logo
Trump scraps Syria sanctions regime

Trump scraps Syria sanctions regime

Politico7 hours ago

President Donald Trump issued an executive order Monday to permanently revoke most sanctions on Syria — as the administration works to navigate upheaval in the Middle East and expand its effort to improve relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors.
The action will immediately terminate five executive orders that created the existing Syria sanctions program and direct the government to waive other sanctions on the books via Congress, export controls and other measures, according to administration officials who briefed reporters on the directive.
The move realizes a promise Trump made during a visit to Saudi Arabia in May to lift all sanctions on Syria. Saudi Arabia and Turkey have both pushed for the U.S. to remove the restrictions to facilitate reconstruction and allow its new leaders to see benefits from reintegration.
Later that month, the U.S. issued preliminary guidance to the public that effectively lifted most restrictions but the new executive order makes that permanent.
As part of the executive order, Trump will direct relevant agencies to examine scrapping sanctions that he cannot remove unilaterally, such as assessing what is required to suspend sanctions imposed under the Caesar Act and to revoke Syria's state sponsor of terror designation as well as one on HTS, the group headed by the country's leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, the officials said. The Caesar sanctions would ultimately have to be repealed by Congress.
The U.S. has had some level of sanctions on Syria since 1979, when the U.S. designated it a state sponsor of terrorism. The U.S. expanded those measures in 2004 over Syria's military presence in Lebanon and support for militant groups. In 2011, Washington imposed sweeping sanctions on Syrian officials, oil exports and the financial sector in response to President Bashar Assad's brutal crackdown on protesters.
But al-Sharaa, a former Islamist militant, toppled the Assad regime in December and has been leading the country's transition away from decades of the family's dictatorial rule. Trump's announcement has widespread support from civil society groups and aid organizations who say the current measures hinder restoring basic services and efforts to return foreign investment to the country and begin reconstruction activities following more than 13 years of war.
The U.S. will maintain sanctions on Assad, his associates and other destabilizing regional actors as well as measures targeting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, according to the administration officials.
Monday's order will create 'a blanket opportunity around all the things we need to turn back on this economy,' U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack told reporters in the briefing. He said the U.S. is creating the conditions for Syria's reintegration rather than dictating terms.
Critics of the Trump administration's approach worry that lifting all sanctions at once will give the U.S. little leverage with Syria's new government to incentivize good behavior.
Barrack argued the administration is taking a measured approach. 'They're saying, 'We are going to give you an opportunity.' We have a bunch of criteria that we want to watch along the way, and all those things that we've talked about that relate to pointing toward the Abraham Accords,' a series of normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states Trump brokered in his first term.
But Trump is removing the sanctions without any preconditions. One senior administration official said an early effort before Trump's trip to try to connect sanctions relief to meeting certain conditions demonstrated such an approach 'doesn't work.' The official was granted anonymity to brief reporters ahead of the announcement.
'The way to entice them to get into the Abraham Accords is to make it fruitful for them on an economic basis, on a civilization basis, on a peace and prosperity basis and that's all coming together,' the official said.
While the administration hopes Syria and Israel will move to normalize ties and they have begun back channel talks on doing so, officials said they understand this would be impossible without an end to the Gaza war. Administration officials have continued to be upbeat about the prospects even as talks have dragged on for months.
The senior administration official said the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran have created a window for such negotiations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rep. Greg Steube says passing Trump megabill in the House will likely ‘be a challenge'
Rep. Greg Steube says passing Trump megabill in the House will likely ‘be a challenge'

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Rep. Greg Steube says passing Trump megabill in the House will likely ‘be a challenge'

Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) said on Monday passing President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in the House will likely 'be a challenge.' 'I do think you're gonna have some challenges on the House side. We can only lose three votes,' Steube told NewsNation's Blake Burman on 'The Hill.' 'You've got 218 you got to get to, we can only lose three, if we lose four the bill's dead, and you've got things in here that moderates don't like, and you've got things in here that conservatives don't like. So, it is certainly going to be a challenge.' House moderate Republicans and hard-line conservatives have recently expressed rising opposition to the Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' only days before the lower chamber is set to consider the legislation. Democrats have already expressed their own vehement distaste for the bill, with members like Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) calling it a 'big bad betrayal bill' and Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) saying it is an 'evil bill.' 'If Republicans pass this big bad betrayal bill, they are quite literally ensuring that more poor Americans will DIE so that billionaires and giant corporations can get a tax cut,' Jayapal said in a post on the social platform X Monday. Former close Trump ally Elon Musk said Monday he would support primary challengers to any Republicans who backed Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk said on X.

Japanese manufacturers are slightly more optimistic despite Trump tariff worries
Japanese manufacturers are slightly more optimistic despite Trump tariff worries

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Japanese manufacturers are slightly more optimistic despite Trump tariff worries

TOKYO (AP) — Business sentiment among large Japanese manufacturers has improved slightly, according to a survey by Japan's central bank released Tuesday, although worries persist over President Donald Trump's tariffs. The Bank of Japan's quarterly tankan survey said an index for large manufacturers rose to plus 13 from plus 12 in March, when it marked the first dip in a year. The survey is an indicator of companies foreseeing good conditions minus those feeling pessimistic. Major manufacturers include auto and electronics sectors, whose exports to the U.S. drive the Japanese economy. U.S. auto tariffs are a worry for major manufacturers like Toyota Motor Corp., but some analysts note global auto sales have held up relatively well in recent months. The U.S. has imposed 25% tariffs on auto imports. Japanese automakers have plants in Mexico, where Trump has announced a separate set of tariffs. The U.S. has also imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Japanese officials have been talking frequently with the Trump administration, stressing that Japan is a key U.S. ally. Trump posted on his social media site Monday that Japan wasn't buying enough rice from the U.S. 'They won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' the president wrote, adding that a letter to Japan was coming. Also on Monday, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told reporters at the White House that Trump 'is going to finalize the frameworks we negotiated with a whole bunch of countries after the weekend.' The Bank of Japan, which has kept interest rates extremely low for years to encourage growth, is expected to continue to raise interest rates, but some analysts expect that to wait until next year. The central bank raised its benchmark rate to 0.5% from 0.1% at the start of this year and has maintained that rate. The next Bank of Japan monetary policy board meeting is at the end of this month. The tankan findings work as important data in weighing a decision. The weak yen has raised the cost of materials for Japan at a time when the U.S. dollar has been trading at around 140 yen, up considerably from about 110 yen five years ago. A weak yen is a boon for Japan's exporters by boosting the value of their earnings when converted into yen. The tankan showed sentiment for large non-manufacturers fell to plus 34 from plus 35. That was better than some forecasts, which projected a deeper decline. The Japanese government reported last week that the nation's unemployment rate in May stood at 2.5%, unchanged from the previous month. ___ Yuri Kageyama is on Threads:

Democrats fail to overturn ruling that tax cuts in GOP megabill don't add to deficit
Democrats fail to overturn ruling that tax cuts in GOP megabill don't add to deficit

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats fail to overturn ruling that tax cuts in GOP megabill don't add to deficit

The Senate voted along party lines Monday that making the expiring 2017 tax cuts permanent as part of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' could be scored as deficit neutral and therefore comply with the Byrd Rule, allowing the bill to pass with a simple-majority vote. Democrats failed to defeat the ruling by the Senate chair, which Republicans control, that the chamber's 940-page One Big, Beautiful Bill Act does not violate the 1974 Congressional Budget Act by using a controversial 'current policy' baseline to score the extension of President Trump's expiring tax cuts as not adding to the deficit. If the tax portion of the bill were scored on a 'current law' baseline, which assumes the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025, then it would add an estimated $3.5 trillion to federal deficits between 2025-34 and would add to deficits after 2034 — beyond the 10-year budget window allowed by the Byrd Rule. Scored this way, the Republican bill would fail the rule, which governs what legislation is eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote on the reconciliation fast track, and Republicans would be forced to rewrite large parts of the measure. But when scored with a 'current policy' baseline, the Congressional Budget Office projects the tax cuts in the Finance Committee's section of the bill would increase deficits by not more than $1.5 trillion between 2025-34 and would not increase on-budget deficits after 2034. Democrats argued a current policy baseline had never been used before in a budget reconciliation bill, and had never been used to score an extension of expiring tax cuts as not adding to future deficits, and therefore was not in compliance with the Senate's Byrd Rule. And Democrats highlighted over the weekend that most of the Republican reconciliation package uses a 'current law' baseline to project the cost of the legislation. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) accused Republicans of 'deploying fake math and budgetary hocus-pocus to make it seem like their billionaire giveaways don't cost anything.' Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) accused Republicans of 'going nuclear' to blow up the Senate rules so they can make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. 'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Wyden said on the floor. Wyden pointed out through a parliamentary inquiry that the Finance portion of the bill used two different baselines, current policy and current law. Senate Democrats had tried to schedule a meeting with Republican Budget Committee staff and with the parliamentarian to discuss whether using a current policy baseline violated Senate precedent and the Byrd Rule, but Republicans 'flat-out refused' to participate in such a meeting, according to a person familiar with the conversations. Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday morning that Republicans are not overruling the parliamentarian and asserted the parliamentarian has said it is up to him as Budget chair to set the baseline. And he argued Democrats in the past have supported the use of a current policy baseline to project the cost of legislation, although it hasn't been done before for a budget reconciliation package. He noted former Democratic Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (N.D.) used a current policy baseline for a past farm bill. Republicans also point out former President Obama's budget office supported using a current policy baseline to score the extension of the expiring tax cuts from the George W. Bush era at the end of 2012. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said on the floor Monday that former Obama Director of the Office of Management and Budget Jeff Zients supported using the current policy baseline for the 2012 fiscal cliff deal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store