logo
Trump's Iran strikes may face backlash from Maga's anti-war supporters

Trump's Iran strikes may face backlash from Maga's anti-war supporters

President Donald Trump's decision to strike three nuclear sites in Iran could deepen a divide among some of the Republican's supporters, including high-profile backers who had said any such move would run counter to the anti-interventionism he promised to deliver.
Notably though, immediately following Trump's Saturday announcement of the strike, some of those who had publicly spoken out against US involvement voiced their support.
The lead-up to the move against Iranian nuclear sites had exposed fissures within Trump's Make American Great Again base as some of that movement's most vocal leaders, with large followings of their own, expressed deep concern about the prospect of US involvement in the Israel-Iran war.
With the president barred from seeking a third term, what remains unknown is how long-lasting the schism could be for Trump and his current priorities, as well as the overall future of his America First movement.
Among the surrogates who spoke out against American involvement were former senior adviser Steve Bannon, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., commentator Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, the founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point. Part of their consternation was rooted in Trump's own vocalized antipathy for what he and others have termed the forever wars fomented in previous administrations.
As the possibility of military action neared, some of those voices tamped down their rhetoric. According to Trump, Carlson even called to apologize.
Here's a look at what some of Trump's biggest advocates had said about US military involvement in Iran:
Steve Bannon
On Wednesday, Bannon, one of top advisers in Trump's 2016 campaign, told an audience in Washington that bitter feelings over Iraq were a driving force for Trump's first presidential candidacy and the MAGA movement. "One of the core tenets is no forever wars, Bannon said.
But the longtime Trump ally, who served a four-month sentence for defying a subpoena in the congressional investigation into the US Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, went on to suggest that Trump will maintain loyalty from his base no matter what. On Wednesday, Bannon acknowledged that while he and others will argue against military intervention until the end, the MAGA movement will back Trump.
Ultimately, Bannon said that Trump would have to make the case to the American people if he wanted to get involved in Iran.
We don't like it. Maybe we hate it, Bannon said, predicting what the MAGA response would be. But, you know, we'll get on board.
Tucker Carlson
The commentator's rhetoric toward Trump was increasingly critical. Carlson, who headlined large rallies with the Republican during the 2024 campaign, earlier this month suggested that the president's posture was breaking his pledge to keep the US out of new foreign entanglements. Trump clapped back at Carlson on social media, calling him kooky.
During an event at the White House on Wednesday, Trump said that Carlson had called and apologized for calling him out. Trump said Carlson is a nice guy.
Carlson's conversation with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that day laid bare the divides among many Republicans. The two sparred for two hours over a variety of issues, primarily about possible US involvement in Iran. Carlson accused Cruz of placing too much emphasis on protecting Israel in his foreign policy worldview.
You don't know anything about Iran, Carlson said to Cruz, after the senator said he didn't know Iran's population or its ethnic composition. You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of a government, and you don't know anything about the country.
Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene
The Georgia Republican, who wore the signature red MAGA cap for Democratic President Joe Biden's State of the Union address in 2024, publicly sided with Carlson, criticizing Trump for deriding one of my favorite people.
Saying the former Fox News commentator unapologetically believes the same things I do, Greene wrote on X this past week that those beliefs include that foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction.
That's not kooky, Greene added, using the same word Trump used to describe Carlson. That's what millions of Americans voted for. It's what we believe is America First.
About an hour before Trump's announcement, Greene posted on X that, Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war.
This is not our fight, she added. Peace is the answer.
In another post following Trump's announcement, Greene urged, Let us all join together and pray for peace."
Alex Jones
The far-right conspiracy theorist and Infowars host posted on social media earlier in the week a side-by-side of Trump's official presidential headshot and an artificial intelligence-generated composite of Trump and former Republican President George W. Bush. Trump and many of his allies have long disparaged Bush for involving the United States in the forever wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Writing What you voted for above Trump's image and What you got above the composite, Jones added: I hope this is not the case
Charlie Kirk
Kirk is among those who seemed to have made a quick about-face.
About an hour after Trump's announcement, Kirk posted a series of messages on social media supportive of Trump, saying Iran had given the president no choice. Kirk praised Trump for acting with prudence and decisiveness" and for the betterment of humanity.
Kirk also reposted a 2011 tweet in which Trump had written that Iran's quest for nuclear weapons is a major threat to our nation's national security interests. We can't allow Iran to go nuclear.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. summit in Alaska a ‘personal victory' for Putin, says Ukraine's Zelensky
U.S. summit in Alaska a ‘personal victory' for Putin, says Ukraine's Zelensky

The Hindu

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. summit in Alaska a ‘personal victory' for Putin, says Ukraine's Zelensky

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Tuesday (August 12, 2025) that Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin had scored a "personal victory" by getting invited to talks with Donald Trump on U.S. soil, and that the meeting further delayed sanctions on Moscow. Mr. Zelensky also ruled out withdrawing troops from Ukraine's eastern Donbas region as part of a peace deal, after Mr. Trump suggested he and Mr. Putin might negotiate a land swap to end the war. The summit, set to take place in Alaska on Friday, will be the first between a sitting U.S. and Russian president since 2021 and comes as Mr. Trump seeks to broker an end to Russia's nearly three-and-a-half year war in Ukraine. Mr. Zelensky, who is not scheduled to take part, has expressed concern that Russia will put forward hard-line demands and that Trump will hammer out a deal that will demand Ukraine cede swathes of territory. "We will not withdraw from the Donbas... if we withdraw from the Donbas today -- our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control -- we will clearly open a bridgehead for the Russians to prepare an offensive," Mr. Zelensky told reporters. The Donbas encompasses the eastern Ukrainian regions of Lugansk and Donetsk, both of which Russia claims as its own and has sought to control since its invasion began in 2022. Mr. Zelensky said Friday's summit would effectively postpone new U.S. sanctions on Russia -- sanctions that Mr. Trump had promised to impose if Putin refused to halt his war. "First, he will meet on U.S. territory, which I consider his personal victory. Second, he is coming out of isolation because he is meeting on US territory. Third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed sanctions," Mr. Zelensky said. Mr. Zelensky also said he had received a "signal" from US envoy Steve Witkoff that Russia might agree to a ceasefire, without elaborating. "This was the first signal from them," Mr. Zelensky said. To prepare for the summit, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held a call with US counterpart Marco Rubio, who told a US radio show earlier that Mr. Trump did not regard the meeting as a "concession" to Russia. The White House, meanwhile, confirmed that the meeting came about after Putin requested it. Mr. Trump's spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said the aim was "for the president is to walk away with a better understanding of how we can end this war". - 'No equipment' - On the battlefield, Mr. Zelensky warned Russia had made sharp advances near the coal mining town of Dobropillia and was planning new ground assaults on at least three different areas of the front line. "Russian units have advanced 10 kilometres (six miles) deep in several spots. They all have no equipment, only weapons in their hands. Some have already been found, some destroyed, some taken prisoner. We will find the rest and destroy them in the near future," Mr. Zelensky said. A map published by Ukrainian battlefield monitor DeepState, which has close ties with Ukraine's military, showed Russia had made a double-pronged advance around 10 kilometres (six miles) deep in a narrow section of the front line near Dobropillia. Dobropillia, home to around 30,000 people before the war, has come under regular Russian drone attacks. The advance also threatens the largely destroyed town of Kostiantynivka, one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. Russian forces have been accelerating their advances for months, pressing their advantage against overstretched Ukrainian troops. The Ukrainian army said Tuesday it was engaged in "difficult" battles with Russian forces in the east, but denied Russia had a foothold near Dobropillia. "The situation is difficult and dynamic," it said in a statement. - 'New offensive' - The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based think tank, said Russia was sending small sabotage groups forwards. It said it was "premature" to call the Russian advances around Dobropillia "an operational-level breakthrough". A Ukrainian military group that oversees parts of the front in the Donetsk region also said Russia was probing Ukrainian lines with small sabotage groups, describing battles as "complex, unpleasant and dynamic". Mr. Trump has described his summit with Putin on Friday as a chance to check the Russian leader's ideas for ending the war. European leaders have meanwhile sought to ensure respect for Kyiv's interests. Russia, which invaded Ukraine in 2022, has made costly but incremental gains across the front in recent months and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions while still fighting to control them. Ukrainian police meanwhile said that Russian attacks in the past hours had killed three people and wounded 12 others, including a child.

US sanctions Congo militia tied to forced labour, smuggling in key mining zone
US sanctions Congo militia tied to forced labour, smuggling in key mining zone

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

US sanctions Congo militia tied to forced labour, smuggling in key mining zone

The US government on Tuesday sanctioned an armed group accused of illicit trading in minerals in eastern Congo as Washington tries to spearhead peace efforts there while pushing for US access to the region's minerals. The US is also sanctioning the Congolese mining company CDMC, saying it sold minerals which were sourced and smuggled from mines near Rubaya.(Representational Image/AP) A senior US government official who spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of the formal announcement said the State and Treasury departments are sanctioning the CODECO armed group, which controlled the key coltan mining site of Rubaya from 2022 to early 2024. 'During this period, CODECO generated revenue by overseeing mining operations, collecting illegal fees and taxes for miners and engaging in mineral smuggling. It also imposed forced labour and executed civilians in mining areas under its control,' the official said in Washington. The US is also sanctioning the Congolese mining company CDMC, saying it sold minerals which were sourced and smuggled from mines near Rubaya, and two Hong Kong exporters, East Rise and Star Dragon, that purchased minerals from the mining area. The State Department said it is freezing the assets of the armed group and companies in the US or under US control and banning all transactions with them. Rubaya is currently under the control of the M23 rebel group, which is already targeted by US sanctions. The mining site lies in the heart of eastern Congo, a mineral-rich part of the Central African nation, which for decades has been ripped apart by violence from government forces and different armed groups, including the Rwanda-backed M23, whose recent resurgence has escalated the conflict, worsening an already acute humanitarian crisis. In June, Congo and Rwanda signed a peace deal facilitated by the US to help end the conflict while helping the US government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the region. Congo and the M23 rebels have also agreed to sign a permanent peace deal by August 18, but renewed fighting has threatened this effort. On Tuesday, Congo and M23 both accused each other of violating the agreement by attacking each other's forces.

White House to lead review of some Smithsonian museums
White House to lead review of some Smithsonian museums

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

White House to lead review of some Smithsonian museums

By Bhargav Acharya White House to lead review of some Smithsonian museums Aug 12 - The White House said on Tuesday it will lead an internal review of some Smithsonian museums and exhibitions ahead of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, after President Donald Trump earlier this year accused the institution of spreading "anti-American ideology" and raised alarm among civil rights advocates. Three top White House officials said in a letter to Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch that the review aims to ensure the institution highlights "historically accurate" and "inclusive portrayals" of the country's heritage. "This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions," the White House letter stated. The letter referenced an executive order issued by Trump in March titled "Restoring Truth And Sanity To American History," when the Republican president singled out the Smithsonian. He said the institution had come under the influence of a "divisive, race-centered ideology" in recent years. The order was in line with the Trump administration's efforts to do away with diversity and inclusion programs in government, universities and corporations. It raised at the vast museum and research institution as well as fears that his administration was undoing decades of social progress and undermining the acknowledgment of critical phases of American history. The Smithsonian Institution consists of 21 museums and galleries plus the National Zoo, according to its website. Representatives of the Smithsonian did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The White House review will assess tone and historical framing of exhibition text, websites, educational materials and digital content, with focus on the exhibitions planned for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the letter stated. The museums should begin replacing "divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions" where necessary within 120 days, the letter said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store