logo
Farmers hit by a federal funding freeze scramble to respond ahead of spring thaw

Farmers hit by a federal funding freeze scramble to respond ahead of spring thaw

NBC News22-02-2025
On Thursday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it would be releasing the 'first tranche' of funding paused under the administration's review of the Inflation Reduction Act, totaling $20 million.
'It's a pittance,' said Mike Lavender, policy director for the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, a farm and food advocacy group. 'There is some semblance that this is moving, but it's clearly not fast enough. The timing matters.'
Small farms may be especially vulnerable, as they tend to have tighter profit margins and more limited access to credit than larger operations. They also make up a large proportion of the farms participating in some of the federal grant programs that have been frozen, according to a recent USDA report.
'With this uncertainty, they are pulling out of farmers markets, canceling contracts already because they do not think they will have the capacity to meet them,' said Vanessa Garcia Polanco, government relations director for the National Young Farmers Coalition, an advocacy group for farmers and ranchers. 'When all that funding is frozen, it sends a signal to them that their business plan is not safe.'
In a press release, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on Thursday that 'it is clear that some of this funding went to programs that had nothing to do with agriculture — that is why we are still reviewing.' She criticized what she described as the previous administration's 'disastrous policies of over-regulation, extreme environmental programs, and crippling inflation.'
The USDA did not say when additional money would be released.
Brian Geier, a farmer in Indiana, had been counting on a $10,000 grant from the USDA to expand the grazing area for his sheep, which he would then rotate with his farm's hayfields to conserve the soil quality over time. Based on the expectation of receiving the grant, he agreed to purchase lambs this spring from a local sheep breeder.
Nine weeks from now, the lambs are expected to be born. But Geier still doesn't know if or when he will receive the funds he was promised to build the fencing and water lines that he needs, so he scrambled to secure a loan from a friend to make sure the lambs will have a place to graze.
'Farmers have to shift when timelines change,' Geier said. 'We have to adapt given the biological situations going on with animals and the seasons.'
Having received no updates from the USDA on his grant as of Friday afternoon, he is now rethinking his plan to purchase more sheep this summer for his farm, which he and his partner founded two years ago. 'We'll just have to scale that back and slow it down.'
Those receiving grants explicitly related to climate change are especially concerned, as the Trump administration has made targeting such programs a political priority.
Pasa Sustainable Agriculture, a nonprofit supporting farmers, manages about 200 climate-related projects funded by the USDA in 15 states, including the upgrades to Roell's orchard in Massachusetts.
The group is now owed close to $2 million in reimbursement from the USDA, according to Executive Director Hannah Smith-Brubaker, who fears she will have to lay off staff if the freeze continues for much longer. 'There are not going to be people to help those farmers and process those payments,' she said.
Roell sought out USDA funds to support a new orchard after Hurricane Helene destroyed beehives they were keeping in western North Carolina — just one of many extreme weather events that disrupted their beekeeping and honey production business.
'The point of this orchard was to make us more resilient,' Roell said. 'We are able to have a diversified farm that has other products to offer and can offset losses when catastrophes like this happen. But instead, now, we have the federal government as a catastrophe.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

USDA spent thousands on giant Trump banners as it was cutting aid to schools and food banks, report says
USDA spent thousands on giant Trump banners as it was cutting aid to schools and food banks, report says

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

USDA spent thousands on giant Trump banners as it was cutting aid to schools and food banks, report says

The Agriculture Department spent thousands of dollars on giant banners featuring President Donald Trump 's face as it was cutting aid to schools and food banks, a new report has revealed. Since Trump took office, his administration has been making cuts to government spending that it sees as wasteful. In March, the USDA slashed two 'pandemic-era' federal programs that provided roughly $1 billion in funding to schools and food banks to buy supplies from local farms to help low-income families. A spokesperson for the USDA told CBS MoneyWatch at the time, "Unlike the Biden Administration, which funneled billions in [Commodity Credit Corporation] funds into short-term programs with no plan for longevity, USDA is prioritizing stable, proven solutions that deliver lasting impact.' The Commodity Credit Corporation is a government-owned entity that finances programs supporting domestic agriculture. Around the same time, the USDA spent more than $16,000 on banners of Trump and former President Abraham Lincoln, who created the department, to hang outside its Washington headquarters, according to documents obtained by Salon. The Independent has reached out to the USDA and the White House for comment. The banners were put up in May which coincided with the department's 163rd anniversary. At the time, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins shared photos of the banners and wrote on X, '163 years after Lincoln founded @USDA, President Trump's bold vision is ushering in a Golden Age for our farmers.' The banners were printed and installed by Maryland contractor Timsco Graphics for $16,400, Salon reported, citing a work order. There were supposed to be three banners, according to the work order, but only two are currently hanging. At the time, Timsco CEO Keith Prichard posted a photo on LinkedIn of the Lincoln banner and another banner of Trump and Rollins. When the banners were first put up the USDA explained its decision to the fact-checking site Snopes. 'USDA has much to remember in the coming months,' the department said, noting the anniversary of its founding, Memorial Day, Flag Day and the Fourth of July. The statement continued: 'USDA is the only federal agency located on the National Mall. The banners on the building's façade observe these moments in American history and acknowledge the vision and leadership of USDA's founder, Abraham Lincoln, and the best advocate of America's farmers and ranchers, President Trump.'

USDA moves to end employee union contracts, documents show
USDA moves to end employee union contracts, documents show

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

USDA moves to end employee union contracts, documents show

WASHINGTON, Aug 13 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture moved on Tuesday to terminate union contracts with thousands of employees of its animal health and food safety inspection agencies, according to documents seen by Reuters. The notices sent to union leaders at the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Food Safety and Inspection Service said the move was aligned with President Donald Trump's March executive order to exclude some federal workers from collective bargaining because their agencies have national security missions, the documents show. The Trump administration has also moved to terminate union contracts at the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Veterans Affairs and other agencies under the executive order. The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Nancy Mace attacks reporter for questioning her bragging about infrastructure she voted against
Nancy Mace attacks reporter for questioning her bragging about infrastructure she voted against

The Independent

time6 days ago

  • The Independent

Nancy Mace attacks reporter for questioning her bragging about infrastructure she voted against

Nancy Mace raged at a reporter who asked her why she was bragging about infrastructure upgrades that she had voted against. The congresswoman from the Palmetto State, who announced that she would be running for South Carolina governor on Monday (4 August), appeared at a town hall in Myrtle Beach as part of her campaign tour. When a reporter questioned her about touting infrastructure projects from the Inflation Reduction Act, which she voted against, Mace snapped back that she must be a 'raging Democrat' journalist. 'You're a raging leftist with that kind of questioning. And I would say, as a woman, you might wanna think about how you view other women.' She said she had every right to claim credit for a project funded by the bill, telling the reporter: 'It is literally our job. Maybe you're confused.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store