Zelenskyy left the call, he recorded his usual evening address to Ukrainians, trying to project optimism. "I spoke with President Trump,' he said, speaking from a playground in Romny as the sun set behind him. "Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire — the pressure is working.' But, he cautioned, "the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details — neither us, nor the United States.' What followed was a week of frantic diplomacy as Ukraine scrambled to avoid being sidelined in the negotiations and prevent Russia from dictating the terms of peace talks. Zelenskyy spoke with nearly 30 world leaders, while his top advisers met online and in person with senior European and American officials to press their case. In doing so, Ukraine turned to a tactic honed over more than three years of war: rallying partners through repeated behind-the-scenes calls and meetings to keep a seat at the negotiating table. Crucially, Ukraine leaned heavily on its European allies to form a united front and relay its message to the Trump administration. Debris in Kostyantynivka, a city in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, on June 20. | David Guttenfelder / The New York Times "The goal was to build a common position with the Europeans and a way to communicate it to Trump,' Oleksandr Kraiev, the director of the North America program at the Kyiv research group Ukrainian Prism, said in an interview. "The Europeans have been really useful in helping Ukraine get back to the table.' Ukraine's first task was to determine exactly what Russia had proposed to end the war. Trump had been vague on the call, the officials briefed on it said, leaving it unclear which territories might be swapped. Would it involve large areas such as the Ukrainian-controlled part of the eastern Donbas region for Russian-occupied land in the south, or smaller, strategic sites like the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant for a Ukrainian city? Zelenskyy instructed his top aides to clarify the situation. They got on a call last Thursday with European counterparts and Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for peace missions, who had received Russia's proposal during a meeting with Putin in Moscow last week. But Witkoff's explanations were muddled, according to the Kyiv-based European diplomat, prompting another call the next day to clear up the confusion. After that second call, it became clear that Russia was not actually offering to relinquish any land, but only demanding that Ukraine give up the territory it holds in the Donbas in exchange for a ceasefire that would freeze the current front lines elsewhere. "Putin wants to achieve by diplomatic means what he failed to achieve by military means,' said Alyona Getmanchuk, the newly appointed head of Ukraine's mission to NATO. "Putin thinks he can use President Trump's mediation and determination to end the war as soon as possible to achieve his goals.' The Russian proposal was a nonstarter for Ukraine, and Kyiv moved to convince the Americans that it was a dangerous gambit. If Russia took all of the Donbas, Ukrainian officials argued, it would gain control of cities and fortifications forming Ukraine's main defensive belt in the area. That would put the Russian army in a much stronger position to attack nearby regions should it decide to resume the war. At first, Kyiv kept Russia's proposal under wraps, worried about how Ukrainians would react, Kraiev said. Most Ukrainians oppose giving up any territory not already under Russian control or formally recognizing Russia's occupation. "It's a classic diplomacy rule: If a possible peace treaty is not acceptable to your public, you limit your comments — you don't say anything,' Kraeiv said. But after Trump disclosed last Friday that a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories,' Zelenskyy had little choice but to push back. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,' he said Saturday morning. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center in Washington on Wednesday. | Bloomberg Zelenskyy, however, appears to have not entirely ruled out possible territorial exchanges, telling reporters this week that this is "a very complex issue that cannot be separated from security guarantees for Ukraine.' To bolster its stance with the Americans, Ukraine continued to enlist its European allies. Over the past week, Zelenskyy spoke by phone with more than 20 European leaders, including several times with President Emmanuel Macron of France, a close ally. That strategy echoed a familiar tactic first applied this spring, when European leaders repeatedly engaged with Trump to press Ukraine's case during early rounds of peace talks and acted as troubleshooter during moments of tension between Kyiv and Washington. On Saturday, senior European and Ukrainian officials met outside London with top American officials, including Vice President JD Vance, to try to dissuade the United States from cutting a peace deal with Russia behind their backs. The intense week of diplomacy culminated in a joint call between European leaders, Zelenskyy and Trump on Wednesday, exactly a week after Trump first revealed Russia's peace proposal. European leaders reiterated their key principles: that a ceasefire must come first; that the current front lines should be the starting point for any negotiations, including on territorial issues; and that any deal would have to be accompanied by security guarantees for Ukraine. The top Ukrainian official said the Americans had carefully listened to Ukraine's and Europe's arguments throughout the week, but he cautioned that no one really knew what they had in mind before Friday's meeting. Zelenskyy echoed that sentiment Tuesday. "I don't know what they will talk about without us,' he told reporters. But he stressed that "substantive and productive talks about us without us will not work.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company


Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Dismissal of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Chief: Reckless Exercise of Power Threatens to Undermine Reliability
The dismissal of a senior government official threatens the reliability of U.S. economic data and the country's statistical system. U.S. President Donald Trump should refrain from attempting to unjustifiably distort statistics. In early August, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Labor Department. Following significant revisions to July's employment statistics data, he criticized the data as having been 'rigged in order to make the Republicans, and me, look bad.' He intends to nominate E.J. Antoni, an economist from a conservative policy research institute, as her successor. As Antoni has praised Trump and seen statistics as problematic, it has led to growing concerns about political interference in economic data. McEntarfer was appointed the commissioner by former U.S. President Joe Biden and confirmed by Congress. Given this background, Trump appears to want to suggest that the statistics data was manipulated to favor the Democratic Party. However, Trump has not provided clear evidence of any alleged wrongdoing. Significant revisions to employment statistics data are not uncommon. It takes time for most of the responses from businesses to be collected and for the accuracy of the statistics to improve. Issues such as the pace of gathering statistics data slowing down after the COVID-19 pandemic have also been pointed out. This time, the growth in nonfarm employment, which reflects economic trends, was significantly revised, from when the June figure was released, downward by 258,000. The data indicates that the economic slowdown may have been influenced by factors such as increased uncertainty due to Trump's tariff policies and strict crackdowns on illegal immigrants. The dismissal of the labor statistics chief should be seen as using power to try to distort the statistics. Trump has recently become more confident in his economic policies. In early July, Trump passed a large-scale tax-cut bill into law, which was one of his signature policies. He also used 'reciprocal tariffs' as a way to conclude a series of deals. Given that he had been boasting about these achievements, Trump may have been unable to tolerate the statistics data, as it threw cold water on them. Highly reliable statistics are the foundation for appropriate economic policy management and a healthy financial market. The United States, which is at the core of the international financial system, bears heavy responsibilities. The country must not undermine the reliability of statistics. Employment statistics, in particular, are crucial for assessing the state of the economy. They are a key indicator to which the U.S. Federal Reserve Board attaches extreme importance, influencing monetary policy, as well as stock, foreign exchange and other markets. Political interference in statistics can often be seen in authoritarian nations like China. If U.S. statistics become opaque, the negative impact will be immeasurable. It is hoped that Trump will consider the issues and exercise restraint. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 14, 2025)