Delhi HC asks LG, Centre to reply to plea on online content takedown notices
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court has sought the response of the Lieutenant Governor on a plea challenging a notification issued by him empowering police to issue takedown notices for social media content.
A bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela issued notice to the LG and the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and asked them to file replies within six weeks.
The court listed the matter for further hearing on September 17.
The bench was hearing a plea filed by Software Freedom Law Center challenging the legality and constitutional validity of the notification issued by the LG that designated Delhi Police as the nodal agency under the Information Technology Rules, 2021, empowering it to issue takedown notices for online content.
The notification empowers Delhi Police officers to issue takedown orders to social media companies and other intermediaries to remove illegal content under the Information Technology Act.
Advocate Talha Abdul Rahman, representing the petitioner, contended that this designation has no basis in law and neither Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, nor the IT Rules, 2021 confer any authority to appoint such a nodal agency.
"The statutory power to block or remove online content is exclusively vested in the Central Government under Section 69A of the IT Act, read with the Information Technology Rules, 2009. The impugned notification, by granting these powers to the police, oversteps constitutional and statutory boundaries and is, therefore, ultra vires the parent legislation," the plea said.
It further said that allowing police officers to unilaterally issue takedown notices, without judicial or independent oversight, opens the door to unchecked censorship and arbitrary restriction of constitutionally protected speech.
It contended that such a move violates Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution and contradicts the landmark judgments of the Supreme Court which emphasise the need for legal safeguards and proportionality in actions impacting fundamental rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
24 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Trial in 2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case delayed again after judge's transfer
The trial in the larger conspiracy case related to the 2020 Delhi riots has been delayed again following the recent reshuffle of 135 judges in courts of the national capital, The Indian Express reported. The case was at the stage of arguments on charges. The trial was expected to begin after the arguments were heard. Five of the 18 persons accused in the matter had completed their arguments, the newspaper reported. They will have to present their arguments before the court again. The special public prosecutors, who had also completed their arguments on behalf of the Delhi Police, will also have to present their arguments again. This is the second time that the case has been delayed because of a routine transfer of the judge, The Indian Express reported. On Monday, Additional Sessions Judge Lalit Kumar of the Karkardooma court directed the special public prosecutors and counsels of the persons accused in the case to submit their schedule relating to the timeframe and the manner in which they will present their arguments, especially the time to be taken by them, Bar and Bench reported. The matter will be heard next on Friday. Kumar assumed charge as the judge on May 30 after the reshuffle in the Delhi district judiciary. The earlier arguments in the case, which began in September, had taken place before the previous judge Sameer Bajpai. Clashes had broken out in North East Delhi in February 2020 between supporters of the Citizenship Amendment Act and those opposing it. The violence left 53 dead and hundreds injured. The Delhi Police has claimed that the violence was part of a larger conspiracy to defame the Narendra Modi government and was plotted by those who organised the protests against the contentious citizenship law. Eighteen persons have been booked under sections of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and the Indian Penal Code. The persons include activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Natasha Narwal, Meeran Haider Tahir Hussain and Ishrat Jahan, and Shifa-Ur-Rehman.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
IPL 2025 RCB vs PBKS: Delhi Police, ECI hop on 18 years trend as Royal Challengers Bengaluru lift maiden title
Cricket's biggest star, widely known as 'King Kohli' by his more than 300 million social media followers, was part of the Indian Premier League from its early days in 2008 and had to wait 18 seasons to finally secure a title with Royal Challengers Bengaluru. Delhi Police and the Election Commission of India have joined the bandwagon of 18 years trend. Following the six-wicket victory over Punjab Kings on Tuesday night, which marked the end of a dramatic and disrupted season for the world's wealthiest franchise cricket league, Kohli dropped to his knees in tears. Delhi Police stated, 'Virat jeet ke liye. Patience zaroori hai!' 'The 18-year wait is finally over — Congratulations RCB New Champion! #IPL 🏆 Turning 18? It's your time to shine! Register as Elector & Be ready to vote like a champion 🏆,' the Election Commission of India posted on X. 'I have given everything to this franchise for the last 18 years. I never thought this moment would come," Kohli said. During the season, he announced his retirement from Test cricket, shifting his full focus to the Twenty20 format in the IPL.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Fraudsters, posing as IPS officers, dupe retired doc of 2 cr
Hyderabad: Cyber fraudsters, posing as IPS officers, duped a 70-year-old retired doctor from the city of 2.2 crore by threatening her with arrest in a fake terror-related case. The Hyderabad cybercrime police registered a case and launched an investigation into the matter. According to officials, the victim, a resident of Srinagar Colony, received a call on May 27 from a fraudster who identified himself as 'Prem Kumar Gautam, IPS'. The caller alleged that she was involved in a terror-related case being investigated in Lucknow and further claimed that her name was linked to money laundering activities. While still reeling from the shock, the victim received a video call on WhatsApp from another fraudster impersonating NIA Director General Sadanand Date. He claimed that her contact number, along with 17 photos of army officers and seven ATM cards, was recovered during the arrest of terrorists. She was warned that the investigation had national security implications and was instructed not to disclose the matter to anyone. "The fraudsters convinced me that I was being treated as a suspect and demanded that I transfer my bank funds for investigation purposes, promising to return the money after verification," the victim stated in her complaint to police. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo To gain her trust, the fraudsters sent a fake notarised acknowledgement, allegedly signed by an Additional Sessions Judge in Tees Hazari Court in Delhi. Between May 29 and May 31, she transferred 2.2 crore to various bank accounts provided by the fraudsters. The fraud came to light when the victim consulted her brother after the fraudsters continued demanding more money. On his advice, she lodged a police complaint on Monday. The case was registered under sections 111(2)(b) (organised crime), 308(2) (extortion), 318(4) (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 319(2) (cheating by personation), 336(3) (forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (forgery of valuable security, will etc), 340(2) (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the BNS and sections 66-C, 66-D of the IT Act. Police are analysing the bank transaction details to identify the accused. Hyderabad: Cyber fraudsters, posing as IPS officers, duped a 70-year-old retired doctor from the city of 2.2 crore by threatening her with arrest in a fake terror-related case. The Hyderabad cybercrime police registered a case and launched an investigation into the matter. According to officials, the victim, a resident of Srinagar Colony, received a call on May 27 from a fraudster who identified himself as 'Prem Kumar Gautam, IPS'. The caller alleged that she was involved in a terror-related case being investigated in Lucknow and further claimed that her name was linked to money laundering activities. While still reeling from the shock, the victim received a video call on WhatsApp from another fraudster impersonating NIA Director General Sadanand Date. He claimed that her contact number, along with 17 photos of army officers and seven ATM cards, was recovered during the arrest of terrorists. She was warned that the investigation had national security implications and was instructed not to disclose the matter to anyone. "The fraudsters convinced me that I was being treated as a suspect and demanded that I transfer my bank funds for investigation purposes, promising to return the money after verification," the victim stated in her complaint to police. To gain her trust, the fraudsters sent a fake notarised acknowledgement, allegedly signed by an Additional Sessions Judge in Tees Hazari Court in Delhi. Between May 29 and May 31, she transferred 2.2 crore to various bank accounts provided by the fraudsters. The fraud came to light when the victim consulted her brother after the fraudsters continued demanding more money. On his advice, she lodged a police complaint on Monday. The case was registered under sections 111(2)(b) (organised crime), 308(2) (extortion), 318(4) (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 319(2) (cheating by personation), 336(3) (forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (forgery of valuable security, will etc), 340(2) (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the BNS and sections 66-C, 66-D of the IT Act. Police are analysing the bank transaction details to identify the accused.
