Windsurf's head of product engineering says a successful software engineer is proficient in these 3 skill categories
Windsurf's head of product engineering believes proficiency in three key areas makes a successful software engineer — coding, research, and "metalearning."
Technical fundamentals are first and foremost, Windsurf's Kevin Hou said in a presentation at the AI Engineer World's Fair in San Francisco.
"If we zoom out and think about what makes you all software engineers successful, there are a couple of different categories. The first of which — coding-related. File reads, running terminal commands, seeing your history, even which tabs you have open inside of your editor. This all informs how to generate the correct code."
Following that, there's knowing how to seek support from external sources, Hou added.
"Things like going onto GitHub and viewing a past history of commits, maybe looking at a PR that is doing something similar to the feature you're about to implement, doing online searches, web searches, looking at documentation," he said.
And finally, there's "metalearning," the Windsurf product engineering head said, which he believes separates the veteran coders from the newbies.
"It's the idea of what separates a junior engineer from a senior engineer, from a staff engineer," he said. "These are the organizational best practices, the engineering preferences, that all get encoded into what makes good code."
Windsurf, which produces AI coding tools for developers and was recently acquired by OpenAI for a reported $3 billion, aims to emulate all the aspects that make up the process of a particularly capable programmer, Hou said. Most of what human engineers do now, he added, the company seeks to automate — eventually making it so people are only responsible for the final approval.
"We know it's not enough just to read," he said. "We need to be able to do and write everything. We need to be able to do it all for you. And so the AI has to take action on a wide variety of surfaces beyond just the coding surface, in order to accomplish what a human software engineer would do."
Windsurf is ultimately looking to make software engineering "99% agent and 1% human," Hou added.
"And as more and more of these timelines and workflows become AI-powered, it becomes possible to have Windsurf working for you at all times," he said. "Not only as you type and use autocomplete and tab, but also in the background — researching when you're working, fully in parallel, only asking you to approve."
Windsurf did not respond to a request for additional comment by Business Insider prior to publication.
As AI-assisted coding becomes increasingly popular, companies have already begun to hire fewer human employees. Early-career workers in the tech sphere have been hit particularly hard. In an ideal world, though, Hou said Windsurf will help make programming a more accessible process, not one that's devoid of people entirely.
"We want to build this future where you can code anytime, you can write software at any time," Hou said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WIRED
26 minutes ago
- WIRED
Senator Blackburn Pulls Support for AI Moratorium in Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Amid Backlash
Jun 30, 2025 9:18 PM After critics called the bill a 'get-out-jail-free-card' for Big Tech that could make it nearly impossible to rein in social media platforms, Senator Marsha Blackburn killed her own compromise. President Donald Trump delivers remarks as he hosts a "One, Big, Beautiful" event at the White House on June 26. Photogaph:As Congress races to pass President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' it's also sprinting to placate the many haters of the bill's 'AI moratorium' provision which originally required a 10-year pause on state AI regulations. The provision, which was championed by White House AI czar and venture capitalist David Sacks, has proved remarkably unpopular with a diverse contingent of lawmakers ranging from 40 state attorneys general to the ultra-MAGA Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. Sunday night, Senator Marsha Blackburn and Senator Ted Cruz announced a new version of the AI moratorium, knocking the pause from a full decade down to five years and adding a variety of carve-outs. But after critics attacked the watered-down version of the bill as a 'get-out-of-jail free card' for Big Tech, Blackburn reversed course Monday evening. 'While I appreciate Chairman Cruz's efforts to find acceptable language that allows states to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI, the current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most,' Blackburn said in a statement to WIRED. 'This provision could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives. Until Congress passes federally preemptive legislation like the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework, we can't block states from making laws that protect their citizens.' For those keeping track at home, Blackburn initially opposed the moratorium, then worked with Cruz on the five-year version of the provision, then changed her mind again to oppose her own compromised version of the law. She has historically championed regulations that protect the music industry, which is a major economic player in her home state of Tennessee. Last year, Tennessee passed a law to stop AI deepfakes of music artists. Her proposed AI provision included an exemption for this kind of law, which expands the legal right to protect one's likeness from commercial exploitation. The version of the moratorium she and Cruz proposed on Sunday also had carve-outs for state laws dealing with 'unfair or deceptive acts or practices, child online safety, child sexual abuse material, rights of publicity, protection of a person's name, image, voice, or likeness.' Despite these carve-outs, the new AI provision received fierce opposition from a wide array of organizations and individuals, ranging from the International Longshore & Warehouse Union ('dangerous federal overreach') to Steve Bannon ('they'll get all their dirty work done in the first five years.') The moratorium's carve-out language comes with a caveat that the exempted state laws cannot place 'undue or disproportionate burden' on AI systems or 'automated decision systems.' With AI and algorithmic feeds embedded in social platforms, critics like Senator Maria Cantwell see the provision's language as creating 'a brand-new shield against litigation and state regulation.' Many advocacy groups and legal experts who focus on these issues, including kid safety rules, say that the new AI provision remains incredibly damaging. Danny Weiss, the chief advocacy officer at the nonprofit Common Sense Media, says that this version is still 'extremely sweeping' and 'could affect almost every effort to regulate tech with regards to safety' because of the undue burden shield. JB Branch, an advocate for consumer rights nonprofit Public Citizen, called the updated moratorium 'a clever Trojan horse designed to wipe out state protections while pretending to preserve them' in a statement, and argued that the undue burden language rendered the carve-outs 'meaningless.' On Monday, Cantwell and Senator Ed Markey introduced an amendment to remove the AI moratorium from the bill altogether, condemning the version proposed Sunday evening as 'a wolf in sheep's clothing,' according to a statement from Markey. 'The language still allows the Trump administration to use federal broadband funding as a weapon against the states and still prevents states from protecting children online from Big Tech's predatory behavior,' he said. (The moratorium ties access to funding from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program to compliance with the five-year pause.) The Trump Administration has urged Congress to vote on the Big Beautiful Bill before the break for the Fourth of July holiday. It's unclear when this amendment will be voted on, but it may be soon—and it may have a supporter in Blackburn.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple Could Turn to OpenAi or Anthropic to Power Enhanced Siri, Report Says
Apple (AAPL) could turn to ChatGPT maker OpenAI or Anthropic for help after delays in the launch of its highly anticipated AI-enhanced Siri, Bloomberg reported Monday. The iPhone maker has held talks with both Anthropic and OpenAI about relying on their AI models instead of in-house technology, according to Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. Siri can be used to access ChatGPT with some iPhone models. Significant delays have raised pressure on Apple to prove it can compete with other tech leaders on AI development. Anthropic declined to comment on the report. Apple and OpenAI did not respond to an Investopedia request for comment in time for publication. At Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this month, Senior Vice President of Software Engineering Craig Federighi said the Siri features 'need more time to reach our high quality bar' and that more information would be released 'in the coming year.' Shares of Apple rose 2% to close just above $205 on Monday. The stock has lost nearly a fifth of its value in 2025 so far, making it the second-worst-performing member of the Magnificent Seven stocks this year after Tesla (TSLA). Read the original article on Investopedia
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I think the iPhone 17 will be boring... but you'll still buy it
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I'd have placed a decent bet on Apple making a big deal about Apple Intelligence at WWDC this year, and from that I'd have predicted that the iPhone 17 would be Cupertino's first proper AI phone. The company somewhat fluffed the launch of Apple Intelligence, with AI-powered features for the iPhone 16 family taking a long time to roll out after its launch, and a smarter ChatGPT-centric Siri still absent. With that in mind, I'd have thought Apple would have gone harder on AI at its yearly developer's conference. I was wrong. Apple Intelligence was mentioned, but more as a smart virtual icing to a cake consisting mostly of the Liquid Glass design material and feature updates across Apple's software ecosystem. So with that in mind it's arguably hard to draw any big insights into what'll be in store at the next Apple event, which is likely to be a September one centred around new iPhones. But I think I can have a good stab at what the next iPhone will be like. It'll be boring. My theory here is that the iPhone 17, if Apple does go with that nomenclature, will be a vehicle for iOS 26 with hardware upgrades taking a back seat. While a lot of the core iOS experience will broadly be the same as iOS 18, the design changes could take a little getting used to; plus there are a host of new features in the native apps that could offer users new ways to do things. So I suspect Apple won't do much on the hardware side to get in the way of that experience; there's not likely to be any big changes to the core iPhone design, camera array or materials. Depressingly, I even expect the standard iPhone 17 will still have a 60Hz display, as it seems like Apple is one of the few companies who can get away with this and still charge a premium price. There are some rumors that tout changes such as the use of aluminum for the frame of the iPhone 17 Pro, but I don't buy them; the rumored iPhone 17 Air could use the lighter material, though I don't see that phone shaking up the core design of iPhones. Rather than champion many hardware upgrades, which in recent years have become iterative to the point of being dull, I think Apple will position the iPhone 17 range as a new chapter in getting the most out of a fresh iOS. And I think a lot of people will buy into it. Much like changing up an outfit with the addition of a new shirt or coat, or swapping the strap of a watch, redesigned software can make tried and tested hardware seem fresh and new, even if most of those changes are merely aesthetic. But I think new features like an overhauled Phone app, smart tools for Maps, Wallet and Music, plus new dedicated Games app-meets-hub will make next-generation iPhones feel a lot newer than those that have simply had camera sensor or button upgrades over their predecessors. I'm particularly intrigued to see how the Games app plays out, as Apple has quietly been strengthening the gaming experience on iPhone, with support for titles such as Death Stranding and a suite of original games in the growing Apple Arcade service, both of which I don't feel Android has a strong answer for. Add in a new chip, which is all but guaranteed for the next-gen iPhones, and you could be looking at some impressive stealthy gaming phones. With that in mind, I can see the iPhone 17 offering a family of phones for people who've resisted upgrading to a new iPhone for a couple of years. That's often the case, of course, but I feel iOS 26 will be more of an upgrade catalyst even though models dating back to the iPhone 11 can run this upcoming iteration of Apple's mobile operating system. I'd place a very solid bet that Apple will market the iPhone 17 range as the ideal vehicle for iOS 26, and I'm forecasting that'll suck in a lot of people; let me know in the comments if you don't agree. All that being said, I'm totally open to Apple surprising me with an iPhone that's being given a serious reworking or just has a good clutch of hardware upgrades. I don't personally think this is the year for that – but I don't think that matters either. iOS 26 is official – here are the 5 biggest new features coming to your iPhone I tested iPhone 16 Pro Max, Galaxy S25 Ultra, and more on a sunny day, and here's the one I'd buy for outdoor photography Mac gaming just leveled up – Steam finally runs natively on Apple silicon