logo
Childhood cancers which take longest to diagnose revealed in new study

Childhood cancers which take longest to diagnose revealed in new study

Teenagers and children with bone tumours in the UK are facing longer waits for cancer diagnosis, according to a new review.
Babies and those with kidney cancer wait the shortest period before they are diagnosed, academics found.
Researchers, led by University of Nottingham, analysed data on 2,000 children diagnosed with cancer between September 2020 and March 2023.
Untreated, tumours grow bigger and can spread around the body, requiring more extensive surgery and more intensive therapies to offer a cure.
On average, children with cancer were diagnosed within 4.6 weeks.
While some children were diagnosed on the same day their symptoms began, others waited up to six years, experts found.
The time to diagnosis was found to be longest among 15 to 18-year-olds, who waited for an average of 8.7 weeks before they were told they had cancer.
And those with bone cancer were found to wait for more than three months on average, or 12.6 weeks.
Meanwhile children under the age of one waited just 3.7 weeks before diagnosis and children with kidney cancer, also known as renal cancer, waited for an average of 2.3 weeks before they were diagnosed.
But they said that overall, half of children and young people diagnosed with cancer in the UK are waiting for four weeks or more to be diagnosed.
They also studied where children were diagnosed and found the majority (67%) were diagnosed after a trip to A&E, after an emergency referral or emergency admission to hospital.
Some cancer types, including bone tumours, soft tissue tumours Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis and brain tumours, were associated with a higher number of medical visits before diagnosis.
Writing in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe, researchers said their work highlights 'disparities for age and diagnostics groups' when it comes to cancer diagnoses as they called for more efforts to 'accelerating diagnosis' for those facing 'lengthy' waits.
They said the findings could help inform health officials as they draw up a national cancer plan for England.
Dr Shaarna Shanmugavadivel, from the School of Medicine at the University of Nottingham, said: 'For the first time, we understand the current landscape of childhood cancer diagnosis in the UK.
'There is an urgent need to focus efforts on young people and tumour types such as bone tumours that are still experiencing lengthy intervals.
'Earliest possible diagnosis is key as time is crucial.
'Untreated, tumours grow bigger and can spread around the body, requiring more extensive surgery and more intensive therapies to offer cure.
'The findings will help focus efforts towards closing the gap for these groups, ensuring more children and young people receive a diagnosis sooner.'
Ashley Ball-Gamble, chief executive of CCLG: The Children and Young People's Cancer Association, and co-author of the study, added: 'It's crucial that we understand why certain groups, such as older teenagers, or those with certain cancers, such as bone and brain tumours, are likely to face a lengthier diagnosis.
'By recognising these differences, we hope to work towards faster diagnoses and improved survival rates.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Northampton hospital 'had A&E patients in chairs for 22 hours'
Northampton hospital 'had A&E patients in chairs for 22 hours'

BBC News

time10 hours ago

  • BBC News

Northampton hospital 'had A&E patients in chairs for 22 hours'

A hospital where A&E patients were left waiting in chairs for 22 hours has been downgraded by General Hospital's Care Quality Commission (CQC) grading has been changed from good to requires improvement following the surprise inspection in February, which found three breaches of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safe staffing and health watchdog issued the hospital with a warning notice because of overcrowding in the emergency department and poor flow of patients through different stages of hospital has apologised to patients and says it has "undertaken significant work" to address the concerns since the inspection. CQC inspectors who visited the emergency department found "widespread care... in ambulances, waiting rooms and corridors".They recorded that, on the afternoon of 19 February 2025, the department had almost double its capacity of patients and the longest wait for a bed was 46 CQC said: "Patients were waiting on chairs for over 22 hours, including elderly patients." Alarms were sounding to indicate that some people were deteriorating but there were no resuscitation beds for patient who was identified as being at risk of pressure sores, and had been in the department for 25 hours, had been given no mitigation inspectors spoke to patients in medical wards, they were told there was no privacy because extra beds had been brought into the CQC said patients were not always being discharged at the point when they no longer needed medical treatment as were staying for an average of 16.6 days, which was significantly higher than the England average of 11.7 days. The inspectors said they had observed a clinical emergency in an area where additional beds had been placed in bays. The "space for additional staff and equipment was compromised but staff ensured this did not compromise... the treatment", their report also found there were instances where medication given to patients was not accurately at the hospital did not always "work with staff when incidents happen to identify what went wrong", the report of regulations were found in safety of treatment, staffing and inspectors did find leaders and staff worked closely together to deliver care and staff understood their responsibilities for safeguarding and protecting people from harm. The medical director of University Hospitals of Northamptonshire, Hemant Nemade, said: "We are truly sorry that we have not provided the level of care that our communities need and deserve."Since the inspection was carried out in February 2025, we have undertaken significant work to address the CQC's concerns."Many new processes are now in place to improve and monitor safety and care, enhance privacy and dignity and improve how we support patients." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Increase in cancer survival rates has slowed, worried experts warn
Increase in cancer survival rates has slowed, worried experts warn

Times

time16 hours ago

  • Times

Increase in cancer survival rates has slowed, worried experts warn

Progress in cancer survival rates has slowed down, experts said, and the gap is wider than ever before between those surviving the deadliest cancers and those living through the least deadly. Research led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and funded by Cancer Research UK looked at the Cancer Survival Index for adults in England and Wales from 1971 to 2018. The researchers found that 49.8 per cent of cancer patients survived to a decade after diagnosis, a rate higher than the one-year survival rate in 1971 and 1972. The team, writing in the journal Lancet Regional Health, Europe, hailed the improvement as 'remarkable', but also noted that the 'speed of improvement in survival has slowed down'. Between 2000-01 and 2005-06, the ten-year survival rate rose from 41.2 per cent to 45.2. However between 2010-11 and 2015-16, the improvement in survival rates was from 47.9 to 49.3 per cent. The difference between the survival rates of different types of cancers remained large: 97 per cent of testicular cancer patients survived for ten years, but only 4.3 per cent of pancreatic cancer patients made it to a decade after diagnosis. Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'Thanks to research, most patients today are far more likely to survive their cancer than at any point in the past. But the reality is that this progress is slowing and for some cancers, it never got going in the first place.' According to the charity, screening programmes have improved survival rates for cancers in the breast, bowel and cervix. For other types such as stomach, lung and brain cancer, they had increased by only a fraction in the past 50 years. The government has launched a call for evidence to shape a national cancer plan in February. It will aim to outline changes in treatment to reduce deaths. Mitchell added: 'The upcoming national cancer plan for England must include commitments to spot more cancers earlier, as well as backing research into new treatments so that each patient, regardless of their diagnosis, can hope for more moments with the people they love.' Michel Coleman, a professor of epidemiology and statistics at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: 'Since I began my career in cancer research I've seen substantial increases in survival for most types of cancer. 'Our understanding of cancer biology has expanded, effective screening programmes have been introduced, and new treatments have been developed. Allowing this trend to stall will have devastating consequences.' The study was conducted using data from about 10.8 million people, available through records from the National Disease Registration Service and the Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'We are prioritising cancer care as we turn around more than a decade of neglect of our NHS. 'We're already seeing progress, with 95,000 more people having cancer diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days between July 2024 and May 2025, compared to the same period the previous year. 'The National Cancer Plan will set out how we will improve survival rates further and address the variation between different cancer types.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store