HOLYROOD SKETCH STEPHEN DAISLEY: It's two months off for the Class of '25... I'd give them all 12
Every other question was on Scotland's woeful record on cancer. Russell Findlay set the tone by noting that one in three cancer patients do not start treatment within the target time.
A dismaying statistic in itself, but one made all the bleaker given the target time is 62 days.
Findlay rhymed off the health boards where patients were still waiting to start life-saving care.
John Swinney noted North Lanarkshire wasn't listed, as it is meeting the target. Bully for them, but hardly reassuring for those in the rest of the country.
Findlay had an idea. Those seldom end well in politics, but the Tory leader made a reasonable suggestion: ring-fence the SNP government's half-billion underspend for an emergency cancer fund.
The First Minister objected that his latest budget had hiked up NHS cancer cash. Then he did something he really needs to knock on the head.
He argued that, if you look at median waiting times, things are going better. They are for the median patient, but what about those waiting longer? In cancer treatment, time is as precious as any medicine or therapy.
Mark Twain was right about the three types of falsehoods: lies, damned lies, and statistics. But trying to hoodwink cancer patients with statistics is the most damnable of all.
The Health Secretary was notably absent, though he's seldom notable when he's present. Findlay queried Neil Gray's whereabouts. My guess would be in a ministerial limo bound for Pittodrie or the pub.
But, no, he was in Osaka at a health technology conference. It's his second official visit lately. I'm sure we're all impressed Mr Gray is big in Japan, but if he wants to be a hit at home he might want to spend more time in Scotland doing his job.
Findlay sniped that the NHS was in crisis but the Health Secretary was 'out of the country talking tech'. It's got to be an improvement on what he talks here. Chanting a litany of SNP failures, Anas Sarwar asked if 'the guy who promised to steady the ship has now become the captain of the Titanic'.
It's worse than that: Swinney is the captain and the iceberg.
Since becoming an MSP in 2024, Tim Eagle has brought a much-needed quality to the debating chamber: snark. He succeeded Donald Cameron after his elevation to the Lords, and while his predecessor was a patrician Highland gent, Eagle is a squawking, talons-bared bird of prey.
'There is no political disaster like an SNP disaster,' he spat, describing how the visitor levy was causing a 'crisis' for rural businesses, including 750 firms in his neck of the woods. The recipients of his philippic mumbled their displeasure.
'You can mutter away, but it's true,' he told them. Gas, meet peep.
Holyrood has now entered its summer recess and MSPs are off for two months. The length of break upsets voters, who reckon politicians should spend less time on their hols and more in parliament.
Have you seen what happens when they're in parliament? The GRR Bill, the DRS scheme, ferries that can't sail. At least when they're on a beach they're not creating new thought crimes to charge us with.
Two months off? I'd give them all 12.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump is right to stir up the hornets' nest on North Sea oil and gas
In spite of their relationship being one of the political world's strangest bromances, Donald Trump's claim that Keir Starmer was 'destroying' the North Sea's oil and gas found other targets in his Aberdeen stopover. As a result – and even in their own backyard – he was not averse to letting John Swinney, the First Minister, and Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, know that he didn't think much of their energy policies. That's assuming that any one of those who'll be called to vote in next May's Scottish Parliament elections really knows what Swinney's or Sarwar's definite policy on North Sea oil and gas will be. Both parties have been playing a version of dodgems, ducking and diving all over the place as they constantly seek to confuse the electorate about what the future holds for what the president rightly described as the North Sea's 'treasure chest'. The SNP have been all over the place in relation to energy, while at least with Nicola Sturgeon voters knew where they were. Then, in that ill-fated and completely nonsensical alliance with the sub-Marxist Scottish Greens, the Scottish Government had set its face firmly against more development of oil and gas fields and any still under way would presumably be abandoned. Everything was geared to renewable power – wind, solar and tidal. And definitely no nuclear generation, either – not ever. Swinney has managed to get the SNP off that ludicrous policy for keeping Scotland's lights on, if only by sitting on the fence and stating that they'd no longer ban all North Sea production and instead would consider new licences to drill on a case-by-case basis. I can just imagine the world's oil giants rushing to do business with the Scottish Government with that sort of 'maybe-aye-maybe-no' condition hanging over their development plans. The Scottish Tories are completely onside with the president in being ready to approve many new licences that would help preserve the current well-paid and highly skilled jobs in the North East of Scotland. And it should help them hang onto key constituencies. But it was Scottish Labour that, until fairly recently, looked to have a fair chance of challenging the SNP for the right to form a government next May. That hope, however, almost disappeared thanks to a whole series of own goals by the UK Labour Government over issues such as winter fuel payments and benefit cuts. It remains to be seen whether their Hamilton by-election victory has put new heart into Labour and also whether they now have a policy on North Sea oil and gas that will attract voters. The omens are not good, if the trades union leader Gary Smith is to be believed. The general secretary of the Labour-supporting GMB union has said that the UK Government's energy policy is 'bonkers' as it plans to cut off investment that would help create jobs. In that he was essentially echoing the president's comments. The UK Government is expected to grant permission for the giant new Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea to go ahead as they already have licences approved. But Ed Miliband, the UK Energy Secretary, has repeatedly said no future licences will be granted by Labour – meaning the North Sea sector is in danger of continuing to shed jobs over time. Labour aims to fight the nationalists on the record of Swinney's Government, which in spite of President Trump's nice words about him are nothing to boast about, and neither is his obsession with breaking up Britain. But there are lots of votes in the energy policies of the three main contenders, and currently only the Tories seem to agree with the Trump 'manifesto' on North oil and gas. He was right to stir up that hornets' nest. The electorate deserve clearer answers, especially from Labour.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chicken or beef? Scientists finally discover which is better for your digestive health...
Eating lean beef could be less damaging to your gut than eating chicken, according to a controversial new study. While red and processed meat have been linked to an increased risk of bowel cancer and heart disease, poultry had, until now, been considered a less risky source of protein. In the study, Spanish researchers analysed how chicken and beef affected the gut microbiome of 16 healthy individuals, mostly aged between 18 and 22-years-old. They found that whilst both diets—which were followed for a period of eight weeks— had an impact on gut bacteria, the chicken-based diet was associated with a significant decrease in microbial diversity and richness. The gut microbiome—the community of friendly bacteria that live in the gut and communicate with the brain—is essential for protecting against infection and disease. After eating a chicken-based diet, participants were also found to have higher levels of harmful bacteria in the gut, which has been linked with a number of diseases including bowel cancer. Interestingly, they found that the beef-based diet led to a significant increase in Blautia bacteria which plays a key role in protecting the mucus barrier in the gut, warding off inflammation and disease. In the study, participants were instructed to follow their usual diet and randomly assigned to eat Pirenaica beef—which is naturally high in potassium, zinc and vitamin B—or chicken three times a week. Chefs prepared the cuts using standardised cooking methods including grilling, stewing and roasting. The nutritional value of both diets, including protein and fat sources, were similar in both groups. Participants then had a wash-out period of five weeks between the two diets, in which they resumed their normal diet. Stool samples were collected at the beginning and end of each diet-period. The researchers found that the chicken-based diet negatively affected the body's ability to process glucose—a type of sugar—which interfered with blood sugar levels. Blood sugar levels often change in the day but it is important to try and keep levels stable. According to the NHS, low blood sugar below 4mmol/L can be dangerous if left untreated causing seizures, sleep disturbances, loss of consciousness and heart palpitations. They also found that this diet lead to a decrease in the production of amino acids—the building blocks of proteins—which are essential for immune function and gut health. Writing in the journal Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, they concluded: 'These findings suggests that the integration of lean red meat from beef into a healthy dietary pattern could positively influence not only the gut microbiome but also some health indicators.' The study had several limitations which the authors acknowledged. One is that although dietary intake was assessed using a questionnaire and diet quality was considered, diet was self-reported which means some foods that could have a significant impact on gut bacteria may have been missed. It comes as concerning research has suggested that regularly eating chicken could double the risk of dying from 11 different types of cancer, including bowel and stomach. Italian researchers found those who consumed over 300g of poultry—equivalent to about four portions—per week, had double the risk of dying from a digestive cancer, compared to those who ate less than one portion. Whilst they admitted they couldn't be sure why this increased risk occurred they theorised that it could be due to high cooking temperatures or the feed given to poultry. According to Cancer Research UK, 21 per cent of bowel cancer cases are caused by eating red or processed meats. Scientists believe this is linked to certain chemicals naturally present in meat, introduced during processing of produced when it is cooked as high temperatures. However, the NHS states that eating meat, as part of healthy balanced diet, helps provide protein which builds and repairs muscles, as well as produces hormones and enzymes. Meat is also rich in vitamin B12, a key component in keeping the nervous system healthy. The health service advises people who eat about 90g red meat — about three thin slices of roast beef — per day to try and cut down to 70g.
Scotsman
40 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Scots residents take note: Why it's not just sunglasses that could save your sight this summer
We all know the drill when the sun finally shines in Scotland, out come the BBQs, flip-flops, and, of course, the sunnies. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But as the UK swelters through a scorching summer, experts are warning that protecting your eyes goes beyond simply slipping on a pair of stylish shades. Eye health is often overlooked in the warmer months, yet the sun's UV rays can cause serious damage to our vision, from dry eyes and irritation, to longer-term risks such as cataracts and macular degeneration. The NHS advises wearing UV-protective sunglasses, but as the mercury rises, eye care experts say we should be thinking even more holistically. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Jason Layton, founder of UK family-run wellness brand Nature's Zest, and natural health expert, said: 'The eyes are one of the most vulnerable parts of the body when it comes to sun exposure. Most people are aware that skin burns, but they forget that UV can damage the retina too. That's why we created Macu XL, to help protect people's long-term vision from the inside out.' Scottish residents are being advised to take care of their eyes this summer Macu XL is a powerful eye supplement containing lutein, zeaxanthin and antioxidants, which help defend the eyes from oxidative stress and high-energy UV exposure, common during long days spent outdoors. But it's not the only step you can take to keep your eyes happy and healthy this summer. FIVE SUMMER EYE HAZARDS, AND HOW TO HANDLE THEM 1. UV Rays Even on cloudy days, UV rays penetrate through the clouds — and they don't just age your skin. Prolonged exposure can damage the cornea and retina, potentially increasing the risk of vision loss over time. Top tip: Always wear sunglasses with UV400 protection, even when it's overcast. Consider supplements like Macu XL to bolster your body's natural defences. 2. Chlorine & Salt Water Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pools and sea swims are a summer staple — but they can leave eyes sore, red, and irritated. Chlorine strips the natural tear film, while salt can cause dryness and stinging. Top tip: Rinse eyes with clean water after swimming, and wear swim goggles to reduce exposure. Hydrating eye drops can help restore moisture levels. 3. Airborne Allergens Pollen counts soar in the summer, and for hayfever sufferers, that often means itchy, watery, puffy eyes. Top tip: Shower and change clothes after being outside, and consider antihistamine eye drops. A cold compress over closed eyes can also soothe irritation. 4. Dry Eye Syndrome Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Air conditioning, fans, and long drives with open windows can dry out the surface of the eyes, causing a gritty, tired feeling. Top tip: Blink often when driving or looking at screens, and use preservative-free lubricating drops if symptoms persist. Stay well-hydrated throughout the day. 5. Sand and Grit Beach days are fun until wind-blown sand gets in your eye. Rubbing can make things worse and even scratch the cornea.
