
Labour is forcing the brightest out of Britain
Meanwhile, the Labour Government is standing still, watching an exodus of talent and enterprise jump to greener pastures where ability and entrepreneurship are applauded, not attacked. I read with despair last month that John Fredriksen, the Norwegian shipping billionaire and Britain's ninth-richest man, is moving to Dubai. On departure he declared 'Britain has gone to hell ' – echoing what I know many of Britain's brightest are thinking.
But this isn't just about the wealthy. Walk through the City today and you'll hear people in their twenties and thirties with first-class degrees from Russell Group universities, several years into prosperous jobs and already contributing greatly to our economy, discussing job offers in Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong. These aren't millennials seeking sun and tax breaks; they're Britain's future leaders leaving before their careers have truly taken off.
I see this clearly through my son and his friends. Over the summer, I listened to his contemporaries – the sort of ambitious, well-educated graduates Britain desperately needs to retain – comparing salary packages from international firms, all based outside the UK.
The ripple effects run deeper than any Treasury spreadsheet can capture. When Fredriksen announced his departure, the headlines focused on losing Britain's ninth-richest man. What they missed was the ecosystem around such figures. The professional services they used, from family offices to accountants and lawyers – all gone.
More damaging still is the signal this sends globally. Fredriksen isn't just another wealthy expatriate seeking lower taxes. He's an extraordinary businessman who built an empire from nothing: a global leader whose investment decisions move markets. When someone of his calibre declares that 'Britain has gone to hell' and relocates to Dubai, it resonates far beyond the financial pages. It tells every international investor, every ambitious entrepreneur, every bit of mobile talent considering where to base their next venture, that Britain is no longer the place to do serious business.
This is the true cost of Labour's war on wealth creation – not just the direct tax revenue lost, but the compound effect of diminished opportunity, reduced ambition and Britain's declining reputation as the natural home for global talent.
This exodus isn't surprising when you consider who's making Britain's economic decisions. Of the 32 members of Labour's Cabinet, just one has ever started a business, while fewer than half have any private sector experience whatsoever. Meanwhile, the homelessness minister has resigned after claims she evicted tenants from a property she owns and then increased the rent by hundreds of pounds – behaviour she was simultaneously trying to outlaw under her own Renters' Rights Bill.
Compare this to Nigel Lawson, who understood that governments don't create wealth – people do. During his six years as Chancellor, Lawson reversed Britain's spiral of industrial chaos, replacing defeatist pessimism with entrepreneurial dynamism.
As we head into what will be a challenging Autumn, I grow increasingly frustrated by this Government's reluctance to pursue radical reforms. Instead, it tinkers around the edges while Rome burns.
The Chancellor should be ambitious and bold. But Rachel Reeves has already admitted that further tax rises are coming, saying she won't rule them out because 'it would be irresponsible for a Chancellor to do that'. We are already reaching peak taxation – the Office for Budget Responsibility warns that the tax burden will hit a historic high of 37.7 per cent of GDP by 2027–28. Yet Labour seems oblivious to the economic reality that tax cuts, not tax rises, stimulate growth.
What the figures reveal is deeply concerning. Labour raised taxes by £40 billion a year in their first Budget, having set out only £7 billion in manifesto tax plans. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research warns that Labour's economic mismanagement has created a £41.2 billion deficit. Put simply, the Chancellor cannot simultaneously meet her fiscal rules, fulfil her spending commitments, and uphold the Labour manifesto pledge to avoid taxing working people.
Take our self-inflicted wound over tax-free shopping. Britain is now the only European country that doesn't offer tax-free shopping to international visitors, handing our competitors a 20 per cent price advantage.
What this Government fails to understand is human behaviour. Every time the Treasury pulls another tax lever, human habits change: the brightest minds leaving for better opportunities abroad, the entrepreneurs quietly relocating their headquarters. Ministers seem transfixed by their spreadsheets and the theoretical millions they believe they can squeeze from each new policy. But spreadsheets don't capture the midnight conversations between parents wondering if they can still afford their child's school fees, or the graduates accepting job offers in Singapore rather than staying home.
We should be learning from countries that understand how to attract rather than repel talent. Italy has successfully brought in 1,186 high-net-worth individuals since introducing its flat tax regime in 2017. Meanwhile, Ireland's tax receipts hit a record €108 billion in 2024. These aren't accidents – they're the result of competitive policies that understand you attract more bees with honey than vinegar.
The choice facing Britain is stark: continue this war on talent and watch more of our brightest follow Fredriksen's path to places like Dubai, or embrace the policies that once made Britain a magnet for global minds and capital.
That's why Kemi Badenoch's approach is the right one. She has made clear she will only announce policies that are costed, and clear, or that will save money. Her vision for a revitalised Conservative Party will take time, trust, and transparency, but what's consistent is that it's always been the Conservatives who are committed to the values of enterprise, sound money, and renewal.
My work over the past 40 years across business, the arts, and education all comes from one place – because I love this country and continue to believe in public service. Born and bred in Grimsby, I could never turn my back on the communities I've grown up with. But they do deserve better. So rather than leave the country, I am committed to doubling down and trying to help tackle the challenges facing us.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
First Nick Clegg lost his seat, now he's on the public-speaking circuit and can't fill them: ANDREW PIERCE
He was once the deputy prime minister but then Sir Nick Clegg led the Lib Dems into the political wilderness at the 2015 General Election before losing his Commons seat two years later. Fortune smiled on him when he moved to Silicon Valley as the PR chief for tech billionaire and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and picked up a salary package north of £10million. Now he's back in Britain – and on the public-speaking circuit. Except the public don't seem willing to listen to him. Media company Intelligence Squared has billed him as being 'at the heart of power for two decades' at an event next month at the 900-seat-capacity Union Chapel in Islington, north London. Such is the woeful response that they've cut ticket prices by 69 per cent and seats are still available. How the mighty fall. Keir hits the right note Is former flautist Sir Keir Starmer delivering a rebuke to disharmonious colleagues when he tells Classic FM? 'As everybody who's ever done music will know you've got to work in a team. You have to play your notes or your instrument at the right time. Got to have eye contact. Those are skills which go way beyond music.' The PM chose Beethoven Piano Concerto No.5, 2nd movement as his favourite piece of music because it's 'what my wife [ Victoria ] walked down the aisle to. Before your wedding day, everyone says it's going to be the best day of your life. And you think, well I'm not sure, what about when Arsenal won the double?' Sensing trouble at home, Starmer stressed: 'A fantastic memory of what was a brilliant day. Better than the double, I'll add, just for when Vic listens in to this.' Former Sun editor David Dinsmore is the new Whitehall communications chief. He never came cheap. The Cabinet Office paid external recruitment consultants alone a whopping £46,000 for finding him. Did no one have Dinsmore's email or phone number? The US vice-president JD Vance and his wife Usha are staying in a sprawling £8,000-a-week Cotswolds mansion near Jeremy Clarkson's celebrated TV farm. It's owned by Johnny and Pippa Hornby who are close friends of David Cameron, the former Tory leader and foreign secretary. Hornby has a business manufacturing electrical components in China and US trade tariffs will be a subject close to his heart. Did Cameron have a hand in the VP's domestic arrangement? Seemingly unashamed of Thames Water's appalling record of raw sewage discharge into rivers, Commander Richard Aylard, a key adviser to the company's chief executive, writes on Linkedin: 'After 21 years in leadership roles with Thames Water, including 15 years as a member of the Executive Leadership Team, I now work on short-term projects and in advisory roles.' No mention by the way of his time with the then Prince Charles when he was sacked as private secretary after advising the heir to the throne to admit to adultery in a TV documentary with Jonathan Dimbleby. Lisa gets a loser badge It wasn't that long ago Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy seemed to be headed for the exit door. And last week, as she announced £88 million worth of investment into youth clubs, she admitted she'd encountered failure before - as young as a Brownie. She told LBC's Nick Ferrari: 'I was a disaster at Brownies. I went there three years - and I only got one badge. That's how bad I was. 'It was the Hostess Badge - and I failed it three times. They made you peel carrots and potatoes and I just couldn't get the hang of it and I couldn't see the point of it. 'Eventually they felt sorry for me, so they just gave me the badge anyway. Not my finest hour.'


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scotland's Grant Forrest claims Nexo Championship title... before fielding a personal call from Donald Trump to congratulate him!
Scotland's Grant Forrest was congratulated by US President Donald Trump as he eased to victory on home soil for the second time in his career following a four-shot success at the Nexo Championship. The 32-year-old, who won his maiden DP World Tour title at St Andrews almost exactly four years ago, took control of windy conditions over the weekend at Trump International Golf Links to assert his dominance. Forrest was congratulated with a FaceTime call by Trump after clinching victory on his course. Posted on the DP World Tour X feed, Trump, who was on the golf course himself in Washington, chatted to Forrest for around a minute. The American President said: 'He is some player. I look forward to playing with him. In fact I'll play with him tomorrow if he could get on a plane! 'I watched you play and what a round of golf. Your swing is great and it's a great honour that you won. Thank you very much.' Holding a three-shot advantage heading into the final round, Forrest saw his lead trimmed to two after Englishman Todd Clements' birdie on the opening hole. However, when he birdied the fourth and Clements carded a triple-bogey eight at the same hole, the Scot led by five and never looked back. The world No 294, who had the luxury of double-bogeying the last, posted a final-round 72 to win by four shots from Englishman Joe Dean. 'It's amazing, I'm just speechless,' said Forrest. 'I think it's the same week as I won four years ago on the calendar, so it's just amazing. That must say something about this week and being at home. 'I just can't believe it. It's been such a tough year on the golf course. It's just a crazy game that you can go and come out and do this, with what feels like out of nowhere.'


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour police boss blasted after handing £5k of taxpayers' cash to help save Liverpool Pride
A Labour Police and Crime Commissioner has been criticised after it emerged she handed over £5,000 of taxpayers' cash for a gay pride march – just weeks before a High Court judge ruled that allowing uniformed police officers to take part in such a parade was biased and unlawful. Emily Spurrell, a former councillor and PCC for Merseyside, made the donation of public money to 'save' Liverpool Pride, which was under threat because of a shortage of funds. The cash from her office – which was the top donation of any organisation or individual – helped the event to go ahead as planned, on July 26. But just days earlier Northumbria Police was admonished by the High Court for allowing uniformed police officers to march under a Progress flag promoting transgender ideology at a pride march last year. In his ruling, Mr Justice Linden said it was 'contrary to the uniformed officers' duties of impartiality', as well as Northumbria Chief Constable Vanessa Jardine's 'own duty of impartiality, to participate in the 2024 march, in Newcastle, in the way that they did.' His judgement had immediate repercussions for police forces nationwide, with some opting to ban their officers from marching and taking part in such future events – unless policing it in an official capacity. Yesterday critics said Ms Spurrell's decision to make the donation when the High Court case was 'on the horizon' was 'an extraordinary misuse of public funds' and 'simply stupefying.' Sarah Pochin, Reform UK MP for nearby Runcorn and Helsby, said: 'The Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner's £5,000 donation to Liverpool Pride is an extraordinary misuse of public funds. 'With rising crime and anti-social behaviour, taxpayers want to see safer streets not political gestures.' Another outraged local told the Mail: 'When other forces are following the ruling and making cancellations in relation to Pride events – the Merseyside PCC was shelling out thousands - that's in no way impartial. 'The decision to make the donation when that High Court case was on the horizon was simply stupefying.' Under police regulations, which are set out in legislation, officers have a duty to act with impartiality and must avoid activities likely to interfere with the impartial discharge of their duties. Allowing Northumbria police officers to march in Newcastle's 2024 Pride in the City parade, and to staff a police stall decorated in the colours of the Progress flag, alongside a van painted in the same design, breached that duty, the judge found. He agreed with lawyers for Linzi Smith, a lesbian who brought the case against the Northumbria force, that when police officers appeared in uniform or under official branding while displaying the Progress flag, it suggested an alignment or support for gender ideology or transgender rights. The Progress Pride flag is a variation on the original rainbow banner adopted by gay rights campaigners in the 1970s. It has extra colours to represent trans and non-binary people, as well as people of colour and those living with Aids. Soon after the ruling, Chief Constable Tim Forber, of neighbouring North Yorkshire police, said any officers from his force who wished to participate in such parades, who were not officially on duty or 'actively engaged in policing the event,' would not be permitted to wear uniform. 'Participating in protest activity, or parades that support any 'cause' can quite rightly undermine the public's confidence in that impartiality,' he said. 'I do not allow the altering of police uniform or the changing of the livery of police vehicles to show support for any cause.' Similarly, Greater Manchester Police officers were also told they will not be able to take part and 'represent the force' at this year's Manchester Pride parade later this month. In a letter to staff, Assistant Chief Constable Stephanie Parker said the High Court ruling had concluded that 'such participation could reasonably be perceived by the public as the police taking a side in ongoing societal and political debates.' She specifically highlighted gender identity and 'related issues' in the correspondence. While GMP 'remains steadfast in its commitment to equality, diversity, and inclusion' and 'would continue to support LGBTQ 'colleagues and communities', Ms Parker said they also needed to 'uphold the principle of operational impartiality'. The senior officer added that staff will continue to be able to attend Manchester Pride 'in a personal capacity' and encouraged 'everyone to continue celebrating and supporting our diverse communities'. 'We understand this may be disappointing to many, but this decision has been made to ensure we remain compliant with legal expectations and maintain public confidence in our impartiality,' she added.