
China to drop Tibetan as core subject in university entrance exams, sparking fears of cultural erasure
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Beijing's push to intensify Sinicization across the Tibetan Plateau has taken a significant step forward, with the Communist Party of China's top Tibetan leader announcing that the Tibetan language will no longer be a core subject in the region's national college entrance examination for most students, Tibetan Review reported on August 7, citing the Financial Times.Gama Cedain, chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) government and the region's deputy party secretary, told a press briefing in Beijing this week that the decision was part of reforms to the gaokao, China's highly competitive national examination, and would, in his words, "improve Tibetans' career prospects." The announcement comes amid President Xi Jinping's Han-centric assimilation policies, which exile Tibetans and rights groups see as an attempt to erase the region's linguistic and cultural identity, Tibetan Review noted.Under the new system, "Tibet, like other provinces and regions," will have "unified exam subjects" such as Chinese, mathematics, and foreign languages, including English, Russian, Japanese, French, German, and Spanish. Tibetan will only be available as an optional subject for students applying to specialised fields like Tibetan literature, meaning only a small fraction of Tibetan students will take it, Tibetan Review said, citing local officials.Gama Cedain framed the change as a move to ensure "fairer access to high-quality education" for all ethnic groups in TAR, most of whom are Han Chinese. But critics argue that this framing masks the deeper objective of weakening Tibetan language education "Once you no longer have the Tibetan language in your entry exam, it no longer is a legal means of communication or useful to seek a profession or get a job," Dawa Tsering, director of the Dharamshala-based Tibet Policy Institute, told Tibetan Review.The publication recalled that similar rhetoric was used by Zhou Yongkang, the former State Security chief, when he oversaw Sinicisation measures in Sichuan's historically Tibetan areas between 2000 and 2002.According to the Tibetan Review, TAR began education reforms in 2024, and officials in six Tibetan prefectures have indicated the new exam rules will be implemented in 2026. The changes have reportedly been communicated verbally to teachers and students over recent months.UN human rights experts have repeatedly warned Beijing against policies that undermine the linguistic and religious heritage of Tibetans. Nevertheless, Tibetan Review stressed that under Xi, the CPC has escalated assimilationist policies toward ethnic minorities, framing them as "modernisation" while narrowing the space for cultural preservation.The August 5 press conference, organised by the State Council Information Office in Beijing, was intended to highlight six decades of socioeconomic development in TAR. Instead, it underscored Beijing's determination to align Tibetan education and identity ever closer to the Han Chinese mainstream.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
As Gaza Starves, A Look At Historic Use Of Famine As Weapon of War
There is increasing evidence that "widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease" are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths" in Gaza, a group of United Nations and aid organizations have repeatedly warned. A July 29, 2025, alert by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a global initiative for improving food security and nutrition, reported that the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip," as access to food and other essential items is dropping to an "unprecedented level." More than 500,000 Palestinians, one-fourth of Gaza's population, are experiencing famine, the U.N. stated. And all 320,000 children under age 5 are "at risk of acute malnutrition, with serious lifelong physical and mental health consequences." U.N. experts have accused Israel of using starvation "as a savage weapon of war and constitutes crime under international law." They are calling on Israel to urgently "restore the UN humanitarian system in Gaza." Israel is not the only government in history to cut off access to food and water as a tool of war. As an Indigenous scholar who studies Indigenous history, I know that countries - including the United States and Canada - have used starvation to conquer Indigenous peoples and acquire their land. As a descendant of ancestors who endured forced starvation by the U.S. government, I also know of its enduring consequences. Dismantling Indigenous food systems From the founding of the U.S. and Canada through the 20th century, settler colonizers often tried to destroy Indigenous communities' access to food, whether it was their farms and livestock or their ability to access land with wild animals - with the ultimate aim of forcing them off the land. In 1791, President George Washington ordered Secretary of War Henry Knox to destroy farms and livestock of the Wea Tribe that lived along the Ohio River valley - a fertile area with a long history of growing corn, beans, squash and other fruits and vegetables. Knox burned down their "corn fields, uprooted vegetable gardens, chopped down apple orchards, reduced every house to ash, [and] killed the Indians who attempted to escape," historian Susan Sleeper-Smith noted in her 2018 book, "Indigenous Prosperity and American Conquest." Women and children were taken hostage. The goal was to destroy villages and farms so that Indigenous people would leave and not return. Seventy-two years later, General Kit Carson conducted a scorched-earth campaign to remove the Navajo from what is now Arizona and New Mexico. Similar to Knox, he destroyed their villages, crops and water supply, killed their livestock and chopped down over 4,000 peach trees. The U.S. military forced over 10,000 Navajo to leave their homeland. Indigenous famine By the late 19th century, numerous famines struck Indigenous communities in both the U.S. and Canada due to the "targeted, swift, wholesale destruction" of bison by settlers, according to historian Dan Flores; this, too, was done in an effort to acquire more Indigenous land. One U.S. military colonel stated at the time: "Kill every buffalo you can! Every buffalo dead is an Indian gone." There were an estimated 60 million bison before U.S. and Canadian settlement; by the 1890s, there were fewer than 1,000. Indigenous communities on the northern Great Plains in both the U.S. and Canada, who believed bison were a sacred animal and who relied on them for food, clothing and other daily needs, now had nothing to eat. Historian James Daschuk revealed in his 2013 book, "Clearing the Plains: Disease, Politics of Starvation, and the Loss of Aboriginal Life," that between 1878 to 1880, Canadian Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald did little to stop a multiyear famine on the Canadian Plains, in what is now Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Macdonald did not hide his intentions. He and his government, he said, were "doing all we can, by refusing food until the Indians are on the verge of starvation." Indigenous peoples on the Canadian Plains were forced to eat their dogs, horses, the carcasses of poisoned wolves and even their own moccasins. All the Indigenous peoples in the region - an estimated 26,500 people - suffered from the famine. Hundreds died from starvation and disease. Malcolm C. Cameron, a House of Commons member at the time, accused his government of using "a policy of submission shaped by a policy of starvation" against Indigenous peoples. His denunciation did little to change their policy. What my great-grandparents experienced Many Indigenous peoples' families in the U.S. and Canada have stories of surviving forced starvation by the government. Mine does, too. In the winter of 1883-1884, my grandmother and grandfather's parents experienced what is remembered as the "starvation winter" on the Blackfeet reservation in what is now Montana. Similar to what happened in Canada, the near extinction of bison by American settlers led to a famine on the Blackfeet reservation. In an effort to slow the famine, Blackfeet leaders purchased food with their own money, but the U.S. government supply system delayed its arrival, creating a dire situation. Blackfeet leaders documented 600 deaths by starvation that one winter, while the U.S. government documented half that amount. As historian John Ewers noted, the nearby "well-fed settlers" did nothing and did not offer "any effective aid to the Blackfeet." My family survived because a few men and women within our family were able to travel far off the reservation by horseback to hunt and harvest Native foods. I was told the story of the "starvation winter" my entire life, as were most Blackfeet. And I now share these stories with my own children. Weapon of war Thousands of children in Gaza are malnourished and dying of hunger-related causes. Due to mounting international pressure, Israel is pausing its attacks in some parts of Gaza for a few hours each day to allow for some aid, but experts have noted it is not enough. "We're talking about 2 million people. It's not 100 trucks or a pausing or a few hours of calm that is going to meet the needs of a population that has been starved for months," Oxfam official Bushra Khalidi told The New York Times. "This is no longer a looming hunger crisis - this is starvation, pure and simple," Ramesh Rajasingham, director of the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, said on Aug. 10, 2025. Many might assume that the use of starvation as a weapon of war happened only in the past. Yet, in places like Gaza, it is happening now. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. The Conversation is wholly responsible for the content.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
No upper hand for US? Why Donald Trump has extended tariff truce with China for another 90 days
Experts believe Trump has not been able to effectively influence China with his trade war tactics. (AI image) US President Trump has extended the trade ceasefire with China by an additional 90 days, temporarily averting a potential economic confrontation between the world's largest economies. Trump said he has been "dealing very nicely with China" as Beijing said it was seeking positive outcomes. Through his Truth Social platform, Trump confirmed signing the executive order for the extension, maintaining that "all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same." Simultaneously, China's Ministry of Commerce announced their matching extension of the tariff suspension. The previous arrangement was due to lapse at 12:01 am Tuesday. Without this extension, the United States could have increased taxes on Chinese imports beyond the existing 30%, potentially triggering Beijing to elevate retaliatory duties on American exports to China. This extended pause provides additional time for both nations to resolve their differences, possibly setting the stage for a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year. American businesses engaged in Chinese trade have responded positively to this development. Also Read | 'China issue more complicated…': After tariff on India, will Donald Trump impose additional duties on China for Russia oil trade? What JD Vance said The US-China Business Council's president, Sean Stein, emphasised that the extension is "critical" for allowing both governments to negotiate a trade agreement. American businesses anticipate this will enhance their access to Chinese markets and provide the stability needed for medium and long-term planning. "Securing an agreement on fentanyl that leads to a reduction in US tariffs and a rollback of China's retaliatory measures is acutely needed to restart US agriculture and energy exports," Stein was quoted as saying by the Associated Press. What Trump's executive order on China said 'The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC (People's Republic of China) to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns,' said the executive order. 'Through these discussions, the PRC continues to take significant steps toward remedying non-reciprocal trade arrangements and addressing the concerns of the United States relating to economic and national security matters,' Trump's order said. 'Based on this additional information and recommendations from various senior officials, among other things, I have determined that it is necessary and appropriate to continue the suspension effectuated by Executive Order 14298 until 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on November 10, 2025,' the order added. Why Trump is extending the rope to China Beyond the language of the executive order passed by Trump, experts believe Trump has not been able to effectively influence China with his trade war tactics. Trump's unfinished agenda includes securing a trade agreement with China, following his significant disruption of global trade through the implementation of substantial tariffs on nearly all nations. Trading partners, including the European Union and Japan, have conceded to asymmetrical trade agreements with Trump, accepting unprecedented US tariff rates (such as 15% on Japanese and EU imports) to avoid more severe consequences. Also Read | 'US has gone rogue on trade...': Jefferies' Chris Wood calls Donald Trump's 50% tariff on India a 'xenophobic autarky'; slams 'beggar thy neighbour' policy The United States has transformed from a predominantly open economy to one characterised by protectionist measures under Trump's trade policies. According to the Budget Lab at Yale University, the average US tariff has increased substantially from approximately 2.5% at the year's beginning to 18.6%, marking the highest level since 1933. So why is Trump being somewhat lenient in his policies with China? Experts feel the answer lies in critical minerals. China has challenged the effectiveness of US trade policies that relied on tariffs as leverage for negotiations. Beijing wielded significant influence through its control over rare earth minerals and magnets, which are essential components in various industries from automotive to aerospace, according to the AP report. The US has agreed to reduce restrictions on exports of computer chip technology and ethane for petrochemical production, whilst China committed to improving US companies' access to rare earth materials. "The US has realised it does not have the upper hand,'' Claire Reade, senior counsel at Arnold & Porter and former assistant US trade representative for China affairs was quoted as saying in the AP report. In May, the US and China avoided an economic crisis by lowering substantial mutual tariffs, which had previously escalated to 145% against China and 125% against the US. Also Read | Donald Trump tariffs: How much will India's fuel bill rise if it stops Russian crude oil imports & where would it buy from? Explained The substantial tariff rates nearly halted commerce between China and the United States, triggering a concerning downturn in global stock markets. During discussions in Geneva in May, both nations agreed to reduce their rates, with the US lowering to 30% and China decreasing to 10%, whilst continuing negotiations. Since demonstrating their mutual capacity to inflict economic damage, both nations have maintained diplomatic dialogue. "By overestimating the ability of steep tariffs to induce economic concessions from China, the Trump administration has not only underscored the limits of unilateral US leverage, but also given Beijing grounds for believing that it can indefinitely enjoy the upper hand in subsequent talks with Washington by threatening to curtail rare earth exports,'' said Ali Wyne, a specialist in US-China relations at the International Crisis Group. "The administration's desire for a trade detente stems from the self-inflicted consequences of its earlier hubris." US-China trade deal: What's the road ahead? Experts feel that the prospects of a comprehensive agreement between Washington and Beijing addressing major US concerns remain uncertain. These concerns include China's inadequate intellectual property protection and their government's support policies, which US officials argue provide Chinese companies unfair competitive advantages globally and have led to a substantial US-China trade deficit of $262 billion in the previous year. Also Read | India-US trade deal: With Donald Trump's 50% tariffs looming, India reviews market access offers for US; three-pronged strategy to protect exporters Limited agreements appear more feasible, according to Reade, such as Chinese commitments to increase American soybean purchases and enhance controls on fentanyl-related chemical exports, whilst maintaining the supply of rare-earth magnets. However, Jeff Moon, who previously served as a US diplomat and trade official and currently heads China Moon Strategies consultancy, suggests that more complex issues will persist, noting that "the trade war will continue grinding ahead for years into the future.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Foreign ministers of 25 countries urge Israel to let aid into Gaza as humanitarian crisis deepens
'The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised,' the foreign ministers said in a joint statement Palestinians collect humanitarian aid packages from the United Arab Emirates after they were airdropped into Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza Strip, on Saturday. AP File The foreign ministers of 25 countries, including the UK, France, Australia, Spain, Japan, and several European Union representatives, have warned that humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached 'unimaginable levels,' and called on the Israeli government to allow essential humanitarian actors to operate in Gaza. 'The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised,' The Guardian quoted the foreign ministers as saying in a joint statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'However, due to restrictive new registration requirements, essential international NGOs may be forced to leave the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs) imminently which would worsen the humanitarian situation still further,' the statement added. The group of countries urged Israel to authorise international NGO aid shipments, unblock humanitarian actors, and allow full access to the region for the UN and other partners. 'We call on the government of Israel to provide authorisation for all international NGO aid shipments and to unblock essential humanitarian actors from operating. Immediate, permanent and concrete steps must be taken to facilitate safe, large-scale access for the UN, international NGOs and humanitarian partners. All crossings and routes must be used to allow a flood of aid into Gaza, including food, nutrition supplies, shelter, fuel, clean water, medicine and medical equipment,' the statement further said. The joint statement also condemned the use of lethal force at aid distribution sites and demanded protection for civilians, aid workers, and medical staff. The ministers expressed support for diplomatic efforts by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt to broker a ceasefire. 'We are grateful to the US, Qatar and Egypt for their efforts in pushing for a ceasefire and pursuing peace. We need a ceasefire that can end the war, for hostages to be released and aid to enter Gaza by land unhindered,' the statement added. Signatories include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and senior representatives from the European Union. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD More than 60,000 people have been killed in the Gaza war so far, according to Palestinian authorities, with a significant number of the victims reported to be women and children. Gaza's Health Ministry said at least 217 people — including 100 children — have died from starvation amid severe shortages of food and humanitarian aid. While Israel disputes these figures, it has not released alternative data. The United Nations has said the reported toll is largely credible and may even understate the true scale of the devastation. The war was triggered by a Hamas-led cross-border assault on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, in which militants killed around 1,200 people and abducted more than 250 others, according to Israeli officials. With inputs from agencies