Google Rolls Out Customizable Gemini 'Gems' in Gmail, Documents, Sheets and More
Gems are task-specific versions of Google's Gemini AI assistant, designed to help users streamline repetitive tasks with ease. Whether it's editing text, writing code, crafting sales pitches, or revising for exams, users can now rely on either pre-made or personalized Gems to get the job done.
'Gems can help you further leverage the power of Gemini in a way that's customized to your needs more efficiently by minimizing repetitive prompting,' Google said in its announcement.
With the new integration, users can upload their own files to offer the Gems contextual insights, making task completion more relevant and intelligent. While custom Gems can't be created directly within Docs or Gmail, users can easily set them up at gemini.google.com/gems/create or use the 'Create a new Gem' option in the Workspace side panel.
This update also supports core Workspace features like @-mentioning and file access, ensuring smooth, AI-powered collaboration. The feature began rolling out on July 2 and will be available to all eligible Workspace users over the coming days. Google notes the rollout might take longer than 15 days to reach everyone.
This move marks yet another step in Google's push to embed AI deeper into everyday workflows.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Oxford India Forum: Students should not see AI as challenge but as opportunity, says Rajeev Chandrasekhar
As the world enters the era of generative AI, with tools like ChatGPT and Gemini taking over the world, there is a real fear that these technologies will undermine the future of young students who are currently in colleges or are just coming out of their professional courses. As the Oxford India Forum held a panel discussion on AI and its role in the society, the conversation also addressed these concerns. advertisementThe panel discussion was attended by Rajeev Chandrashekhar, former IT Minister, Sameer Chauhan, Director UNICC, and Vikram Doraiswami, who is the High Commissioner of India in the UK. One of the key questions during the discussion, which was moderated by Prachetas Bhatnagar, who is Head of Strategy and Operations, Policy and Politics at Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, revolved around the anxiety among college students regarding the impact of AI on their careers. Replying to a question, Chandrashekhar said that AI would definitely bring big changes. 'AI is going to change the landscape of what we see as work. AI is changing the landscape of what we understand as innovation. (Earlier) I think search in many, many ways changed the dynamics and landscape of talent and who did well and who did not do so well at work,' he said. Then he elaborated that this would mean stark changes at workplaces. 'AI is going to take (change) to the next level. It's going to be an extremely deep change in the workflows. And the concept of talent and skills at work is going to be reimagined in ways that we cannot today understand,' he said. Yet, within the change there is the opportunity. 'I always tell students, don't underestimate the power of AI or how you will work and how you will succeed or fail,' said Chandrashekhar. 'And don't overestimate the hyperbole of AI and get threatened by it and see this as a challenge rather than an opportunity.'The discussion around AI was not just limited to its impact on careers or on workplaces. In the same discussion, the panelists also discussed the way forward for India as far as deep tech and AI is concerned, the concept of tech sovereignty and the social impact of AI, particularly around misinformation. 'If you think misinformation in the world of social media is a problem, that is going to look like a walk in the park when you see what's going to happen down the road with AI,' said Chandrashekhar.- Ends
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
ChatGPT is obsessed with the number '27'! Experts reveal shocking details
If you've ever asked ChatGPT to 'pick a number between 1 and 50,' chances are it replied with 27. It's not just a one-off thing. This oddly specific number keeps showing up across AI models, from ChatGPT to Gemini and Claude. (I tried it too.) What started as a harmless prompt has now snowballed into a curious internet mystery: Why is AI so obsessed with 27? Multiple AI models show the same behaviour, and experts believe it's revealing something surprisingly human hiding in the data.(Pexels) Turns out, the explanation goes deeper than just randomness, and it might reveal more about us than about the machines. I asked ChatGPT to choose a number between 1 to 50 and it chose 27.(ChatGPT) The pattern no one expected Several users and researchers recently began experimenting with basic numerical prompts across leading AI chatbots. The results were strangely consistent. While a few models, like LeChat, occasionally veer towards 37 and Claude towards 42, 27 remained a recurring favourite, especially in ChatGPT. Medium writer, Kartikey Sengar, was one of the first to point this out in his article analysing cross-platform outputs. He called the pattern 'too frequent to be a coincidence,' adding, 'It's not that 27 is programmed into the model—it's that it somehow keeps surfacing across AI behavior.' Is it really the AI - or is it us? Before diving into conspiracy theories, it's important to remember one thing: AI doesn't dream up numbers on its own. Models like ChatGPT are trained on massive datasets sourced from books, websites, forums and human conversations. Their patterns are rooted in our own behaviour. So, could this preference for 27 be a mirror reflecting our own subconscious? Experts think so. 'AI is not magical. It's predictive. If humans tend to lean toward 27 in casual number selections, the model learns to do the same,' says an AI researcher who has worked on large language model behaviour. 'The output is a reflection of the input—us.' The cultural significance of the number 27 Why 27, though? It's not a round number, nor is it the halfway point in a range of 1 to 50. But 27 does hold surprising significance in both science and pop culture. For one, the Moon takes about 27 days to orbit the Earth. Human skin cells also regenerate every 27 days, and in numerology, 27 is considered a 'spiritually charged' number. Then there's the infamous '27 Club'—a group of iconic musicians like Amy Winehouse, Kurt Cobain, and Jimi Hendrix who all died at age 27. All these layers of meaning could be why the number has organically found its way into more content and, in turn, AI training datasets. What AI's favourite number says about us More than a quirk, this numerical fixation reveals how artificial intelligence can surface hidden patterns in human behaviour. The next time an AI spits out 27, it's not because it's haunted, it's because our cultural consciousness has nudged it in that direction. As models grow more sophisticated, even these small, strange patterns offer a peek into the evolving relationship between human minds and machine learning. So yes, ChatGPT might be obsessed with 27! But maybe, just maybe… we were too, all along.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Exclusive-Googles AI Overviews hit by EU antitrust complaint from independent publishers
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Alphabet's Google has been hit by an EU antitrust complaint over its AI Overviews from a group of independent publishers, which has also asked for an interim measure to prevent allegedly irreparable harm to them, according to a document seen by Reuters. Google's AI Overviews are AI-generated summaries that appear above traditional hyperlinks to relevant webpages and are shown to users in more than 100 countries. It began adding advertisements to AI Overviews last May. The company is making its biggest bet by integrating AI into search but the move has sparked concerns from some content providers such as publishers. The Independent Publishers Alliance document, dated June 30, sets out a complaint to the European Commission and alleges that Google abuses its market power in online search. "Google's core search engine service is misusing web content for Google's AI Overviews in Google Search, which have caused, and continue to cause, significant harm to publishers, including news publishers in the form of traffic, readership and revenue loss," the document said. It said Google positions its AI Overviews at the top of its general search engine results page to display its own summaries which are generated using publisher material and it alleges that Google's positioning disadvantages publishers' original content. "Publishers using Google Search do not have the option to opt out from their material being ingested for Google's AI large language model training and/or from being crawled for summaries, without losing their ability to appear in Google's general search results page," the complaint said. The Commission declined to comment. The UK's Competition and Markets Authority confirmed receipt of the complaint. Google said it sends billions of clicks to websites each day. "New AI experiences in Search enable people to ask even more questions, which creates new opportunities for content and businesses to be discovered," a Google spokesperson said. The Independent Publishers Alliance's website says it is a nonprofit community advocating for independent publishers, which it does not name. The Movement for an Open Web, whose members include digital advertisers and publishers, and British non-profit Foxglove Legal Community Interest Company, which says it advocates for fairness in the tech world, are also signatories to the complaint. They said an interim measure was necessary to prevent serious irreparable harm to competition and to ensure access to news. Google said numerous claims about traffic from search are often based on highly incomplete and skewed data. "The reality is that sites can gain and lose traffic for a variety of reasons, including seasonal demand, interests of users, and regular algorithmic updates to Search," the Google spokesperson said. Foxglove co-executive director Rosa Curling said journalists and publishers face a dire situation. "Independent news faces an existential threat: Google's AI Overviews," she told Reuters. "That's why with this complaint, Foxglove and our partners are urging the European Commission, along with other regulators around the world, to take a stand and allow independent journalism to opt out," Curling said. The three groups have filed a similar complaint and a request for an interim measure to the UK competition authority. The complaints echoed a U.S. lawsuit by a U.S. edtech company which said Google's AI Overviews is eroding demand for original content and undermining publishers' ability to compete that have resulted in a drop in visitors and subscribers. (Reporting by Foo Yun Chee. Editing by Jane Merriman)
