US Quality Stocks Are on Sale: Manulife JHI's Miskin
Lisa Shalett of Morgan Stanley making the point that she believes this is a market looking for a credible narrative. Do you think there is one? Earnings growth is the last bastion and the most important fundamental driver of stocks in the US. Earnings growth is there. We're seeing about 13 14% earnings growth, but no one cares actually. US quality stocks are the worst performers within the US equity market and for the global market, quality is on sale. The US is on sale. The sell American trade that we've seen for much of this year has made U.S. assets of the best value we're seeing per pound for pound for the earnings growth are getting. So earnings growth is the only thing that's going to get there. In Europe, earnings are down on a year over year basis. About 4% in small caps are down and midcaps are about flat. U.S. large cap quality stocks have the best earnings. The only problem is markets don't seem to be paying attention to it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US bankruptcies are surging past 2020 pandemic levels
The US economy appears to be on a solid footing, but there's some pain beneath the surface. Corporate bankruptcies this summer have surged to their highest levels since 2020. The list for July filings includes names such as Del Monte Foods and LifeScan Global. Some beloved 1990s and 2000s brands were among the companies to file for bankruptcy this summer, continuing a troubling trend that hints at pain beneath the surface of the US economy. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership Forever 21 and Joann's are among the companies that filed for bankruptcy recently, with many famous retailers closing stores and reducing their physical footprint. Data from S&P 500 Global shows that this summer, US corporate bankruptcy filings surged to their highest level since 2020, with 71 public and private companies filing for bankruptcy last month. That's an increase from June, when 63 companies filed for bankruptcy. Despite a strong stock market and 3% economic growth in the second quarter, some once-prominent names reported hard times in July, citing difficult economic conditions. "Companies are contending with elevated interest rates as uncertainty from US tariff policy pressures costs and supply chain resilience," S&P 500 Global said. Canned goods producer Del Monte Foods, for example, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, noting declining demand and high inventory costs. Leadership also cited a heavy debt burden. Del Monte had combined debts of between $1 billion and $10 billion, Business Insider reported last month. While the August numbers have not been reported yet, a few prominent companies have already filed for bankruptcy, including fashion retailer Claire's. The retailer submitted its second Chapter 11 filing on August 6, also citing declining demand and high interest rates. That puts it in the same category as Forever 21, Rite Aid, and Party City, all once-popular retail chains that have filed for bankruptcy and closed locations in 2025. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Absolutely no one pays attention': I could steal from my children's trust fund without them having a clue
I don't believe the young person writing to your column this week is conflating their disappointment in their mother with financial mismanagement. It would be exceptionally easy to do if one were so inclined. My husband died about 18 months ago when our boys were in their early 20s. I handled all of the paperwork and transfers of accounts after he passed, and I could have been taking money out of the boys' trust for myself without them having a clue. Homeowners rush to refinance as mortgage-rate plunge opens window of opportunity I'm a senior who barely survives on $1,300 a month. No way could I live on $1,000. Is the time-honored 15% tip for restaurant service becoming the norm again? What 20-year-old boy knows anything about such things? If I hadn't told them about the trust, they wouldn't even know it existed. I am on the paperwork as the guardian of the trust, and if I filed the IRS paperwork every year, who's to know where the disbursements go? Absolutely no one pays attention, and while our lawyer set it all up for my husband and me, she was not involved at all after his death. To be clear, I am managing all of it for my boys, not touching a penny. Before my husband passed away, our lawyer suggested changing me to the beneficiary of the trust in question, and I said no. I continue to manage it for our boys. I hope you will consider this scenario going forward. Widow & Mother Related: My brother's 'good daughter' siphoned $70,000 from her father's accounts. Should she still get an inheritance? Don't miss: 'Things are getting tougher': I'm struggling with $145,000 in debt. Should I refinance my 3.5% mortgage? The beneficiary of a trust or bank account can become vulnerable to bad actors, and, yes, that bad actor could be the remaining parent who decides to help themselves to the money or pay themselves exorbitant fees. You are correct about that. The daughter in the letter you mentioned was 20 at the time of her father's passing and, in the eyes of the law, was of age to control her own bank account if she was listed as a beneficiary. The financial institution has a fiduciary duty to pass that account along. If there was a will, as the daughter suggested, that will would be made public. She could contact the probate court in the county where her father lived to access a public copy of any will in existence. More likely, from her retelling, her mother inherited most of her husband's estate. But inheritance theft is real — and the pages of this column are rife with sordid tales of missing money and skullduggery. Such malfeasance could include forged amendments to wills or trusts, missing or destroyed documents, emptied safe-deposit boxes, and/or gifts becoming 'loans.' The best way to prevent this is to choose a trustworthy trustee and, even better, choose two trustees who they can keep an eye on each other. As you point out in your letter, transparency and full disclosure of an estate plan would keep everyone in the loop. When beneficiaries and heirs are kept abreast of the contents of an estate and who is named as a beneficiary, it is much harder to fritter away money without the knowledge of those parties. The more you disclose, the harder it is to hide criminal behavior in plain sight. 'Trustees are responsible for managing a trust in a way that avoids conflicts of interest and ensures it is administered in the best interest of the beneficiaries,' according to J.P. Morgan Wealth Management. Otherwise, they could face civil and criminal penalties. 'The trustee should not use the trust assets for the trustees' own profit and must avoid any adverse interests that conflict with those of the beneficiaries,' it adds. In some cases, it's wiser to appoint a professional rather than a family member who may be tempted to self-deal. 'Consider a scenario where a family business is owned by the trusts and a key executive who runs the business is also a potential trustee,' J.P. Morgan says. 'If that person is selected as a trustee while also running the business, it could lead to a conflict of interest.' Unfortunately, even if a couple has an agreement to pass assets down to the next generation, the surviving spouse can renege on that deal if the estate plan is not airtight. This can be particularly painful and common in blended families with second spouses. Managing a trust requires balance: Trustees can also be held liable if they act recklessly. Most states have adopted the 'Prudent Investor Act' where a trustee is required to invest trust assets under a program of diversification to provide income and/or growth of principal. The prior historical rule, known as the 'Prudent Man Rule,' focused more on the need to preserve assets, leading to conservative investments that may have provided income and did not allow for growth of the trust principal. 'No one can perfectly predict the outcome of every investment decision, but a trustee must apply the prudent investor rule when making investment decisions based on the information available at the time,' according to a guide from Fidelity. 'Whether the outcome is good or bad is not a factor if the trustee followed the principles of the prudent investor rule,' it adds. 'The nature and level of the investment risk should be compatible with the aims of the trust and its beneficiaries.' Not every trust will have the same goals, which should be set out by the grantor. 'Trustees are expected to analyze and make sound decisions that are compatible with portfolio distribution requirements, the level of risk tolerance and other factors,' Fidelity adds. A beneficiary who suspects dodgy dealings can take action. In most jurisdictions, the legal right exists to compel a trustee to provide a report of their activities, including financial information; if they refuse, they can compel the trustee to do so via a court petition. Under Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. rules: 'A trustee must keep and render accurate accounts. The accountings should reflect receipts and disbursements, gains and losses on investments, and other transactions affecting the account.' 'Such records are also necessary for completion of tax returns. Usually, the state law requirements apply to testamentary trusts or court-appointments and call for accountings to the court at specific intervals.' It's difficult to steal money from a trust outright, which is why we hear the phrases 'embezzlement' or 'misappropriation of funds' where a trustee diverts funds for their own use. That could involve something as simple as paying themselves extortionate fees. Your boys are fortunate to have a mother who is looking out for their interests. We may never know for sure whether the daughter in the previous letter was right to suspect her mother of mismanaging funds from the family trust. The good news: When beneficiaries do suspect foul play, there's a lot they can do. Don't miss: My late husband's employer is forcing me to take 10% 401(k) distributions. Help! Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell: 'I have a great mortgage rate': I need $80K to buy my husband out of our home. Do I raid my $180K Roth IRA? 'I'm tired of corporate America': My wife and I have $1.65 million. I'm 61. Can I retire already? 'This scam stuff is going to get worse': A man approached me in my car — he had a crazy story An economic reset is underway which will drive the S&P 500 to 7,500 next spring, one strategist says These Eli Lilly executives have been scooping up stock after its big drop Why a jumbo Fed rate cut in September would 'come across as panicky' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Priscilla Presley's ex-business partners sue her for more than $50 million, alleging fraud
Priscilla Presley's former business partners have filed a lawsuit seeking more than $50 million in damages, alleging fraud and breach of contract. Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko filed the lawsuit Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court. Among many other allegations, they say Presley used them to financially exploit her name, image and likeness, hiding the fact that she had sold those rights decades earlier. The lawsuit comes just over a year after Presley, the 80-year-old former wife of Elvis Presley, sued Kruse and Fialko, alleging they engaged in elder abuse in a 'meticulously planned and abhorrent scheme' to 'prey on an older woman by gaining her trust, isolating her from the most important people in her life, and duping her into believing that they would take care of her (personally and financially), while their real goal was to drain her of every last penny she had.' Kruse and Fialko's lawyer, Jordan Matthews, said in a statement Wednesday that the 'evidence will establish that the real victims here are my clients, who invested millions and years of hard work into revitalizing Priscilla Presley's brand, only to be betrayed and falsely accused once the money was on the table and every personal and business issue had been resolved.' An email seeking comment from Presley's lawyer was not immediately answered. Kruse and Fialko's lawsuit says Kruse is a well-known auctioneer and Fialko a successful entrepreneur, both of whom dealt in Elvis Presley memorabilia. The duo previously sued Priscilla Presley in Florida. They say she approached them in 2021 looking for help to save her from financial ruin, which they spent thousands of hours working to do. 'Kruse and Fialko deployed IP, know-how and creative marketing to enhance Priscilla's brand,' the lawsuit said, and formed several companies to exploit her name, image and likeness. But they say as this was happening, Presley hid from them that she had sold the rights to license her name as part of a $6.5 million deal with Elvis Presley Enterprises in 2005. The lawsuit says that when confronted about the previous agreement, Presley repeatedly denied making it, and later said she had forgotten about it when confronted with evidence of it. The lawsuit also alleges Presley sought to take advantage of the 2023 death of her daughter and Elvis Presley's heir, Lisa Marie Presley, to aggrandize herself and regain a stake in the Elvis' estate. Priscilla and Elvis Presley were married from 1967 to 1973, divorcing four years before the death of the rock 'n' roll legend. Kruse and Fialko say they brokered a 2023 deal to end a legal fight over the estate between Priscilla Presley and Lisa Marie Presley's daughter, actor Riley Keough, getting Priscilla Presley $2.4 million. But the lawsuit says she cut them off in violation of contracts soon after, publicly smeared them and later sued them. Priscilla Presley's lawsuit says that Kruse and Fialko fraudulently convinced her they were essential to her recovering financially, and that her former trusted advisers had been cheating her. It said they compelled her to take part in sham companies, lost control of her name, image and likeness, and forced her into 'a form of indentured servitude.' 'By isolating her and immersing themselves in every aspect of her life, the Defendants were able to fraudulently induce Presley into giving them power of attorney, control over her family and personal trusts, and control over her bank accounts," the lawsuit said. Priscilla became a major public figure when she was a teenager because of her relationship with one of the world's most famous men. She never left the public eye, but she has regained a special prominence in recent years through Baz Luhrmann's 2022 film 'Elvis' and Sofia Coppola's 2023 film 'Priscilla,' based on her memoir. She is also an actor who starred in the original 'Naked Gun' franchise in the 1980s and 1990s, and she had a cameo in the new reboot. Andrew Dalton, The Associated Press
