Iran demands accountability for Israel and US after ‘war of aggression'
'The US-Israeli attacks on our nuclear facilities were in stark violation of NPT [the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] and the UNSC Resolution 2231 that has endorsed Iran's peaceful nuclear programme in 2015 by consensus,' Araghchi said in a speech at the BRICS summit in Brazil, cited by state-run Press TV.
'The US's subsequent involvement in this aggression by targeting Iran's peaceful nuclear installations has left no doubt as to the full complicity of the American government in Israel's war of aggression against Iran.'
Iran won the support of fellow BRICS+ nations meeting in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday, with the bloc condemning the recent Israeli and US air strikes that hit military, nuclear and other targets.
The 11-nation grouping said the attacks 'constitute a violation of international law'.
'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025,' leaders said in a summit statement, without naming the United States or Israel.
'We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities,' the bloc added.
The declaration is a diplomatic victory for Tehran, which has received limited regional or global support after a 12-day bombing campaign by the Israeli military that culminated in US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan.
Israel launched the surprise attack on Iran's military, nuclear, and civilian sites on June 13, killing at least 935 people. The Iranian Health Ministry said 5,332 people were wounded.
Tehran launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes on Israel, killing at least 29 people and wounding more than 3,400, according to figures released by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
The fighting ended with a US-sponsored ceasefire that took effect on June 24 and continues to hold.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOGE told regulator to ‘rubber stamp' nuclear
A DOGE representative told the chair and top staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that the agency will be expected to give 'rubber stamp' approval to new reactors tested by the departments of Energy or Defense, according to three people with knowledge of a May meeting where the message was delivered. The three people said Adam Blake, detailed to the NRC by the Department of Government Efficiency, described a new regulatory approach by NRC that would expedite nuclear safety assessments. 'DOE, DOD would approve stuff, and then NRC would be expected to just kind of rubber-stamp it,' said one of the three people, who were all granted anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. The meeting was held after President Donald Trump signed a May 23 executive order that would supplant the NRC's historical role as the sole agency responsible for ensuring commercial nuclear projects are safe and won't threaten public health. Two of the three people said Blake used the term 'rubber stamp' at the meeting that included NRC Chair David Wright, senior agency staff and DOE officials. Under Trump's executive order, the NRC could not revisit issues assessed by DOE or the Pentagon, but the people with knowledge of the meeting said Blake and DOE officials went a step further to suggest the NRC's secondary assessment should be a foregone conclusion. Trump's executive order and staff departures have added to concern at the independent agency and among nuclear experts that the White House is exerting more control over the NRC's mandate under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 than any previous administration. "The NRC is working quickly to implement the executive orders reforming the agency and modernizing our regulatory and licensing processes,' said NRC spokesperson Maureen Conley. 'We look forward to continuing to work with the administration, DOE and DOD on future nuclear programs." The NRC's Wright was not made available for an interview. POLITICO's E&E News also reached out for comment from Blake about the 'rubber stamp' remark and his role at the agency. Blake and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. When asked about the May meeting, a DOE spokesperson referenced Trump's executive order. Trump has said he wants to quadruple the U.S. supply of nuclear power by 2050. Tech industry allies, Republicans in Congress and Secretary of Energy Chris Wright have been sharply critical of the NRC for what they say is an unreasonably slow approval process that has held back the nuclear industry. Defenders of the NRC and former agency officials agree that today's smaller reactor designs require a new approach to licensing nuclear technology. They're also adamant that a political push to build more nuclear reactors, and fast, doesn't change NRC requirements under the law to ensure new reactor designs are safe. Nuclear is now in political vogue again, with bipartisan support lately driven by Silicon Valley and Trump administration plans to use nuclear power to fuel huge artificial intelligence data centers. Some clean energy supporters see new, smaller nuclear reactors as crucial sources of carbon-free power in the 2030s. In the weeks following the 'rubber stamp' comment, the NRC experienced significant upheaval, including the abrupt June 13 firing of Christopher Hanson, a Democratic commissioner originally appointed during Trump's first term and the former chair under President Joe Biden. Hanson took to social media to protest the termination, saying it was done 'without cause, contrary to existing law and longstanding precedent regarding removal of independent agency appointees.' Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, told POLITICO at the time that 'all organizations are more effective when leaders are rowing in the same direction,' adding that Trump 'reserves the right to remove employees within his own Executive Branch who exert his executive authority.' Wright's term on the commission expired at the end of June as his reappointment from Trump waited in a Senate committee. Wright's appointment squeaked through the Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday on a party-line vote after Democrats decried what they characterized as the administration's 'hostile takeover' of the NRC. The decision by Trump and top aides to insert DOE into the NRC's statutory licensing process was spelled out in four executive orders Trump signed May 23 — prompting nuclear experts to warn of "serious consequences" if the NRC's loss of independence erodes safety. Trump ordered a 'wholesale review' of the NRC's reactor design and safety regulations, with a nine-month deadline for proposed changes and final action in another nine months. The order said commission reviews of new designs must be completed within 18 months, with shorter deadlines set as appropriate. A committee of at least 20 people would perform the review, including representatives of DOGE and the Office of Management and Budget, headed by Russ Vought, the architect of Project 2025's conservative blueprint for shrinking the federal government. Leadership at Idaho National Laboratory, which has been one of the centers of DOE's research on nuclear reactors, has said DOE can perform safety evaluations of new reactors, and in doing so move more quickly and efficiently than the NRC. The lab sent a proposal to members of Congress in April. The DOE process is viewed by industry 'as being much shorter and more straightforward than NRC's licensing process,' the INL authors said. Trump directed the creation of an 'expedited pathway to approve reactor designs' that had been tested and certified either by DOE or the Defense Department. Under the Trump order, safety designs for new reactors approved by the two agencies could not be revisited by the NRC unless new issues arose. Former NRC chairs and other experts have noted the agency has accelerated reviews in response to the ADVANCE Act that Congress passed last year. Stephen Burns, former chair of the NRC during the Obama administration, and Emily Hammond, a former DOE deputy general counsel and now a George Washington University law professor, have questioned the necessity and merits of the White House's high level of involvement. Trump's order for a review of NRC rules and regulations was issued to revise processes that evolved over the 70-year regulatory history of the NRC and its predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission. The White House announced that NRC staff will undergo a 'substantial reorganization' with turnover and assignment changes. The resurgence of nuclear power is rooted not just in bipartisan interest, but in the emergence of companies building small modular reactors, or SMRs. The advanced reactors by developers including TerraPower, X-energy, General Electric Hitachi Nuclear Energy, NuScale Power and Kairos Power are factory-built and meant to bring down the daunting development costs of large, conventional nuclear power plants. Big tech companies such as Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta are also signing long-term agreements with utilities that own nuclear reactors and SMR startups for future purchases of electricity to power their AI data centers. The NRC is assessing a plan to reopen a closed unit at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. And last month, the agency received a combined license application from Fermi America, a Texas-based company led by former Energy Secretary Rick Perry that plans to build the nation's largest nuclear power complex. The 'HyperGrid' site is in Amarillo, Texas, near the largest U.S. assembly plant for nuclear weapons known as Pantex. 'The Chinese are building 22 nuclear reactors today to power the future of AI,' said Perry, the former Texas governor. 'America has none. We're behind, and it's all hands on deck.' One of the three people with knowledge of the May meeting and Blake's 'rubber stamp' remark said the influx of nuclear license applications — and from politically connected people — is adding pressure and scrutiny to the process. 'This is where the rubber hits the road,' the person said. All of this comes amid a shake-up of senior leadership at the NRC. That includes the commission's Executive Director of Operations Mirela Gavrilas, who had worked at the agency for more than 20 years and who was effectively forced out, according to the three people. As the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee sent Wright's renomination to the full Senate on Wednesday, its top Democrat, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, withdrew his support. '[Wright] came before our committee, however, not just as a nominee but as the present leader of the commission,' Whitehouse said. 'I hoped to see Chairman Wright rise to the occasion, but circumstances right now at the NRC continue to deteriorate.' 'In response to my questions for the record, the chairman acknowledged there is a DOGE staffer at the agency. This individual sits in an office that reports directly to the chairman. However, the staffer is — and I quote the [question for the record] from Mr. Wright — the staffer is 'on detail from the Department of Energy, and as such does not have an NRC supervisor,'' he continued. In written replies to the committee, Wright committed to 'ensure that the NRC's regulatory independence is preserved.'
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Book Review: 'The Mission' reveals troubling political meddling in CIA after 9/11
The meeting place of facts, ego, ignorance and politics typically is a messy arena as Tim Weiner illustrates over and over in this powerful account of the Central Intelligence Agency actions since the 9/11 attacks. The title, 'The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century,' would seem to suggest a tidy, academic-style analysis. Instead, it's a riveting account of a vital institution that descended into turmoil with agents after 9/11 sometimes creating diabolical tortures and units operating seemingly on their own. The author details an agency that buckled under pressure from the younger President Bush to find evidence that Saddam Hussein had developed chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Compelling evidence was not to be found but Bush pressed on anyway with a military campaign to topple Hussein, killing 4,492 American service members in the process. Weiner leaves no doubt as to who is responsible in every misdeed and operational failure he describes — everyone in this 392-page narrative is identified by name. How Weiner persuaded so many people to talk on the record is a journalistic feat that should make this book impossible to dismiss. If 'The Mission' has a fault, it's that it is light on prescription — how do we insure that the CIA remains faithful — without political meddling — to its mission gathering the intelligence needed to keep America safe ? The CIA must reclaim its original mission, Weiner writes: 'Know thy enemies.' To do that work, the CIA has since its inception attracted some of America's brightest and most dedicated, willing to risk their lives to get the information the nation's top political and military leaders need. Consider counterterrorism expert Michael D'Andrea, for example. Weiner writes that D'Andrea worked 100 hours per week, obsessively pursuing al-Qaeda. How he managed that pace as a chain smoker is unexplored. Perhaps his vegetarian diet helped. Half of the book details how the CIA swerved far out of its intelligence-gathering lane after the 9/11 attacks and morphed into a paramilitary organization, calling its torture tactics 'enhanced interrogation techniques' and killing many thought to be terrorists absent the oversight that governs the military services. For example, one agent let a prisoner freeze to death in a dungeon-like 'fetid hellhole' at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. In the agent's defense, the post 9/11 months and years were a time of pervasive fear of another attack and relentless pressure on the CIA to prevent that. Some notable successes followed; agents penetrated both the Kremlin and Saddam Hussein's government. Knowledge is the essential tool of national security and peace and 'The Mission' makes it clear we let the CIA go off track at our peril. 'A new cold war is slowly escalating toward existential danger,' the author writes. 'Only good intelligence can prevent a surprise attack, a fatal miscalculation, a futile war.' ___ AP book reviews:
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
US government announces $200 million Grok contract a week after ‘MechaHitler' incident
A week after Elon Musk's Grok dubbed itself 'MechaHitler' and spewed antisemitic stereotypes, the US government has announced a new contract granting the chatbot's creator, xAI, up to $200 million to modernize the Defense Department. xAI is one of several leading AI companies to receive the award, alongside Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI. But the timing of the announcement is striking given Grok's recent high-profile spiral, which drew congressional ire and public pushback. The use of technology, and especially AI, in the defense space has long been a controversial topic even within the tech industry, and Musk's prior involvement in slashing federal government contracts through his work at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) still raises questions about potential conflicts — though his relationship with President Donald Trump has more recently soured, and his administration has claimed Musk would step back from any potential conflicts while at DOGE. The contract announcement from the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) is light on details, but says the deals will help the DoD 'develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas.' Alongside the contract award, xAI announced 'Grok for Government,' which it says will supply 'frontier AI products' to the US. In addition to the DoD contract, xAI says other federal agencies will now be able to purchase its tools via the General Services Administration (GSA) schedule. The company plans to work on new products for government customers, like custom models focused on national security, applications for healthcare and science use cases, and models accessible in classified environments. Days after changes to Grok sent it off the rails (saying that if 'calling out radicals cheering dead kids makes me 'literally Hitler,' then pass the mustache,' and referencing a 'pattern-noticing meme' where 'folks with surnames like 'Steinberg' (often Jewish) keep popping up in extreme leftist activism, especially the anti-white variety'), the company apologized for 'the horrific behavior that many experienced.' It said the update responsible for Grok's tirades was active for 16 hours but had been deprecated. Instructions given to the chatbot, like to not be 'afraid to offend people who are politically correct,' had the 'undesired' effect of leading it to 'ignore its core values in certain circumstances in order to make the response engaging to the user,' — even if that meant 'producing responses containing unethical or controversial opinions.'
