logo
Violence is becoming the new normal of Trump's America

Violence is becoming the new normal of Trump's America

Gulf Today7 hours ago

Eric Lewis,
The Independent
Political violence has existed as long as politics. From both the left and the right, violence against political enemies has been a feature, not a bug, of radical political movements. Vladimir Lenin developed a "science of terror", in which violence was essential to overthrow the state. In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler declared: "The very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and regular employment of violence." And Benito Mussolini declared political violence a necessary tool both in his early days as a socialist and after his conversion to fascism. Radicals demonise their enemies and insist on responding with violence justified by any means.
So there is nothing new about the political violence that is becoming increasingly normalised in American life. While much is aimed at Democrats, the Republicans are not immune. The 2024 campaign saw two assassination attempts on Trump, and, in 2017, Steve Scalise, now the Republican Majority Leader of the House, was shot at a softball game.
The social media echo chamber, amplified by easy access to weapons, draws a variety of misfits, conspiracists and millenarian nuts out of the woodwork. But by any objective measure, political violence is primarily counter-revolutionary violence, and at the moment that is most obviously of a type egged on by MAGA rhetoric and the dehumanising and mocking of victims.
In Minnesota, a pro-Trump, anti-abortion gunman posing as a police officer murdered the former Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives, Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in cold blood and put 17 bullets into Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who miraculously survived. This, in a state known for "Minnesota Nice".
The MAGA-sphere went into immediate overdrive to blame it on "the libs". Senator Mike Lee of Utah posted photos of the gunman with the caption, "This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way." In one brief sentence, Lee tells the lie that the killer was somehow a MAGA political enemy rather than a Trump supporter, and that the problem with violence is Marxists and Marxism.
The United States has many issues but adherence to or even knowledge of the principles of Karl Marx is not one of them. A second post by Lee says "Nightmare on Waltz [sic] street," a bizarre attempt at humour suggesting Minnesota Governor Tim Walz was to blame for the shootings.
So, with two people dead and two gravely injured, children left without parents and a quiet, progressive community terrorised, the response from the right is that it is the liberals' fault. There is no need for apology or even empathy: it is not a serious matter. Trump initially said there was no place for political violence, but then took the time to say he would not call Governor Walz to discuss the terrible violence because Walz was "a mess," grossly incompetent, and a "terrible governor." There is no shared empathy in tragedy for Trump. Political enmity is the cardinal value.
Yet two weeks ago, Democratic Senator Alex Padilla was manhandled and thrown to the ground by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's security goons for daring to try to speak out at a press conference in California. They knew that he was a US Senator, and he repeated it multiple times. In the face of video evidence, the Trump Administration simply lied. Trump was reported as saying that Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants who worked menial jobs to send him to MIT, "looked like an illegal."
Just two of Padilla's 53 Republican colleagues in the Senate spoke out; the rest were silent. Additionally, in May, Mayor of Newark Ras Baraka was arrested and Congresswoman LaMonica McIver was charged with felony assault and obstructing ICE. Last week, the New York City Comptroller, Brad Lander, was roughed up and arrested by ICE for demanding to see a warrant. All are Democrats, and three are people of colour.
When then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home was invaded in 2022 in an attempt to kill her (she wasn't home), her octogenarian husband, Paul, had his skull fractured with a hammer. First, the MAGA-sphere lit up with the baseless rumour that this was a gay encounter gone wrong, and then they treated it as a joke.
Trump went full stand-up comic: "We'll stand up to crazy Nancy Pelosi, who ruined San Francisco — how's her husband doing, anybody know?" But he had more: "And she's against building a wall at our border, even though she has a wall around her house, which obviously didn't do a very good job."
And of course, during the insurrection of January 6 2021, when thousands of people were looking to hang Trump's former vice president, Mike Pence, and invaded Nancy Pelosi's office, this too was par for the course. For hours, Trump did nothing to stand them down and was accused of suggesting that Pence indeed deserved to be hanged. When back in power, he indiscriminately gave a blanket pardon to more than 1,000 of those who invaded the capital, including those involved in violence and injury to more than 1,000 police officers, and multiple deaths. These were, in Trump's view, the real patriots.
Political violence against enemies has been coupled with comic relief to convince people that they don't really need to worry about these victims or what is going on in the streets or federal buildings of America.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants more high-tech missiles and drones in $893 billion budget request
Trump wants more high-tech missiles and drones in $893 billion budget request

Al Etihad

timean hour ago

  • Al Etihad

Trump wants more high-tech missiles and drones in $893 billion budget request

26 June 2025 10:08 WASHINGTON (Reuters) US President Donald Trump wants a pay raise for troops, more high-tech missiles and drones in next year's defence budget, while cutting Navy jobs, and buying fewer ships and fighter jets to save money, according to budget materials posted $892.6 billion, the defence and national security budget request is flat compared with this Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up budget, which also includes nuclear weapons-related activities carried out by the Department of Energy and increases funding for homeland security, puts Trump's mark on the military by pulling funds away from weaponry and services to fund his White House said the funding will be used to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific and revitalize the defence industrial of the funding for Trump's marquee Golden Dome missile defence shield was included in a separate budget request and is not part of the latest proposal sent to the 2026 budget, Trump requested fewer F-35 jets made by Lockheed Martin (LMT.N) and only three warships. Procurement of a Virginia-class made by General Dynamics (GD.N) and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII.N) and 15 other ships are expected to be included in a separate appropriation bill, the Navy budget asks for a 3.8% pay raise for troops, but also trims costs by retiring older weaponry including ships and planes that are more expensive to operate. Under the plan, the Navy will reduce its civilian employee workforce by 7,286 to Biden's budget from his last year in office, which had asked for 68 F-35 jets in fiscal 2025, Trump's fiscal 2026 request seeks only 47 of the fighter Pentagon continues prioritizing purchasing munitions and key weapons Air Force is continuing its investment in the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile – Extended Range and Long Range Anti-Ship missiles which have longer ranges and can be more effective in the the other hand, the budget seeks far fewer Precision Strike Missile, which will replace the Army Tactical Missile (ATACM) used in Ukraine. Lockheed Martin makes all three budget also boosts spending on small drones - in part because of lessons learned in Ukraine where unmanned aircraft have proven to be an integral part of low-cost, yet highly effective detailed request comes as Republicans debate defence spending priorities in their sweeping $150 billion defence package contained in the pending "One Big Beautiful Bill Act". The act has already been passed by the House of Representatives and will give an initial $25 billion boost to Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defence shield. Defence spending usually accounts for about half of the US discretionary budget; the rest goes to transportation, education, diplomacy and other departments.

U.S. to Resume Iran Nuclear Talks
U.S. to Resume Iran Nuclear Talks

Arabian Post

time2 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

U.S. to Resume Iran Nuclear Talks

Arabian Post Staff -Dubai U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that American and Iranian officials will meet next week to discuss Tehran's nuclear ambitions, following a concerted military campaign that he claims has effectively neutralised key Iranian enrichment facilities. The announcement came at the NATO summit in The Hague. Trump defended the use of bunker-busting bombs against the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites, asserting they had been 'obliterated' and describing the bombing campaign as a decisive blow to Iran's nuclear programme. He struck a triumphant tone, crediting the strikes with hastening the end of the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, though he expressed reservations about formalising a diplomatic agreement: 'We may sign an agreement. I don't know, to me, I don't think it's that necessary,' he told reporters. ADVERTISEMENT U.S. intelligence assessments, however, diverge on the scale of success. A preliminary report from the Defence Intelligence Agency concluded the setbacks to Iran's nuclear efforts might be limited to a matter of months, not years. CIA Director John Ratcliffe affirmed that the programme had been 'severely damaged' but stopped short of declaring it destroyed. Israeli officials estimated the setbacks to be multi‑year, while the International Atomic Energy Agency emphasised uncertainties over Iran's stockpile and called for robust inspections. Diplomatic activity has meanwhile resumed. This U.S.–Iran meeting will follow six rounds of indirect talks mediated by Oman and Italy, which collapsed in mid‑June as the military confrontation intensified. Earlier this week, European envoys from the E‑3—France, Germany and the UK—engaged in direct negotiations in Geneva with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Those discussions aimed to bridge differences after stalled U.S. efforts. White House special envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated red‑line U.S. stipulations ahead of next week's meeting: Tehran must renounce nuclear weaponisation and accept restrictions on uranium enrichment. He noted the U.S. is open to crafting a comprehensive peace framework, building on what Trump described as a de‑escalation following 'a victory for everybody'. From Tehran, Iranian officials have not confirmed next week's meeting but emphasised national security. The Iranian parliament accelerated a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, pending guarantees for the safety of nuclear infrastructure targeted in the strikes. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf accused the IAEA of failing to condemn the U.S. attack. Meanwhile, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi urged renewed inspections to clarify the status of enriched uranium moved before the bombings. Regional and global actors are also weighing in. France has called for robust diplomacy to carve a sustained peace path. China has echoed the call for diplomatic restraint. Israel hailed the strikes as a critical setback to Iran's programme; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed Trump's strong posture and emphasised the need to keep pressure on Tehran. ADVERTISEMENT Analysts note the gravity of waging diplomacy in the shadow of military action. One specialist observed that while bombings may degrade enrichment infrastructure, they can complicate trust and cooperation needed for inspections and verification. Moreover, uncertainty lingers over the status of highly enriched uranium caches. Rebuilding diplomatic channels will require assurances, reciprocal transparency, and a mutual understanding of consequences. Trump has warned that if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear programme, the U.S. is prepared to act again: 'Sure,' he said when asked about further strikes. Yet the pendulum has swung toward a blend of military deterrence and diplomatic engagement. As next week's talks approach, key questions remain: who will represent each side, where the dialogue will occur, and whether the focus will be solely nuclear constraints or broader regional stability. White House administration officials have yet to disclose details, but the U.S. envoy confirmed Washington's intent is to establish a framework that could replace the 2015 agreement. Trump also signalled openness to exploring a bilateral relationship beyond nuclear confines: 'We'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran,' he said, as long as Tehran adheres to non‑weaponisation terms. As the diplomatic window opens under the spectre of military force, the world watches to see whether this fragile blend of coercion and conciliation can unfold into a sustainable agreement—one that might ensure Iran never pursues nuclear weapons and stabilises a volatile region.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store