
Many business travelers are quietly taking their families along on trips
So she convinced a family member to tag along.
"They would meet up with me when my son needed to be nursed," she said. "We also had the evenings together."
The trip worked so well that Colkmire took more business trips with non-colleague companions.
"My grandma went to Houston with me, a friend went to St. Paul, and my mom helped me when I needed to do a job in Washington D.C.," she said. "Each person loved getting the free trip."
More than half of business travelers (55%) have had loved ones join their work trips, according to a survey of 4,000 adults from the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Spain published Wednesday by the travel tech company TravelPerk.
Among C-suite executives, the number jumped to 73% — with travelers saying they've had partners (53%), children (22%), friends (21%), and even pets (7%) tag along, according to TravelPerk's data.
For some, bringing loved ones on business trips isn't just a perk — it's a way to reclaim time together, according to Jean-Christophe Taunay-Bucalo, TravelPerk's president and COO.
"Traveling for work can be lonely," he told CNBC Travel. "Work trips can be an opportunity to experience something new, and by taking a loved one along, you remain connected."
Plus, business travelers don't have to miss family time, be it bedtimes or birthdays, said Taunay-Bucalo.
"For me, it's about having the best of both worlds, and sometimes performing at my peak also means seeing my kid at the end of a work day — it provides some normality," he said.
Other business travelers who spoke to CNBC said there is another motivation — money.
Colkmire, who now runs a travel website, recalled the time she joined her husband on a work trip to Vienna, Austria.
"Our expense was cut in half, which was a huge blessing so that we were able to explore an area of the world that we had not yet been to without breaking the bank," she said.
Bridgette Borst Ombres, a former journalist turned public relations consultant, said she has used work trips to create "budget-friendly mini-vacations" for her family.
"Attending a tech conference at Disney World in Orlando, Florida, was the perfect business trip to bring along my husband and then-2-year-old daughter," she said. "The conference lasted two days, so while I was working, my husband took our daughter to visit his dad, who lived in the area, and we'd meet up for dinner in the evenings."
After the conference ended, Ombres and her family spent a few days at Walt Disney World.
"My hotel was covered by my company for the first two days, but I paid for the additional nights and all of our activities. My plane ticket was also covered by the company but I purchased my husband's ticket separately," she said.
That blend of personal and business travel, or "bleisure" as it's known, was valued at $315 billion in 2022 by Allied Market Research. The advisory firm projects blended trips will reach $731 billion globally by 2032.
Bringing loved ones on business trips is common and generally accepted, said Frank Harrison, regional security director for the Americas at risk management company World Travel Protection.
However, that doesn't mean that employees are revealing their plans to their companies.
"I didn't keep [my] travel plans a secret, nor did I broadcast them to coworkers," Ombres said. "Part of it was worrying it might come across as unprofessional."
Deepak Shukla, CEO of the London-based marketing company Pearl Lemon, said he's turned three-day work trips into week-long adventures with his wife in New York City, Lisbon, Dubai and Tokyo.
"I don't hide it from my team," he said. "If the work's done and costs aren't creeping into the company card, it's nobody's business."
However, he said big corporations often view traveling with family as a "policy grey zone."
"The sticking points are expense claims, insurance coverage, and whether leisure days blur into workdays ... [which are] messy for tax and liability," he said. "That's why some companies quietly allow it but expect employees to keep receipts and activities clearly split."
Ombres said allowing family and friends to join business trips can boost morale and build loyalty among employees.
"I'm all for it," she said. "As long as it doesn't interfere with the work."
She said she sets clear expectations for work to be completed on trips, and as long as that's met, "there's no reason to try to micromanage how people spend their personal time."
Gabe Richman, CEO of Seattle-based biotech company Omic, agreed, saying he's combined work trips with family vacations in San Diego and Frankfurt, Germany.
He said he encourages employees to travel with loved ones as long as "business objectives are met first." He said employees should clearly separate personal and work expenses and ensure companies incur no additional costs. Travelers should also be transparent about their plans with their companies, he said.
Beyond that, travelers should make the most of the trip — for business and pleasure.
"Business takes me to places we'd never vacation to otherwise." he said. "Why waste the opportunity?"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Putin got a warm Trump meeting. Europe is afraid Zelenskyy won't.
While publicly Europe and Ukraine have appeared upbeat, privately officials were wary of Putin's red carpet welcome back to the West, where he secured the veneer of global legitimacy without making the kind of gestures toward peace the U.S., Europe and Ukraine have sought. 'Worries have been there all the way this year, and yesterday's meeting did not really help,' a European official said. Trump's position on the war has yo-yoed in recent weeks. While he had for months blamed Ukraine for the conflict, he had been more critical of Putin and Russia in the lead-up to the summit. He even said Putin would face 'severe consequences,' if he did not agree to stop the war after Friday's gathering. But after several hours of meetings with Putin in Alaska, Trump backtracked on a demand for an immediate ceasefire, again said it would be up to Ukraine to end the fighting and advised Kyiv to 'take the deal,' without specifying what Putin had suggested. Trump said after the summit that he negotiated with Putin over land swaps but declined to provide more details. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Sunday will lead a teleconference among the 'coalition of the willing' — countries that have indicated they will provide troops and other support to Ukraine at the end of the war, according to a European official. Ahead of the summit, Trump said he supported some American role in providing security guarantees — some form of assurance or support from Washington to deter Russia from attacking again after a peace deal is agreed. Nordic and Baltic leaders welcomed those commitments again after Trump spoke with European officials late Friday. While Trump did much more than usual to consult with Europe in the lead-up to the summit with Putin and after, the frequent contact does not seem to have yielded tangible results. European officials are relieved that Trump did not agree to a deal with Putin but disappointed that the threat of steep secondary tariffs targeting third countries buying Russian oil was tabled. 'They want to try to influence the negotiation process as much as possible, because they know Trump really wants to do it this way, and they don't want to leave the initiative to Putin,' said Giuseppe Spatafora, a former NATO official who is now a research analyst at the EU Institute for Security Studies. 'In general, the Europeans talk much more often to Trump than during the first 100 days, which is good. They have influence. But it's limited.' Zelenskyy's last visit to the Oval Office in February quickly went off the rails when Vice President JD Vance and later Trump both lectured him for not being grateful enough for American support and overplaying what they said was a weak diplomatic position. Zelenskyy's decision to wear a black polo, black pants and boots rather than a suit further soured the atmosphere. But Trump and Zelenskyy have been on better terms in recent meetings, as Kyiv's allies sought to improve the relationship and Trump's frustration with Putin mounted.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Want your son to be a CEO? New study reveals the most powerful male name in the US — and you won't guess what it is
It's not Tom, Dick, or Harry. A new study has revealed that Robert is the most powerful male name in America, with a whopping 21 of the Fortune 500 company CEOs bearing the moniker. The analysis was conducted by Profit Engine, with the company interested in examining whether a person's name had an impact on their professional life. 'The patterns we discovered were quite striking,' Jason Morris, CEO of Profit Engline, proclaimed in a press release. 'While correlation doesn't equal causation, these results definitely make you wonder if there's something to the old saying about names shaping destiny.' 'These findings reveal something notable about representation in American corporate leadership,' Morris said. 'The complete dominance of traditional male names isn't a coincidence.' New Africa – Powerful Americans bearing the name include Disney boss Robert 'Bob' Iger and Boeing boss Robert Ortberg. Interestingly, however, no US president has ever been named Robert. 'Robert has been a powerhouse name for decades,' Morris declared. 'It projects authority and tradition, both of which are qualities that boards of directors clearly value when selecting leadership.' Since the year 2000, however, the classic name has fallen far from favor. That year, it was the 29th most popular name for boys born in the US, according to the Social Security Administration. By 2020, it had fallen to number 80. Last year, it slipped further and is now the 90th most popular boys' moniker in America. Profit Engine found that Fortune 500 CEOs were far more likely than the general public to possess traditional names. Dusan Petkovic – If you want your son to be a CEO and you're not a fan of the name Robert, the analysis shows that it's still best to stick to the classics. Profit Engine found that male Fortune 500 CEOs were far more likely than the general public to possess traditional names. After Robert, Michael was revealed to be the second most powerful name, with 19 Fortune 500 CEOs bearing the moniker. James, John, Christopher, William, David, Mark, Timothy, Brian, Andrew, Thomas and Scott followed in that order. 'These findings reveal something notable about representation in American corporate leadership,' Morris said. 'The complete dominance of traditional male names isn't a coincidence. It reflects decades of systemic patterns in who climbs the corporate ladder.' 'What's particularly telling is that we're not seeing the diversity of names that reflects modern America. No Aidens [or] Ethans, despite these being popular baby names in recent decades,' he added. 'This suggests either a generational lag or that certain naming conventions still carry unconscious advantages in professional settings.'


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The last frontier isn't as far away from San Francisco as you imagine
The wind was blowing in from the ocean, and even though it was winter, we were thinking of summer. We heard the call of the sea and the call of the wild. So the Sailor Girl, my companion in small adventures, signed us up for a cruise from San Francisco to Alaska and back. Eleven days at sea aboard a big white cruise ship. Adventure is where you find it: hull down on a schooner in the far Pacific, huge ocean swells off Cape Horn, an Atlantic crossing. It's an adventure just getting underway from the Sausalito dock in our own dream boat. So why not pay somebody else to provide a nice warm cabin, three meals a day, a balcony on the sea world, and a steward to make the bunk? It's easy to sail away if San Francisco is your home port. On a good day you can be aboard a ship and unpacking your stuff in less than an hour after leaving your doorstep. It's still light when the Farallones are abeam, wild, gray and windswept. Course northwesterly to Alaska. We were aboard the Ruby Princess, 16 decks of easy living, 951 feet long, 113,000 tons, so big you can hardly feel the ship move. But still, that's the North Pacific Ocean just over the rail, and for two days there is no land in sight. No ships, no birds either. A different world. On the third morning — Alaska. Even the name is something special. It makes you think of snowy mountains, ice, forests, bears, tundra, cold, the last frontier. Just thinking about Alaska makes you want to put on a warm sweater. Of course, passengers on cruise ships see only a small part of the largest American state, just the coast, but not the vast interior. It's something to dream about. Alaska can be frustrating and annoying — overcrowded, commercial, soggy, gray, a bit disappointing. But it's also full of wild stories, unexpected surprises and small towns. It's so beautiful it can take your breath away — something you notice on a sharp, cold day. Ketchikan is one of the rainiest small cities in the world — 149.54 inches a year. It was raining steadily when we got there, then rain turned to mist, then back to hard rain, then to damp. There were five big cruise ships there that morning. Thousands of tourists crowding the narrow sidewalks. The shops all open, selling diamonds, watches, T-shirts, totem poles, rain slickers. Juneau was next, a small city nearly drowning in cruise ships. This season Juneau has scheduled 600 cruise ship calls, well over a million visitors in a five-month season. There were five ships at Juneau the day the Ruby Princess was there, the next day six ships, the day after that seven. So there were lines for everything in Juneau. Despite that, Juneau has a kind of offbeat charm. It's the state capital, so the town has another life. Juneau is both a city and a borough, with about 30,000 people, spread out so much between the mountains and the water that the borough of Juneau is bigger than Delaware. Juneau has lots of cars and trucks and buses, but only 18 miles of roads, which lead, essentially, nowhere. Everything comes to town by plane or boat: cars, refrigerators, furniture, groceries, the hops to make Alaskan Amber beer, the whiskey they serve at the Red Dog Saloon. The Red Dog Saloon is a particularly raucous and noisy tourist trap. Fun, too. Juneau made national news a few days after we stopped there when an overflow lake that takes meltwater from the Mendenhall Glacier, about a dozen miles from downtown, spilled over the rim like a bathtub overflowing. The water roared down a small river and into the edge of town. Luckily, the city and borough had just built a levee of special sandbags, so a flood was averted. But it was a lesson: The power of nature is never very far away in Alaska. We saw that the next day when the Ruby Princess called at the small town of Haines, not far from Skagway. Haines has only 1,657 permanent residents, and the Ruby Princess was the only ship in town that summer Tuesday, so we felt more like visitors than tourists. Haines has had booms and busts, a fish cannery, an Army post, a paved road into Canada and good prospects. In season, the woods are full of bald eagles and the waterways full of salmon. We took a trip up the Chilkat River, a big, wide, fast stream on the edge of wilderness. In Ketchikan we saw the Loyal Order of Moose lodge on the main street. On the river we saw a moose. We saved best for nearly last — a long, slow voyage on the big ship up the Endicott Arm, a fjord that extends 30 miles from Holkham Bay east toward the Canadian ice fields. The water is deep and dark, sometimes cobalt blue and sometimes green. Small and occasionally larger pieces of ice float on the surface, small bergs and growlers, drifting down the water. The pieces of ice are brilliant white when the sun hits them. Sailing up Endicott Arm is like sailing up Yosemite Valley thousands of years ago in the ice age, when Yosemite was a deep lake fed by glaciers. The walls of Endicott Arm are steep sheer cliffs and rounded domes — 'Sublime Yosemite cliffs,' John Muir wrote of the place. He and the Rev. S. Hall Young were the first outsiders to see Endicott Arm in 1880. The native Tlingit people took them there. Muir explored nearby Tracy Arm and Glacier Bay in 1879 and 1880 at a time when much of Alaska was unknown to the outside world. At the end of Endicott Arm is the wall of the Dawes Glacier, 600 feet high and half a mile wide, a river of ice thousands of years old extending into Canada. The ship turned at the face of the glacier and moved slowly out; we passed another ship with room to spare. This time, facing south in the afternoon sun, it was possible to see up the canyons and dozens of waterfalls and cascades, some hundreds of feet high. The streams rise from high mountains and empty faraway valleys, not a house, not a sign humans were ever there. True wilderness. The Dawes Glacier and the Sawyer Glacier in nearby Tracy Arm have been melting, moving back. In Muir's time they were much larger; in 23 years ending in 2013, the bigger of the two receded by nearly 2 miles. Yet there is plenty of beauty left. Still, you can stand at the rail of a luxurious ship and look up past the face of the cliff, up a steep slope lined with trees and brush toward a high ridge and wonder what might be on the other side. Maybe an adventure. Three days after the Ruby Princess left Endicott Arm, a series of small earthquakes rattled the area. They triggered a massive rock slide in Tracy Arm just after dawn. It was huge, the biggest slide in 10 years. The slide went into the water and set off a wall of water 10 feet high. No one was hurt; because the country was nearly empty, no ships in either waterway. We sailed back, of course, stopping in Victoria, British Columbia, for a day, two days at sea and the Golden Gate on a foggy dawn. It was a Monday morning, and San Francisco was just waking. You could tell. The first sound from the city was the Pier 39 sea lions barking.