Residents and council clash over 'Great Wall of Clydach'
The local authority agreed the fence could potentially be reduced in height and painted a darker colour to reduce its impact - though it was highlighted galvanized steel was not suitable for painting.It said it would aim to mitigate the impact "as soon as practicable" and when it understood what residents wanted.The meeting revealed the fence cost £40,000 to buy and install and is only intended as a temporary nine-month measure - though the council said it would consider removing it earlier, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.The highways chief said planning permission was not required for the fence, which is within the Bannau Brycheiniog National Park, but the national park had been informed.Carl Touhig, who is responsible for highways within Monmouthshire County Council, said previous efforts to keep vehicles off the road including gates and boulders had failed as they had been damaged or removed.A rockfall in 2023 led the council to commission a report which suggested the road should be closed to people as well as vehicles. It said options included creating new footpaths over the top of the hill and below the existing road, as well as rebuilding the carriageway further into the mountain - though Mr Touhig said this would cost more than £1m and involve heavy machinery on unstable ground.
Farmer Wayne Elliot, who was involved in court action that ruled the council was responsible for the road, said: "You could shift the road back, the farmers would help do it, they'd get it done in a week and it would cost you a lot less."Mr Touhig said: "You can't have farmers going up there to build a road we would adopt. That is not going to happen."He added blocking the road at either side was not sufficient as the open countryside meant people would still have access from above and below.The carriageway is almost at the edge of the cliff due to erosion and "a rockfall could take the whole road out", he said. Mr Touhig said if something were to happen to someone using the road while it was unsafe he could be "prosecuted for corporate manslaughter", adding "someone losing their life would be far worse than a prison sentence".He said motorcyclists had been using the road, while residents claimed since the fence was put up people have been using it to abseil down the rockface of the old quarry.Former county councillor Martin Thomas called the fence "disgusting" and said he feared glare from the metal could cause an accident on the recently-competed A465 beneath it.Among complaints from residents was whether the the potential impact on a breeding pair of peregrine falcons at the quarry had been considered.The council said it would work with the community on mitigating its impact and to provide a permanent solution.A further public meeting will be held on 14 May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
18 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire barn extension refused over arrow slits
Emma Dymond had sought planning permission and listed building consent from Monmouthshire County Council to allow open access from her kitchen, in the barn that was converted to a home in either the late 1990s or early 2000s, to the proposed single storey extension. But that was rejected by the council's planning department in January and the decision has been upheld by an independent planning inspector after Ms Dymond appealed to Planning and Environment Decisions Wales. The inspector, identified only as JP Tudor, said they agreed covering the arrow slit vent would have an adverse effect on the significance of Ms Dymond's home, North Barn, which is an associated building of the grade II-listed Whitehouse Farmhouse at Llanvair Grange Road, Llanfair Kilgeddin. Whitehouse Farm was listed in 1991 for its architectural and historical importance as a substantial early 17th century house while the barn, now in separate ownership, is considered to retain 'significance as an example of a substantial former agricultural threshing barn, possibly dating from the 18th century'. The council had said a lean-to could be acceptable but the one proposed would involve the unacceptable removal of a large part of the rear external wall to create the opening from the kitchen. This photograph shows where it was proposed to build the lean-to extension and the arrow slit vents, and window, that would have been lost. Tudor's report stated: 'That would entail the loss of one of two arrow slit vents within that section of the wall.' Ms Dymond had said the timber frame extension would be sympathetic to the original building and a modern window added during the original conversion would also have been removed while she said the arrow slits had been rebuilt in a non-traditional square-sided manner. The inspector upheld the council's decisions and also noted Welsh historic buildings body Cadw had 'appeared' to object to the lean-to extension and ancillary works, as well as the proposed opening, but said those elements had been approved in a further application made in January with a smaller proposed opening to the extension.
South Wales Argus
2 days ago
- South Wales Argus
Giant Penperlleni shed cannot be used for holiday lets
Homeowner Lyndon Hawkins wanted to divide the outbuilding used as a workshop and for storage, and that stretches for eight metres, into two holiday lets. He'd argued there had been an outbuilding within the garden of his semi-detached cottage on Pen Y Wern Road, Penperlleni for 70 years and as part of his appeal against the refusal of planning permission produced an ordnance survey map from 1971 clearly showing a structure. He also provided independent inspector, Zoe Baxter, who was appointed by Planning and Environment Decisions Wales to consider the appeal, with Google Streetview images for 2009 and 2011 showing an outbuilding adjacent to the southwestern boundary of his garden. But Ms Baxter said the planning permission, granted by Monmouthshire County Council in 2020 for rebuilding the outbuilding, demonstrated it was of a 'slightly different shape and position within the site' despite being of a similar size to the earlier building. As a result she found the original outbuilding 'no longer exists' and had been replaced with the building approved in 2020. Her report said the council was right to refuse planning permission in line with its policy on converting buildings in the countryside for residential use. The shed is in the garden of this home. (Image: Monmouthshire County Council planning file.) The policy requires buildings to have been used for their intended purpose 'for a significant period of time' and states 'particularly close scrutiny will be given to proposals relating to those less than 10 years old, especially where there has been no change in activity on the unit.' Ms Baxter's report stated the building was still being used for storage and as a workshop when she visited, on May 1, and explained the 10 year guide is intended to prevent people gaining planning permission for new buildings for a purpose allowed under the policy and then seeking to convert the use to one that isn't normally permitted. She wrote in her report: 'Although I am not suggesting this is the case in the scheme before me, Policy H4(e) seeks to prevent applicants circumventing the strict control over development in the countryside by acquiring planning permission on the basis a new building will be used for a purpose which complies with countryside policy but intending to convert it to purpose that would not.' She also said Mr Hawkins had failed to provide sufficient details on the private drainage system proposed and how it would manage wastewater effluent or organic materials discharging directly or indirectly into the catchments of the rivers Usk and Wye.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
The British public will never forgive Labour's latest cruel pension raid
We're not going to the dogs: 12 reasons why Britain remains the greatest place to live
