logo
I'm a former royal marine-turned-Labour MP – Rachel Reeves is missing the point on defence

I'm a former royal marine-turned-Labour MP – Rachel Reeves is missing the point on defence

Independent26-03-2025

When I was under daily attack from rockets and mortars as a royal marine in Afghanistan, we knew the importance of the humanitarians working alongside us. Doctors, engineers and general staff, all were vital parts of our mission to deliver peace and stability in extraordinarily difficult circumstances.
When much of the infrastructure was destroyed in the town of Garmsir, forcing residents to flee to Taliban -controlled areas, it was UK and international aid that helped rebuild health clinics, roads and houses – working in conjunction with the British and American troops providing security. People duly returned to Garmsir, and it turned our allies in the Afghan Government into a more credible force.
When I worked in the tribal districts of Pakistan, UK aid helped to bring good governance to areas that were infamous for instability and exporting terrorism. It was also UK aid that provided the Pakistani government with expert advice on setting up courts, health centres, schooling, and better agriculture. Improving people's lives and providing justice gave young men alternatives to joining armed groups – making us all safer.
I later worked with Syrian civil society and refugee groups in the region as an aid worker. As that civil war comes to an end, it will be the groups that UK aid supported which might offer the best hope of achieving a tolerant and stable country.
What these experiences taught me is that the military must work hand-in-hand with aid organisations and civil society. It is the most effective way to successfully stabilise fragile states, confront the roots of extremism, and – crucially – prevent conflicts from spreading or from breaking out in the first place.
When we reduce our development spending, we reduce our capacity to deal with conflict at the root, and our defence spending needs to go up to compensate for it. Prevention is better than cure. As research by the Institute for Economics and Peace has found, each £1 we spend on conflict prevention can save £16 that otherwise needs to be spent to mitigate the destruction caused by conflict.
The chancellor has announced the government will accelerate its plan to reduce aid spending to just 0.3 per cent of national income to fund the boost to the defence budget, which means finding nearly £5bn of savings by next year – but this means the risks to the UK and the defence costs of responding to them will increase.
And it is not only in war zones that the consequences of cutting the development budget will be felt. More conflict means they will also be felt in the UK if food and energy prices spike, if irregular migration rises, and if threats from extremist groups grow. Our military and security services will face those challenges at the very time when their attention must be focused on the desperate situation in Ukraine.
To be clear, I strongly support increasing the defence budget to 2.5 per cent of GDP, with the ambition to go further in the next Parliament. I still remember the massive underfunding we faced in Afghanistan almost 20 years ago. Many of us had to buy our own body armour. We were driving unarmoured Land Rovers in a country littered with IEDs and Soviet landmines. Defence underfunding is not new.
With Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine now in its third year, it has never been more important to rebuild the capability to show strength and support for our allies in Europe. This is the right course of action. The most effective way to ensure peace in Europe is through strength.
However, state-on-state conflict is not the only threat to the UK and its interests. There are more active conflicts across the globe than at any time since the end of the Second World War in places like Gaza, Sudan, Yemen, Myanmar and the Sahel. As we increase our defence capabilities, we must ensure that UK Aid is helping to prevent and mitigate conflicts like these.
In Afghanistan, our armed forces worked side by side with aid workers, just as British-backed aid workers are now in Ukraine alongside brave Ukrainian soldiers. There are so many stories of the courage of aid workers across the world's conflict zones, where fighting is causing destruction, starvation and healthcare emergencies.
As a former royal marine, I understand the need to raise defence spending. But I urge the government to maintain as much of the vital development budget as we can. Our investments in conflict zones and our work preventing conflicts make us all safer.
Alex Ballinger MP served in the Royal Marines from 2005 to 2013. He is now the Labour MP for Halesowen and Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for the Armed Forces.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Popular clothing retailer to close almost 200 more stores in 2025
Popular clothing retailer to close almost 200 more stores in 2025

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Popular clothing retailer to close almost 200 more stores in 2025

Another popular clothing retailer is set to close nearly 200 locations in the US this year. Torrid, which sells plus-size women's apparel, plans to shutter up to 180 stores 'to better align our current demand and sales channels', according to the company's report for the first quarter of 2025. Digital sales have grown to represent almost 70% if Torrid's total demand from customers, according to CEO Lisa Harper. 'We're accelerating our transformation to a more digitally-led business, which includes optimizing our retail footprint,' stated Harper on Thursday. 'We now plan to close up to 180 underperforming stores this year—allowing us to reduce fixed costs and reinvest in areas that drive long-term growth, including customer acquisition and omnichannel enhancements.' Torrid plans to lean on its customer base, of which 95% are enrolled in its loyalty program, to work towards a 'digital transformation' aimed at growing its revenue. Harper added that the report for the quarter ending on May 3 shows 'results in line with expectations', including $266million in net sales. Torrid is launching Lovesick and Studio Luxe, and projects that the sub-brands will represent almost one-third of its business by next year. 'Our sub-brand strategy is delivering positive results, exceeding expectations and helping us reach new and younger customers while driving higher margin sales,' Harper stated. More Trending Torrid, which makes apparel for women sizes 10 to 30, has long been an American mall staple. The company has not disclosed which locations are on the chopping block this year. Torrid's upcoming closures come after once-reigning fast fashion clothing brand Forever 21 closed the last of its brick-and-mortar in the US early May. Forever 21 filed for bankruptcy for the second time in six years in March and placed part of the blame on online retailers like Shein, Temu and Amazon that until recently utilized the 'de minimis exemption' to avoid paying tariffs on imported goods under $800. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Six people killed after plane crashes into Pacific Ocean near San Diego MORE: Two dead after gunman opens fire outside Bellagio Hotel in Las Vegas MORE: Popular discount store announces another shop closure in blow to high street

Fury as BA calls Falkland Islands capital by its ARGENTINIAN name in ‘ludicrous and insulting' blunder
Fury as BA calls Falkland Islands capital by its ARGENTINIAN name in ‘ludicrous and insulting' blunder

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Fury as BA calls Falkland Islands capital by its ARGENTINIAN name in ‘ludicrous and insulting' blunder

Falklands war veterans slammed the error, which BA promised to investigate FALKLANDS FURY Fury as BA calls Falkland Islands capital by its ARGENTINIAN name in 'ludicrous and insulting' blunder BRITISH Airways has been branded disgraceful for using the Argentinian name for the capital of the Falklands Islands on in-flight entertainment screens. The UK's flag carrier airline refers to Port Stanley as Puerto Argentino. Advertisement 3 Port Stanley is the Falkland Islands' only city Credit: Rex 3 255 British military personnel died in the 74-day conflict in 1982 Credit: Getty The British title is relegated to a set of brackets underneath. Ed West, of The Spectator magazine, spotted the blunder and said: 'Curious wording for a British Airways in-flight map.' Last night, BA promised to investigate as the error was described as 'ludicrous' and 'insulting' by Falklands war veterans. Argentina still claims sovereignty but its invading forces lost the 74-day conflict in 1982. Advertisement British forces scrambled halfway around the world to put down General Leopoldo Galtieri's troops after they took Port Stanley in a surprise raid. This Saturday is the 43rd anniversary of Britain's victory. Former head of the Royal Navy, Admiral Lord West, who won the Distinguished Service Cross during the war, said the name error was 'disrespectful' to islanders. He told The Sun: 'It's disgraceful. Advertisement 'The Falklands are a British overseas territory and 99.9 per cent of islanders want to stay British. 'We have said very clearly there will be no discussions about sovereignty. The New British Airways First Class Seat 'For the flag carrier airline to give Port Stanley another name is unforgivable.' Lord West, whose HMS Ardent was sunk by Argentine forces, added: 'I don't know why they would do it. Advertisement 'Everyone on the Falkland Islands calls it Port Stanley. 'They should change it back as soon as possible. 'This is insulting to the population of Port Stanley.' In all, 255 British personnel lost their lives defending the islands. Advertisement In 2017 Argentina's senate voted to rename Port Stanley as Puerto Argentino and celebrate Sovereignty Day there if it is ever recaptured. The in-flight map shows only the names of world capitals and not countries' names. It means BA does not reference the Falklands by its Argentinian name Islas Malvinas. British Airways' parent company, International Airlines Group, is based in Spain. Advertisement A BA spokeswoman said: 'We are grateful this has been brought to our attention. 'We'll be reviewing it with the third party supplier that provides the in-flight map service.'

Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street

Leader Live

time2 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store