
Trump Administration News: House Passes Sweeping Bill to Fulfill President's Domestic Agenda
The House on Thursday narrowly passed a sweeping bill to extend tax cuts and slash social safety net programs, capping Republicans' chaotic monthslong slog to overcome deep rifts within their party and deliver President Trump's domestic agenda.
The final vote, 218 to 214, was mostly along party lines and came after Speaker Mike Johnson spent a frenzied day and night toiling to quell resistance in his ranks that threatened until the very end to derail the president's marquee legislation. With all but two Republicans in favor and Democrats uniformly opposed, the action cleared the bill for Mr. Trump's signature, meeting the July 4 deadline he had demanded.
The legislation extends tax cuts enacted in 2017 that had been scheduled to expire at the end of the year, while adding new ones Mr. Trump promised during this campaign, on some tips and overtime pay, at a total cost of $4.5 trillion. It also increases funding for defense and border security and cuts nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid, with more reductions to food assistance for the poor and other government aid. And it phases out clean-energy tax credits passed under former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. that Mr. Trump and conservative Republicans have long decried.
Also included is a $5 trillion increase in the debt limit, a measure that Republicans are typically unwilling to support but that was necessary to avert a federal default later this year.
The bill's final passage was a major victory for congressional Republicans and for Mr. Trump, who celebrated in a Thursday night speech in Des Moines, Iowa, meant to kick off a yearlong celebration of the 250th anniversary of the country's founding.
'With this bill,' Mr. Trump said, 'every major promise I've made to the people of Iowa in 2024 became a promise kept.'
Mr. Trump plans to sign what he has frequently referred to as his 'big, beautiful bill' on Friday. G.O.P. lawmakers who had feuded bitterly over the legislation ultimately united almost unanimously behind it, fearing the political consequences of allowing a tax increase and of crossing a president who demands unflagging loyalty and was pressuring them to fall into line.
'If you're for a secure border, safer communities and a strong military, this bill is for you,' Mr. Johnson said, extolling the bill ahead of the final vote. 'If you're for common-sense fiscal responsibility and reducing the deficit, this bill is for you. If you're for fairer and lower taxes, bigger paychecks, affordable gas and groceries and restoring dignity to hard work, this is the bill for you.'
But it also was a major political gamble for the party that will leave vulnerable lawmakers open to sharp attacks ahead of next year's midterm elections.
Many economists have estimated that its greatest benefits would go to the wealthiest Americans, who would see the most generous tax cuts. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently predicted that cuts to Medicaid, including the imposition of a strict work requirement, could leave 11.8 million more people without health insurance by 2034.
The office, studying earlier versions of the bill, had also warned of large benefit losses in food stamps, which will also have new work requirements, threatening to leave millions without benefits. At the same time, contrary to Republican claims that it cut deficits, the budget office reported the measure would swell the already soaring national debt by at least $3.4 trillion over a decade.
Polls show that the bill is deeply unpopular, and Democrats have roundly denounced it as a move to slash critical government programs to fund tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. They have repeatedly accused Republicans of being so much in Mr. Trump's thrall that they embraced a bill that would harm their own constituents, with cuts to programs that the president had vowed to protect.
In an impassioned closing speech on the House floor that stretched for more than eight and a half hours, breaking the chamber's record and delaying a final vote well into the afternoon, Representative Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, assailed the measure as a 'disgusting abomination' that would hurt Americans.
In what amounted to a last gasp of Democratic opposition to the bill, Mr. Jeffries spent much of his time reading testimonials from Americans who said they relied on Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and other government help and worried that cuts would upend their lives. He made a point of highlighting that several of the letters came from people who live in Republican congressional districts that are among the Democrats' top targets for the midterm elections.
'This bill is an all-out assault on the health care of the people of the United States of America, hardworking American taxpayers,' Mr. Jeffries said. 'These are the people we should be standing up, to work hard to lift up. But instead, they're victims of this legislation.'
In the messy, monthslong process of pushing through a bill that divided their party, Republicans in both the House and Senate made it clear that they, too, were uncomfortable with parts of it, criticizing its flaws before most of them ultimately banded together to pass it.
Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, who cast the deciding vote for the bill in her chamber after cutting a series of deals to insulate her constituents from its harshest cuts, said just moments after she had backed the bill that she did not like it.
'This has been an awful process — a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline that has tested every limit of this institution,' Ms. Murkowski said in a statement earlier this week, in which she urged the House to reopen and improve it.
As if to underscore the political risks of the bill — and the intense pressure Republicans faced from Mr. Trump to embrace it — Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced during Senate debate on it that he would not seek re-election next year. He went on to savage the bill as a disaster for Medicaid that would betray the president's promises to protect the program. The announcement from Mr. Tillis, whom Mr. Trump had threatened with a primary challenge after he expressed opposition to the bill, was a harsh reminder for Republicans of the consequences of crossing the president on the measure.
Because of the slim Republican majorities in both chambers, ideological rifts within the party were frequently magnified as Mr. Johnson and Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the majority leader, tried to muscle the legislation through the House and Senate. They succeeded only after protracted negotiations, several seemingly insurmountable setbacks and parliamentary gymnastics.
The House devolved into paralysis on Wednesday and into Thursday morning in the hours before the final action, as a handful of Republicans withheld their votes to bring up the measure.
Mr. Trump, who had met with recalcitrant Republicans throughout the day Wednesday to pressure them to support the measure, weighed in with angry posts on social media, threatening any defectors.
'MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' he wrote.
In the end, Mr. Johnson pulled off a victory, the latest in a series of instances in which he has faced resistance in his own party to a major legislative priority — only to pull out a narrow win with the help of considerable pressure from Mr. Trump.
The bill squeaked through the Senate by the narrowest of margins on Tuesday. But the changes that senators made to cobble together support for it exacerbated party divides that have plagued G.O.P. efforts to advance Mr. Trump's agenda since the beginning. Fiscal conservatives demanded even deeper cuts to rein in the deficit, while more mainstream lawmakers whose seats are at risk were wary of the biggest cuts to popular government programs.
One member of each faction voted against the bill on Thursday: Representative Thomas Massie, a fiscal hawk from a deep-red district in Kentucky who had railed against the high cost of the bill, and Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a moderate from a battleground district in suburban Pennsylvania that Democrats won in the 2024 presidential election, who had expressed concern about the Medicaid, SNAP and other safety net cuts.
Mr. Trump and party leaders refused to reopen the bill for changes, a time-consuming process that would have blown through the president's chosen timetable and prolonged negotiations on the package for weeks or months, potentially killing the entire enterprise.
Ultimately, the fiscal conservatives who had railed the most strongly against the bill followed a familiar pattern of caving and supporting it. Conservatives have repeatedly refused to back major legislation because of its potential impact on federal deficits, only to back down under pressure from Mr. Trump.
After the House gave final approval on Thursday, the president waved off questions about the fractious process, telling reporters on his way to Iowa that it was 'very easy' to sway Republican holdouts. He equivocated on whether conservatives won any concessions outside the bill in last-minute talks.
'What I did is we talked about how good the bill is,' he said.
Image
Democratic representatives assailed the Republican bill on the steps of the Capitol on Wednesday before raising a number of procedural roadblocks on the House floor.
Credit...
Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, one such holdout, alluded to deals that he and others cut with Mr. Trump. Mr. Harris, the chairman of the ultraconservative Freedom Caucus, said that lawmakers were swayed by talk of 'executive actions' and other steps he and his administration could take to change the way the law would be carried out.
'We came to significant agreements with the administration that changed the entire package, both inside and outside the bill, significantly.' Mr. Harris said after the final vote. (Once enacted, the legislation itself cannot be changed except by an act of Congress.)
Moments after the bill passed, some Freedom Caucus members were already raising the possibility of trying to push through another big policy bill later in the year under special rules that shield fiscal measures from a filibuster, allowing them to pass by a simple majority vote.
Representative Chip Roy of Texas, a Freedom Caucus member and one of the Republican holdouts who ultimately voted to pass the bill, said Mr. Trump and White House officials assured him on Wednesday they could use 'another reconciliation package or two,' and executive orders, 'to fix some of the broken appropriations process,' including additional changes to Medicaid, as well as to Medicare.
'I got comfortable with what the administration can do to ameliorate those areas where it got worse,' after the bill was passed by the Senate, Mr. Roy added.
Emboldened by the G.O.P. rifts, Democrats have made a point of projecting a united front while they railed against the bill and ramped up pressure on vulnerable Republicans. They condemned Republicans who had warned that many of their constituents rely on Medicaid and cautioned their party's leaders not to try to balance the federal budget at the expense of the much-needed health care program.
'We cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations,' wrote Representative David Valadao of California, one of the most endangered Republicans, and 11 other G.O.P. lawmakers in an April letter to Mr. Johnson.
Mr. Jeffries highlighted such statements during his remarks, appealing to Republicans to reject the bill.
'Join us, join us, join us!' he shouted at one point, turning to the G.O.P. side of the chamber. 'All we need are four,' he added, alluding to the number of Republican defections that would defeat the measure. But as the Democratic leader well knew, the Republicans who had spoken out had flipped their positions on the bill overnight.
When the final vote came, every signatory to the letter voted yes.
Reporting was contributed by Catie Edmondson , Tony Romm , Andrew Duehren , Chris Cameron and Tyler Pager .
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Buffett's 1 test to spot a 'satisfactory' asset - how to shockproof your nest egg amid Donald Trump's tariffs
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. The stock market has been on a roller coaster this year, as escalating trade tensions under President Donald Trump have rattled investor confidence. Many are worried about the fate of their finances. But investing legend Warren Buffett has a simple test to help cut through the noise — and spot what truly counts. In a 2018 interview with Yahoo Finance, Buffett said there are two types of things people buy: one qualifies as a real investment — the other, not so much. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 4 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) No millions? No problem. With as little as $10, here's how you can access this $1B private real estate fund of diversified assets usually only available to major players The test to tell the difference is simple. If trading were banned for a period of time, would the asset still hold up? Buffett walked through how that works with some examples. 'If you buy something — a farm, an apartment house or an interest in a business — and look to the asset itself to determine whether you've done something, what the farm produces, what the business earns, and so on, you don't really care whether the stock market's open,' Buffett said. 'You look at the investment itself to deliver the return to you.' Simply put, the kinds of assets Buffett sees as real investments produce returns on their own. They don't need an open market — or a future buyer — to be worthwhile. That's not the case with more speculative assets. As Buffett explained: 'Now, if you buy something like Bitcoin or some cryptocurrency, you don't have anything that's producing anything. You're just hoping the next guy pays more — and you only feel you'll find the next guy to pay more if he thinks he's going to find somebody that's going to pay more.' Buffett's philosophy can offer peace of mind. Markets are inherently volatile. Even high-quality assets can swing wildly in price. But if your investment doesn't depend on being sold to someone else to deliver value, you can worry less about the day-to-day ups and downs. He summed it up clearly: 'If you ban trading in farms, you could still buy farms and have a perfectly decent investment.' Let's take a closer look at the kinds of assets that pass Buffett's test — and how you can get in on them. Buffett may not be known as a real estate investor, but he often uses real estate to illustrate what a productive, income-generating asset looks like. In 2022, Buffett stated that if you offered him '1% of all the apartment houses in the country' for $25 billion, he would 'write you a check.' Why? Because regardless of what's happening in the broader economy, people still need a place to live and apartments can consistently produce rent money. The best part? You don't need to be a billionaire investor to get in the game. Crowdfunding platforms like Arrived have made it easier for average Americans to invest in rental properties without the need for a hefty down payment or the burden of property management. With Arrived, you can invest in shares of rental homes with as little as $100, all without the hassle of mowing lawns, fixing leaky faucets or handling difficult tenants. The process is simple: browse a curated selection of homes that have been vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Once you find a property you like, select the number of shares you'd like to purchase, and then sit back as you start receiving rental income deposits from your investment. For accredited investors, Homeshares gives access to the $36 trillion U.S. home equity market, which has historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, this approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. If you're interested in commercial real estate, there are plenty of opportunities as well. First National Realty Partners (FNRP), for instance, allows accredited investors to diversify their portfolio through grocery-anchored commercial properties without taking on the responsibilities of being a landlord. With a minimum investment of $50,000, investors can own a share of properties leased by national brands like Whole Foods, Kroger and Walmart, which provide essential goods to their communities. Thanks to Triple Net (NNN) leases, accredited investors are able to invest in these properties without worrying about tenant costs cutting into their potential returns. Simply answer a few questions — including how much you would like to invest — to start browsing their full list of available properties. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Farmland is another asset Buffett likes to point to — and yes, it passes his test with flying colors. Alongside his comment about apartments in 2022, he also stated: 'If you said … for a 1% interest in all the farmland in the United States, pay our group $25 billion, I'll write you a check this afternoon.' Just like housing, farmland meets a basic human need. No matter what's happening in the markets, people still need to eat. That consistent demand makes farmland a resilient, long-term asset — and often a hedge during times of economic uncertainty. If you are interested in gaining exposure to this space, FarmTogether is an all-in-one investment platform that lets qualified investors buy stakes in U.S. farmland. The platform identifies high-potential agricultural properties and then partners with experienced local operators to manage the land effectively. Depending on the type of stake you want, you can get a cut from both the leasing fees and crop sales, providing you with a cash income. Then, years down the line after the farm rises in value, you can benefit from appreciation of the land and profits from its sale. When it comes to advice for everyday investors, Buffett suggests one simple thing: an S&P 500 index fund. These are investment funds that offer broad exposure to the S&P 500 — the top stocks listed on U.S. exchanges. Such a straightforward approach gives investors instant diversification without the need for constant monitoring or active trading. The beauty of this approach is its accessibility — anyone, regardless of wealth, can take advantage of it. Just keep in mind that, while the S&P 500 has a healthy average annual rate of return, past gains don't guarantee future returns. There may be rough times ahead, but long term, tracking the index can provide results. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis There's a 40% chance of a recession hitting the U.S. economy this year — protect your retirement savings with these essential money moves (most of which you can complete in just minutes) Here's how 5 minutes could get you up to $2M in life insurance coverage — with no medical exam or blood test Rich older Americans are using these 3 retirement saving strategies to supercharge their nest eggs — here's how to use them to prepare for a comfy retirement Money doesn't have to be complicated — sign up for the free Moneywise newsletter for actionable finance tips and news you can use. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNET
22 minutes ago
- CNET
We Love This Narwal Freo X Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo, and It's a Door-Busting $470 for Prime Members
Summer is in full swing and even though the Fourth of July was yesterday, there are still plenty of holiday deals that can help you score your favorite items for less. However, if you missed this major shopping event, Prime Day is coming up and there are plenty of early deals on big ticket items such as robot vacuums and mops. We've spotted this Narwal Freo X robot vacuum and mop combo for just $430 with an Amazon Prime membership. This saves you $470 and represents a total discount of 52%. This Narwal Freo X robot vacuum and mop combo offers suction power of 8200 Pa for spotless floors and carpets. Your purchase includes a base station this robot vacuum and c This Narwal Freo X robot vacuum and mop also includes a zero-tangle brush that'll be especially beneficial to pet owners and parents. The bristle brush itself is also conical and can lift debris, dust and dirt as well as pet hairs. Narwal's mops are designed not to leave behind any streaks for spotless floors. Narwal's dock includes a child-lock safety feature, detergent dispenser and a mop auto dry function. There are cool tech features such as floor-mapping, obstacle detection and weather adaptation to prevent standing water when there's no sun out. With a battery life of up to 210 minutes, this robot vacuum and mop can get through a lot of dirt and dust on a single charge. But that's not all, you can store up to seven weeks' worth of dust and debris in this Freo X's dust bag, sync it to a home assistant such as Alexa or use app controls to schedule cleanings. Keep in mind that this robot vacuum and mop is only compatible with 2.4Ghz Wi-Fi. If you need a new robot vacuum and aren't sure whether or not it's for you, check out our list of the best robot vacuums so you can suss out your options. We're also keeping up with early Prime Day deals so you can grab what you need without paying full price. James Martin/CNET Amazon Prime: 30-day free trial Prime Day requires an Amazon Prime membership, though you don't have to be a paying member to get in on the savings. Start your 30-day Prime free trial now and you'll be able to shop the best deals without paying for a subscription -- just remember to cancel before it renews. See at Amazon Best Prime Day Robot Vacuum Deals Check out our collection of top Prime Day robot vacuum deals so you can save time and money in addition to keeping your floors clean. See Now Why this deal matters This Narwal Freo X is a massive $470 off for Amazon Prime members for a limited time and saves you 52%. It includes a battery life of 210 minutes and high suction power so your floors and carpets are always clean and fresh. It's only compatible with 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, but if that's available to you then this is a fantastic deal to take advantage of while it's at this price.


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
It's Your Last Chance To Shop The Best 4th Of July Furniture Sales
The fireworks are over and the 4th of July is firmly in the rear view mirror. But that doesn't mean that Independence Day sales are over: In fact, many of the best 4th Of July furniture sales are still running for a few more days. That means there's a bit more time to get as much as 75% off anything at Frontgate's Celebrate Summer Event, up to 70% off a wide selection of items in Wayfair's 4th Of July Clearance section or 60% off mid-century favorites at West Elm's July 4th Sale. Spruce up your home for summer with these 4th Of July furniture sales from West Elm, Pottery Barn ... More and more. Illustration: Forbes / Photo: Retailers Our deals team has researched and curated the best furniture deals from top retailers that are continuing to run their holiday weekend sales. Among those include markdowns on Forbes Vetted editor-approved products, like 30% off our favorite patio chair, 25% off our pick for one of the most comfortable couches we've tested and 36% off our top dining table. Read on to find 36 of the best 4th of July furniture sales you can still tap into right now—but don't delay, because most of these sales end on July 6. Does 4th Of July Have Good Furniture Sales? Yes, many furniture companies offer deals during the 4th of July weekend. Major brands including Wayfair and Frontgate deeply discount both their indoor and outdoor furniture, giving you the opportunity to score new pieces for your living room, dining room, bedroom and patio. What Is The Best Month To Buy Furniture On Sale? The best months to buy furniture on sale are typically January and July. During these months, brands mark down several pieces to make way for their upcoming spring and fall collections. That being said, most holiday weekends—including Memorial Day, the 4th of July and Labor Day—are opportune times to buy discounted furniture. What Kind Of Furniture Lasts The Longest? Furniture made from high-quality, durable materials will last the longest. Look for pieces made of solid wood (such as oak, walnut and teak), metal and/or leather. For patio furniture, consider options that are naturally weather-resistant or have been treated with a special waterproof coating.