Possible ban on labelling plant-based food with animal terms like 'burger'
The European Commission is set to consider a ban on plant-based food products from being labelled with terms such as 'sausage', 'burger', or 'steak'.
It follows a proposal from French MEP Céline Imart to make it illegal to use terms linked to animal products on labelling for products that don't contain meat.
The Commission is currently drafting its own proposals for the reform of the common market organisation (CMO) regulation, which allows for changes to rules governing agricultural products.
These are due to be published in the coming weeks.
A number of member states, including Ireland, have expressed support for such a ban.
The EU's Agriculture and Fisheries Council recently debated a paper from the Czech government calling for the protection of traditional names of animal-origin food.
Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Slovakia co-signed the document, while Ireland, France, and Spain are among the countries backing it.
According to the paper, an increasing number of plant-based foods have come onto the single market that are "similar in appearance, taste and consistency to products of animal origin", and that they are "very often labelled with the names belonging to meat, eggs, honey, fish, and products made from them" despite the fact that they "differ substantially from food products of animal origin".
The paper says that it is essential that foods that "imitate" foods of animal origin do not "mislead the consumer by their labelling".
Farming groups welcome pressure on Commission to make changes
Welcoming reports that the EU Commission is under pressure to ban the use of dairy or meat terminology to promote vegetarian or synthetic foods, ICMSA President Denis Drennan said that "the employment of terms like 'sausage', 'burger' and 'schnitzel' in vegetarian or vegan foods was deliberate and cynical and must constitute a breach of any trade descriptions act as commonly understood.
"The hijacking of traditional meat and dairy terms actually constitutes an admission by the corporations involved that they are unable to convince consumers other than by such camouflage.
"Obviously, people are free to eat whatever they want but it is a matter of considerable irritation to farmers to see the very people and corporations who want to replace our naturally produced meat and dairy with their own non-meat and non-dairy products very deliberately using the terms that they know are generally understood to refer to traditional dairy and meat products," Mr Drennan added.
Last year the European Court of Justice ruled that EU member states were prevented from introducing bans on the use of meaty names on non-meat products.
This followed a legal challenge from plant-based food producers against a French ban.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
22 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Will the EU sanction Israel?
The European Union has some lofty goals when it comes to human rights. The EU is said to be 'based on a strong commitment to promote and protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law both within the EU and worldwide'. The bloc's policies comprise the inclusion of human rights clauses in all agreements on trade and co-operation with non-EU countries. There are such clauses in the EU's 'association agreement' with Israel which includes a free trade deal. READ MORE However, do not expect the EU to invoke the clauses to suspend trade with Israel despite its war in Gaza where the death toll has passed 56,000 according to the Hamas -run health authorities. Israel's actions are seen by many in Europe as a disproportionate response to the Hamas attack on October 7th, 2023, when 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. But, as Pat Leahy and Jack Power report in our lead story , pro-Israel countries, including Germany and Italy, are set to block efforts by Ireland and other member states to take action against Israel over its war in Gaza at today's summit of EU leaders in Brussels. Several member states, also including Austria , the Czech Republic and Hungary , will not agree for the EU to take action despite a recent review of an EU-Israel trade agreement that found Israel was committing human rights violations in conflict with it. Ireland and other countries favour taking action, up to and including suspending the trade agreement with Israel, but officials accept that any move to sanction Israel at the summit would likely be blocked. Several capitals traditionally supportive of Israel opposed the review even being mentioned in a joint statement – or 'conclusions' – that would be signed by all 27 national leaders. It is expected, however, that the conclusion will point to the 'dire' humanitarian situation in Gaza , and diplomats said the focus was likely to be on pressuring Israel to allow aid into the enclave rather than for any sanctions. Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the EU's inability to reach a unified position on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is a 'huge stain' on the union . At home, the Government published a summary of its proposed legislation to prohibit the sale of Israeli goods produced in the occupied Palestinian territories . As expected, it makes no reference to services being subject to a similar ban. This drew criticism from pro-Palestinian campaigners and Opposition parties. The summary, or 'heads' of the Bill, will now be sent for pre-legislative scrutiny by the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee. Regardless of whether services ends up being included in the Bill, it will be a small gesture by a small country in opposition to how Israel treats the Palestinian people. While the Government hopes other countries might follow suit with similar measures, it will not have the same impact as collective EU sanctions against Israel. Lofty words on human rights notwithstanding, the prospect of this happening seems remote. Best reads How did Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan fare when he filled in for the Taoiseach at Leaders' Questions on Wednesday? Miriam Lord writes that there was 'a new sheriff in town' and 'expectations were modest'. Jack White details how Tánaiste Simon Harris promised an 'expansionary package' in the budget and said the VAT rate for small businesses will be reduced permanently as he addressed Fine Gael's parliamentary party meeting on Wednesday evening. Investors in Israeli bonds approved by the Irish Central Bank risk being legally complicit in genocide in Gaza , a Social Democrats TD has claimed in a letter to its governor. Jack Horgan-Jones and Harry McGee report . Officials first became aware of an error which could lead to Ministers and civil servants owing thousands of euro to the State in 2017, eight years before it became public, the Oireachtas committee on finance was told. Jack Horgan-Jones' reports the story on the meeting . Playbook Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill is due to take parliamentary questions in the Dáil from 8.47am. Patrick O'Donovan, the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport, is up next at 10.23am. Leaders' Questions is at noon. Government business in the afternoon is a second stage debate on the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 from 1.52pm. TDs have an opportunity to raise topical issues from 5.26pm. A Sinn Féin Bill on transparency and social value in public procurement will be debated from 6.26pm. There will be statements on nursing homes and the care of older people in the Seanad from 11.30am. Senators will debate proposed changes to the Local Property Tax regime from 1.30pm. The Committee on Children will meet the Ombudsman for Children at 9.30am. The Garda Commissioner is due before the public accounts committee (PAC) at 9:30am. The Committee on Defence and National Security is due to continue its pre-legislative scrutiny of the heads of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 – the Government legislation aiming at scrapping the triple lock for overseas troop deployments – at 9.30am. The full Dáil, Seanad and Committee schedules can be found here . EU watches on as Trump changes the world Listen | 41:42
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
'Important step' as tribunal on Russian aggression agreed
Ukraine and the Council of Europe human rights body have signed an agreement on forming the basis for a special tribunal intended to bring to justice senior Russian officials for the crime of aggression against Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset signed the accord in the French city of Strasbourg at the Council's headquarters. "This is truly a very important step. Every war criminal must know there will be justice and that includes Russia. We are now boosting the legal work in a serious way," Mr Zelensky told the ceremony. "There is still a long road ahead. Today's agreement is just the beginning. We must take real steps to make it work. It will take strong political and legal cooperation to make sure every Russian war criminal faces justice, including (President Vladimir) Putin". Ukraine has demanded the creation of such a body since Russia's February 2022 invasion, accusing Russian troops of committing thousands of war crimes. It is also intent on prosecuting Russians for orchestrating the invasion. The 46-member Council of Europe, set up after World War II to uphold human rights and the rule of law, approved the tribunal in May, saying it was intended to be complementary to the International Criminal Court and fill legal gaps in prosecutions. The ICC has issued an arrest warrant against Mr Putin, accusing him of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Mr Berset said the next step to set up the tribunal, which the Council of Europe hopes could start work next year, would be an enlarged agreement to "allow the widest possible number of countries to join, to support, and to help manage the tribunal". It has not yet been decided where the tribunal would be based. "International law must apply to all, with no exceptions and no double standards," said Mr Berset. This is the first time such a tribunal has been set up under the aegis of the Council of Europe, the continent's top rights body. The 46-member Council of Europe is not part of the EU and members include key non-EU European states such as Turkey, the UK and Ukraine. Russia was expelled in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine. According to the Council of Europe, the tribunal will be set up within the framework of the body "with the mandate to prosecute senior leaders for the crime of aggression against Ukraine". It said the tribunal "fills the gap" created by the "jurisdictional limitations" of the ICC. Russian Defence Minister Andrei Belousov said that European supplies of arms and mercenaries to Ukraine had increased the threat of destabilisation in Europe, the Interfax news agency reported. "Attempts to prolong military actions by supplying Ukraine with arms and mercenaries increase the threat of destabilisation. Including in Europe itself," Mr Belousov was quoted as saying. Meanwhile Russia's air defence units destroyed 50 Ukrainian drones overnight, the Russian defence ministry said. Nearly half of the drones were downed over the Kursk region on the border with Ukraine, while the rest were destroyed over several Russian regions, including three over the Moscow region, the ministry added. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, writing on the Telegram messaging app, said specialists were examining debris on the ground. Moscow's Vnukovo International Airport suspended departures and arrivals in response to the threat, news agencies quoted aviation watchdog Rosaviatsiya as saying. Restrictions were also in place for a time at airports along the Volga River.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Pro-Israel countries to block Irish efforts to sanction Israel at EU summit
Pro- Israel countries, including Germany and Italy , are set to block efforts by Ireland and other member states to take action against Israel over its war in Gaza at today's summit of EU leaders in Brussels. Several member states, also including Austria , the Czech Republic and Hungary , will not agree for the EU to take action despite a recent review of an EU-Israel trade agreement that found Israel was committing human rights violations in conflict with it. The EU-Israel 'association agreement' governs relations between the bloc and Israel and includes a free trade deal. Ireland and other countries favour taking action, up to and including suspending the agreement, but officials accept that any move to sanction Israel at the summit would likely be blocked. READ MORE Several capitals traditionally supportive of Israel opposed the review even being mentioned in a joint statement – or 'conclusions' – that would be signed by all 27 national leaders. Haggling over the language in the joint communique was set to continue into Thursday. It would be 'bizarre' if a statement from EU leaders at the end of the summit failed to mention the critical review, one diplomat involved in the talks said. It is expected, however, that the conclusion will point to the 'dire' humanitarian situation in Gaza , and diplomats said the focus was likely to be on pressuring Israel to allow aid into the enclave rather than for any sanctions. The dispute over the wording in the statement illustrates the tense divisions that remain within the EU about how to push Israel to change course and let humanitarian aid flow into Gaza. 'There is no consensus on the issue around the European table,' the diplomat said. Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the EU's inability to reach a unified position on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is a 'huge stain' on the union . Speaking in Brussels on Wednesday, Mr Martin said there must be 'consequences' for Israel's human rights violations. 'Europe needs to speak with a very strong voice, to end this blockade and get vital humanitarian aid into the population of Gaza – otherwise Europe will not have credibility,' he said. The Taoiseach is expected to have discussions with like-minded countries, including on the legislation to ban imports from the occupied Palestinian territories. Irish officials were cautious about the prospects for countries to co-ordinate such actions, but expressed frustration with the EU's lack of action. Yesterday, the Government published a summary of its proposed legislation to prohibit the sale of Israeli goods produced in the occupied Palestinian territories. As expected, it makes no reference to services being subject to a similar ban. This drew criticism from pro-Palestinian campaigners and Opposition parties. [ Where do Europe and Ireland stand as Donald Trump changes the world? Opens in new window ] The summary, or 'heads' of the Bill, will now be sent for pre-legislative scrutiny by the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee. Meanwhile, Nato leaders on Wednesday backed a big increase in defence spending and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack after a brief summit tailor-made for US president Donald Trump . In a short statement, Nato endorsed a higher defence spending goal of 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – a response to a demand by Mr Trump and to European fears that Russia poses a growing threat to Europe's security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The planned increases will see hundreds of billions of euro more being spent on defence and military capabilities over the next decade. 'We reaffirm our iron-clad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all,' said the statement, which came after Mr Trump sparked concern on Tuesday by saying there were 'numerous definitions' of the clause.
