logo
4 Quick And Healthy Breakfasts With 30g Of Protein

4 Quick And Healthy Breakfasts With 30g Of Protein

Vogue9 hours ago

If you know you need to eat more protein but aren't sure where to start, breakfast is a good place. Eating a sizeable portion of your daily protein goal first thing not only ticks a box early, it also helps to curb energy slumps, sugar cravings, and sluggishness later in the day. Current guidelines recommend 0.75g of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, but this number can change depending on your age and lifestyle. For example, if you strength train regularly or have an active job, this number may increase. If you're older and more sedentary, it'll decrease.
'Eating a healthy portion of protein for breakfast can help balance blood sugar and energy,' says nutritionist and founder of Artah, Rhian Stephenson, who tends to recommend closer to 1.2g of protein per kilogram of bodyweight to her clients. 'Plus, studies have shown that front-loading your day with adequate protein improves satiety and decreases appetite throughout the day.' Consider us persuaded. Here are four simple high-protein breakfast recipes to incorporate into your morning routine.
1. High-protein yogurt bowl
Nutritionist and functional medicine practitioner Farzanah Nasser eats this high-fiber, high-protein breakfast most mornings. 'This recipe hits 30g of protein and 13g of fiber, which is almost half of the daily recommended amount. It also contains two sources of probiotics (which help maintain a healthy gut microbiome), and will keep you full until lunchtime—no energy crashes in sight.'
Ingredients
150g 0% fat Greek yogurt
¼ to ½ cup kefir
20g shelled hempseed
20g ground flaxseeds
1 tsp chia seeds
1 heaped tsp oats
1 heaped tsp almond butter
Fruit of choice
Optional: honey
Method
Add the yogurt, kefir, hempseed, flaxseeds, chia seeds, and oats into a bowl and mix well. Then top with your fruit of choice (Nasser likes one kiwi fruit) and a drizzle of almond butter and honey.
2. High-protein spinach scramble
'This satisfying breakfast is quick to make and provides a healthy dose of protein to start the day,' says Lingo by Abbott's resident nutritionist, Sophie Bertrand. 'Eggs are rich in a variety of nutrients, including vitamins A, B12, E, as well as choline, zinc, and selenium. The spinach adds beneficial antioxidants and fiber, too.'
Ingredients
3 large eggs
¼ cup low-fat cottage cheese
½ cup fresh spinach
1 tsp olive oil
Salt and pepper to taste
Optional: 1 tbsp chia or hemp seeds
Method
Heat a pan over medium heat and add the olive oil. Crack the eggs into a bowl and whisk them until the yolks and whites are well combined. Pour the eggs into the pan and cook, stirring gently, until they begin to set but are still slightly runny. Add the cottage cheese and spinach to the eggs and continue cooking, stirring occasionally, until the eggs are fully scrambled and the spinach has wilted. Season with salt and pepper to taste, and sprinkle in chia or hemp seeds if using. Serve immediately and enjoy.
3. High-protein peach smoothie
'This 'springtime in a glass' smoothie not only delivers more than 30g of protein—thanks to the protein powder—but the hemp seeds and nut butter support everything from blood sugar balance to muscle recovery and neurotransmitter health,' says naturopathic nutritionist and hormone specialist Jessica Shand. 'The maca root powder helps with energy and hormone balance, while the bee pollen supports immunity, and the fruit is rich in antioxidants.'
Ingredients
200ml organic kefir
50ml unsweetened almond milk
1 scoop protein powder
1 tsp maca powder
1 tbsp bee pollen
1 peach
1 cup frozen raspberries
½ cup frozen avocado
½ cup frozen mango
2 tbsp hemp seed
1 tbsp nut butter
Method
Add all ingredients to your blender and blitz until smooth.
4. High-protein vegan eggs on toast
'Tofu is a minimally processed product made from soya beans and is an excellent source of protein with good amounts of all nine essential amino acids,' explains plant-based nutritionist Rohini Bajekal. 'This recipe is also rich in herbs and spices, which are the most antioxidant-rich of all food groups. When you use them in dishes, it tends to reduce the desire for excess salt, oil, and sugar.' This recipe pairs well with sourdough or rye bread, says Bajekal, but you could also pop it into a wrap for a portable version.
Ingredients
150g firm tofu (15g protein
50g chickpea flour (10g protein)
30g spinach (1g protein)
2 tbsp nutritional yeast (4g protein)
1 slice wholemeal bread (3g protein)
¼ avocado
1 tbsp olive oil
½ small onion, diced
¼ bell pepper, diced
½ tsp turmeric
¼ tsp paprika
¼ tsp cumin
Optional: ¼ tsp black salt
Salt and pepper to taste
Fresh herbs such as basil for garnish
Method

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The worst hamburgers for your health — and the ones you should consider for your BBQ to avoid high sodium, fat this summer
The worst hamburgers for your health — and the ones you should consider for your BBQ to avoid high sodium, fat this summer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The worst hamburgers for your health — and the ones you should consider for your BBQ to avoid high sodium, fat this summer

Grilling season is upon us at long last, and for many Canadians, the chance to soak up more summer by having dinner outside is a key part to making the most of these sweet, sunny days. However, most barbecue fare can be a minefield of sodium. A Health Canada report from 2017 states many Canadian kids and men consume the mineral to potentially health-affecting excess. That includes 72 per cent of children aged four to 13, and a whopping 90 per cent of men between ages 14 and 30. On the other hand, notably, less than half of women in the same age group aren't consuming excess sodium. A small amount of sodium is a necessary part of a balanced diet as the mineral regulates blood pressure, keeps fluids in balance and helps muscle and nerve functioning. But too much is a serious health concern: "The average daily sodium intake of Canadians is currently estimated at 2760 mg, which is higher than the established goal of 2300 mg per day," Health Canada shares in that same report, going a long way to explaining the prevalence of high blood pressure in the country. This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. The study adds roughly 25 per cent of Canadians over age 20 have been diagnosed with high blood pressure. But it also explains the actual number is likely much higher, given the condition presents no symptoms and develops slowly. If that's not enough to have you put down the salt shaker, how about this: Heart disease and stroke are, respectively, the second and third leading causes of death in Canada after cancer. Most of the excess sodium in the typical Canadian diet is found in salty snacks, condiments, canned soups, frozen entrees like pizza and microwaved meals — and, above all, bakery goods and processed meats. Burgers, sausages, canned meats and deli meats all fall under this last category. That means when it comes time to fire up the grill, those watching their sodium intake can't just reach for any old patty. Here, we're comparing the nutritional label on a variety of popular grocery store favourites. From veggie burgers and imitation meat patties, to your classic chicken and beef burgers, this is everything you need to know about the sodium content in popular pre-made hamburger products you may be eyeing this summer. Pre-formed beef burgers are a barbecue staple. However, these patties are typically full of sodium, with some packages noting a single patty could use up a whopping quarter of your recommended daily value (DV) intake. When it comes to the DV on nutrition labels, five per cent or less is a little, while 15 per cent and above is a lot. President's Choice Thick and Juicy Beef Burgers Sodium: 600 mg, 26% DV Fat: 33 g (includes 15 g saturated + 1.5 g trans), 44% DV No Name Beef Burgers Sodium: 440 mg, 19% DV Fat: 28 g (includes 13 g saturated + 2 g trans), 37% DV Compliments Frozen Traditional Beef Burgers Sodium: 390 mg, 17% DV Fat: 10 g saturated + 1 g trans, 55% DV Montana's Frozen Canadian Angus Beef Burgers Sodium: 570 mg, 25% DV Fat: 11 g saturated + 2 g trans, 65% DV Changing it up with chicken burgers keeps barbecued dinners interesting as summer's heat continues on. These patties also seem to score slightly lower on sodium and fat levels than their beef counterparts. Zabiha Halal Chicken Burgers Sodium: 480 mg, 21% DV Fat: 8 g (includes 2 g saturated), 11% DV Compliments Balance Chicken Burgers Sodium: 330 mg, 14% DV Fat: 1.5 g saturated, 8% DV Janes Breaded Chicken Burgers Sodium: 410 mg, 18% DV Fat: 1.5 g saturated, 8% DV Great Value Chicken Burgers Sodium: 300 mg, 13% DV Fat: 11 g (includes 15 g saturated + 0.1 g trans), 15% DV Need a break from the red meats or poultry? Fish burgers are a good alternative when you're thinking of firing up the barbecue. Stick to non-breaded versions to stay on the healthier side. Compliments Wild Pacific Salmon Burgers Sodium: 310 mg, 13% DV Fat: 0.3 saturated, 2% DV President's Choice The Ultimate Atlantic Salmon Burgers Sodium: 420 mg, 18% DV Fat: 10g (includes 1.5 g saturated), 13% DV High Liner Breaded Fish Burgers Sodium: 610 mg, 27% DV Fat: 13g (includes 1 g saturated), 17% DV Janes Beer Battered Fish Burgers Sodium: 410 mg, 18% Fat: 1.5 g saturated, 8% DV Gone are the days of vegetarians getting left out at the cookout: Brands like Impossible, Beyond Meat, Yves and Gardein offer a this-close facsimile of their beef brethren — including the sodium and fat, it seems. Beyond Meat Plant-Based Burgers Sodium: 370 mg, 16% DV Fat: 6 g saturated + 0.1 g trans, 31% DV Impossible Plant-Based Burgers Sodium: 370 mg, 16% DV Fat: 8 g saturated, 40% DV Yves The Good Veggie Burgers Sodium: 310 mg, 14% Fat: 0.2 g saturated, 3% DV Gardein Suprême Plant-Based Burgers Sodium: 420 mg, 18% DV Fat: 9 saturated + 0.1 g trans, 44% DV Burger patties composed of vegetables, beans, grains and seasonings are an old-school vegetarian staple. Typically, these burgers are top-tier in healthiness regarding sodium and fat levels. Dr. Prager's California-Style Veggie Burgers Sodium: 250 mg, 10% DV Fat: 0 g saturated Big Mountain The Original Veggie Burgers Sodium: 135 mg, 6% DV Fat: 2 g saturated, 10% DV President's Choice Chickpea and Sweet Potato Veggie Burgers Sodium: 590 mg, 26% Fat: 9 g (including 1g saturated), 12% DV Wholly Veggie The Big Griller Veggie Burgers Sodium: 250 mg, 11% DV Fat: 0.5 g saturated, 5% DV Another potential sodium minefield standing between you and a barbecue meal that meets your dietary needs are burger buns. Some buns, it seems, might have as much salt as the patties they're clasped around. Some buns from the D'Italiano brand have 16 per cent of your daily sodium allotment per bun. That means a burger with one of these buns could have as high as half your daily intake, depending on the variety of patty inside — and that's before you've put cheese or ketchup on it. Wonderbread white buns, meanwhile, clock in at 10 per cent of your daily sodium needs — as do Compliments brand brioche buns. Villaggio's Toscana buns have 12 per cent of your daily sodium allowance, while Dempster's hamburger buns clock in at 10 per cent. Even though it tastes sweet, ketchup packs a sodium punch. At 50 grams — or about four tablespoon's worth — you're being delivered 18.5 per cent of your daily sodium recommendation. Mustard and relish aren't off the hook, either: According to the USDA, the average yellow mustard has 23.5 per cent of your daily sodium in a comparable amount. On the other hand, relish hovers around 16.5 per cent of your sodium needs for about four tablespoons. Adding cheese? One slice of Kraft Singles has 12 per cent of your sodium allowance, while Ziggy's brand cheddar slices offer seven per cent. It's possible that building the perfect burger could cost an entire day's worth of sodium intake if you're not careful. But simple swaps — like reaching for unprocessed cheese, going light on the condiments and checking the nutrition facts on the buns — can keep things in check, as will occasionally choosing patties made from chicken, fish and vegetables in place of beef. Get ready to light the grill!

King Charles' Cancer Is Incurable, Bombshell Report Suggests
King Charles' Cancer Is Incurable, Bombshell Report Suggests

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

King Charles' Cancer Is Incurable, Bombshell Report Suggests

King Charles' will die 'with' but not 'of' cancer, a bombshell report claimed Saturday. The report essentially confirms long-standing rumors that the king's cancer is considered manageable but ultimately incurable, which is the case for many older individuals afflicted by the disease. Charles is 76. The report will be unwelcome in the palace, as it will reignite speculation that the king's health is in a delicate state, rumors that were brought to fever pitch when Prince Harry said in a recent BBC interview that he didn't know how long his father had left to live. Charles' aides have consistently briefed reporters that he is, broadly speaking, winning his battle against cancer and the king himself recently said he was on 'the other side' of the health crisis. The king is back to essentially running a full diary after being diagnosed with cancer last year, albeit with some modifications. The report, by the respected royal writer and associate editor of the U.K. Daily Telegraph, Camilla Tominey, also claimed that Charles will never move into Buckingham Palace due to his health struggles. 'The talk now is that he may die 'with' cancer, but not 'of' cancer following a rigorous treatment program,' she wrote. A spokesperson for the king declined to comment. Tominey who was the first to break the news about Prince Harry and Meghan dating and also about the latter's row with Kate Middleton. The report added that planning for Charles' 80th birthday in 2028, while 'very tentative,' is going ahead. Tominey also claimed that Charles and Harry could be publicly reunited at the Invictus Games, in Birmingham in 2027, with palace aides quietly investigating whether the event could provide a suitable backdrop for a long-awaited reconciliation. It is understood officials hope any reconciliation would include Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. The king last saw the children in 2022. Harry has said he can't bring his family safely to the U.K. and hinted some powerful palace figures want him dead. Intriguingly, Tominey suggests that a reconciliation might be considered because of the negative impact the narrative of estrangement is having on the king's reputation. She writes: 'There is an awareness that the impasse cannot continue forever, not least if it starts to reflect badly on the king.' Prince Harry said, in a bitter interview with the BBC following a comprehensive legal defeat on his security arrangements, that he does not know how long his cancer-hit father has left to live because the king won't speak to him. Harry also said he won't bring his family to the U.K., blamed his father for his security being reduced after leaving the royal family, and said he had 'forgiven' those family members who had hurt him. He added: 'Some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book but I would love reconciliation with my family.' Appearing emotional, the prince added: 'I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff.' 'There is a lot of control and ability in my father's hands. Ultimately, this whole thing could be resolved through him,' Harry said. ​'There's no point in continuing to fight anymore. As I said, life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile.'

Limited Survival Benefit With Expanded Kidney Donor Criteria
Limited Survival Benefit With Expanded Kidney Donor Criteria

Medscape

time3 hours ago

  • Medscape

Limited Survival Benefit With Expanded Kidney Donor Criteria

VIENNA — The use of expanded-criteria donors for kidney transplantation in older and high-risk recipients did not provide the same survival benefit as the use of standard donors, according to an analysis of data from more than 64,000 individuals in the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry, using target trial emulation. 'When determining who is a suitable transplant candidate, we shouldn't only focus on the patient alone, because the outcomes will also depend on donor quality,' said study presenter Rachel Hellemans, MD, PhD, a nephrologist at Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium. 'Of course, ideally, we would like to give a transplant to everyone, but shortage is a reality,' she continued. The possibilities for older patients to receive a standard-criteria donor kidney depend on local allocation systems and waiting times. Waiting an extended period for a transplant carries the risk of clinical deterioration, Hellemans pointed out, and patients may want to 'settle for an expanded-criteria donor kidney — although, in general, these kidneys perform less well.' 'Even in the absence of a true survival difference, patients may still value this kind of transplantation to improve the quality of their remaining life years,' she said. But clinicians need to be careful 'to interpret and communicate the results of our study' she cautioned, 'because, despite a very thorough pretransplant workup,' and 'careful decision-making as a transplant team, there remains an element of unpredictability and some very real risks, especially in the early post-transplant period.' Exploring the Margins of Survival Benefits The research presented here at the 62nd ERA Congress 2025 was based on an analysis of data on more than 64,000 individuals on the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry. 'Transplantation is, no doubt, the optimal treatment strategy for many of our patients with kidney failure,' said Hellemans, 'and it often leads to substantially better survival compared to continued dialysis, but its successes have also made us push the boundaries.' She pointed out that, due to a lack of suitable donor organs, clinicians have increasingly turned to less-than-ideal donors, such as those who are older, have more comorbidities, or who have died due to circulatory disorders. On the other hand, patients on dialysis now have improved survival, said Hellemans. Therefore, the question becomes: 'Where do the margins lie for the survival benefit with transplantation?' 'Although this may sound like a simple question,' she continued, 'it's actually a very difficult one to answer.' Ideally, a research question like this would be answered with a randomized control trial (RCT), 'which is impossible for ethical and practical reasons.' The next best step is to turn to registry data, but this is fraught with methodological pitfalls. Hellemans said that approximately half of such studies in the field suffer from avoidable biases, likely leading to an overestimation of the true benefit of transplantation. Moreover, the most recent comprehensive assessment of the impact of recipient age and comorbidities, and donor quality on mortality risk in older patients, was published in 2013, and Hellemans pointed out that this is a fast-evolving field, and so regular updates are required. The researchers therefore turned to the ERA Registry, which contains data on 64,013 adults from France, Catalonia (in Spain), Denmark, Norway, and the United Kingdom who were on dialysis and wait-listed for a first deceased donor kidney transplant between 2000 and 2019. The study investigators looked at 5-year survival with transplantation vs continued dialysis, stratified by donor type: standard-criteria donor kidneys, or those from donors younger than 60 years of age without significant risk factors for poor kidney function; and expanded-criteria donor kidneys, which includes all donors aged ≥ 60 years, and aged 50-59 years who had at least two of the following: a history of arterial hypertension, death from cerebrovascular accident, and/or last serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL. The recipients were also stratified by age and presence of comorbidities, namely diabetes, and a history of cardiovascular disease. To overcome the limitations of using registry data, the researchers turned to a methodological framework known as target trial emulation. Here, they treated their observational data as if it was from an RCT, in which transplantation was considered the intervention, and each transplant launched one of a series of sequential trials comparing the outcome with that seen for patients who remained on dialysis. They then controlled for country, time on dialysis prior to wait-listing, calendar year of transplantation, patient sex, cause of kidney failure, and diabetes. This way, Hellemans explained, they could avoid the biases that normally come with registry-based studies. Provided there is no important and measured confounding, target trial emulation can 'achieve a level of evidence that closely approximates that of a true RCT.' Standard Criteria Donor vs Extended Criteria Donor The results showed that, no matter the recipient's age, the 5-year adjusted survival rate was substantially better for transplant patients who received a standard-criteria donor organ than those who remained on dialysis. However, when the researchers turned to expanded-criteria donors, they found that the survival benefit from transplant decreased with increasing recipient age — to the extent that, among those who received a donor organ after circulatory death, the advantage all but disappeared. Among patients aged 75 years and older, 5-year survival rates for recipients who received kidneys from extended criteria donors were estimated at 57%–58%, only slightly higher than the 54% in those who remained on dialysis. A similar pattern was seen when looking at recipients with diabetes and those with cardiovascular disease: standard-criteria donors were associated with a survival benefit with transplant over remaining on dialysis — no matter the recipient's age — while the benefit dropped off sharply with increasing age in patients receiving expanded-criteria donor organs. A key factor was the increased early post-transplant mortality observed in older patients receiving expanded criteria kidney donations, Hellemans reported. There was a sharp rise in mortality risk compared with staying on dialysis in the first 10 months after undergoing transplant, followed by a drop-off in risk until, at 5 years, the hazard ratio for death was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.74-1.36) for the two approaches, she explained. Limitations of the study include the heterogeneous nature of the donor population, and potential residual confounding factors due to the lack of information on the functional status of the patients, said Hellemans. In addition, the presence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease were recorded only at the time of wait-listing, thus they did not include incident cases during follow-up. Moreover, 5-year survival as an outcome has its limitations, she pointed out, as few patients remained on dialysis beyond this timeframe. Informed Discussions With Patients 'The breadth of data we could access via the ERA Registry showed that the survival advantage of a transplant plateaus for the very oldest or highest-risk patients who are likely to receive an expanded-criteria or circulatory-death donor kidney,' said Vianda Stel, PhD, associate professor in the Department of Medical Informatics at Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands, and director of the ERA Registry, in a press release. 'This arms clinicians with guidance to have informed discussions with their patients. The message is not 'don't transplant older people,' ' she said, but rather 'be open about uncertainty when the numbers say benefit may be marginal.' 'We were always convinced that we can give a benefit by giving a transplant to every patient on the waiting list,' Christoph Wanner, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and head of the Division of Nephrology, University of Würzburg, Germany, told Medscape Medical News . 'And now we see that, in those aged 75 years, they will not have a benefit with the expanded donor criteria.' He said that the 'big question' is whether the current findings will affect clinical decision-making. 'I think dialysis doctors will respond to this and maybe keep patients on dialysis for various reasons and not push them into transplant. This new data give us the justification' to make that argument. Given that the pool of available organs cannot be expanded, Wanner believes that current waiting lists could be rationalized so that 'the organs that are available could be directed to a smaller proportion of patients, and therefore people would benefit' from lower wait times. Daniel W. Coyne, MD, professor of medicine, Nephrology/Internal Medicine at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, commented on X (formerly Twitter) that the benefit with expanded-criteria donation decreases with older age 'is not what my transplant group is telling our patients in the US.' He added: 'We need this [trial] emulation in US data.' | content The research received no specific grant. Hellemans, Stel, Wanner, and Coyne reported no relevant financial relationships.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store