"Global community must adopt zero-tolerance towards terror funding": Hemang Joshi
During their two-day visit, the delegation met South Korea's top leaders, including the Foreign Minister and National Assembly members, and engaged with business leaders and the Indian diaspora to counter misinformation and strengthen ties.
Speaking to ANI, BJP MP Hemang Joshi said, 'During our two-day tour of South Korea, we engaged with a wide range of individuals and communities to highlight India's stance on terrorism--our 'new normal'. India and South Korea share a strong commercial relationship, and economic cooperation between the two countries is thriving. As part of the visit, we hosted a lunch with top business leaders from South Korea and discussed international financial aid being misused by Pakistan, not for development, but to fund terrorism.'
Joshi said the delegation stressed the urgent need for the world to take a zero-tolerance approach to terror funding, adding that security cooperation with South Korea was a key focus ahead of its upcoming presidential polls.
'We emphasised the urgent need for the global community to adopt a zero-tolerance approach towards terror funding. Security cooperation between India and South Korea was a key theme, especially in light of South Korea's upcoming presidential elections in eight days,' Joshi said.
He informed that the Indian delegation met top South Korean leaders, presidential advisors, and lawmakers to seek stronger support against terrorism and urged continued backing for India at global forums like the UNSC and FATF.
'Along with the Indian Embassy, our delegation met advisors to both major presidential candidates. We received unequivocal support from both sides in the fight against terrorism... We requested that South Korea continue supporting India's efforts in international forums like the UNSC and FATF. The message we brought had a clear and positive impact... Our delegation also held important meetings with top South Korean leadership, including the Foreign Minister, Deputy Foreign Minister, and key members of the National Assembly. These discussions helped strengthen our ties and ensured our position was clearly understood at the highest levels. Beyond politics, we reached out to business leaders, think tanks, and the Indian diaspora to counter misinformation... Under the leadership of Sanjay Jha, our delegation was successful in correcting misconceptions and reinforcing India's position on critical issues,' Joshi said.
The delegation, led by JD-U MP Sanjay Kumar Jha, includes Aparajita Sarangi (BJP), TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee, Brij Lala (BJP), John Brittas (CPI-M), Pradan Baruah (BJP), Hemang Joshi (BJP), Salman Khurshid, and Mohan Kumar.
The delegation aims to brief international partners on India's response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and its broader fight against cross-border terrorism while engaging with leaders in Japan, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, and Singapore.
Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7 as a decisive military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack by Pak-sponsored terrorists, in which 26 people were brutally killed. Indian Armed Forces targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, leading to the elimination of over 100 terrorists affiliated with groups including Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Madras Day 2025: On Madras dealing with the Chinese
Towards the end of July this year, at the AGM of the Madras Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the country's second oldest trade body and founded in 1836, Vellayan Subbiah of Murugappa Group addressed the audience. He spoke on how China has developed in the last few decades and how much India has to catch up if it intended to be serious competition. Also Read: Tamil Nadu's oldest and India's second trade body still puts up a fight for industry Listening to it brought to mind the decades of unease that has existed in the relationship between the two countries. But far older to that, of course, is China's interaction with south India. When a few years ago Prime Minister Narendra Modi made Mamallapuram his location of choice for his summit with Xi Jinping, the paramount leader of China, he was perhaps trying to re-establish a relationship of healthy exchange that had once existed. The accounts invariably begin with Bodhidharma, the 6th Century CE south Indian (as per one version), who travelled to China, met the Emperor Wudi, counselled him, and then stayed on in that country. The legend of Bodhidharma, and it has to be qualified as that, if correct in terms of date and location, makes him a contemporary of the Pallavas. Since then, and especially after the release of the film 7am Arivu, Bodhidharma has grown in stature and has been passed off as fact. The problem there is lack of documentation. But we do have better records of another who made the journey in reverse order —Xuanzang. He travelled to India in the 7th century CE and, incredibly, made it back safely to China as well. During his sojourn in India, he came to Kanchi too. Trade with China was another matter altogether. It had probably existed from time immemorial and, certainly, we do know that trade relations existed during Pallava and Chola times. Rajaraja and later Kulothunga I sent trade delegations to that country with a view to boost business. During colonial times, the East India Company, while it made over most Asian trade to its servants, jealously guarded its rights over China. Madras was the point of entry for most Chinese goods, which included copper, quicksilver, sugar (still known as Chini), and zinc. The last named was known then as tutenag in Europe, and even today, the word thuthanagam is prevalent as a term for anodising in Tamil. Circulation of fake currency Once in a while, the Chinese would show their true colours — a famed incident in the 18th Century CE was their dumping on us fake pagodas, the currency then in use in Madras, with a far lower gold content. It gave the Company quite a headache to sort that out. But an indicator of a future history of conflict was the Opium War, fought between the British and the Chinese in the 1840s, which ended in the ceding of Hong Kong. Soldiers from Madras, comprising infantry regiments, sappers, and miners, were employed by the British in Canton, Nanking, and other places. China Bazaar in Madras is still an abiding name. And though it may have derived from porcelain alias 'china' being sold here, it is intriguing that Chinese dentists settled here from the 1930s onwards and some continue their practice. They have very little to do with China itself and a point to ponder is that during the Chinese aggression of 1962, they contributed to the Indian War Fund! In more recent years, Sino-Indian border conflicts have dominated the news. But a Chennai-based engineering company did the unthinkable — it became the first such entity from India to set up a manufacturing plant in China! Sundram Fasteners (Zhejiang) Limited began operations in 2004 and continues to flourish. It just goes to show that conflicts will happen, kingdoms and governments will rise and fall, but trade is eternal.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Address concerns of farmers, workers on priority, demands CPI(M)
The CPI(M) Andhra Pradesh State Committee has urged the Central and State governments to act immediately to address the hardships being faced by the farmers, workers, and citizens in the wake of floods, soaring power tariffs, and privatisation. Addressing the media in Vijayawada on Thursday, CPI(M) State secretary V. Srinivasa Rao, along with Central Committee member K. Lokanatham and State Secretariat member K. Prabhakara Reddy, outlined the resolutions passed at the State Secretariat meeting. Polit Bureau members B.V. Raghavulu and U. Vasuki participated. Mr. Srinivasa Rao said the party demanded ₹10,000 per acre compensation for crop losses in the Godavari region, urgent repairs to the tanks, canals, and roads, and a farmer-friendly crop insurance scheme fully funded by the Central and State governments. He said the party opposed land allocation to the LuLu Group malls in Visakhapatnam and Vijayawada, calling it harmful to small retailers, and urged use of lands for public and RTC development. He condemned the alleged forcible installation of smart meters and an additional ₹12,000 crore tariff burden. He said the party would observe August 28 as 'Pratijna Dinam' to commemorate the Basheerbagh firing incident. Mr. Srinivasa Rao appealed to the political parties to back the INDIA bloc's Vice-Presidential nominee Justice Sudarshan Reddy, and criticised the YSRCP, TDP, and JSP for siding with the BJP-led NDA on the issue. He further said that the party opposed the alleged privatisation of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant and forced land acquisitions, and demanded priority to tribal rights and Polavaram oustees' rehabilitation.
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Not Aadhaar, PAN Or Voter ID: So What Really Makes You An Indian Citizen?
New Delhi: Citizenship has become a topic of intense discussion after the Bombay High Court clarified that having an Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter ID does not automatically make someone an Indian citizen. These documents serve only as proof of identity, the court said. This raises an important question: if PAN, voter ID or Aadhaar are not proof of citizenship, what officially establishes Indian nationality? Legally, India does not mandate a single document to prove citizenship. The Constitution lays down specific conditions. Anyone meeting these conditions qualifies as an Indian citizen. Add Zee News as a Preferred Source Citizenship matters because it defines the legal bond between an individual and the nation. It grants rights and privileges. These include fundamental rights, voting rights, legal protections, employment rights and a sense of belonging. Laws determine who qualifies as a citizen. The Constitution of India, in Articles 5 to 11, outlines the rules. On January 26, 1950, all individuals living in India qualified as citizens if they were born in India, had at least one parent born in India or had resided in India for the preceding five years. Certain groups who migrated from Pakistan also qualifies. They include those whose parents or grandparents were born in undivided India, individuals who returned to India after moving to Pakistan and persons born abroad to Indian parents or grandparents. The Citizenship Act of 1955 expanded these provisions. It defines the circumstances under which citizenship can be granted or revoked. Citizenship can be acquired through birth, descent, registration, naturalization or integration of new territories into India. Birth-Based Citizenship Section 3 grants citizenship to individuals born in India between January 26, 1950 and July 1, 1986 or those born later with at least one Indian parent. The Citizenship Amendment Act of 2003 further refined the rules, covering children born after its enactment. Descent-Based Citizenship Section 4 allows individuals born outside India to claim citizenship if one parent is an Indian citizen. Registration within a year of birth at an Indian mission is required for those born abroad after December 3, 2004. Registration And Naturalisation Foreign nationals meeting specific criteria can apply for citizenship under Section 5. They must renounce previous citizenship once approved. Section 6 allows long-term residents to apply through naturalisation, following a set procedure. Citizenship Through New Territories Section 7 covers cases where foreign territories become part of India. Legal procedures confirm citizenship, and an official government notification lists eligible residents. Proof Of Citizenship India does not issue a single, universal document as proof of citizenship. Birth certificates serve as evidence for individuals born in India, issued by local municipal or panchayat authorities. Applications can be made online or offline, and approved certificates record the place of birth, confirming eligibility for citizenship. Those granted citizenship through registration or naturalisation receive a certificate signed by an Indian government official of under-secretary rank or higher. This certificate serves as official proof of Indian citizenship. Documents such as passports, Aadhaar, PAN, voter ID or ration cards are not legal proof of citizenship. They serve as identity documents or residency proof and cannot confer citizenship. Lack of these documents does not strip a person of Indian nationality.
