King Charles' true feelings about Meghan laid bare with 'strange' nickname
Members of the royal family have long used unusual nicknames to refer to each other by, with each name having a sweet back story. And while many of the senior working royals have unique names they are referred to as behind closed doors, there is one bizarre nickname that has long caught the attention of eagle-eyed royal fans.
While Meghan Markle and Prince Harry stepped away from the royal family five years ago, there was a time that Meghan was seemingly quite close with her in-laws, especially her father-in-law, King Charles. When Meghan was first introduced to the King, he was reportedly blown away by her confidence.
The relationship between Meghan and Charles grew over the years, with Charles even agreeing to walk Meghan down the aisle on her wedding day in 2018, after her own father was unable to attend the wedding in Windsor.
Before the big day, a royal insider came forward to share the unique name that Charles had for Meghan, and revealed the strange but poignant meaning behind it.
In royal expert Katie Nicholl's book The New Royals, she explains that Charles had long admired Meghan's strength of character and gave her a fitting nickname to reflect this, as Nicholl wrote: "Charles reportedly nicknamed his future daughter-in-law 'Tungsten' because of her toughness and resilience."
This is not the first time that Charles' initial nickname for Meghan has been reported, as in June 2018, the Daily Mail wrote that Charles called Meghan 'Tungsten', a type of metal because she is "tough and unbending".
A source told the Mail on Sunday at the time: "Prince Charles admires Meghan for her strength and the backbone she gives Harry, who needs a tungsten-type figure in his life as he can be a bit of a softy. It's become a term of endearment."
Despite Harry and Meghan's wedding being a grand affair attended by the entire royal family, not everyone was convinced of their union, as explosive new claims from a royal expert came to light.
According to royal authror Sally Bedell Smith, one of Queen Elizabeth 's cousins and confidants made a series of comments about the validity of the royal couple's relationship in the lead up to their high-profile nuptials, claiming that Meghan had 'engineered' their union.
Bedell Smith wrote that Lady Elizabeth Anson said just days before the nuptials: "We hope but don't quite think she is in love. We think she engineered it all," adding: "It's worrying that so many people are questioning whether Meghan is right for Harry.'
'The problem, bless his heart, is that Harry is neither bright nor strong, and she is both. Meghan is clearly brighter than Harry, but she has to be careful not to overshadow him."
According to Bedell Smith, Lady Anson said that Meghan was "full of charm" as well as "intelligent and thoughtful" when she and Harry first became engaged in 2017, but as the wedding drew closer, the relationship between the late Queen and the Sussexes soured.
Bedell Smith said Lady Anson told her that the former monarch was left 'dismayed' about some of the arrangements being made for the wedding and had become "very worried" about her 'weak' and 'besotted' grandson.
She claims that the former monarch had been left shocked that Harry had asked the Archbishop of Canterbury to perform the ceremony without asking the Dean of Windsor first, and that the now Duke of Sussex thought his grandmother could just "do what she wants".
According to Bedell Smith, Lady Anson said that due to this, Harry had "blown" his relationship with his grandmother. She writes that Lady Anson told her several months before the wedding: "She [the Queen] said she was really upset. I was shocked when the Queen told me this, how she was so saddened.'
However, the author later claims that several weeks closer to the nuptials, Lady Anson told her that Harry and his grandmother had "patched things up".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Meghan's tendency to 'control', according to a royal insider: How the Duchess sought to master 'every aspect' of her life and even had a 'careful plan' for how she would 'out' her relationship with Harry
By all accounts, Meghan's life story so far could be considered a modern day fairy tale. Meghan had a Cinderella–esque rise, growing up as a young girl in Los Angeles before she arrived at the Palace and became the Duchess of Sussex. However, while a fictional story will have many unforeseen twists and turns, in Meghan's case nothing happened by chance. Tom Bower, writing in his bestseller Revenge, looks back on the early days of Harry and Meghan's romance where he claims the former Suits actress meticulously planned how to 'out' Prince Harry as her boyfriend. 'In Meghan Markle 's life, little happened by chance. Beyond the empathetic smile was woman who disrupted spontaneity and liked to control every aspect of her life. In late September 2016 nothing was more important than her relationship with Harry,' Bower said. According to the royal insider, it was around this time that Meghan decided that her career needed an 'adjustment' – so in October 2016 her Wikipedia was purged of any reference to her work on Deal Or No Deal and her time as a model. 'A section headed "humanitarian work" was inserted' in its place, which referenced her speech at a United Nations women's event in New York among other achievements. It would appear as though, at this time, Meghan was attempting to downplay the media career she worked so hard to build and instead was beefing up her humanitarian work. Harry and Meghan at the 2018 Invictus Games. Meghan had a Cinderella–esque rise growing up as a young girl in Los Angeles before she arrived at the Palace and became the Duchess of Sussex And, unsurprisingly, two weeks later Meghan emailed her agent – Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne – to announce the end of her acting and commercial career. 'I realised it meant losing her as a friend as well as a client,' Gina told Bower. The timing of everything that month had been 'carefully planned' even down to the Halloween birthday party the couple attended in Toronto with Princess Eugenie and her boyfriend. Here, Meghan shared a photo on Instagram of her 'secret Halloween date'. Bower said: 'Most at the party were in no doubt that Meghan was '"outing" Harry. 'For her own good reasons she wanted the relationship to be publicised. In media hype, some would call it the "Greatest Story since the Abdication".' A week later the romance burst into public view when journalist Camilla Tominey broke the story. The Daily Mail soon caught on to it, reporting that the couple had 'matching bracelets' and pointing out that Harry's private instagram account followed Meghan. Bower wrote: '"It has a ring of truth," confirmed the Palace about the global sensation creating a frenzy outside Meghan's house. She emerged, smiling to a crowd of photographers, and drove to the Suits studio.' The ploy worked: Meghan gained 100,000 new followers and 'journalists received numerous tips about the clothes and accessories Meghan was wearing'. However, once Meghan became a working member of the Royal Family she quickly learnt that in the Firm the narrative would not be so easy to control. According to one royal author, Meghan allegedly tried to not only carve out their own independent career as a working royal but also tried to 'outshine' every other member of the family – including the late Queen Elizabeth II. Writing in his royal biography Yes Ma'am – which explores the lives of the men and women who serve the royals – author Tom Quinn claims that Meghan Markle caused a panic during her brief time as a working member of the family when the Duchess of Sussex signaled she wanted to operate separately from the Queen. Quinn said: ' Buckingham Palace became really worried when they became aware that Meghan had plans for her life as a working royal that were not going to be part of a general strategy agreed with the staff – she just wanted to do her own thing. 'Which is fair enough if you're not a member of a tightly controlled institution, but it was never going to be acceptable that Meghan should outshine Princess Anne, Prince Charles [as he then was] and Elizabeth the Queen.' Speaking to Quinn, a former Courtier for Elizabeth said: 'Elizabeth always had to be the centre and focus of everything the Royal Family did, and I don't think Meghan understood why that had to make her do things she didn't want to do. 'She didn't understand that when you join the Royal Family, you don't do as you please, you do as you're told. In a sense, you become a servant of the family.' Meghan's tendency to go off-script and rebel against the constraints of royal life were glaringly obvious during the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's tour of southern Africa in 2019. While stopping to speak to ITV journalist Tom Bradby, Meghan gave a remarkably candid interview about how she was struggling to cope with the media scrutiny on top of being a new mother and a newlywed. During the interview she thanked Bradby for asking if she was OK, claiming that 'not many people have asked if I'm OK'. And then when asked if it had been a struggle, she agreed with the reporter's analysis. While Meghan received praise in some circles for her openness, it was not the sort of answer many working royals would have been expected to give during a royal tour. And the interview, along with the trip, became something of a PR disaster for the Royal Family. Quinn added that Meghan 'undoubtedly felt constrained' by the Royal Family and that she and Harry needed 'do their own thing without consulting the big royal machine'. Only a few months later Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals which not only gave them the freedom to control their narrative but also came with some lucrative benefits as well. In 2019, during the interview with Tom Bradby, Meghan was remarkably candid about how she was struggling to cope with the media scrutiny on top of being a new mother and a newlywed According to royal author Valentine Low, it was Meghan's yearning to monetise her royal title which led to 'Megxit'. Writing in his tell–all book Courtiers, Low claims that Meghan's desire to 'earn money for herself' led the couple to abandon their duties entirely. Low revealed that during discussions about how to reach a happy middle ground – which could please the whole family – multiple scenarios were explored. These ranged from Harry and Meghan 'having a month a year to do their own thing' to 'spending most of their time privately but doing a select number of royal activities'. The one caveat for the Sussexes continuing royal duties – however small or minor – was that they must stick to the 'normal rules about royal behaviour'. Crucially, that would mean Harry and Meghan could not 'act or take decisions in order to gain financially'. Low writes: 'Some suspected that in the end she wanted to make money. And the only way she was going to do that was by leaving her royal life behind and going back to America.' Indeed, since stepping down as a working royal, Meghan appears to have focused much of her energy on her solo business projects and media projects – with the next season on With Love, Meghan set to debut next week.
Edinburgh Live
15 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle skewered by TV host in brutal three-word putdown
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced criticism from Sky News Australia presenter Paul Murray as he took aim at their fresh agreement with Netflix. This follows the streaming giant's decision to extend its partnership with the duo through a multi-year, first-look arrangement, covering all television and film projects from Archewell Productions. Nevertheless, reports suggest that Harry and Meghan will only earn from this agreement if Netflix chooses to greenlight their proposals, marking a significant departure from their £80million arrangement in 2020. First-look agreements typically permit a company to assess a project before determining whether to proceed with it. Should they decline, the creator is then free to pitch it elsewhere, reports the Express. A representative for Meghan and Harry told the Daily Mail that the couple did receive compensation for the deal, though they declined to reveal further specifics, stating: "I can say no more owing to commercially confidential contractual agreements." Responding to the agreement, Sky News Australia presenter consulted US television commentator Megyn Kelly, asking: "Speaking of negotiations, what do you think the balance was between Harry and Meghan and Netflix? Because they have re-done a deal but it's a really 'p**s weak version' of the first deal, they don't get the automatic money and then you have to make something, you basically have to make something and then will decide whether they going to show it or not to get the money, how do you make of that negotiation went?" Megyn delivered a withering response as she stated: "To me it sounds like they Netflix while to cancel and someone representing Meghan and Harry begged them to at least say that it's a first look, in a way to say we don't think you're losers, you're not cut off, we think you're winners, such winners that we want to get the first look to see what you're doing later down the line because they might want to buy it. (Image: Sky News) "But really, it's just a save face mechanism, Netflix has these two under contract, if it wanted to have an exclusive deal with them, it would have, it has more money than God, it's not hurting for cash." Meghan's statement read: "We're proud to extend our partnership with Netflix and expand our work together to include the As Ever brand. My husband and I feel inspired by our partners who work closely with us and our Archewell Productions team to create thoughtful content across genres that resonates globally and celebrates our shared vision." One programme that is certain to be broadcast is the second series of With Love, Meghan, which features Meghan preparing dishes in the kitchen alongside celebrities and lifestyle experts.
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Terence Stamp dead: Superman star dies aged 87 as family pay sad tribute
Superman actor Terence Stamp has reportedly died aged 87, his family as confirmed. The movie star is best known for playing General Zod in the Hollywood hits Superman and Superman II. Stamp, who was an Oscar nominated actor, also appeared in Pier Paolo Pasolini's Theorem in 1968, A Season in Hell in 1971 and The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert in 1994, where he starred as a transgender woman. The actor is said to have died this morning. Stamp was born in London's East End in 1938 as the son of a tugboat stoker. His early years saw him endure the bombing of the city during World War Two. Before leaving school to work in advertising, Stamp won a scholarship to go to drama school. "He leaves behind an extraordinary body of work, both as an actor and as a writer that will continue to touch and inspire people for years to come," the family said in a statement. "We ask for privacy at this sad time," reports the Daily Mail. His cause of death has not been reported. Stamp was known for his good looks and dress sense alongside his acting as he was dubbed one of Britain's most glamorous couples with Julie Christie. They had starred together in Far From the Madding Crowd in 1967. The actor also dated model Jean Shrimpton, and became photographer David Bailey's muse. Stamp lost out on the role of James Bond but went on to work in Italian films. He worked with Federico Fellini in the late 1960s. Stamp decided to take a break from the glitzy world of Hollywood fame as he studied yoga in India. However, upon his return he bagged his most high-profile role. He appeared as General Zod, the megalomaniacal leader of the Kryptonians, in Superman in 1978 and its sequel in 1980.
