Austerity plan: FD bans vehicle purchases, new posts
The notification issued by the division stated that the federal cabinet in its decision dated 10.06.2025 has approved continuation of following austerity measures for fiscal year 2025-26 as already notified by; (i) finance division during fiscal year 2024-25, dated 04.09.2024 in pursuance of Cabinet decision dated 27.08.2024; (ii) Cabinet Division vide OM No 7-1/2023-Min-I dated 28.02.2023 in pursuance of Cabinet decision dated 22.02.2023; and (iii) Cabinet Division vide OM No 9-148/2002-Min-II dated 28.02.2023 in pursuance of Cabinet decision dated 22.02.2023.
Budget 2025–26: Austerity or stimulus?
The notification stated that the Cabinet further approved that:(1) the following austerity measures shall also be applicable mutatis mutandis during fiscal year 2025-26 in the case of all federal government attached departments, state-owned enterprises and statutory bodies etc including regulatory authorities: (a) approved by the Cabinet on 22.02.2023 and notified by the Cabinet Division vide OM No 9-148/2002-Min-II dated 28.02.2023; and (b) approved by the Cabinet on 27.08.2024 and notified by the Finance Division dated 04.09.2024.
In the case of state owned enterprises, these austerity measures shall be considered a direction of federal government under Section 35 of the State-Owned Enterprises (Governance & Operations) Act, 2023 and under the relevant sections of their respective organic laws in the case of statutory bodies.
The Finance Division's notification issued on September 4, 2024 stated that in pursuance of the Cabinet's decision for case No 232/28/2024 dated 27.8.2024, the following austerity measures are notified till further orders:-
(i) There shall be a complete ban on the following expenditures with respect to the current budget. (a) Purchase of all types of vehicles with the exception of operational vehicles such as ambulances and other medically equipped vehicles, fire fighting vehicles, buses and vans for educational institutions, solid waste vehicles and motorbikes; (b) Procurement of machinery/equipments with the exception of those required for hospitals/laboratories/agriculture/mining/schools; (c) creation of new posts including contingent paid/temporary posts; (d) Continuation of contingent paid/temporary posts beyond one year; (e) Treatment abroad at government expense; and (f) All non-obligatory visits abroad where government of Pakistan funding is involved.
(ii) The Austerity Measures notified by the Cabinet Division vide OM Nos 7-1/2023- Min-I and No 9-148/2002-Min-II dated 28.2.2023 will remain applicable unless modified or withdrawn by the Federal Cabinet.
(iii) All posts lying vacant for last three years shall be abolished. Purchase of durables and creation of posts under PSDP funded projects shall be exempted from the application of this ban.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
PHC seeks reply on PTI's independents petition
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has issued a written order in response to a petition filed by Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur, challenging the Election Commission of Pakistan's (ECP) decision to declare Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers as independent members of the provincial assembly. The bench, comprising Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali, has sought a response from the Attorney General's Office. According to the written order, the Additional Attorney General has been directed to submit a reply before the next hearing. The court also ordered that this petition be heard alongside other related petitions filed by the Chief Minister and the Speaker of the K-P Assembly. The hearing has been adjourned until August 5. Chief Minister Gandapur filed the constitutional petition against the ECP's decision to strip PTI-affiliated assembly members of their party status and designate them as independents. In a related matter, the Chief Minister and the Speaker have also challenged the oath-taking of women elected on reserved seats at the Governor House, requesting the court to declare the move null and void. In his petition, Gandapur contended that PTI remains a functioning political party and still holds a majority in the K-P Assembly. He argued that the ECP's exclusion of PTI from the legal definition of a political party is unlawful. According to the ECP rules, a party must possess an election symbol to be officially recognized; however, Gandapur pointed out that under the Elections Act, 2017, the presence of an election symbol is not a mandatory criterion for political party recognition. He maintained that where there is a conflict between election rules and the Act, the provisions of the Act must prevail. The petition asserts that the ECP has no authority to declare PTI candidates as independents, and it requests the court to declare PTI lawmakers as legitimate party members. Furthermore, Gandapur urged the court to nullify the allocation of reserved seats, alleging that PTI was unjustly denied its rightful share despite being the majority party. The petition also calls for multiple ECP orders to be declared unlawful, citing deliberate exclusion of PTI in the distribution of reserved seats and allocation to rival parties. Meanwhile, PHC on Saturday deferred further proceedings and transferred the case to another bench regarding a petition filed against the sharing of videos from an event at Women University Swabi on TikTok. During the hearing, Deputy Commissioner (DC) Swabi Nasrullah, Additional Assistant Commissioner Fakhar Alam, and representatives of Women University Swabi appeared before the court. The case was heard by a bench comprising Justice Ejaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali. The petition, filed by Advocate Muhammad Hamdan, alleged that videos from a university event, attended by the DC and other officials, were later uploaded to the DC's personal TikTok account. The petitioner argued this act violated several articles of the Constitution and the official Code of Conduct, which may warrant penalties including dismissal from service. Advocate Hamdan contended that the DC's actions were contrary to social and cultural norms, sparking concern among the local community.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Minister vows rights-based laws with global best practices
LAHORE: Punjab Finance Minister Mian Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rehman has said that all new legislation must be developed in line with international best practices, uphold human rights principles, and ensure the presence of effective and reliable implementation mechanisms. He expressed these views while chairing a meeting of the Punjab Cabinet Committee on Legislation, Business and Privatisation on Friday. The committee reviewed key proposals submitted by various provincial departments concerning legislative reforms and policy amendments aimed at enhancing public welfare. Prominent among the agenda items were the draft Punjab Child Labour (Prohibition) Rules 2024 and the draft Punjab Occupational Safety and Health Rules 2024. The meeting also discussed and welcomed the proposed twinning agreement between Faisalabad and the city of Shymkent in Kazakhstan, terming it a positive step towards strengthening bilateral cooperation and promoting Punjab's global outreach. Additionally, the committee approved the policy framework for the issuance of NOCs for establishing new petrol pumps across the province, aimed at streamlining procedures and ensuring regulatory compliance. Addressing the participants, the minister reiterated that Cabinet committees play a pivotal role in ensuring transparency and effectiveness in legislation and policy formulation. He directed all relevant departments to finalise the proposed measures with a strong focus on public interest and submit them to the full Cabinet for formal approval at the earliest. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
SC rejects Commissioner IR's plea against LHC order
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court dismissed the petition of Commissioner Inland Revenue against the Lahore High Court (LHC) order, saying the findings on facts does not suffer from any illegality or error. The petitioner department had assailed the LHC, Rawalpindi bench's order dated 26.03.2025, whereby, reference application filed under Section 47 of the Sales Tax 1990 by the petitioner against the order dated 4.01.2024 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR), Islamabad, was dismissed. A two-judge bench of Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi heard Commissioner Inland Revenue's appeal. The court noted that the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original passed by the Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue in the instant case, against the respondents (M/s Mustafa Enterprises) are based on vague and frivolous allegations and certain conclusions have been made on mere presumptions only, whereas, no material or evidence has been produced to substantiate the same. The court further noted that while passing the Order-in-Original, the Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue exceeded his jurisdiction while travelling beyond the very premises and the allegations made in the show cause notice, whereas, the respondents were never confronted with any such allegations or entries as reflected in the bank statement which were subsequently furnished by the respondents, showing the details of the total amount and the particulars of suppliers from whom purchases were made. It observed that while initiating the proceedings against the respondents, there was no material or evidence available on record to make out a case against the respondents of illegal or inadmissible claim of input tax adjustment, whereas, the entire proceedings and the Order-in-Original passed in the instant case was based on presumptions, whereas, no inquiry or verification was made by the department in respect of alleged fake/flying invoices. The SC judgment said that the ATIR and the Division Bench of LHC were justified to set aside both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, while recording concurrent findings on facts which does not suffer from any illegality or error. The proceedings in the instant matter were initiated by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue Unit-IV Cantt Zone RTO, Rawalpindi vide show cause notice dated 10.08.2021, whereby, the respondents were required to submit the record to prove as to whether the purchases made for the (Tax Period July 2019 to June 2020) amounting to Rs323,722,601 against which an amount of Rs55,032,846 was claimed as input tax, were actually made by them. It was further alleged in the show-cause notice that the record submitted by the respondents does not prove as to whether such purchases were actually made by the respondents during subject period, therefore, they have also failed to comply with the requirements of Section 73 of the Act. It was concluded that respondents did not purchase any coal from the local suppliers and unlawfully claimed input tax on the basis of fake/ flying invoices issued by the dubious suppliers, therefore, caused loss to the national exchequer to the tune of Rs55,032,846 by violating the provisions 6,7,8,22,23,26 and 73 read with Section 2(37) of the Act. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
