Letters to the Editor, July 24th: On Gaza, the NDP, Repealer regret and wind farm demolition
Palestinian children face death
, July 23rd) is horrific, and it makes me wonder why the Israeli government and its people think that it is acceptable to prevent food aid reaching Gaza.
How can anyone be so heartless? You cannot defend the indefensible. Children are starving. – Yours, etc,
DEE DELANY,
Raheny,
READ MORE
Dublin 5.
Sir,- The photograph on the front page (Wednesday 23rd) is beyond shocking – the skeletal limbs of little Muhammad, with a plastic bag for a nappy – and what can we do about it? We must unite in trying to find a solution – individually we are helpless. – Yours, etc,
ROSARY COX,
Mount Merrion,
Dublin.
Sir, – With every passing day more news emerges of the horrors being inflicted on the population of Gaza by the Israeli military; funded, armed and given diplomatic cover by the West. On Wednesday, Sally Hayden ('Without intervention the last reporters in Gaza will die', Page 1, July 23rd) reported that more than 100 aid organisations warned of 'mass starvation' in Gaza.
With every killing of an innocent Palestinian a part of our collective humanity dies, and so does our right to call ourselves civilised people. If we are to rescue what little remains of international law and universal human rights, then our governments must work together to immediately end the suffering with concrete actions against Israel. Failure to do so will represent the greatest moral failing of our lifetimes and will cast a shadow on us all for generations to come. – Yours, etc,
CALLUM SWIFT,
Moycullen,
Galway.
Sir, – The continued conflation of Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state has become a dangerous and cynical distortion of the public understanding of the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.
Equating criticism of Israeli policy with anti-Semitism not only stifles legitimate debate but it places Jewish people around the world at risk by implying they are collectively responsible for the conduct of a government and state they may neither belong to nor support. That conflation is itself anti-Semitic. It reduces a diverse and global people into a single political ideology, silencing dissent and enabling prejudice under the guise of collective protection.
Binyamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government, despite presenting themselves as defenders of the Jewish people, have arguably become among the most effective enablers of modern anti-Semitism. Not because they hate Jews, but because they conflate Jewish identity with the actions of a nationalist state engaged in systemic oppression and weaponise that identity to deflect criticism.
The fight against anti-Semitism, as with all forms of racism and sectarianism, must not be hijacked to shield a state from accountability. It must remain rooted in the defence of human dignity and not the preservation of political power. – Yours, etc,
JOHN O'NEILL,
Alexandra Walk,
Dublin 8.
Review of the National Development Plan
Sir, – The big announcement emerged on July 22nd confirming an investment plan to the value of €275 billion to be implemented over the next 10 years. We will find out the details regarding what the National Development Plan (NDP) is to deliver and, of course, it'll be presented as being for the greater good of this country – as it should be. So, can we assume that the NDP will deliver on all of its promises because lessons have been learned from the many recent and not so recent experiences that have resulted in plans or commitments coming up short or falling by the wayside due to various combinations of mishaps, mistakes, misjudgements, misunderstandings and miscalculations?
Will there be low or no tolerance for delays or cost overruns? It's positive to note that consideration is being given to strengthening of legislation with a view to being able to fast-track projects of national importance or to be able to exempt the requirement for some environmental impact assessment reports in relation to certain strategically significant brownfield sites. The enormous purse being allocated to this NDP will not translate into the delivery that it promises unless it is matched and robustly supported by the kind of trenchant political will and leadership that, regretfully, we haven't been seeing for some time. – Yours, etc
TOM TIERNAN,
Shanaway Road,
Ennis.
Sir
,
– The Government's renewed commitment to the National Development Plan is welcome, but the core challenge remains delivery.
Time and again, Ireland has struggled to turn plans into reality. A key obstacle is the low threshold for initiating judicial reviews, which frequently delay or derail vital infrastructure projects. While many in politics acknowledge this issue, few appear willing to act. Without reform, we risk further stagnation.
Equally troubling is a broader lack of ambition and accountability within the Civil Service. A culture of risk aversion and process over progress has taken hold, where maintaining the status quo is often prioritised over achieving results.
We must confront these structural and cultural issues directly. A failure to do so will only lead to the repetition of past failures. – Yours, etc.,
MEL MCCARTHY,
Skerries,
Co Dublin.
Galway, city of the traffic
Anyone who lives, or has lived, in Galway will know full well that any idea of light rail for Galway is quite simply a deluded fantasy.
Murt Coleman (Letters, July 23rd) happily ignores the fact that to install light rail would mean Galway coming to a dead stop for however many years it would take to construct the system.
Last year your article '
Case for 'Gluas' light rail in Galway identified by feasibility study
' (Wednesday Oct 30th, 2024) showed a map of the proposed route for this fantasy light railway. This simply mimicked the east-west bus routes. Maybe this is a covert justification for the Galway Outer-Bypass or, as it would come to be known, the Galway Outer Carpark. Yours, etc,
ANTHONY MORAN,
Bundoran,
Co Donegal.
Repealers regret?
Sir, – The 10,852 abortions provided in Ireland in 2024 are not a national shame – they reflect accessible, compassionate healthcare delivered at home.
These are not nameless, faceless women as imagined in Breda O'Brien's article (
Admit it, the reluctant repealers were wrong
, Opinion, July 19th). They are our sisters, wives, girlfriends, colleagues and nieces – real people, with real lives and real challenges. They live in the reality that contraception isn't 100 per cent effective, that life is messy, and that control over one's body is essential to dignity.
Repeal didn't introduce abortion – it ended the cruelty of exporting it. Since Repeal, women no longer have to leave the country to access legal, safe, timely care. But we are still failing women every week – those who must travel to the UK because they fall outside the narrow criteria of our legislation. These women, too, deserve care and compassion at home.
When Breda O'Brien raises concerns about coercion into abortion, she forgets the intergenerational trauma of women coerced into endless pregnancies – forced to give birth against their will, trapped in poverty or abuse, shamed by families or hidden away in institutions. That, too, was coercion. That, too, was violence.
The pre-Repeal system didn't protect women – it punished the poor and marginalised. Women with means could leave. Those without were left with no choice at all.
Abortion will always be complex and deeply personal. But what we've built is a system that offers care instead of condemnation – a system grounded not in judgement, but in empathy (ionmhá).
Repeal replaced shame with dignity, silence with support, and risk with safety.
That is not a failure. That is justice – and it was long overdue.
BRIAN KENNEDY,
Nenagh,
Co Tipperary
Planning Nostalgia
Sir, – Unlike Evan Campbell (Letters, 27 July), I welcome The Irish Times devoting 1,800 words to a critique of the 22-storey College Square tower, as the unavoidable presence of such an addition to the skyline deserves a cultural conversation.
Whether one agrees with Frank McDonald (
Tower of Darkness
, Ticket, July 19th) on issues such as the appropriateness of tall buildings (I would argue density can be achieved without height) or the protection of urban vistas (I would agree the new tower has a catastrophic impact on the historic urban landscape), surely it is appropriate to have a public discussion on topics fundamentally affecting the character of the city.
Dublin has plenty of capacity for tall buildings and density in appropriate locations, but this can be achieved while maintaining the quality of the historic centre. – Yours etc.,
STEPHEN WALL,
Rialto,
Dublin 8.
Sir, – I rather enjoyed your retired correspondent Frank McDonald's article about the new high-rise building adjacent to Mulligans pub in Dublin, and its impact on views from Trinity College and other parts of Dublin. This brought back a few memories.
In 1984 An Bord Pleanála granted planning permission for a 40-storey tower on a site in Georges Quay in Dublin, proposed by the Irish Life Assurance Company. Dublin City Council (Dublin Corporation as it was then) planners had approved a scheme with a maximum height of 11 stories, but this was appealed by third parties for, among other grounds, being too high! Two different expert planning authorities had reached polar opposite views of what height should be permitted on that site. The late Carmencita Hederman, mayor of Dublin at the time, took legal action, on behalf of Dublin Corporation, against the An Bord Pleanála decision. Rather than wait for years for a court decision, Irish Life reapplied to Dublin Corporation for a 14-storey tower, which was granted this time.
Following further appeals and delays the 'tower' (also known jokingly as Canary Dwarf, with its pyramid roofscape) was eventually constructed on the Georges Quay site beside Tara Street station in 2001, 19 years after the first application in 1982. Oh, the vagaries of the Irish planning system. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose! – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL KINSELLA,
Sydney,
Australia.
Demolishing Derrybrien
Sir, – Michael McDowell (
Opinion, July 23rd
), laments the planned dismantling of the Derrybrien wind farm, portraying it as a needless loss of renewable energy and public money. But his analysis sidesteps the fundamental reason we are in this position: noncompliance with EU environmental law.
The failure to conduct an environmental impact assessment (EIA) before construction began in 2003 is not a minor technicality, but a breach of well-established EU environmental safeguards. These assessments exist to prevent precisely the kind of disaster that occurred at Derrybrien: the destabilisation of peatland, a massive landslide and the destruction of a river ecosystem, including the death of an estimated 50,000 brown trout. Had proper due diligence been carried out, this damage and the ensuing legal and financial consequences might have been avoided entirely. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL O'MEARA,
Fenor,
Co Waterford.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Powerscourt Distillery up for sale and what the Online Safety Code means for you
Receivers appointed to the Powerscourt Distillery in Enniskerry, Co Wicklow have put the business and its assets up for sale . Hugh Dooley reports on the latest development in the saga. Donald Trump is not a fan of diversity, equity and inclusion. That much is clear, but his rules to remove what the American right calls 'bias' in artificial intelligence (AI) models threatens to set back US ambitions in the space for the long term. In his column, Emmet Ryan explains why. Why would the tobacco industry lobby for tighter controls on what is arguably its most important product now? Cantillon explores the issue, along with the fallout from Amazon pulling a project from Ireland over electricity supply and where Datalex leaving the Irish stock market leaves the Dublin bourse. The new Online Safety Code has arrived , but what exactly does it involve? Ciara O'Brien outlines what it aims to do, and how it could impact you. READ MORE A €100 million plan to redevelop St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre in Dublin has been turned down by An Coimisiún Pleanála. As Gordon Deegan reports, the refusal overturns a grant of permission owners DTDL Ltd secured from Dublin City Council in December 2023. John FitzGerald on the 'poor show' of a trade deal struck between the EU and the US Listen | 23:32 This week host Ciarán Hancock is joined in studio by economist and Irish Times contributor John FitzGerald. He gives his reaction to the EU-US trade deal that will see a 15% tariff rate on European imports going into the US, a deal that he feels the EU had agreed to with 'two hands tied behind its back' on account of its continued reliance on the US when it comes to the war in ahead of Budget 2026 John outlines the need for the Government to stop pumping money into a booming economy and focus on making space for much-needed infrastructure. He feels we are inflating the economy when we should be cutting expenditure or raising taxes, neither of which would be politically by John Casey with JJ Vernon on sound. Cardboard box-maker Smurfit Westrock still expects to post full-year earnings growth of as much as 11 per cent to $5.2 billion (€4.5 billion), as it continues to turn around its North American operations even as tariffs weigh on consumer demand box sales. Dublin-based media firm NewsWhip is to be bought by a US firm in a deal worth as much as $65 million. Ian Curran has the story. The recent slump in official figures for the number of people visiting Ireland moderated sharply last month, according to Central Statistics Office data published on Wednesday. Some 654,500 foreign residents visited Ireland in June. That represented a year-on-year drop of 2 per cent, compared with drops of 10 per cent in May; 4 per cent in April; 15 per cent in March; and 30 per cent in February. Colin Gleeson reports. Datalex, the retail software provider for airlines, said on Wednesday that it plans to delist from the Irish stock market after 25 years and raise €6 million of needed funds by way of debt, following a sustained period of stock price malaise. Joe has the details. Joe also reports on Hostelworld, which said its net bookings and revenues have picked up during the summer months after a slow start to the year. Dublin Airport has applied for permission to add new boarding gates to ease overcrowding in a busy section of the gateway. State owned airport operator DAA said on Wednesday that it was seeking permission from local planning authority Fingal County Council to extend its pier one west building, part of the airport's terminal one facilities. Barry O'Halloran reports. Irish food ingredients giant Kerry saw revenue increase by 1.3 per cent to €3.5 billion in the first half of 2025 despite what it described as a 'soft' demand environment linked to macroeconomic uncertainty. Eoin BUrke-Kennedy reports. If you'd like to read more about the issues that affect your finances try signing up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Why isn't the message on climate change getting through?
Almost every time I catch a news bulletin on radio or TV this summer, it strikes me that the conversation on climate change is in drastic need of a reset. Time and again, reports are broadcast concerning extreme weather events, from unprecedented rainfall in Asia to searing heatwaves in southern Europe , from record temperatures in the Arctic to devastating flooding in the US. One particularly tragic event this month was the loss of many young lives at a much-loved summer camp for girls in Texas. Time and again, these events are described as once-in-a-lifetime occurrences, rare events that are hugely regrettable but unavoidable. Indeed, I was struck by the number of times the expression 'acts of God' was used on US news channels – or 'acts of satan' as conservative American journalist Cal Thomas put it on the Last Word on Today FM Although understandable, this reaction is wide of the mark. This is because it has been known for many years now that the probability of such events occurring is greatly enhanced in a warming climate. Indeed, it is a matter of basic physics that, as our atmosphere warms, extreme weather events such as violent storms will undoubtedly become more frequent and more severe. READ MORE Why isn't this message getting through? I lost count of the number of media reports I saw that failed to mention the issue of climate change altogether,or referred to it in passing as a side issue. One reason may be a genuine misunderstanding of the science. It is true that there have been plenty of extreme weather events in the past and it is also true that one cannot usually draw a direct link between a particular weather event and climate change. However, innumerable studies have shown such events are becoming much more common and are rendered much more likely by a warming atmosphere. A second reason is politics. For some reason, a great many of those on the conservative side of the political spectrum seem unable to accept the findings of climate scientists, dismissing them as exaggerated or 'woke'. Thus an entire field of science has been dragged into the culture wars. Some argue that this rejection is not surprising as conservative parties tend to maintain close links with corporate interests. Given that a central finding of climate science is that global warming is closely linked with the emission of greenhouse gases from industrial activity – in particular with the burning of fossil fuels – it was entirely predictable that these industries would use their considerable wealth and power to convince their friends in politics to ignore the science. [ Forty degree heatwaves are the 'new norm'. Now we see what's coming for Ireland Opens in new window ] An extreme example of this behaviour can be found in the US . A striking characteristic of US president Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' is a systematic attempt to hamper developments in renewable energy at every turn, whilst removing almost all constraints on the mining of fossil fuels. There is little question that Trump's second term will be a major blow to attempts to wean the world's largest economy off fossil fuels, a regression that is already causing several other countries to review their own commitments in reducing emissions. One answer to this dangerous situation is communication. After all, not many people – whatever their politics – would genuinely wish an unstable climate on their children. What is needed is a sea-change in attitude, similar to what occurred in the case of the tobacco industry. As historians such as Naomi Oreskes have pointed out, the tobacco lobby used its power and influence to block action on smoking for many years. Yet the truth eventually prevailed and smoking is no longer the menace it once was. [ Let's inconvenience some oligarchs before we come for exhausted mothers Opens in new window ] Thus, it is incumbent on scientists and science communicators to redouble efforts to convey the threat posed by climate change. It seems to me the best way to do this is to explain both the basics of climate science and aspects of the practice of science such as convergence (how different lines of evidence can point to a single explanation) and consensus (how scientists come to agree, often after great initial scepticism and much debate, on that explanation). The alternative is that the painstaking findings of climate scientists are perceived as inflexible dogma, a not uncommon view that is as dangerous as it is mistaken. Dr Cormac O'Raifeartaigh is a senior lecturer in physics at the South East Technological University (Waterford) and a fellow of the Institute of Physics
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Who do you call if you want to speak to the leader of unionism? It's complicated
There were the usual calls during July for unionist parties to 'show leadership' over parades, bonfires and related tensions. Some of this annual criticism was unfair: unionist leadership was evident at local level in various places, even if it was not always leading people in the direction others would prefer. The top level of unionist politics is where a strange, unprecedented rudderlessness is apparent. To paraphrase Henry Kissenger , who do you call if you want to speak to the leader of unionism? The official answer is the leader of its largest party, Gavin Robinson of the DUP . However, the DUP's size no longer conveys dominance. While it still holds a clear majority of unionism's seats, it is clinging on to a bare majority of unionism's votes – 51 per cent in the last assembly and general elections in 2022 and 2024. It managed a more respectable 58 per cent in the 2023 council elections. There is no sense of a prospective recovery. In opinion polls, the DUP dropped below the majority threshold four years ago and after a rebound has fallen below it again, to just 41 per cent of unionist support, in the latest LucidTalk survey. READ MORE The DUP and the UUP jockeyed to be the largest unionist party for decades, but that race appears to be long over. The UUP has been in almost uninterrupted decline for a quarter of a century and is bumping along on half the DUP's vote share. Nobody can foresee it regaining the top spot. All the growth within unionism this decade has been by the Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV). It does as well as the UUP in opinion polls but only half as well in elections, probably due to its appeal and resources being too thinly spread across the region. Although unionism has had significant third parties before, this has generally been at times of high drama, such as the mid-1970s or the years around the Belfast Agreement. Today's three-way split has been driven by Brexit, with voters upset at the DUP's disastrous handling of the issue. However, anger at the sea border has largely subsided to something more like exasperation. The fragmentation of unionism is now sustained not by high drama but by what looks like permanent damage to the DUP's reputation for competence. [ Unionism must offer a positive future, not hark back to a past that was often dark and divided Opens in new window ] An exhausted party system is compounded by unusual circumstances at the top of all three main unionist parties. Robinson was catapulted to the helm of the DUP last year by the resignation of Jeffrey Donaldson, currently awaiting trial for alleged sexual offences. Although Robinson was seen as a future leader, there is an understandable feeling among the public and some party colleagues that his elevation was rushed. The DUP believes its leader should sit at Stormont, as that is the overwhelming focus of Northern Ireland politics. [ Windsor deal an opaque mess, says Democratic Unionist Party leader Opens in new window ] But Robinson is stuck at Westminster, leaving leadership at Stormont to Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly, who holds her seat thanks to co-option rather than election. This is all a complicated legacy of the DUP's botched leadership contest in 2021. It continues to undermine the authority of everyone involved. Neither DUP leader is doing a bad job: a poll in February ranked Little-Pengelly as Stormont's most popular minister. That only underscores the ennui in unionist politics, suggesting voters are so fed up with the DUP it no longer matters who is in charge. The UUP is also under unorthodox management. A selection row last year caused the resignation of leader Doug Beattie. With no obvious replacement, former leader Mike Nesbitt stepped back into the role, making clear he was doing so as a final duty before retirement. This unavoidably adds to the perception that the UUP is counting down the days until its own demise. [ Unionists and Sinn Féin have 'common goal' of making NI work, says Ulster Unionist leader Opens in new window ] TUV leader Jim Allister so dominates his party it is frequently described as a one-man band. Paradoxically, he has been sidelined by his shock triumph in last year's general election, when he unseated the DUP's Ian Paisley. This meant Allister had to vacate the TUV's only assembly seat and move to Westminster, where a lone MP struggles to make an impression. The councillor co-opted to replace him at Stormont, Timothy Gaston, is an effective opposition backbencher but that hardly fills unionism's leadership vacuum. The wider context for unionism's lack of direction is the loss of its overall majority in elections from 2017 and the loss of the first minister's post in 2022. Previous DUP leaders used the office of first minister to present themselves as prime ministers of Northern Ireland, an erroneous but easy way to project leadership by default. Little more by way of vision was required. Contrary to nationalist suspicions, the DUP has had no difficulty accepting second place at Stormont. It is having great difficulty figuring out how to lead unionism from that position.
