Delhi University professors divided over removal of papers on Islam, Pakistan, China
The move has not gone down well with several committee members. Professor Monami Sinha voiced strong opposition, calling the change an act of ideological censorship.She warned that removing such papers undermines critical academic enquiry, especially at a time when understanding regional geopolitics is crucial."We argued that it is imperative to study Pakistan and China in detail. Ignoring these geopolitical realities would be academically short-sighted," Professor Sinha stated.She also raised concerns over the removal of references to caste, communal violence, and same-sex relationships from the revised Sociology and Geography curricula.PROPONENTS CALL FOR AN INDIA-FIRST SYLLABUSOn the other hand, some members supported the decision, asserting that the current syllabus was "agenda-driven" and lacked balance. Committee member Professor Harendra Tiwari questioned the selective inclusion of topics.advertisement'Why only a paper on Islam and International Relations? Why not on Hinduism or Sikhism?' as quoted by PTI.According to him, the committee's goal is to create a curriculum that is "India-centric" and unbiased, serving national academic interests.Tiwari made it clear that the dropped courses will not be reinstated unless they align with an India-first academic perspective.FURTHER DISCUSSION AHEADThe topic remains unsettled, and the upcoming meeting on July 1 is expected to see further deliberation on the revised syllabus.The issue has not only triggered a division within the committee but has also raised broader questions about academic freedom, inclusivity, and political influence in higher education.As this debate unfolds, students and faculty await clarity on what direction Delhi University's curriculum will ultimately take.(With inputs from PTI)- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Congress, Chidambaram speaking Pakistan's language: Shivraj Chouhan
Union minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Monday accused the Congress and its leader P Chidambaram of "speaking the same language" as used by Pakistan and claimed that the Opposition was "running away" from a discussion in Parliament on Operation Sindoor out of fear of being unmasked. Speaking to reporters inside the Parliament complex, he said when the government is ready to discuss the issue then why is the Opposition running away from it. The Lok Sabha was adjourned till 2 pm on Monday amid opposition protests on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, delaying the start of the discussion on Operation Sindoor. A political row erupted on Monday over Chidambaram's reported remarks that the terrorists behind the Pahalgam could have been "homegrown". "It was their demand only that a discussion should be held on Operation Sindoor. And, when the government is ready for discussion, why is it running away from it? The entire Opposition is not letting a discussion on terror and terrorism. Is there a fear of being unmasked?" Chouhan said. Reacting to former home minister Chidambaram's reported remarks related to the Pahalgam terror attack in a video interview, Chouhan said, "Why is P Chidambaram saying this?" "The language in which Pakistan is speaking, the same language is being used by Chidambaram and Congress... The mask has been removed from the Opposition's face," he said, wondering if the Congress leader was asking for proof about Pakistan's hand in the attack. Chidambaram, in an interview with The Quint, said, "...for all we know they could be homegrown terrorists, why do we assume they came from Pakistan?". He, however, later said that his remarks had been taken out of context. "Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation. The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!" he wrote on X. Earlier in the day, BJP leader and former Union minister Anurag Thakur accused the Congress of casting doubts on the achievements of the Indian Army during Operation Sindoor. Speaking to PTI Videos inside the Parliament complex, he alleged, "When it comes to terrorist attacks, Pakistan is unable to defend itself, but Rahul-occupied Congress leaders are quick to take its side." Thakur said this was not the first time that Congress leaders have demanded evidence from the Indian Army while attempting to "absolve Pakistan in advance". "The country will not give dossiers anymore, it will give doses. We will not give proof, we will give coffins to terrorists," the Hamirpur MP said. Thakur said those who once promoted an anti-India narrative could not face the Indian Army during the operation, in a reference to Pakistan. "This mindset of placing doubt on our soldiers while shielding Pakistan shows the Congress' low thinking and anti-national attitude," he alleged. BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj said Chidambaram's comments were "deeply shameful", especially given his stature as a former home minister. Speaking to PTI Videos, she pointed out that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had declared the start of the Monsoon Session a celebration of Operation Sindoor's success. "And yet, someone like P Chidambaram gives such a should be ashamed," she said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Fashion Value Chain
17 minutes ago
- Fashion Value Chain
India–UK FTA to Boost Gem Trade to $7 Billion by 2027
The signing of the India–UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on 24 July at Chequers, the official country residence of UK PM Sir Keir Starmer, marks a significant milestone in strengthening bilateral trade. Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi led a 20-member Indian business delegation that included Mr. Kirit Bhansali, Chairman of the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), who actively participated in the historic moment. The landmark agreement grants zero-duty access to nearly 99% of Indian exports, with the gem and jewellery sector poised to be a major beneficiary. In 2024, India exported $941 million worth of gems and jewellery to the UK. The FTA is projected to push exports to $2.5 billion and increase overall bilateral trade in the sector to $7 billion over the next two years. This tariff elimination significantly enhances the global competitiveness of Indian-made gems and jewellery, offering new opportunities to MSMEs, manufacturers, and skilled artisans across India. Commenting on the FTA, Mr. Kirit Bhansali, Chairman, GJEPC, stated, 'It was an immense privilege to witness this historic moment under the visionary leadership of Hon'ble PM Shri Narendra Modi. With duty concessions now in place, India's gem and jewellery exports to the UK are expected to rise dramatically, from $941 million to $2.5 billion in just three years.' Mr. Bhansali also presented the commemorative book Gem of a Partnership – India–UK FTA to both Prime Ministers during the UK–India Reception. GJEPC further showcased the Indian Crafts Reimagined jewellery collection, which reflected India's traditional artistry through techniques like filigree, Meenakari, Warli, and Kashmiri architectural motifs—aligning with the Hon'ble PM's Design in India initiative. GJEPC continues to support its members through webinars, trade expert sessions, and awareness campaigns to ensure the industry leverages the full benefits of this FTA.
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Is Delhi University ready for 4-year UG programme? Teachers question
As Delhi University prepares to begin its new academic session on August 1, faculty members have raised serious concerns about the university's readiness to implement the fourth-year undergraduate programme (FYUP) and some postgraduate the new academic year at Delhi University set to begin on August 1, faculty members have voiced concerns alleging unresolved syllabus issues related to some postgraduate courses and the newly introduced fourth-year undergraduate programme (FYUP).advertisementThere was no immediate response available from the varsity over the allegations. This will be the first batch of students to enter the fourth year under the Undergraduate Curriculum Framework (UGCF), a component of the National Education Policy (NEP).However, teachers claim they are still awaiting clarity on the final syllabus, despite the proposals being approved in Executive Council meetings held on May 23 and July faculty members allege that due process has been sidestepped, and key decisions were made without adequate consultation. Many of the changes were passed despite formal dissent notes from teachers, further fuelling Dev Habib, associate professor at Miranda House, criticised what she called political overreach in academic matters."We hear that committees have been set up which are dictating terms. This is unconstitutional and is owing to excessive interference by BJP-RSS," she alleged, accusing the university administration of disregarding academic Dhusiya, an elected member of the Executive Council, said the university is not equipped to support the expanded curriculum. "DU is still not prepared for the fourth year NEP-UGCF," he said, citing shortfalls in infrastructure, budget and highlighting institutional tensions, Rudrashish Chakraborty, an associate professor at Kirori Mal College, pointed to undue external influence on academic content."Outsiders have been pressuring departments to alter syllabi," he said, noting that such interference had prompted the resignation of the head of the history department. "No academic can survive here without compromising integrity."With the clock ticking down to the start of classes, the alleged unresolved syllabus concerns cast doubts over DU's preparedness for its most significant academic transition in years.(With PTI inputs)- Ends
