Sikh girl not allowed to take exam for wearing ‘kada', Badal writes to PM
on Sunday urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to "intervene directly to put an end to this painful chain of events in the country".
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In a letter to the Prime Minister, Badal sought to draw the PM's attention to an incident on Sunday in which a baptised Sikh girl,
from Tarn Taran district, was reportedly stopped from entering the examination centre as a candidate for the Rajasthan Judicial Services at Poornima University, Jaipur, on the plea that she was wearing her sacred articles of faith – 'kada' and 'kirpan'.
"This was a gross violation of her constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 25 of the Statute, and it denied her fundamental right to practise her religion.
Article 25 of the Constitution specifically mentions 'kirpan' among other symbols of the Sikh religion, which are exempt from any bar even on flights," Badal said.
He added in the letter to the PM, "It is shocking that rules, if any, are framed by lower authorities flouting the sacred Constitution of India. The govt of India should issue -- or, if necessary -- re-issue clear-cut guidelines to all states and Union Territories about the exemption to the inseparable articles of faith."
Badal stated that it was "not a one-off incident but part of the ever-increasing number of examples of religious intolerance towards the uniqueness of Sikh identity. In a similar incident last year, two Sikh girls were stopped from appearing for Rajasthan Judicial Services (RJS) in an exam centre in Jodhpur."
"Sikhs and their identity are inseparable, and this was duly acknowledged and constitutionally mandated for compliance for all purposes in the country by the Founding Fathers.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
But some officials at lower rungs deem themselves even above the Constitution. This must stop as this vitiates communal harmony in the country," Badal wrote in the letter to the PM.
"You are personally aware of the profound spiritual and emotional significance of the Sikh religious symbols and what these mean to our devoutly religious and fiercely patriotic community. I request you to issue immediate directions for compliance to ensure full respect to these symbols at all levels across the country," the letter read.
Badal also urged the Rajasthan high court to provide the victimised Sikh girl, Gurpreet Kaur, a special opportunity to appear for the RJS examination, ensuring her right to uphold her faith is respected.
Earlier in the morning, the SAD president had taken to X, asking Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal to take strict action against the guilty officials to ensure such incidents were not repeated in his state.
Will Raise Issue in Parliament: Harsimrat Kaur Badal
SAD MP from Bathinda, Harsimrat Kaur Badal, while condemning the incident as "unfortunate and discriminatory" and demanding strict action against officials who "barred" the girl from appearing in the examination, took to X and wrote, "I will definitely raise this issue in Parliament so that such incidents do not happen with our Sikh children in the future and a permanent solution is found."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Selection of UCC panel members within state govt's domain: Gujarat HC
The Gujarat High Court has said the setting up of a five-member committee on Uniform Civil Code (UCC) by the state government cannot be said to have caused prejudice to any class of people, and does not warrant its interference. A single bench of Justice Niral R Mehta on Tuesday rejected a plea challenging the constitution of the committee and seeking the court's direction for its reconstitution as there was no representation of minority communities. The selection of the committee members would be "within the absolute domain of the state government," the court said. On February 4 this year, Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel announced the formation of the committee to assess the necessity of the UCC and also to draft a bill for it. The panel is chaired by retired Supreme Court judge Ranjana Desai. Its members include retired IAS officer C L Meena, advocate R C Kodekar, former Vice Chancellor Dakshesh Thakar and social activist Geetaben Shroff. In the detailed judgment made available on the HC's website, the bench noted the constitution of the committee was purely an administrative decision. The court said it was of the firm opinion that once the UCC committee has been constituted purely by an executive order under Article 162 of the Constitution of India, selection of its particular members would be "within the absolute domain of the state government." It is "perfectly justified for the state authorities to select the members of the committee and for which, writ of mandamus cannot be issued," it said. "By constituting a committee, it cannot be said that prejudice is caused to any class of people when more particularly it is always open for any class of people to make representation espousing their views on the Uniform Civil Code to the committee so constituted," the court said. It said in the absence of any statutory provisions, the authority cannot be expected or directed to act in a particular manner as it would be "unjustified and unwarranted interference in the purely administrative affairs of the state authorities," it said. "Under the circumstances, I see no good reason to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in a realm of administrative decisions taken under Article 162 of the Constitution of India by the State of Gujarat," the bench added. The court, therefore, cannot direct the state to act in a particular manner as any direction and/ or order in that regard would be "unjustified and unwarranted interference in the purely administrative affairs of the state authorities," it said. The petitioner, Surat resident Abdul Vahab Sopariwala, had approached the HC seeking a direction to the state government to reconstitute the committee with fresh members with the knowledge and experience over the subject law, and adopt a consultative process involving all religious and cultural communities before any move to implement the UCC. His lawyer had argued that members of the present committee are not experts on the subject law and are interested parties, and therefore the selection of members is against the principles of fair play. Even when the committee was formed with the objective of implementation of the UCC, covering many personal laws and touching minorities, there was no representation of any minority communities in the panel, he said. The committee should thus be reconstituted by including representation from the minority communities so that real purpose and object of the constitution of the committee can be achieved, he had said in his submission. Advocate General Kamal Trivedi said in his submission that the constitution of the committee is purely an administrative action and has nothing to do with any statutory duty of the state government. There is, therefore, no legal requirement prescribed by any statute for and how such committee can be constituted, he said. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the committee is in breach of any statutory or legal duties, for which the court would issue its prerogative writ of mandamus by exercising its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, he said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
NMC has asked disabled students to declare ‘what they cannot do'. This is illegal — and cruel
It was a typical exhausting Friday at my medical college. I returned home, drained from the day, expecting nothing more than dinner and rest. Instead, what awaited me was an email from the Supreme Court of India. I was being directed — on short notice — to assess a NEET-UG aspirant with a disability the very next morning and submit my report in a sealed envelope by Monday. The court had rejected two previous assessments by AIIMS Nagpur and AIIMS Delhi. Why? Because both had done what most institutions do best — calculate percentages of disability instead of assessing a student's ability to pursue medicine. The student was Om Rathod — 88 per cent disabled due to muscular dystrophy — and yet, burning with determination to become a doctor. What the court wanted was not a number, but an answer: Can he, with the right support, study medicine? That assessment led to a landmark Supreme Court judgment — a rare beacon of inclusive justice — directing the National Medical Commission (NMC) to revise its outdated and discriminatory guidelines for MBBS admissions. But what came next — just last week — is a betrayal not just of that spirit, but of the law. The NMC's 'interim guidelines' came two days before the counselling deadline. Buried within them was a new clause: A self-declaration affidavit. It asks candidates with disabilities to legally affirm — on stamp paper — what they cannot do. Can they stand on one leg? Can they climb stairs unaided? The real question is: Why isn't the NMC reading the Constitution? I asked Om, the same young man whose courage moved the apex court to act, whether he could truthfully answer those questions. 'No,' he said. And he shouldn't have to. These questions are humiliating, ableist, and illegal. They punish you for not performing like a non-disabled body — even though the very idea of 'reasonable accommodation' is to remove barriers so people can perform. I assessed Om's functional competency. He uses a mobility scooter. I use callipers and crutches myself. Neither of us can bear weight on our affected limbs. Neither of us can climb stairs without help. But both of us made it through medicine. So what, exactly, is NMC trying to assess? The committee behind these guidelines clearly has no understanding of functional ability or of what the Supreme Court ordered. In its first meeting in February — on record in the Anmol v UOI case — the NMC agreed it was time to rename 'Disability Assessment Boards' to 'Ability Assessment Boards,' and to define what reasonable accommodations actually mean. None of that made it into the final document. Instead, the NMC waited till the Court went on summer recess and dropped this vague, ableist document without public consultation — just days before the counselling deadline. This delay has created chaos once again. A family from Odisha has been stuck in Delhi for over a week waiting for their son's assessment. In the South, students from Telangana and Andhra are being forced to travel across states to Kerala or Tamil Nadu. The Court had explicitly ordered one assessment centre per state. Clearly, the NMC wasn't listening. It also wasn't listening when the court mandated that these assessment boards must include doctors with disabilities, to train them and guard against ableist bias. That, too, never happened. So what we get are absurd rejections like the one from Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital in Tamil Nadu: 'Since the patient is wheelchair-bound, she cannot do coordinated activities of the lower limb. Not eligible.' Wheelchair-bound? Patient? This is not only inaccurate, it's insulting. The same state has a gastro-surgeon with polio performing liver transplants and a urologist doing surgeries using a standing wheelchair. The organisation Doctors with Disabilities: Agents of Change has multiple wheelchair-user (not patients) doctors thriving and flourishing. Perhaps the doctors rejecting these students should consult their own colleagues before making such statements — or, at the very least, read the Omkar Gond v UOI (2024) judgment. What makes this even more damning is that there's still no appellate body in place, even though the Court mandated one. That means these students — already exhausted, humiliated, and denied — have no path to appeal unless they somehow make it to the high court or the Supreme Court again. But how many can afford that? How many have the strength? It's clear now that neither the NMC nor DGHS has learned anything from the multiple rap-on-the-knuckle SC orders. They continue to deny disabled aspirants, recycling the same experts who wrote the guidelines the Court already struck down. The result? A process that is not just broken — it is cruel. This isn't just a policy failure. It is a systemic refusal to listen, to learn, to evolve. The experts with lived experience are the ones who navigate this reality every day. Until our institutions learn to value lived experience over outdated assumptions, the cycle of discrimination will continue — wrapped neatly in a sealed envelope, marked urgent, and delivered into the void where justice should have been. The writer is a medical doctor at University College of Medical sciences, Delhi, and SC SC-appointed expert in Om Rathod v DGHS and Anmol v UOI SC judgements. Views are personal
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Repeated attacks on minorities undermine India's core values, says Grand Mufti
New Delhi, July 31 (UNI) Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, the grand mufti of India, has raised serious concerns over a series of incidents targeting minority communities in parts of north India, warning that such actions threaten the core values of India's secular and democratic framework. In a strongly worded statement issued yesterday, the grand mufti condemned the recent mob attack on a group of Malayali Catholic nuns in Chhattisgarh, who were reportedly harassed and subjected to a public trial during a train journey over allegations of religious conversion and human trafficking. "Repeated incidents that violate the spirit of religious freedom and coexistence enshrined in our Constitution are deeply troubling. Mob vigilantism against minorities is not only unlawful but also corrodes the fabric of national unity and brotherhood," Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad stated. He further recalled a similar case in Kerala, where underprivileged students from north India, who enrolled in orphanages for education, were unjustly accused of human trafficking and denied their right to education. "State borders must not become barriers to education, employment, or free movement. Their purpose is purely administrative — not to divide the people of our nation," he said. Expressing concern over broader trends, the grand mufti pointed to recent developments in Bihar, where sections of the population reportedly faced scrutiny over their citizenship status during a voter list revision. He also cited exclusionary practices in Assam that have left many ordinary citizens vulnerable. "Such actions risk not only violating fundamental rights but also damaging India's image as a pluralistic and inclusive democracy on the global stage," he noted. Reaffirming the constitutional guarantees of life, religious freedom, and freedom of movement, Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad emphasized the need for urgent and unified action. He said, "Illegal evictions and targeted assaults on minorities cannot be justified—legally, morally, or constitutionally. Civil society, the judiciary, and governments at all levels must work together to counter those who incite hatred and disrupt social harmony." He urged political parties, state and central authorities, and the public to remain vigilant and proactive in upholding India's unity in diversity. "Safeguarding the integrity of our democracy and the rights of all citizens must remain our collective responsibility," he said. UNI XC VAN PRS
