logo
Stock-Split Watch: Is Nvidia (NVDA) Next?

Stock-Split Watch: Is Nvidia (NVDA) Next?

Yahoo2 days ago
Key Points
Nvidia has split its stock six times, most recently 10-for-1 in June 2024.
The current stock price is well below previous split-launching highs.
Long-term value for Nvidia investors comes from its leadership in AI, not stock splits.
10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›
Semiconductor designer Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has split its stock six times so far, including a splashy 10-for-1 split in June 2024. The shares are climbing to new highs again with a market cap of $4.34 trillion.
Will Nvidia announce another split before the end of 2025? Let's have a look.
Nvidia's business is booming
First and foremost, a stock split wouldn't make sense if the company were in financial trouble. That's a pretty academic concern here, though. As the leading supplier of high-performance artificial intelligence (AI) accelerators, Nvidia is enjoying a golden age.
Its trailing revenue has soared 354% higher over the last two years to $148.5 billion. Nvidia converted $72.1 billion of those beefy sales into free cash flow over the last year. That's up from $5.1 billion two years ago.
And many experts expect its booming business to stay strong for years. Rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD) and Cerebras have developed competitive AI chips, but Nvidia's solutions quickly emerged as an industry standard.
Surging data center construction around the world suggests that the market leader will see plenty of AI chip orders in the coming years. Ergo, Nvidia is doing quite all right, and some would argue that the stock is undervalued today.
Why Nvidia's next split isn't around the corner
A technical issue makes it clear that Nvidia won't execute the next stock split in 2025. These moves need approval, usually by a passing vote at the company's annual meeting of shareholders. That ship sailed on June 25.
Management could call a special meeting just to consider a stock split proposal, but honestly, it's not that big of a deal. Hold that thought -- I'll explain what I mean in a minute.
All right, but would it make any sense to lower the share price with another split someday soon? The stock is trading at nearly $180, having gained 46% since last year's big split.
But the stock soared all the way to $1,200 per share before Nvidia reorganized its stock offering in 2024. Before that, it cost a split-adjusted $740 around the time of the 4-for-1 split in July 2021.
A 46% gain is impressive, especially when starting from a market-cap launchpad worth $3 trillion. But it's a long way to go from $180 to $1,200, or even to the lower $740 range.
Judging by Nvidia's earlier split announcements, I'd be surprised to see another stock split in the next year or two. That's true even if the stock price keeps rising 46% per year.
Stock splits in 2025: More hype than wealth-building substance
As noted earlier, stock splits aren't a big deal. They used to be, when stocks had to be traded in round lots of 100 shares. But that requirement was scrapped in 2007, and most brokerages allow trading of fractional shares nowadays. The concept of hugely expensive round lots is nearly as outdated as stock quotes in fractions of a dollar (not seen since 2001), and the real-world value of stock splits disappeared when these changes were made.
Splits are still great headline fodder in 2025, and you can see them as the board of directors issuing a vote of confidence for future price gains. But the split itself neither boosts nor hurts the stock price or total market value. You're just cutting Nvidia's $4.34 trillion of shareholder value into a different number of equal shares: 10 shares worth $176 each is exactly the same as 40 shares priced at $44.
So don't worry too much about Nvidia's stock-splitting plans. It's not likely to happen soon, and it's not a game-changing event if it takes this accounting step. Just keep an eye on the evolving AI boom to make sure the chipmaker hangs on to its dominant market share.
That's where the real shareholder value comes from, after all.
Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025
Anders Bylund has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Stock-Split Watch: Is Nvidia (NVDA) Next? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How ‘Vibe Coding' Is Creating A New AI Economy
How ‘Vibe Coding' Is Creating A New AI Economy

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How ‘Vibe Coding' Is Creating A New AI Economy

In early January, 18‑year‑old Justin Jin launched Giggles — an AI-powered social entertainment app that's reportedly attracted over 120,000 waitlist sign-ups and generated 150 million impressions — all without a venture capital war chest, a marketing budget, or a traditional engineering team. Instead, he and his team of young co-founders leveraged AI to build an app for Gen Alpha and Gen Z, where users interact through AI-generated content, digital collectibles and gamified social engagements. A few weeks later, another startup arrived on the scene — Base44, founded by a non-technical creator who used AI to 'vibe code' a no-code development platform. Within six months and under ten people, it reached profitability, pulled in 300,000 users and sold to Wix for $80 million in cash, according to TechCrunch. Suddenly, a new archetype emerged: Companies not founded on traditional engineering teams, but shaped by creativity, culture and AI orchestration. This is the story of the moment. AI is redefining entrepreneurship, allowing people with a vision and cultural understanding — but not necessarily computer-science degrees — to ship platform-level products. But questions are mounting: Can this new model of entrepreneurship scale beyond prototype success without deeper engineering muscle? The Rise Of Vibe Coding Two years ago, the phrase 'vibe coding' barely existed. Today, it's everywhere. The term — coined by Andrej Karpathy, former AI lead at Tesla and cofounder of OpenAI — describes writing with AI by simply speaking ideas. 'You fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials and forget that the code even exists,' Karpathy tweeted in February. It's shorthand for a new era, where programming is done through a natural language like English. According to Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator, many startups now use AI to generate up to 95% of their codebase — achieving results that once required teams of 50 to 100 engineers with fewer than ten people. Meanwhile, in a recent article for Business Insider, Alistair Barr highlighted how 'non‑traditional, AI‑native developers' are turning natural language into apps, fundamentally altering SaaS economics. This shift is democratizing entrepreneurship. Product managers, artists, even high-schoolers can now ship products faster than ever before, all without technical expertise. But it also comes with some problems. As Nigel Douglas, head of developer relations at Cloudsmith, cautioned in the Financial Times, 'If you're creating an app in your spare time, a 'DIY disaster' might just mean an ugly interface. But in a business setting, the wrong tool can do real damage and result in data breaches, service outages, or a compromised software supply chain.' GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke echoed this warning at the just-concluded VivaTech in Paris: 'A non‑technical founder will find it difficult to build a startup at scale without developers,' adding that tools like vibe coding don't provide the depth needed to justify serious investment. Even AI-native founders acknowledge the model's limitations. 'There's a need to build technical depth. We know that's important and are expanding engineering operations and bringing on advisors,' said Edwin Wang, co-founder of Giggles. 'The future, however, must be a community-governed and decentralized future where there's a balance between creativity and coding.' When Creativity Replaces Code: The Giggles Test Case Giggles is a microcosm of this transformation. Jin, alongside co-founders Edwin Wang and music artist Matthew Hershoff, built a system where users are rewarded for digital expression through game-like interactions — including AI-generated videos, collectible content, and daily quests. The result was a storytelling-centric platform developed without a traditional coding team — a structure that reflects the emerging blueprint behind many Gen Z–led apps. Jin previously founded Mediababy, which sold for $3.8 million, according to Reuters. That experience, he said, shaped his belief that platforms thrive when they prioritize user expression and fluid engagement over rigid structure. At Giggles, that belief translated into a product anchored in prompt-driven creativity, gamified feedback loops, and community-led interaction. As Wang noted, the company positions itself not just as an alternative to TikTok, but as a platform tailored for a generation it believes is increasingly disengaged from traditional social formats. And according to Hershoff, 'creators aren't limited to just posting photos and videos. They can vibe code a game, develop an app, create a whole virtual world and post it on Giggles.' Can AI-First Startups Scale? For all the momentum behind AI-native startups, there's a hard truth facing founders like Jin: culture can spark attention, but infrastructure sustains it. Platforms like Giggles, which thrive on virality and creator energy, eventually confront the same foundational question as any company with ambition. Can they scale securely, reliably, repeatedly and with technical discipline? At this stage, Giggles is less an anomaly and more a litmus test for how AI is transforming digital entrepreneurship. It's a living experiment in what happens when creativity, not technical expertise, drives product development. But to evolve from prompt-powered outfits into structured business ecosystems, these companies will need more than just vibes. They will need systems, safeguards and engineering depth. That's where founders must reckon with the limits of what vibe coding can achieve. Dohmke's warning at VivaTech isn't a dismissal of AI's potential, but a reminder of where the handoff happens. While AI can accelerate the zero-to-one moment, scaling responsibly requires the engineering rigor to turn a clever idea into a truly dependable platform. Jin and his team appear to recognize that. While Giggles was built without a traditional engineering stack, the company is now investing in its technical foundation. Wang, the platform's co-founder and lead developer, acknowledges that 'scaling creativity still requires coding discipline.' That doesn't diminish their AI-first origin; it refines it. The next test for Giggles — and others like it — isn't whether AI can launch a product. It's whether that product can become the infrastructure others depend on. A Hybrid Future For Founders What might the next decade yield? The trends point at a wave of hybrid founders: People with vivid creative vision and AI fluency who bring in veteran operators and engineers to solidify their product. That's the emerging blueprint: rapid prototyping, followed by structural discipline. Industry stalwart Reid Hoffman sees that promise, noting that 'bringing AI into your toolkit makes you enormously attractive.' But he and others caution that early AI advantage doesn't equal long-term lead. As AI-generated code gets better, so too must practices around testing, review, and security. In the end, the rise of vibe coding is real, but it's only half the story. Architecture, execution and human judgment are what matters most. While Giggles, Base44 and the rising 'AI-native' wave might be writing the prologue, the plot turns on whether these founders can turn vibe into real structure. 'In the end,' Jin told me, 'it's not just about who can build fast. It's about who can build something that lasts.'

Vingroup Plans to Build $14.3 Billion Port, Logistics Center
Vingroup Plans to Build $14.3 Billion Port, Logistics Center

Bloomberg

time21 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Vingroup Plans to Build $14.3 Billion Port, Logistics Center

Vietnamese conglomerate Vingroup JSC plans to invest about 373.84 trillion dong ($14.3 billion) to build a seaport and logistic center in the northern city of Haiphong, according to a statement on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange website. The project will consist of three phases and construction will run from 2026 until 2040, the statement said. Vingroup will use its own funds to finance about 15% of the total investment costs and seek external sources to pay for the remaining 85%.

Yankees are paying 3 players a combined $43.8 million to not play for them
Yankees are paying 3 players a combined $43.8 million to not play for them

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Yankees are paying 3 players a combined $43.8 million to not play for them

The New York Yankees have always been known for having a lot of money. They may not be the richest franchise in baseball anymore, though. The New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers seem to be shelling out even more dough. But the Yankees have one financial flex going for them, if it can be called a flex. And it's this: They're currently paying three players a combined $43.8 million not to play for them. Those three guys are DJ LeMahieu, Aaron Hicks and Marcus Stroman. The number works out to $43,785,714, to be exact. MORE: Cubs' Matthew Boyd has mastered the balk pickoff move Baseball contracts, unlike many of those in other professional sports, are fully guaranteed upon signing. That means when the Yankees get rid of Hicks in the past, or LeMahieu and Stroman this season, they're still owed their money. Stroman was just released after his last start, a bit of a surprise move. And like Stroman, both Hicks and LeMahieu were better before getting their latest Yankees contracts than they were afterward. MORE: Red Sox leapfrog the Yankees in the standings for first time since March As a big-market club with deep pockets, the Yankees can afford to make mistakes in contracts every once in a while. It's still not ideal that these mistakes are costing more than $43 million to guys not currently wearing the pinstripes in any form. The $43 million might not come in handy now, but it could matter greatly down the line. That's very real money that the Yankees won't have from production they aren't getting anyway. MORE MLB NEWS: White Sox batters have turned into 1927 Yankees Steven Kwan shows kindness on the most stressful day of his MLB career Marlins' Jakob Marsee starts his MLB career in a way no one ever has Rockies' Warming Bernabel is red hot Oneil Cruz makes one of the best throws in MLB history Red Sox phenom Roman Anthony makes MLB history not done since Elmer Valo in 1940

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store