Swinney: Scotland must be alive to the threat of Farage after English elections
John Swinney accused Labour and the Conservatives of making a 'fundamental mistake' by 'cosying up' to the right-wing party.
Reform UK won its first mayor during the local elections south of the border, and came second to Labour in another two, while it also overturned a large Labour majority at a Westminster by-election.
Results are still pouring in from England's council elections but Mr Farage's party already returned more than 100 councillors by Friday afternoon.
Speaking to the PA news agency in Glasgow during a climate conference, Mr Swinney accused the former Ukip leader of giving voters 'false hope'.
'The results coming in from England demonstrate that Farage is a real political threat,' he said, 'and the Labour and Conservative parties have made fundamental mistakes in dealing with Farage because they have cosied up to them, rather than confronting them.
'The Scottish National Party has every intention of confronting the politics of Farage because they are politics that are populist, they are deceptive, they give people false hope, and they blame others, and the SNP will confront those politics.'
Asked if Reform UK's victories could be replicated at next year's Holyrood elections, the SNP leader said: 'We've got to be alive to the political threat from Farage and the answer to Farage is to confront him – it's not to cosy up to him.
'The Labour Party and the Conservatives have cosied up to Farage, and look where it's got them in England.
'Well, I have absolutely no intention of cosying up to Farage.
'I'll give the political leadership to the SNP and to Scotland that will confront the politics of Farage, because his politics are divisive, they provide people with false hopes, and they are fundamentally damaging to our society and our democratic values, and they have to be confronted.'
Mr Swinney was speaking after appearing at The Better Society Academy, a climate conference at The Social Hub in Glasgow on Friday.
Recent polling has suggested Reform UK – which does not currently have a Scottish leader – could return more than 10 MSPs to the Scottish Parliament next year.
A Survation poll on Friday put support for Reform UK on 14% for the constituency vote at Holyrood and 12% for the regional list. The Tories stood at 13% and 16% respectively.
The survey, carried out on behalf of Diffley Partnership, found 36% of people are planning to vote for Mr Swinney's party on the constituency section of the ballot, with 28% saying they will support the SNP on the regional list section of the vote.
Support for Anas Sarwar's Scottish Labour was at 22% on both the constituency and the regional list ballot, according to the poll.
Last week, Mr Swinney chaired a summit to battle the rise of the far-right, which he said included Reform UK.
In response, Reform UK – which was not invited – described the SNP leader as a 'democracy denier' and accused him of being scared of the party's popularity.
A Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: 'John Swinney loves nothing more than talking up Reform at every opportunity.
'The reason is because, as polling experts have said, every vote for Reform increases the chances of him being returned as First Minister and the SNP having a pro-independence majority in the Scottish Parliament next year.
'Only the Scottish Conservatives are standing up for the common-sense mainstream of Scots, and against the fringe obsessions of the SNP and the other left-wing parties at Holyrood.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Scotland's deficit grew by £5.1bn, Government estimate shows
The latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) figures reported 'overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.2 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.6% of the country's GDP. The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland. Minus £26,188,000 Scotland's net fiscal balance in 2024-25 Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.' Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion. Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24. 'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border. He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels. Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said voters north of the border will expect 'better outcomes' from higher levels per person of public spending (Ben Whitley/PA) 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. 'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.' She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'. Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours Shona Robison, Scottish Finance Secretary Arguing the figures highlight the 'limit' of devolved powers, Ms Robison said while the Scottish Government is responsible for more than 60% of public expenditure north of the border, it only controls 'around 30% of revenue'. The Finance Secretary told journalists: 'As an independent Scotland we would have the powers to make different choices, different budgetary results, to build a stronger economy and enable Scotland to be a fairer, wealthier and greener country.' She pointed to Ireland, saying GDP there had grown 12.5% over the last year, with a budget surplus of 24 billion euros (£20.7 billion) in 2024. Ms Robison hailed that as an example of 'what a small independent country, one of our nearest neighbours, is able to do with the full powers of independence'. She said: 'What we want, through the powers of independence, is to be able to make our own decisions. 'If you look at Ireland and what they have been able to do with the powers they have, it's like night and day compared to the economic conditions of the UK economy or the Scottish economy. 'Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours, whether it is Ireland, or some of our Scandinavian neighbours.'
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Nicola Sturgeon vs Boris Johnson: Two memoirs and two unreliable narrators
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Maybe it was only to be expected of someone credited with being the best political communicator of her generation, but you've got to hand it to Nicola Sturgeon and the publicists at Macmillan behind her memoir Frankly. Her occupation of the Scottish news headlines since the end of last week has been total. 'A triumph. Frankly is the most insightful and stylishly open memoir by a politician since Barack Obama's Dreams From My Father,' said star Scottish novelist Andrew O'Hagan in the blurb for advance orders on Amazon (hard-cover £20.77). Didn't read that, but I liked Mayflies, so I'll take his word for it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The drip-drip of lines in The Times serialisation, the extra tit-bits and a few tears in her interview with ITV's Julie Etchingham and a characteristically combative interview on Radio 4's Today programme have kept the Sturgeon bandwagon rolling, as she happily prepares the ground for the next chapter of her life, perhaps with some international organisation like Unicef, wringing out the sympathy from every episode at every opportunity. Will Boris Johnson be tempted to review Nicola Sturgeon's new memoir, Frankly? (Picture: Duncan McGlynn) | Getty Images Straightening their records Not having privileged access to a freebie advance review copy or having time to nip down to Waterstones – where it was on sale with £6 knocked off three days ahead of official publication – before this column's deadline, my take on Ms Sturgeon's recollections is reliant on those extracts and interviews, and so much of it has been copied and posted that maybe I needn't bother with the book itself. But as a historic document perhaps I should, and it can sit on my bookshelf next to Unleashed, Boris Johnson's account of his rise and fall from Number 10, a similar exercise in record straightening, for want of a better phrase. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I have no idea if Andrew O'Hagan has read Unleashed and therefore puts it behind Frankly in the league table of political revisionism, but while styles clearly differ, both must be unreliable narrators of their own stories, just as I'm not best qualified to be an unbiased judge of Ms Sturgeon's work. But with such a polarising figure, who is? As The Salt Path controversy gloriously illustrated, first-person accounts aren't necessarily the most reliable. A reviewer of Unleashed in the left-of-centre New Statesman magazine explained: 'Maybe it is a feature of memoirs, but large chunks of this one feels like the version of Boris Johnson's time in office he wishes were true. Or perhaps he genuinely believes it to be true.' This must surely apply equally to Ms Sturgeon's recollections. 'I must have blocked it out' It stretches credibility to beyond breaking point that, as Ms Sturgeon told Julie Etchingham, she has little memory of what happened or how she felt when the police arrived at her door to turn the place over as part of the investigation into alleged embezzlement of SNP funds. We know she did nothing wrong because she will not face any charges, so would a normal person in the same situation not have remembered something of how it felt to be an innocent person whose life was upended in an instant? The 'I must have blocked it out or something' explanation for her amnesia, at one of the most dramatic moments in her life, seems rather similar to the evidence she gave to the parliamentary probe into her office's involvement or otherwise with the initial complaints against Alex Salmond. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It also seems spiteful, and unchallengeable because he is dead, to claim Mr Salmond didn't read the independence white paper before publication in 2013, instead heading off on a trade trip to China. Maybe he read the detail on the plane? Who knows? At least we have confirmation that the 'most detailed' preparation for a new country was anything but, which anyone with half a brain, including nationalists, knew at the time. What does that say for the recent independence papers she commissioned, which were worse? The Press corps too is a target for a disgraceful hatchet job, claiming men in the Scottish press hushed up allegations of inappropriate behaviour against a political reporter, when Ms Sturgeon should have known the journalist was dismissed after his editor, a man, was informed. 'Memoir of a clown' Just as Mr Johnson remained befuddled as to why Partygate became such a big deal, apart from the desire of a lot of Tory MPs to do him in, Ms Sturgeon cannot understand why the Gender Recognition Reform Bill became such a defining and damaging issue, in which she believes resolutely to be in the right, perhaps because, as she has now told the world, she regards her sexuality as not being 'binary'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Johnson book was so widely panned as being 'the memoir of a clown', as The Guardian described it, and was relatively light on revelation and heavy on entertainment value, that I don't recall its publication last October being accompanied by anything like the same media frenzy as Frankly, but then again Scotland is a small country and it's August with not a lot else going on, and Unleashed was released for the UK political conference season when the news agenda is usually packed. The timing is instructive. Ms Sturgeon does genuinely seem to be looking forward to new life – and isn't it fun that the Queen of Separatism apparently loves London, and chose The Times of London to serialise her book. But it's clear from Unleashed that return is very much on Mr Johnson's mind, and according to a recent Conservative Home survey, it's a hope shared by a quarter of 2024 Conservative voters.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Anti-Jewish' summer camp accused of backing Iran is cancelled - concerns were raised that it was radicalising children as young as nine
A summer camp sponsored by an Islamic charity accused of backing Iran has been cancelled after concerns were raised it could expose children as young as nine to extreme views. Local councillors said they had been 'swamped' by petitions to call off the upcoming four-day residential camp run by the Ahlulbayt Islamic Mission charity in Kings Langley, Hertfordshire. Representatives of 11 Reform UK branches across the county had also written to the managers of the centre where Camp Wilayah was due to be held, demanding that it be cancelled. The Daily Mail can now reveal that the residential, described as a 'unique opportunity' for children aged nine to 14 to build on their Islamic values, will not go ahead as planned over the August bank holiday. Liberal Democrat and chair of Hertfordshire County Council Laurence Brass welcomed the decision, saying the final call had been made by the scout group that own the venue. He added: 'We have been swamped with petitions for it to be cancelled. 'I was very upset that it was going ahead and I am very pleased with this result. I think it is the right decision.' Mr Brass said that Hertfordshire County Council is due to announce the cancellation of the camp officially on Wednesday. Camp Wilayah, which has been run by Ahlulbayt Islamic Mission for a number of years, was due to be held between August 22 and August 25. According to the charity's website, any girls attending were required to wear a hijab and loose clothing. They were also due to be separated from the boys for the duration of the camp, except for daily prayers, talks and a team photo. Ahlulbayt Islamic Mission, which is based in Cricklewood, north-west London, has been accused of backing Iran's theocratic regime. In posts on social media, the charity has repeatedly praised Tehran's leader Ayatollah Khamenei - and even described his books as a 'great read'. The organisation has also refused to condemn the terror group Hamas and said in the wake of the October 7 attacks that 'Zionists brought this disaster upon themselves'. Meanwhile in another post on Instagram from last year, young children can be seen drawing and colouring in Palestinian flags and watermelon symbols. Legal lobby group UK Lawyers for Israel previously criticised the planned activities at the camp - saying they could incite hatred towards Jewish people. It said in a comment to The Telegraph: 'AIM's deep ideological alignment with the Iranian regime and its record of extremist propaganda presents an unacceptable risk to children. 'We hope the local authority and other agencies will act decisively to protect vulnerable young people from exposure to harmful and radicalising content.' In a post on their website on Tuesday, Ahlulbayt Islamic Mission confirmed that Camp Wilayah had been postponed until further notice. The charity said this was in light of 'serious threats levelled at the safety of children at the camp'. The statement read: 'Following discussions with Hertfordshire Scouts, and in light of serious threats levelled at the safety of children at the camp, we regret to announce that this year's Camp Wilayah will not proceed at Phasels Wood over the bank holiday weekend. 'We know this decision will cause some disappointment; however, our first priority is to protect the safety and security of our children, and we take this matter very seriously. 'For foreign political lobby groups, media outlets and far right thugs to make unfounded allegations that heighten the risk and encourage harm to children in the UK is truly disgraceful. It added: 'For over a decade, Camp Wilayah has been a cherished space where our children could enjoy the outdoors, grow in their values, and form lifelong friendships. 'Many of those who attended Camp Wilayah are now doctors, plumbers, teachers, engineers, and public servants, proud citizens who give back to Britain every single day. 'No evidence of wrongdoing has ever been found at Camp Wilayah, yet our children are being punished simply for their faith.' 'To attack such a wholesome and positive tradition is shameful, especially when threats are made by the Reform Party to mobilise protests and disrupt children's camps. 'Not only is this despicable behaviour, but it is Islamophobia in plain sight, and it should alarm every member of society.' UK Lawyers for Israel wrote to Brentwood Council in London and Hertfordshire County Council last month asking for Camp Wilayah to be banned. The group warned councillors: 'There is compelling reason to believe that the event may be used as a platform to radicalise children, incite hatred or violence, and glorify terrorist ideology.' Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick also raised concerns that children should be allowed to attend camps run by 'supporters of the Iranian regime'. A spokesperson for Hertfordshire County Council previously said: 'We are aware of concerns around this planned activity camp, and we are working with partners to understand the situation and whether it raises any safeguarding issues.' There is no evidence the charity poses a risk to children and in a statement on their website it says its goal is to 'promote peace' and 'create a better world for everyone'. It reads: 'We at AIM are committed in our efforts to spread peace, tolerance and co-existence; and to promote social harmony as contained in our rich and abundant Islamic heritage. 'AIM believes that the continual pursuit of its objectives will create a better world for everyone.'
