Court halts conclusion of Chagos Islands deal with injunction
Downing Street insisted the deal is the 'right thing' but would not comment on the legal case.
A hearing is expected to take place at 10.30am.
In the injunction granted at 2.25am on Thursday, brought against the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Mr Justice Goose granted 'interim relief' to Bertrice Pompe, who had previously taken steps to bring legal action over the deal.
'The defendant shall take no conclusive or legally binding step to conclude its negotiations concerning the possible transfer of the British Indian Ocean Territory, also known as the Chagos Archipelago, to a foreign government or bind itself as to the particular terms of any such transfer,' Mr Justice Goose said in his order.
It requires the Government to 'maintain the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom over the British Indian Ocean Territory until further order'.
According to the order, the judge granted the injunction 'upon consideration of the claimant's application for interim relief made out of court hours' and 'upon reading the defendants' response'.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had been expected to attend a virtual ceremony alongside representatives from the Mauritian government on Thursday morning to sign off on the deal.
Britain would give up sovereignty of the island territory to Mauritius under the deal, and lease back a crucial military base on the archipelago for 99 years.
A Government spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on ongoing legal cases.
'This deal is the right thing to protect the British people and our national security.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Far-right and anti-asylum protesters gather in Nuneaton
Far-right protesters clashed with police on Saturday after hundreds of people gathered outside the town hall in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, for a planned protest. The event was organised in response to two men, reportedly Afghan asylum seekers, who were charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in the town
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour is forcing the brightest out of Britain
How many people do you know leaving the UK? My list gets longer every week. Meanwhile, the Labour Government is standing still, watching an exodus of talent and enterprise jump to greener pastures where ability and entrepreneurship are applauded, not attacked. I read with despair last month that John Fredriksen, the Norwegian shipping billionaire and Britain's ninth-richest man, is moving to Dubai. On departure he declared 'Britain has gone to hell ' – echoing what I know many of Britain's brightest are thinking. But this isn't just about the wealthy. Walk through the City today and you'll hear people in their twenties and thirties with first-class degrees from Russell Group universities, several years into prosperous jobs and already contributing greatly to our economy, discussing job offers in Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong. These aren't millennials seeking sun and tax breaks; they're Britain's future leaders leaving before their careers have truly taken off. I see this clearly through my son and his friends. Over the summer, I listened to his contemporaries – the sort of ambitious, well-educated graduates Britain desperately needs to retain – comparing salary packages from international firms, all based outside the UK. The ripple effects run deeper than any Treasury spreadsheet can capture. When Fredriksen announced his departure, the headlines focused on losing Britain's ninth-richest man. What they missed was the ecosystem around such figures. The professional services they used, from family offices to accountants and lawyers – all gone. More damaging still is the signal this sends globally. Fredriksen isn't just another wealthy expatriate seeking lower taxes. He's an extraordinary businessman who built an empire from nothing: a global leader whose investment decisions move markets. When someone of his calibre declares that 'Britain has gone to hell' and relocates to Dubai, it resonates far beyond the financial pages. It tells every international investor, every ambitious entrepreneur, every bit of mobile talent considering where to base their next venture, that Britain is no longer the place to do serious business. This is the true cost of Labour's war on wealth creation – not just the direct tax revenue lost, but the compound effect of diminished opportunity, reduced ambition and Britain's declining reputation as the natural home for global talent. This exodus isn't surprising when you consider who's making Britain's economic decisions. Of the 32 members of Labour's Cabinet, just one has ever started a business, while fewer than half have any private sector experience whatsoever. Meanwhile, the homelessness minister has resigned after claims she evicted tenants from a property she owns and then increased the rent by hundreds of pounds – behaviour she was simultaneously trying to outlaw under her own Renters' Rights Bill. Compare this to Nigel Lawson, who understood that governments don't create wealth – people do. During his six years as Chancellor, Lawson reversed Britain's spiral of industrial chaos, replacing defeatist pessimism with entrepreneurial dynamism. As we head into what will be a challenging Autumn, I grow increasingly frustrated by this Government's reluctance to pursue radical reforms. Instead, it tinkers around the edges while Rome burns. The Chancellor should be ambitious and bold. But Rachel Reeves has already admitted that further tax rises are coming, saying she won't rule them out because 'it would be irresponsible for a Chancellor to do that'. We are already reaching peak taxation – the Office for Budget Responsibility warns that the tax burden will hit a historic high of 37.7 per cent of GDP by 2027–28. Yet Labour seems oblivious to the economic reality that tax cuts, not tax rises, stimulate growth. What the figures reveal is deeply concerning. Labour raised taxes by £40 billion a year in their first Budget, having set out only £7 billion in manifesto tax plans. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research warns that Labour's economic mismanagement has created a £41.2 billion deficit. Put simply, the Chancellor cannot simultaneously meet her fiscal rules, fulfil her spending commitments, and uphold the Labour manifesto pledge to avoid taxing working people. Take our self-inflicted wound over tax-free shopping. Britain is now the only European country that doesn't offer tax-free shopping to international visitors, handing our competitors a 20 per cent price advantage. What this Government fails to understand is human behaviour. Every time the Treasury pulls another tax lever, human habits change: the brightest minds leaving for better opportunities abroad, the entrepreneurs quietly relocating their headquarters. Ministers seem transfixed by their spreadsheets and the theoretical millions they believe they can squeeze from each new policy. But spreadsheets don't capture the midnight conversations between parents wondering if they can still afford their child's school fees, or the graduates accepting job offers in Singapore rather than staying home. We should be learning from countries that understand how to attract rather than repel talent. Italy has successfully brought in 1,186 high-net-worth individuals since introducing its flat tax regime in 2017. Meanwhile, Ireland's tax receipts hit a record €108 billion in 2024. These aren't accidents – they're the result of competitive policies that understand you attract more bees with honey than vinegar. The choice facing Britain is stark: continue this war on talent and watch more of our brightest follow Fredriksen's path to places like Dubai, or embrace the policies that once made Britain a magnet for global minds and capital. That's why Kemi Badenoch's approach is the right one. She has made clear she will only announce policies that are costed, and clear, or that will save money. Her vision for a revitalised Conservative Party will take time, trust, and transparency, but what's consistent is that it's always been the Conservatives who are committed to the values of enterprise, sound money, and renewal. My work over the past 40 years across business, the arts, and education all comes from one place – because I love this country and continue to believe in public service. Born and bred in Grimsby, I could never turn my back on the communities I've grown up with. But they do deserve better. So rather than leave the country, I am committed to doubling down and trying to help tackle the challenges facing us.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Nicola Sturgeon denies 'conspiracy to destroy' Alex Salmond
Scotland's former first minister Nicola Sturgeon has denied the existence of a conspiracy to destroy her mentor Alex a fresh extract from her memoir, published in the Sunday Times, Sturgeon accuses Salmond of failing to show any contrition for his "inappropriate" behaviour towards 2020 Salmond was cleared of 13 sexual offence charges, including attempted rape, but during the trial his lawyer admitted his client could "have been a better man."The ex-SNP leader and Alba Party founder died of a heart attack in North Macedonia in October last year, aged 69. "It felt to me", writes Sturgeon, that Salmond "would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him."She adds: "He impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy - government, police, Crown Office. "He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all."In the memoir, entitled Frankly, Sturgeon describes the moment when Salmond first informed her of the allegations against him."The substance of the complaints, one in particular, shocked me. I felt sick", she writes. At first, she says, Salmond had appeared "upset and mortified" and had "effectively admitted the substance of one of the complaints," calling it a "misunderstanding" for which he had Sturgeon goes on, it quickly became evident that her predecessor as first minister wanted her "to intervene and to stop the investigation in its tracks or divert it into some kind of siding."Her refusal to do so, she says, "made the break-up of one of the most successful partnerships in modern British politics all but inevitable.""I had to face the fact that he was determined to destroy me. I was now engaged in mortal political combat with someone I knew to be both ruthless and highly effective," she him as a friend, Sturgeon continues, resulted in her going through "a grieving process.""I had occasional, vivid dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft," she succeeded Salmond as SNP leader and first minister in 2014 until she resigned in March 2023. Sturgeon also writes about the Scottish government's botched investigation into the complaints against 2019, a judicial review had concluded that the process was unlawful, unfair and tainted by apparent was later awarded more than £500,000 in costs."In Alex's narrative, he wasn't just a victim any more," writes Sturgeon, "he was now a vindicated victim."It later emerged that messages had been exchanged between women complainers - a Scots law term for someone alleging that they are a victim of crime - and also between SNP staff writes that Salmond inaccurately "spun these as evidence of people conspiring to bring him down". Rather, she said, the messages were between loyal supporters expressing "deep shock" and "women who considered themselves victims of his behaviour" who were "seeking support and comfort from each other."Sturgeon accuses Salmond of trying to "distort and weaponise" genuine shock or trauma in a way that was "truly disgraceful," adding "it strikes at the heart of why I find it so hard to forgive him"."A conspiracy against Alex would have needed a number of women deciding to concoct false allegations, without any obvious motive for doing so. "It would then have required criminal collusion between them, senior ministers and civil servants, the police and the Crown."This, she says, was "a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct."Reflecting on Salmond's death, while attending a conference in the North Macedonian city of Ohrid, Sturgeon writes that the emotions she felt suggested she had not come to terms with their estrangement."I know I will never quite escape the shadow he casts, even in death", she concludes. The extract is the second to be published from Sturgeon's the first, published in The Times on Saturday, the former first minister described her arrest by police investigating the SNP's finances as the worst day of her describes being questioned by detectives as part of Operation also writes about her "utter disbelief" about police raiding the home she shared with her husband Peter Murrell in April in the extracts, the former SNP leader describes the pain of suffering a miscarriage and sets out her views on sexuality, which she says she does not consider "to be binary".
