Art relocation is a fine art. Master it
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
The Indian art market has witnessed remarkable growth, with a 265% increase between 2013 and 2023. This surge, driven by heightened visibility through auctions and global recognition of Indian artists, has led to a rise in art investments. As more collectors and institutions acquire fine art, ensuring secure and efficient relocation is critical. Fine art relocation presents challenges, each requiring specialised solutions: Customs and taxation complexities Navigating the regulatory landscape can be intricate, with varying customs laws and taxation policies across jurisdictions. Delays and unexpected costs often arise due to differing interpretations of regulations.Risk of damage and theft Artworks are susceptible to damage from environmental factors such as humidity, temperature fluctuations and improper handling. Theft during transit is a concern, necessitating advanced security measures.Authenticity and provenance assurance Verifying authenticity and documented history of artworks is crucial, especially during international relocations where legal disputes or ownership claims may arise. In this case, a concrete, legal and verifiable proof of ownership document, an NOC for antiques, and customs clearance receipts are essential to smooth transportation.Technology is revolutionising the way fine art is relocated, enhancing both security and transparency:Tracking systems GPS-enabled real-time tracking ensures greater visibility during transportation. Stakeholders can monitor movement, environmental conditions and potential risks in transit.Blockchain for provenance verification Blockchain provides for immutable records, where every touch, movement and repair logged forever. Auto-trigger insurance payments are also embedded into smart contracts. Scans are also needed to verify the authenticity of a fine art before loading.Given the complexities of international art relocation, lawyers can help collectors and institutions navigate customs regulations, taxation requirements and cross-border transportation protocols.Selecting the right logistics partner is essential for safe and efficient art relocation. Key considerations include:Expertise and reputation Working with providers that have a proven track record in fine art handling ensures adherence to best practices in packaging, transportation and storage.Climate-controlled transportation Artworks are sensitive to temperature and humidity fluctuations. Specialised carriers with climate-controlled vehicles help mitigate risks associated with environmental exposure.Secure handling protocols Professional logistics firms employ trained handlers and custom packaging solutions to protect artworks during transit.Given the high financial and cultural value of fine art, insurance coverage is essential:Tailored coverage Policies should account for various risks, including physical damage, theft, and loss during transportation.Assessing insurance providers Choosing insurers with extensive experience in fine art ensures that claims are processed efficiently and coverage terms align with the specific needs of collectors and institutions.As logistics tech continues to develop, sophisticated devices will gain more prominence in the relocation process. AI tools can go a long way in automating compliance tracking, while digitising custom clearance platforms can expedite processes, leading to reductions in time and resource waste.Logistics providers have also begun to integrate tech-driven thinking in their approach and decisions with consistent innovations in temporary storage solutions and on-site installation and preservation of artworks. Sustainability mandates and considerations would also dominate the approach, with EV-led transportation, reusable crating, and carbon-neutral shipping becoming mandatory for logistics providers and art houses alike.As the Indian art market continues to grow, investment in logistics will be crucial in maintaining integrity and legacy of fine art. Such innovations would be essential to build firm trust from foreign and domestic major stakeholders to participate and propel the Indian art scene actively.The writer is assistant GM, relocations, world mobility & fine art, Crown Worldwide Group
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Winning limited war by disruption, not just destruction
On May 10, 2025, Pakistan and India announced a ceasefire bringing to an end a confrontation which militarily did not last for more than four days and nights. Such conflicts are categorised as limited wars (as opposed to a general war), in which the aim, scope, rules of engagement, intensity, duration, geographical span, etc. are scaled down. Neither side seeks decisive results and both aim to end the engagement in a position of military strength that yields a political advantage during negotiations. Therefore, a limited war is controlled, calculated and often influenced by diplomatic concerns. Within this very broad definition of a limited war, we will look in a little more detail at the 'May War' of 2025. The conflict was ignited by an attack on April 22 by Kashmiri militants in Pahalgam resulting in the deaths of 26 civilians tourists. Within hours India attributed the attack to a little known group it alleged was affiliated with Lashkar-e-Taiba, leading to heightened tensions. This may or may not have been a false flag operation by the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), the Indian equivalent of United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or Israel's Mossad, etc. Was it a coincidence that it occurred during a visit by the American vice president just as a terrorist attack on Sikhs, allegedly carried out by Kashmiri militants, occurred during former US president Bill Clinton's visit in 2000? It reminds me of a quote attributed to Ian Fleming's James Bond novel, Goldfinger: "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action". In her autobiography, Clinton's foreign secretary Madeline Albright blamed the killing on Hindu militants (for Hindu Militants read the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the militant wing of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party). Attacks by militants in Indian Held Kashmir (IHK) have been occurring periodically and even if Pahalgam was not a false flag operation, in such an eventuality, India was prepared to execute a contingency that would gave it political and military gains. The instant gain was finding it an excuse to suspend the 64-year-old Indus Basin Water Treaty that had survived two wars and withstood many twists and turns. Having what they considered a political victory, the Indians now wanted to militarily 'punish' Pakistan for supporting terrorism in IHK. I have been on the Directing Staff at the National Defence University and have taught all manners of conflict strategies relevant to the scenarios in the Subcontinent, including limited wars. However, it was during the Kargil conflict that I realised that in many ways a limited war is more difficult to manage. In a general war troops are mobilised, formations and units deployed in the battle zone according to a predetermined plan, air bases placed on war footing, satellite bases activated, ships and submarines move out to sea, etc. for a no holds barred conflict. On the other hand, in a limited war mobilisation is very selective and every deployment and action has to be gauged against counteractions by the enemy. A limited war only remains limited if both sides choose to do so and if one side is reckless, the escalation ladder becomes steep. After the Pahalgam incident on April 22, Indian security forces spent two days conducting joint operations in Jammu and Kashmir, which they allege led to the death of a senior Lashkar-e-Taiba commander. They also demolished residences they claimed belonged to suspected militants. Concurrently they activated the Line of Control (LoC) with both sides exchanging artillery and small arms fire across multiple sectors. By April 28, diplomacy gained traction to limited avail with the US seemingly sitting on the fence. Finally on the night between May 6 and 7, India launched "Operation Sindoor," with missile strikes on what they claimed was terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir. This is when the conflict got interesting, but to appreciate the scale and nature of the PAF response we have to go back to a similar incident in 2019 when the IAF struck what it alleged was a terrorist camp near Balakot. Operation Swift Retort, the PAF response to India's strikes showed glimpses of its prowess in the electromagnetic sphere. The counterstrike package of the PAF had a very strong component of electronic warfare that enabled their aircrafts to engage the enemy without activating their own radars thus concealing their locations. But back then, the PAF was still far from possessing the technology need to excel in multi-domain operations that encompasses real-time imagery, cyber units disabling enemy radar, drones providing surveillance and fighter jets launching precision strikes – all while being coordinated through secure, networked communications. The PAF had acquired radars from different countries and integration of those technologies of different origins was achieved by an indigenous Data Link that integrated all these systems. According to military analysts, the PAF decided to build on this capability and under a modernisation plan, the PAF established the PAF Cyber Command (PAFCC) and the PAF Space Command (PAFSC) in Islamabad. It also created the NASTP (National Aerospace Science & Technology Park) which has become a hub for various indigenous programs. One of the biggest advantages that the armed forces of Pakistan have over the Indians is that development, testing and manufacture of weapons and military systems is guided by the services themselves. Within a few years, and of course with much assistance from the Chinese, the PAF developed a capability which took aerial combat to a completely new level. EW was no longer just a force multiplier and coupled with AI, it became central to a new art of warfare that I call AI-Centric Cognitive Warfare where 'AI-Centric' highlights the primacy of machine intelligence and 'Cognitive Warfare' indicates the strategic aim of winning the battle. In other words, war by disruption, not just destruction Parallels can be drawn from history where dramatic and unexpected innovations changed the method of warfare. The feudal knights in armour (the heavy cavalry) who had dominated the battlefields of medieval Europe were defeated by the arrows of the English longbows which penetrated their plate armour. The advent of large cannon in late medieval period was a watershed moment that sounded the death knell of siege warfare by rendering traditional castles and city walls useless. The German Blitzkrieg in the opening stages of Second World War marked a dramatic shift from the static trench warfare of the previous World War and its core principles continue to influence military doctrine till now. Each of these breakthroughs was more than a tactical improvement — they represented a fundamental change in how wars were fought. AI-Centric Cognitive Warfare may prove to be the next such transformation, reshaping battlefields with speed, precision, and control over information itself. In future limited wars (as well as operations on a larger scale), AICCW will shift the battlefield focus from brute force to brainpower. The aim will be to deliver maximum damage quickly — not just by destroying enemy assets, but by breaking their ability to think, respond, or coordinate effectively. AI will take the lead in planning and executing operations with speed and precision. It identifies weak spots in the enemy's defences, disrupts their communication, and creates confusion in command structures — often before the first missile is even launched. Weapons of destruction like tanks, fighter aircrafts, missiles, artillery, drones, etc would still used, but their employment will be guided by AI systems that target not just hardware, but the minds and systems behind them. A limited war fought within the concept of AICCW would open with launching cyber and electronic attacks to jam radars, blind sensors, and distort battlefield awareness. This would be in tandem with strikes to overwhelm the enemy's decision-making and disrupt leadership and command structure by neutralising communication hubs, and information nodes (e.g., radio trucks, SIGINT stations), making it hard for the enemy to fight back. Having established a secure battlespace eliminate or cripple the enemies' assets identified through AI analysing enemy patterns, communication flows, and sensor emissions to target command elements. Rather than 'kill everything,' own forces will be able to focus on the neutralisation/destruction of the most critical assets. As the battle unfolds, AI will adjust the operation in real time — redirecting drones, retargeting missiles, and shifting tactics. There are indications that the Pakistan Army is also developing an AICCW capability. It has officially announced that the Corps of Signals has been elevated from a supporting arm to a combat arm. This signifies a shift in the role and responsibilities of the Corps, placing them at the forefront of military operations rather than simply providing support and is a noteworthy development in the Pakistan Army's structure and operational capabilities. I would not be surprised if our 'Silent Service', the Pakistan Navy is already well ahead in developing an AICCW capability. In a region like South Asia where tensions can spike quickly and escalation must be avoided, AICCW offers a way to achieve decisive results without a full-scale war. These AI-led limited wars could be over in days, with one side effectively paralysed before it can respond. The key is to win the cognitive battle — to confuse, deceive, and disable the enemy mentally and operationally before they can regain control. However, such fast, AI-driven warfare comes with dangers. Misjudging the enemy's red lines or failing to control escalation could turn a limited war into a larger conflict. And as machines take over more decision-making, the role of human judgment and restraint becomes more critical than ever. Author's Note: all material for this article has been gathered from open sources. Syed Ali Hamid is a retired Pakistan Army major general and a military historian. He can be contacted at syedali4955@ All facts and information are the responsibility of the writer
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Key step in democratising AI: IIT-B releases 16 datasets on AIKOSH
In an important milestone for India's Artificial Intelligence (AI) ecosystem, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay has released 16 diverse and culturally significant datasets on AIKOSH, India's official AI repository, making it among the biggest contributors to AIKOSH. This marks a crucial step in democratising AI by making high-quality, India-centric data openly accessible to researchers, startups and developers across the country. IIT Bombay made the announcement on X, saying that these datasets are designed to support innovation and research in AI and Machine Learning (ML), particularly in the Indian context. *IIT Bombay Releases 16 AI Datasets on AIKOSH: Enabling the Future of Responsible AI in India 🇮🇳* IIT Bombay is thrilled to announce the release of 16 diverse and culturally significant datasets on AIKOSH, the Government of India's official AI repository. These datasets are… — IIT Bombay (@iitbombay) May 30, 2025 AIKOSH, which was launched in March by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, is a national platform aimed at providing support for inclusive AI development across the country. The 16 datasets by IIT Bombay are part of a larger pool of 21 AI models now available on AIKOSH, which were created by BharatGen, a Section 8 company funded by the Department of Science and Technology for indigenous AI development in India. The company is a consortium of seven partners. Led by IIT Bombay, the consortium includes IIT Kanpur, IIT Mandi, IIT Hyderabad, IIT Madras, IIM Indore and IIIT Hyderabad. Prof Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Department of Computer Science Engineering, IIT Bombay, said, 'Our goal is not just to build AI models but to provide resources that startups and system integrators can leverage, creating a favourable and sovereign AI ecosystem for India.' The datasets released on AIKOSH include handwritten and printed Indian scripts, multilingual audio data and resources designed to interpret visual and spoken inputs from Indian environments. Among the notable contributions are a large-scale Sanskrit Optical Character Recognition (OCR) dataset consisting of over 218,000 sentences from historical texts to support the digitisation of ancient Indian knowledge. There is also a speech recognition dataset with more than 78 hours of Sanskrit audio. Additional resources include capabilities for detecting tables across documents in 14 Indian languages and a comprehensive Wiki on Indian Knowledge Systems, among others. Prof Ramakrishnan said, 'Equal emphasis on India data and its provenance allows these models to uniquely balance Indian data alongside English data, ensuring true relevance and understanding for our diverse nation, while also catering to its security. These models are built with Indian linguistic and cultural nuances at their core. By making these datasets available to all thorough AIKOSH, we are democratising AI in order to foster innovations across the country, eventually to build a self-reliant and inclusive AI ecosystem for India.'
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
'We all rise above party politics': Manish Tewari joins Tharoor, Khurshid in India's stand against terror
NEW DELHI: As the Modi government pushes its global diplomatic outreach under , senior Congress leader Manish Tewari joined the chorus of support from opposition leaders, calling for unity in the face of terrorism. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking in Addis Ababa as part of an all-party delegation, Tewari said, 'When it comes to India's self-respect, we all rise above party politics. ' Tewari's remarks came after similar endorsements from Congress colleagues - Shashi Tharoor and Salman Khurshid, even as party president Mallikarjun Kharge has taken a confrontational line, accusing the Centre of misleading the nation and demanding a special Parliament session after the Chief of Defence Staff confirmed an aircraft loss during military operations. Addressing the Indian community in Ethiopia's capital, Tewari said, 'If Pakistan does not stop promoting terrorism, then the answer, which has so far been very calculated, will be very aggressive.' He mentioned that Ethiopia has expressed support for India's position and condemned the April 22 that killed 26 people. In an interaction with ANI, Tewari said, 'Ethiopia has appreciated India's actions in self-defence. We share a deep civilizational relationship with this country. Our people-to-people ties have always been strong and friendly.' Highlighting the delegation's engagements, Chandigarh MP said they met Ethiopia's former Prime Minister, the Deputy Chairperson of the ruling Prosperity Party, and leaders from the African Union and Ethiopian Parliament. 'The African Union was one of the first to define terrorism clearly. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Their solidarity is significant,' he noted. The delegation, received at Bole International Airport by Indian ambassador Anil Kumar Rai, includes leaders from across party lines: Rajiv Pratap Rudy, Anurag Thakur (BJP), Vikramjit Singh Sahney (AAP), Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu (TDP), Anand Sharma (Congress), V. Muraleedharan (BJP), and former diplomat Syed Akbaruddin. Their visit is part of Operation Sindoor, launched by the Indian government on May 7 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. As part of this initiative, seven all-party delegations have been dispatched to over 30 countries - including France, the UK, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Japan, the US, and South Africa, to expose Pakistan's role in cross-border terrorism and present India's zero-tolerance policy. Operation Sindoor involved precision strikes by on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the elimination of over 100 terrorists affiliated with Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen.
