Mum shares agonising photos of her baby's blistered face after making chilling SPF discovery all parents should know
They were only outside for three hours, but later that day, 12-month-old Rhegan was 'literally bright glowing red'. By the next morning, she was covered in huge fluid-filled blisters.
13
13
The youngster was rushed to the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People in Edinburgh, where a nurse warned that her face would peel back to raw skin.
Lauren, 22, now wants to warn other parents.
The carer, from Dalkeith, Midlothian, tells Sun Health: 'I just want to make people aware.
'I thought, 'It's Scotland, how can she burn that badly with sun cream?' It's crazy.
'She's in agony. It's such a wee shame.'
The family visited the farm show in Haddington, East Lothian, on June 28.
It was an overcast day, with highs of just 18C.
'Kai and I both had jumpers on,' Lauren says.
'It was chilly and I actually remember thinking to myself, 'Do I bother with sun cream or not?', but I thought, 'I'll put it on just to be safe'.'
She applied Malibu Kids Factor 50 sun cream, which is labelled as 'high protection' and 'clinically proven to be kind to skin'.
Parents warned 3 common summer foods are dangerous to toddlers - and eating a specific fruit can cause nasty sunburn
'We were out from 10.30am to 1.30pm then went straight home,' Lauren says.
'Rhegan was sleeping in her car seat and when she woke up, she was literally bright glowing red.
'The highest recorded temperature that day was 18C and that would have been later in the afternoon, so we would have been home by then.'
Lauren initially applied aloe vera and aftersun, but Rhegan's condition worsened overnight.
'She woke up in the morning and she was just so blistered - huge big filled blisters,' Lauren says.
'As soon as we saw we took her right to hospital.
'I just felt panic straight away and just the guilt was awful.'
Doctors were 'shocked' by the injuries and treated Rhegan with ointment. They advised that she stay indoors for a minimum of two weeks.
Lauren says: 'She's in agony. Every time I have to put the cream on her I literally have to pin her down.
'It's so sore for her. It's open skin I'm having to touch with the cream.'
Lauren says she trusted the sun cream because it was labelled as a kids' factor 50 product, but she's vowed never to use it again.
'It's so, so sad and you feel so guilty, but you just look at a bottle and think, 'Factor 50 for kids, perfect, what can go wrong?',' she adds.
'You just think that if they've got sun cream on then they can go and play in the sun.
'We weren't even abroad, we were literally on our doorstep in Scotland - you wouldn't think that it could ever happen.
'We've never used that sun cream before, that was the first time. God I would never ever again use it.'
13
13
13
13
Lauren is now urging other parents to check UVA star ratings on products before using them on children.
The index ranges from 0 to 5 stars, indicating the percentage of UVA radiation absorbed by the sunscreen in comparison to UVB.
The higher number, the more balanced the protection is.
The NHS recommends using lotions with a UVA star rating of at least four. The product Lauren used was only rated three.
It doesn't mean it doesn't work, but a higher rating means better protection against burns and skin cancer.
'I would say just absolutely research the sun cream you're using on your child beforehand,' she says.
'Check the ratings. Ratings on sun creams go by stars. Five-star is the best and that one was only a three-star.
'Had I known that, I would never have bought that product.'
Rhegan is still in pain, and Lauren says her daughter's face 'only seems to be getting worse'.
What does the UVA star rating mean?
THE star rating for sun cream bottles was developed to illustrate the balanced protection that a product offers against both UVA and UVB rays.
The index ranges from 0 to 5 stars. These indicate the percentage of UVA radiation absorbed by the sunscreen in comparison to UVB.
The higher number of stars means the more balanced that protection is.
You may also see the letters 'UVA' in a circle, which means the product has been approved by the EU.
It is another way of saying that the product provides good balanced protection against UVA and UVB.
Why should people care about choosing a sunscreen with high SPF and high UV protection?
Extended exposure to the sun can lead to skin damage, experts say.
There are four types of skin damage: skin ageing, hyperpigmentation, sunburns, and skin cancer.
"By protecting yourself from the sun, you reduce the likelihood of damaging your skin," the British Association of Dermatologists says.
"Make use of the shade during the hours of high intensity (11am and 3pm in the UK typically), wear clothing that will shade your skin, and use sunscreen with at least SPF30 and either the UVA logo or 4 to 5 stars, making sure you're applying it well and re-applying it regularly."
Source: British Association of Dermatologists
'She is still so sore,' she adds.
'The nurse in the hospital said that pretty much her whole face will just peel back to just raw skin.
'But she still is herself I suppose, just a bit less so.
'I am worried about scarring.
'Obviously because it's her face and with her being a wee girl, I just hope that it doesn't leave her marked.'
SUMMER FEARS
Lauren says she now fears taking her daughter out in the sun.
'I'm worried, so we definitely won't take her out again this summer,' she says.
'She will have to stay indoors for two weeks but the rest of the summer she won't be out in the sun.
'It was just her birthday and she got loads of garden toys, including a sand pit, but that will definitely not be used this year.'
A spokesperson for Malibu Sun said it has sent the company's complaints information pack to Lauren and is waiting to hear back to investigate further.
13
13
13
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scots going private and paying £2.5k for cataract surgery amid an SNP waiting list crisis for eye operations
Thousands hard-pressed Scots are raiding their savings to pay for cataract surgery amid soaring NHS waiting lists, MailOnline can reveal. Latest figures show 8,500 people north of the Border shelled out around £2,500 for the operation last year – more than double the number who went private in 2019. Some 19,000 people are currently stuck on an NHS waiting list for the eye surgery across Scotland. One patient under the care of NHS Grampian has been waiting for more than three years to receive treatment. The figures expose the scale of the NHS waiting times crisis under the SNP – and the lengths to which Scots are going in order to get timely care. Public Health Scotland last month admitted waits of more than two years for specialist NHS appointments and treatment were at record highs. It said the number of people stranded on a waiting list after being referred for an outpatient clinic more than two years ago stood at 5,262. That is despite First Minister John Swinney setting out in January that he would bring down waiting lists. Last night, Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: 'I can only imagine the panic and distress that these waits are causing for patients. I know NHS staff are working hard to get waiting lists down but they are not getting the support they need from bosses and ministers... It's clear the SNP have no plan for tackling long waits for complex specialties.' Data obtained via the Private Healthcare Market Information group shows that 8,500 Scots paid for cataract operations out of their own pocket in 2024, more than double the 4,075 people forced to go private for the surgery in 2019. Figures obtained by Mr Cole-Hamilton's party found long NHS waits for cataract surgery – in which the eye's cloudy lens is swapped for a clear artificial lens – at a number of health boards. NHS Grampian admitted one person had been waiting for 1,253 days – almost three-and-a-half years. The longest waits elsewhere include 869 days in NHS Shetland, 824 days in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 680 days in NHS Ayrshire and Arran, 644 days in NHS Borders, 548 days in NHS Fife, 532 days in NHS Lanarkshire and 508 days in NHS Highland. Meanwhile, the figures show that in total 18,956 Scots are on a cataract waiting list, with the longest list being in NHS Ayrshire and Arran, where 3,207 people have been referred. Embattled NHS Fife comes in second, with 2,440 patients waiting for the surgery. Embattled NHS Fife comes in second, with 2,440 patients waiting for the surgery. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'We have allocated £106million to health boards to help tackle the longest waits and deliver over 150,000 additional appointments and procedures.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE SNP MSP breaks ranks to call for NHS Fife boss Carol Potter and her board to RESIGN over gender storm
A Nationalist MSP has broken party ranks to urge NHS Fife bosses to quit over their handling of a transgender legal battle. Michelle Thomson last night hit out at the health board as it was revealed the dispute with nurse Sandie Peggie had so far cost taxpayers £220,500. The Falkirk East MSP is the first serving SNP politician to condemn NHS Fife's handling of the landmark tribunal relating to single-sex spaces. She accused the board – headed by chief executive Carol Potter, who earns at least £147,700 a year – of a seemingly 'breathtaking disregard for their duties of good governance and candour'. And the MSP raised concerns about the 'direct, and indirect cost to the public purse... at a time when the wider NHS is struggling'. Heaping pressure on Health Secretary Neil Gray to step in, Ms Thomson said she would be 'disappointed' if he continued to insist he had confidence in the board. Her intervention follows revelations last week that the health board had spent hundreds of thousands of pounds defending itself and trans medic Dr Beth Upton against a claim brought by Mrs Peggie. The 50-year-old A&E nurse has taken her case to an employment tribunal after being suspended from her job. NHS Fife chiefs took action against her after she challenged the presence of Dr Upton, born a biological male, in the female changing rooms at Kirkcaldy's Victoria Hospital. The huge costs associated with the ongoing tribunal were revealed on Wednesday following a months-long transparency battle between MailOnline and the health board. However, those close to the case said the true legal bill could climb to around £1 million once the tribunal, which continues this week, concludes. That would likely include extra internal legal costs and fees for outside counsel for NHS Fife, which is using an expensive English-based KC to defend their position, as well as the claimant Sandie Peggie's legal fees, which can later be requested from the health board. The case started before April's Supreme Court ruling clarified that the definition of a woman under the Equality Act 2010 is based on biological sex, meaning trans women have no automatic right to access female-only spaces. Last night Ms Thomson said: 'It cannot just be me who has considered what on earth is going on in the board of NHS Fife. 'The Supreme Court judgement was extremely clear, and so to then proceed with the remainder of the Peggie hearing when it can only result in abject failure for them seems to have breathtaking disregard for their duties of good governance and candour.' She added: 'The cost to the public purse will be significant at a time when the wider NHS is struggling. 'It's clear to me that all of the board must consider their position'. She added she would be 'extremely surprised and disappointed' if My Gray continued to claim he had confidence in NHS Fife and its leadership. Last week NHS Fife conceded that as of May 31, 2025, a total of £220,465.93 had been spent on legal costs relating to the tribunal. It was noted that the sum could pay for nine nursing assistant starting salaries of £23,362 or around 40 hip replacements. The Scottish Government last night said the Health Secretary continues to have confidence in NHS Fife and its leadership.
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
EasyJet served me ROTTEN ham on flight home… I turned green & now airline has been forced into food packaging overhaul
The airline launched an immediate investigation into food packaging 'ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTED' EasyJet served me ROTTEN ham on flight home… I turned green & now airline has been forced into food packaging overhaul Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A DAD turned green after being served "rancid" ham covered in mould on an easyJet flight - with the airline subsequently ordering a packaging overhaul. Idriss, 37, bought a Spanish tapas box for around £8 during a flight from Santorini to Gatwick on June 29. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 The rotten ham has led to a major packaging overhaul Credit: Supplied 4 Dad Idriss said he was nearly very ill Credit: Supplied 4 easyJet has ordered new packaging seals Credit: Alamy But found the ham was rotting, despite being in date, with Idriss saying he was almost sick - and fears other passengers could be at risk. As a result, the airline has now ordered a food supplier to implement "corrective measures" in the form of an improved packaging seal, The Sun can reveal. Idriss told us: "When I opened up the pack of ham it was absolutely disgusting, in the top corner it was all really mouldy. "It was really awful. It is lucky I didn't eat it because with meat that's gone off you could likely be very sick." However, musician Idriss, from Surrey, did initially accidentally put the rotten meat in his mouth and said it tasted of "sewage". The flight attendant offered a free replacement but Idriss declined, adding: "To be honest, it's put me off ham. I don't want to eat ham at all, it was so grim. "Imagine if I'd have eaten it. With ham, or pig meat you have to be so careful - I could've literally been so ill." He added: "I don't know how it can go off when it's packed in that air tight. "It did smell off, as soon as I opened it I could smell it." After emailing easyJet when he got home, the dad - who spends over £30,000 a year with the airline due to work travel commitments - he was told the issue was caused by "a broken packaging seal". Drunk offshore worker causes carnage on Scotland-bound easyJet flight after partner dumps him In the email, seen by The Sun, Idriss was told: "After reviewing this incident, I can confirm that the mould was caused by a broken packaging seal. "As a result, the supplier is implementing corrective measures by introducing a new packaging format with an improved sealing style. "We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of food safety across our operations and continue to closely monitor feedback related to food safety to ensure that all food supplied to our customers and crew is safe and of good quality. "We apologise that your experience did not meet these expectations." An airline spokesperson told The Sun: "We take food safety onboard very seriously and as this is well below the standards we expect for our customers. "We immediately raised [Idriss'] experience with our supplier who identified this isolated incident was caused by damaged packaging, and have taken steps to ensure this does not happen in future. "We have been in touch with [Idriss'] to apologise and have offered a gesture of goodwill for his experience." Do you know more? Email
