Fans React to Pedro Pascal Touching Willem Dafoe's Wife in 2024 Clip
Fans react to Pedro Pascal touching Willem Dafoe's wife clip resurfacing
Pedro Pascal sparked mixed reactions online after a video clip resurfaced showing him touching Willem Dafoe's wife, Giada Colagrande, during Dafoe's Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony in January 2024.
The footage shows Pascal placing his hand on Colagrande's chin and stroking it while standing directly in front of Dafoe for a few seconds. In the cut-out clip of the video, some viewers noted that Dafoe's expression might have appeared to change after Pascal's interaction with Colagrande.
Some fans have commented that they believe Pascal is facing unfair scrutiny, as the cut-out clip does not provide any context for Pascal's interaction with Colagrande. Netizens also claim that although several pictures exist of Pascal hugging Dafoe seconds later, these images haven't circulated as widely as the controversial moment.
One commenter posted on X (formerly Twitter) that some social media users are unable to 'fathom platonic intimacy' between a male and a female. Another wrote, 'Clips shared with no back story or out of context become viral and can change public perception of someone and destroy people's lives.'
Online discussions about Pascal's physical interaction with colleagues started after he appeared at the San Diego Comic-Con with Fantastic Four star Vanessa Kirby. In a moment of 'anxiety,' Pascal reached out for Kirby's hand.
In response, Kirby took his hand and squeezed it assuringly. While the tender moment showed the pair's close friendship, it also received criticism online. Later, Kirby addressed the incident in a Vanity Fair interview.
She explained, 'What happened is we were both incredibly nervous going out in front of thousands of people who love this comic.' She added, 'He wanted me to know that we were in this together, and I found it a lovely gesture and was very glad to squeeze his hand back.'
The post Fans React to Pedro Pascal Touching Willem Dafoe's Wife in 2024 Clip appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
43 minutes ago
- Forbes
‘The Bad Guys 2' Just Set A Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score Record
The Bad Guys 2, the sequel to the Dreamworks 2022 original, has just hit theaters. While it remains to be seen how it will far against Fantastic Four and Superman , reviews are in and in one category in particular, they are stunning. As it stands, while The Bad Guys 2 has a great 85% on Rotten Tomatoes from critics, it has an even better 95% audience score. That means it is currently tied as the highest audience score for a Dreamworks animated film, going back almost 30 years. Additionally, it's the only sequel to do so out of the two, lower profile movies it's tied with. There are only two sequels in the whole top ten list besides The Bad Guys 2, albeit I guess you could count Puss in Boots as a spin-off instead. Here's the list: The Bad Guys 2 – 95% Spirit Untamed – 95% – 95% Abominable – 95% – 95% Puss in Boots: The Last Wish – 94% – 94% The Croods: A New Age – 94% – 94% The Bad Guys – 93% – 93% How to Train Your Dragon – 91% – 91% Shrek – 90% – 90% How to Train Your Dragon 2 – 90% – 90% The Prince of Egypt – 90% Kids movies tend to have audience scores that skew rather high, 'crowd pleasers,' as they are, but getting up there this high is an achievement. Interestingly, it's fun to know that the recent How to Train Your Dragon live-action remake got a 97% audience score, better than any of these and one of the best for a mainstream film this decade. Impressive! As for The Bad Guys 2 , here's the synopsis, building off the concept and events of the first one: 'Everyone's favorite felons are back, and this time, they've got company. In the new action-packed chapter from DreamWorks Animation's acclaimed comedy smash about a crackerjack crew of animal outlaws, our now-reformed Bad Guys are trying (very, very hard) to be good, but instead find themselves hijacked into a high-stakes, globe-trotting heist, masterminded by a new team of criminals they never saw coming: The Bad Girls.' It's quite a cast, led by Sam Rockwell, but also featuring Marc Maron, Craig Robinson, Anthony Ramos, Zazie Beetz. Natasha Lyonne and Awkwafina. The original made $250 million worldwide, a solid haul, but it seems like the sequel could end up beating it, as its opening weekend looks like it will be higher. It's dangerously close to Fantastic Four in taking the #1 spot. It's certainly the case that the audience score falls in time as more reviews come in, but for now? Yeah, it's record-level. Follow me on Twitter , YouTube , and Instagram . Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Shares Shockingly Sexist Tweet About Woman Being Property
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has a message for the women of the world that's disgraceful even by his dumpster-tier standards: that they're designed to be captured or bartered as property. In a bizarre exchange on X-formerly-Twitter, Musk replied to a post by Morgonn McMichael, an anti-LGBTQ influencer with ties to far-right groups. "Why do liberal white women hate white people so much?" McMichael asked, gaining over millions of impressions that can lead to huge payouts thanks to Musk's new policies. "They've been programmed to do so by their teachers and the media," the world's richest man drooled in response. It's the kind of hard-hitting insight Musk has come to be known for since he took over the platform back in October of 2022. But a response to Musk's brilliant missive — and the tech tycoon's response — is what really raised eyebrows. "Women are built to be traded to another tribe (or captured) and slide seamlessly into their new culture," wrote Dr. Insensitive Jerk, an anonymous account known for spouting eugenicist, anti-democracy, and racist takes on X. "20 years after they are captured, they are the matriarchs who enforce that culture. That is why women conform to the dominant culture, and thereby amplify that culture," the poster continues. "They think that keeps them safe, and they are correct, but only in the sort term. In the long term, they will be forced to remember they are white." "Better they are reminded of that by white men, because the alternative is not so gentle," Dr. Insensitive concluded. Musk, never one to shy away from reactionary drivel, reposted the vile screed, boosting it to his 223 million followers. It'd be a shocking outburst at any moment, but feels particularly striking given the renewed attention on the relationship between Musk and other elites and the disgraced sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein. Of course, his moves drew some criticism — as well as plenty of support on X, which under Musk's ownership has rapidly become a safe space for pretty much every genre of reprehensible hate speech under the Sun. "Retweeted by the man who has been divorced three times, pretty sure you're not the tribe," quipped on user. However prominently their half-baked ideas appear on his platform, the tech mogul and his fellow travelers might benefit from a history lesson. For decades, scholars studying the historical development of women in society have broadly agreed that gender roles are determined by social, economic, and historical conditions; women aren't "built to be traded" any more than men are built to be chattel slaves. Going back centuries, in fact, scholars have found that primitive peoples customarily practiced marriage not for personal gain, but for the collective benefit of the tribe. It wasn't until the early days of class-based society — where social standing is decided by wealth, income, and occupation — that men began to view women as inferior, leading to the kind of violence that Musk seems to regard as a fact of life. Indeed, it's no coincidence: both slavery and sex trafficking emerged at the same moment in history, a fact Musk and his reactionary followers would do well to wrap their heads around. More on Musk: Elon Musk Using Eugenics Startup to Inspect DNA of Potential Babies for Intelligence
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
YAHOO POLL: Has Fantastic Four revived the MCU for you?
The Fantastic Four: The First Steps had its world premiere on Monday (21 July) night and the first reactions to the film were generally positive. The film was under immense pressure and expectations, no doubt due to its troubled cinematic history. Its first iteration under 20th Century Fox in 2005 was a flop. A reboot in 2015, also under 20th Century Fox, reimagined Marvel's First Family as a dark, gritty comic book film but it didn't fare better either. Other polls YAHOO POLL: Will you take Wegovy to lose weight? YAHOO POLL: Is the key to a good life in Singapore emotional and mental well-being? YAHOO POLL: Should Astronomer CEO Andy Byron have resigned? However, Marvel can finally breathe a sigh of relief as, despite a steep drop at the box office in its second weekend, the film is sitting well with critics. If anything, the fact that it retained the top position in the second weekend is a testament to the strength of the film. Fantastic Four has garnered an 86 per cent rating with critics and a 92 per cent rating with audiences on Rotten Tomatoes. If it matters, Fantastic Four scored higher than James Gunn's Superman – which was released earlier in July. So, we want to hear from you – Has Fantastic Four revived the MCU for you? Related: Matt Shakman on why The Fantastic Four: First Steps didn't give continuity to Thunderbolts post-credits scene Ioan Gruffudd reflects on why his third Fantastic Four movie was scrapped Marvel's next moves: Black Panther 3 and a young X-Men cast to 'keep the cost down'; Blade and Deadpool 4 are lower priorities
