logo
5 Ways To Tackle A Lack Of Engagement In The Workplace

5 Ways To Tackle A Lack Of Engagement In The Workplace

Forbes3 days ago

Less than a quarter of employees globally are engaged at work
Last year the percentage of engaged employees globally fell to 21% from 23% in 2023, with manager engagement tumbling to 27% from 30%, according to the Gallup State of the Global Workplace: 2025 Report. What's more, this loss of engagement cost the world economy a staggering US$438 billion in lost productivity.
So, as work demands continue to mount, how can leaders ensure their teams are energized, motivated and committed to work? Here are five ways they can proactively tackle disengagement in the workplace:
1. Confront toxicity
One pressing barrier to workplace engagement is the persistence of toxicity. Toxic behaviors within teams include bullying and harassment, micromanagement, gossiping, inappropriate behavior, favoritism and outright discrimination.
'Many workers disengage simply because they don't feel respected or included,' says Faye Allen, a chartered quantity surveyor and author of Building Women. 'When people face exclusion, sexism and microaggressions, they often withdraw.'
Allen argues that by addressing toxicity at work – as well as cultivating diversity and inclusion – leaders can unlock collaboration and fresh ideas that might otherwise go untapped. 'Your commitment to inclusion fosters a workplace culture where individuals feel seen, valued, supported and empowered to contribute fully,' she says. 'Tackling disengagement starts with building safe, inclusive spaces where everyone has the opportunity to thrive.'
To address declining employee engagement, Dr Rich Stockdale, CEO of natural capital non-profit Oxygen Conservation and author of Scaling Conservation, advocates for radical transparency. This is an approach that promotes openness, honesty and full disclosure within an organization.
'If you want your team to feel genuinely engaged, you must provide them with all the necessary information and involve them in the decision-making process', Stockdale explains. 'For example, beginning the week with a highly structured and focused team meeting opens a forum to discuss key projects, business performance and all the issues and challenges for the week ahead.'
According to Stockdale, this kind of radical transparency not only builds trust but also a culture of continuous learning, both essential for sustained engagement. When mistakes are openly discussed and seen as opportunities, team members feel safer to participate and contribute ideas. Stockdale believes that radical transparency is an 'invitation for everyone to engage in thoughtful conversations, evaluate the potential consequences and seek innovative solutions, further deepening engagement.'
3. Use storytelling to communicate
'Communication skills are a vital component of a leader's engagement toolkit,' argues Elliot Kay, impactful communication specialist and co-founder of The Speaker Awards. He believes that to truly engage a team, leaders must move beyond simply describing the work and toward storytelling with authenticity.
'While the facts are crucial, it's the way that you communicate these that secures your team members' attention and commitment,' says Kay. 'The best communicators cut the fluff and are aligned with their core purpose. They explain the 'why' and demonstrate appreciation for their team's input and expertise because it is these elements that help people build a sense of connection with their work, their colleagues and the organization.'
It's essential that leaders adapt to the communication styles of others. For some, precise statistics will be engaging while others will be more interested in an inspiring story or example. 'An effective leader will understand how to tailor their communication style to a particular team or individual,' notes Kay. 'This extends to tone of voice and physical presence too.'
4. Align everyone around the shared goal
Ritavan, a technology entrepreneur and author of Data Impact, believes that leaders should use a military practice called Commander's Intent to boost engagement. 'It encourages leaders to clearly communicate their overarching goal, empowering and aligning their teams to act autonomously while maintaining accountability,' Ritavan explains.
Commander's Intent can be described as a clear description of what a successful mission will look like. It can enable employees to act intelligently, independently and with agility. When this approach is adopted, success is measured against achieving the mission's intent, not merely in terms of following instructions or a roadmap.
'Commander's Intent helps to ensure everyone involved knows their goal and the overall vision of how to achieve it,' says Ritavan. 'This allows people to assess the scope within which they can operate and the types and levels of risks that are acceptable. In turn, you can expect that team members know their work better, do their work better and collaborate better.'
5. Empower middle managers
According to Gallup, 70% of the variance in team engagement is determined solely by the manager. For this reason, Chris Spratling, founder of advisory business Chalkhill Blue and author of The Exit Roadmap, recommends investing in training and fostering autonomy to empower middle managers. 'If your managers are disengaged, their teams are too,' he observes.
Spratling believes that by investing in leadership development programs, mentoring and coaching, organizations can equip middle managers to take on greater responsibility. He explains: 'This not only distributes leadership more effectively throughout the business but also deepens managers' sense of ownership and connection to the company's mission.'
Empowered middle managers act as a vital bridge between senior leadership and frontline staff, according to Spratling. 'By sharing power across multiple layers of your organization, you decentralize control and create a ripple effect,' he says. 'Engaged managers lead more connected, motivated and high-performing teams, ultimately driving stronger business outcomes.'
The importance of tackling a lack of engagement in the workplace
Lack of engagement is a major workplace problem, as the Gallup research attests. That's why leaders should prioritize tackling it and focus as much as possible on getting their people back on board.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PCE report: New inflation data shows price increases accelerated
PCE report: New inflation data shows price increases accelerated

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

PCE report: New inflation data shows price increases accelerated

Tariff-related uncertainty is clouding the Federal Reserve's path forward, even as today's inflation data gives mixed Finance Senior Reporter Jennifer Schonberger joins Morning Brief to explain how a divided Fed is weighing sticky inflation and the lagging effects of tariffs as markets eye a potential rate cut in watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. and that, uh, report we got out this morning on the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the personal consumption expenditures index, which has both personal income and inflation has a little bit for both the Hawks and the doves on the Fed. Uh, inflation coming in a bit higher than expected, so a point for those Hawks, and personal income and spending coming in a bit lower, so a point for those doves. But I think there may be some one-off issues going on here. Uh, we saw a lot of front loading with tariffs earlier this year, and we're seeing that reverse in this report. Also, it was pointed out that the decrease in personal income primarily affected government social benefits to people and farm proprietors incomes. So I'm not really worried that the Fed is going to be too worried about the personal income side of the economy based specifically on this report. This seems like sort of one-off. So this doesn't really change the calculus from what I can tell for the Fed. Earlier this week, we heard from Fed chair J. Powell, who testified before Congress, and he says he doesn't really think that we've really seen the impact of tariffs on inflation yet. He's really looking to those summer months, June, July, and August to see what the impact is going to be, and if those reports come in mild, then he seemed to imply a rate cut could be in play for September. But this very much points to a continuation of the wait and see camp. One thing that is going to be very interesting to me to watch is that we know that there are two very clear doves on the Fed committee, both Fed Governor Waller and Mickey Bowman. And Bowman said earlier this week on Monday in a speech that if inflation comes in mild ahead of the July meeting, she would support a rate cut. Well, this morning was a bit of a gray area. So I'm really going to be looking to see whether those two governors end up dissenting at the July meeting. But it's very clear we have a divided Fed, and this report certainly isn't going to settle that debate. How? And within that, Jennifer, just to follow up on that, how could this divided Fed be further impacted in their at least thought process, especially coming off of tariff policy that they needed to see how it played through and then waiting for deals, waiting for clarity, which we're just hearing this morning, of course, on the US and China deal and 10 more, according to Howard Lucknik, that are set to come within days here, how that could also impact what their waiting to show through in the data going into those meetings where they're anticipated to start to kick off some of the 50 basis points of cuts that markets are anticipating by the end of the year? Yeah, Brad. I mean, Chair Powell said very clearly this week that if uncertainty were to lift, then that would certainly help the case for rate cuts. But it really comes down to what is the effective tariff rate. And while we did see a deal announced on China on those rare earth minerals, it's unclear whether we have any settling on the tariff rate for China and for any of these other countries. So I think there's still a lot of information that the Fed needs to receive, and again, Chair Powell had said it's going to take time for a lot of this to work through the economy. The three major things that are going to be important for whether tariffs have an impact on inflation are one, the effective tariff rate, two, inflation expectations, and three, how long it takes for those tariffs to be passed through to prices. Is it going to be quick, which could be maybe like a one-time reset in price, or is it going to be slower, which would be a case for more persistent inflation. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The Fed's Preferred Inflation Gauge Was Higher Than Expected In May
The Fed's Preferred Inflation Gauge Was Higher Than Expected In May

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Fed's Preferred Inflation Gauge Was Higher Than Expected In May

"Core" PCE inflation rose 2.7% over the year in May, higher than the 2.6% anticipated by forecasters. Officials at the Federal Reserve use core PCE prices to judge whether inflation is running at the 2% annual rate they target. Fed officials have debated lowering the central bank's key interest rate, which affects borrowing costs. They have been reluctant to do so this year because of concerns that tariffs will push up rose faster in May than forecasters had anticipated, and consumers unexpectedly lost income and pulled back on spending. According to a report on Personal Consumption Expenditures by the Bureau of Economic Analysis Friday, "core" consumer prices, which exclude volatile prices for food and energy, rose 2.7% over the year. That is up from an upwardly revised 2.6% annual increase in April and higher than forecasters had expected, according to a survey of economists by Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal. The uptick in core PCE inflation is especially significant because it's Federal Reserve officials' preferred inflation benchmark. The central bank sets the nation's monetary policy with the goal of keeping inflation running at 2% a year. Fed policymakers are currently debating whether inflation is tame enough to start cutting the central bank's influential federal funds rate, which affects borrowing costs on all kinds of loans. PCE prices rose 2.3% over the year when factoring in food and gas, an acceleration from an upwardly revised 2.2% annual increase in April and in line with forecaster expectations. Falling gas prices helped keep PCE inflation relatively cool in May, similar to the CPI inflation measure, a separate report released earlier in the month. Also of significance for the Fed, consumers pulled back on spending in May as their incomes fell. Consumer spending fell 0.1% month-over-month after rising 0.2% in April. Forecasters had expected spending to rise 0.1%.The spending pullback could be related to President Donald Trump's tariff campaign. Many consumers had bought imported products in March and April in anticipation that tariffs would drive up prices, and subsequently didn't need to buy those things in May, at least one economist said. People have also gotten nervous about the state of the economy, according to consumer surveys, and that may be making some people more cautious about spending. "What's causing the consumer to slow down? It is likely a range of forces—a pullback from very strong spending and tariff front-running, some worries about the economy due to tariffs and slower population growth all are coming to a head," Ali Jaffery, an economist at CIBC, wrote in a commentary. Personal income fell 0.4% over the month, the first decrease since September 2021. However, the decline in personal income says more about the quirks of Social Security payments than it does about the economy's trajectory: the drop was related to the Social Security Fairness Act, the bureau said. The Biden-era legislation boosted benefits for some public servants when it went into effect earlier in the year, and gave some people one-time retroactive payments. Read the original article on Investopedia

Waters price target raised to $375 from $370 at BofA
Waters price target raised to $375 from $370 at BofA

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Waters price target raised to $375 from $370 at BofA

BofA analyst Michael Ryskin raised the firm's price target on Waters (WAT) to $375 from $370 and keeps a Neutral rating on the shares. The firm is updating its price targets for stocks under its coverage in the Life Sciences & Diagnostic Tools, LSTs, sector, the analyst tells investors. The firm notes LSTs remain under pressure as uncertainty persists with the macro environment and U.S. government policies. Recent weeks, however, have seen some signs of improvement as tariff concerns have cools slightly, the firm adds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See Insiders' Hot Stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on WAT: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Waters Corporation Amends Credit Agreement for Flexibility Waters Corporation Re-elects Board at Annual Meeting Waters Corporation's Strategic Acquisition of Halo Labs: Enhancing Biologics Capabilities and Market Position Waters acquires Halo Labs Waters price target raised to $370 from $350 at BofA Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store