logo
US withdraws from UNESCO again, only 2 years after rejoining

US withdraws from UNESCO again, only 2 years after rejoining

Korea Herald23-07-2025
United Nations (AP) — The Trump administration announced Tuesday that it will once again withdraw from the UN cultural agency UNESCO, an expected move that has the US further retreating from international organizations.
The decision to pull US funding and participation from UNESCO comes two years after the Biden administration rejoined following a controversial, five-year absence that began during President Donald Trump's first term.
The White House cited similar concerns as it did in 2018, saying it believes US involvement is not in its national interest and accusing the agency of promoting anti-Israel speech.
The decision, which won't go into effect until December 2026, will deal a blow to an agency known for preserving cultural heritage through its UNESCO World Heritage Sites program — which recognizes significant landmarks for protection, ranging from the Taj Mahal to Egypt's pyramids of Giza and the Grand Canyon National Park. The agency also empowers education and science across the globe.
It is the Trump administration's latest move to pull support for UN agencies under a larger campaign to reshape US diplomacy. Under the "America First" approach, the administration has pulled out of the UN World Health Organization and the top UN human rights body, while reassessing its funding for others.
This has left the UN, which is in the process of its own massive overhaul, reevaluating core programs and initiatives and what the international body would look like without support from the US — its largest donor.
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement that the withdrawal was linked to UNESCO's perceived agenda to 'advance divisive social and cultural causes.'
She added that UNESCO's decision in 2011 'to admit the 'State of Palestine' as a Member State is highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization.'
UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay said she 'deeply' regrets the US decision but said it was expected and that the agency 'has prepared for it.' She also denied accusations of anti-Israel bias, saying it contradicts 'the reality of UNESCO's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism.'
Azoulay added that 'the reasons put forward by the United States of America are the same as seven years ago, even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism."
Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the UN, celebrated the announcement, saying in a statement that it is a 'fitting response to the consistent misguided anti-Israel bias of UNESCO, an organization that has lost its way.'
The Biden administration had rejoined UNESCO in 2023 after citing concerns that China was filling the gap left by the US in UNESCO policymaking, notably in setting standards for artificial intelligence and technology education.
'Unilaterally withdrawing the United States from UNESCO is another assault by the Trump administration on international cooperation and US global leadership," Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said.
'This decision cedes more ground to US competitors, especially China, who will take advantage of America's absence to further shape the international system in their favor.' The withdrawal, which was first reported by the New York Post, came after a review ordered by the Trump administration earlier this year.
While the US had previously provided a notable share of the agency's budget, UNESCO has diversified its funding sources in recent years as the US contribution has decreased. Today, American assistance represents only 8 percent of the agency's total budget.
Azoulay pledged that UNESCO will carry out its missions despite 'inevitably reduced resources.' The agency said that it is not considering any staff layoffs at this stage.
'UNESCO's purpose is to welcome all the nations of the world, and the United States of America is and always will be welcome,' she said. 'We will continue to work hand in hand with all our American partners in the private sector, academia and nonprofit organizations, and will pursue our political dialogue with the US administration and Congress.'
The US previously pulled out of UNESCO under the Reagan administration in 1984 because it viewed the agency as mismanaged, corrupt and used to advance the interests of the Soviet Union. It rejoined in 2003 during George W. Bush's presidency.
France, where UNESCO is based, stated in a press release that it regrets the US decision to withdraw from the agency, which was founded in 1946 'to prevent conflicts through education, culture and tolerance.'
'France supports UNESCO, which backs several of its priorities at international level, particularly access to education for all, the protection of endangered heritage, the protection of our oceans, the responsible development of artificial intelligence and the fight against anti-Semitism and hate speech,' the French Foreign Ministry said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Aug. 1 tariff negotiation deadline won't be extended
Trump says Aug. 1 tariff negotiation deadline won't be extended

Korea Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Trump says Aug. 1 tariff negotiation deadline won't be extended

US President Donald Trump said Wednesday this week's deadline for making trade deals with countries will not be extended, as South Korea and other countries are striving to reach a tariff agreement with the United States before the deadline. His remarks in a social media post came as his administration's "reciprocal" tariffs, including 25 percent duties on South Korea, are set to go into force on Friday unless a deal is struck. "THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE — IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED," he wrote on Truth Social. "A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!" Meant to address trade barriers to American exports, the steep reciprocal tariffs took effect on April 9, but Trump placed a 90-day pause on them on the same day to allow for negotiations. Later, Trump extended the pause, saying the new levies will take effect on Aug. 1. In a separate post, Trump accused India of having "the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country," saying that the country will pay 25 percent tariffs, starting Friday. The Trump administration has so far reached a trade deal with Britain, the European Union, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. (Yonhap)

N. Korean assembly chief claims US, S. Korea preparing to 'actualize' nuclear war
N. Korean assembly chief claims US, S. Korea preparing to 'actualize' nuclear war

Korea Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

N. Korean assembly chief claims US, S. Korea preparing to 'actualize' nuclear war

The head of North Korea's legislative body on Wednesday accused the United States and South Korea of preparing to "actualize" a nuclear war, insisting that its nuclear development is a self-defense measure vital to ensuring its security against such threats. Pak In-chol, chairman of the North's Supreme People's Assembly, made such a claim during a United Nations-led gathering of top legislators around the world in Switzerland, blaming the US and other Western countries for causing "instability and chaos" to maintain their "hegemonic position." "The advanced preparations of the United States and the ROK to actualize a nuclear war have entered the gravity stage," Pak said through an interpreter at the sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament. "This impels the DPRK to take every necessary measure in response to such geopolitical crisis. Possessing capabilities to cope proactively with various security threats ... is an issue of vital importance of our state for defending its sovereignty, security threats and territorial integrity," he said. The ROK is short for South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. The DPRK stands for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the North's official name. Pak said that the North will never tolerate the "high-handedness, arbitrariness of the U.S. and its following forces," and will "fully discharge its responsibility" to defend international justice. Pak also claimed that his country is carrying out various activities under its development road map for the "prosperity and happiness" of its people, including long-term construction plans and other measures to improve education, health care and science. "Our people are achieving miraculous successes in their struggle for overall development," Pak said. South Korea's National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik attended the meeting and delivered a speech calling for communication channels between the two Koreas to be kept open even as inter-Korean relations remain frayed.

Korea's AI sovereignty hopes face test under new US push
Korea's AI sovereignty hopes face test under new US push

Korea Herald

time11 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Korea's AI sovereignty hopes face test under new US push

Trump's AI action plan sparks concerns of US dominance, threatening Seoul's W240b efforts to build independent AI infrastructure As US President Donald Trump signed an executive order last week unveiling an 'AI action plan' to maintain America's dominance in artificial intelligence, concerns are rising that the move could undermine South Korea's ambitions to build its sovereign AI ecosystem. According to industry sources on Wednesday, the Trump administration's plan, signed on July 23, triggered a rapid response from China, which announced its own global AI governance initiative just three days later. At the heart of the US plan is a push to develop and export a full-stack AI package — including high-performance GPUs, servers, software and foundation models — designed to encourage or "ensure" allied nations adopt US AI technologies and standards. Korean experts warn that this could pose a serious challenge to Seoul's sovereign AI strategy, which centers on developing a national foundation model capable of achieving at least 95 percent of the performance of global leading models. The Lee Jae Myung administration is currently conducting a competitive selection process to identify 'national representative AI teams,' with up to 240 billion won ($173 million) in funding allocated for the winners. A recent report by the Korea AI Software Industry Association (KOSA) assessed that 'the US AI action plan could become an obstacle to Korea's AI self-reliance,' citing the risk of domestic firms being relegated to downstream roles, such as app development, within a US-centric AI platform structure. 'If key AI models and platforms are controlled by the US, Korean companies may find themselves merely feeding applications into foreign ecosystems,' the KOSA report read. In response, the Ministry of Science and ICT said accelerating the development of domestic foundation models and securing key resources such as AI talent and GPU computing power are vital countermeasures to the evolving global landscape. 'Completing our sovereign AI ecosystem as swiftly as possible is the best defense,' a ministry official said. 'We will fine-tune our strategy based on the capabilities of the selected national AI teams.' President Trump's recent remarks emphasizing the easing of regulations on AI are also expected to have an impact on Korea's implementation of its AI Framework Act. Korea became the second country in the world, following the European Union, to pass a comprehensive AI law, which is set to go into effect next year. While some industry insiders say that Korean startups could benefit from narrowing the tech gap by leveraging open-source models promoted by the US, they also caution that such dependency could leave Korea vulnerable to future geopolitical and technological shifts. 'One cannot deny the efficiency of utilizing some US technologies,' said an industry source who requested anonymity. 'But to avoid external vulnerabilities, Korea must acquire the full spectrum of capabilities required for AI sovereignty — from models to infrastructure and platforms. Striking a balance between national independence and global collaboration will be the key to Korea's future AI policy.' Experts also stress the importance of diplomatic finesse in minimizing potential conflicts around AI governance while safeguarding Korea's technological sovereignty. 'A two-track strategy may be necessary,' said Lee Jae-sung, professor of the Department of AI at Chung-Ang University. 'In the early stages, actively using open-source tools can help close the gap with big tech. Over the long term, however, we need to transition to domestic solutions and build an independent AI base.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store