Film fans baffled as Academy implements key new rule for 2026 Oscars
A new mandate has been implemented ahead of the 2026 Oscars, and it's prompted confusion among film fans as to why it wasn't already in place.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced Monday, local time, that 'Academy members must now watch all nominated films in each category to be eligible to vote in the final round for the Oscars.'
Members who lodge votes for the coveted awards will only be able to access final round ballots if they can confirm they have, indeed, watched all nominated films.
Organisers will be enforcing the mandate by monitoring viewer activity via its official screening room platform. If voters have watched nominated films via other avenues – such as at festivals or private events – they must submit proof indicating where and when they viewed the film.
Cue mass confusion among followers as the Academy Awards heads into its 98th ceremony next March.
One user wrote on X, 'THEY WEREN'T DOING THAT BEFORE?????????????????????'
'So prior to this they didn't have to watch all the films? This goes to show that these award shows are not real!' another added.
'Wait what … I thought this was already a rule. since it's apparently new, were they really voting by drawing movie titles out of a hat?' a third wrote.
Another chimed in, pointing out, 'This should have been the rule from the start. How do you vote on winners without even watching all the films.'
Indeed, the Oscars have been operating on an honour system among its members since their inception, unlike the British Academy Film Awards (BAFTA), which has mandated viewing for several years now.
Elsewhere among the raft of changes announced, the Academy will, for the first time in its history, present an award for Achievement in Casting.
'To determine the nominees, the Casting Directors Branch will review eligible films and vote to shortlist up to 10 titles, based on the level of creative input and collaboration demonstrated during the casting process,' a statement read.
The board is also addressing the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) use after this year's nominated films, Emilia Perez and The Brutalist, were found to have used AI during production.
While stopping short of setting rules, the Academy noted in its statement, 'With regard to Generative Artificial Intelligence and other digital tools used in the making of the film, the tools neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination.
'The Academy and each branch will judge the achievement, taking into account the degree to which a human was at the heart of the creative authorship when choosing which movie to award.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
Global superstar Cynthia Erivo on what to expect from Wicked: For Good and her new album
Oscar-nominated actress and singer Cynthia Erivo says recording her new album last year provided her with "a sanctuary" amid her rise to global super-stardom. Erivo, who was nominated this year for the Academy Award for Best Actress for her role as Elphaba in the smash-hit musical movie Wicked, has just released her sophomore solo album, I Forgive You. She told ABC News Breakfast that the writing process for the album took place during the production of Wicked. "I really got down to it as we were filming," she said. "Then I was really in the middle of making it when we were on the press tour. So, it took a lot." Erivo says recording the album proved to be a cathartic experience for her as Wicked propelled her to international fame. "It was a sanctuary for me," she said. "It was really lovely to almost re-centre every time I went into the studio, to find little pieces of myself in the music and express pieces of myself, and just even to get back to writing again was just lovely. "I keep using the word 'freeing', because it was such a lovely way to explore what I could do with my voice and what I could do with music and it's been such a lovely affirming process to be a part of." The highly anticipated trailer for the sequel to Wicked, titled Wicked: For Good, was released earlier this week. Erivo says she's excited for fans to see part two, which is due out later this year. "These two women are now grown up. They're now having to deal with some of the decisions that they've made in the first movie, and it's not easy for either of them. "You have to follow each of their stories and they have to find their way back to each other. "I feel like this part is quite special because they have to be independent in their ideas, they have to be independent in the decisions they make from now on, and you get to see them both, I think, in their power." Erivo told News Breakfast host Bridget Brennan that tea is one of the ways she cares for her voice. "We joke about it but tea is always really helpful. "A type of mug has always been with me. Lots of hydrating, trying to get as much rest as you possibly can, which is not always possible, but if you offset it with how much you hydrate it should be fine. "I warm up before every kind of vocal anything, because it sort of makes sure that my vocal cords aren't shocked when I start singing, but just trying to take it easy. "Sometimes it's time to be quiet, sometimes it's time to talk." Erivo hopes her new album will allow fans to see her more vulnerable side. "I don't think I'll ever stop being a work-in-progress. "I think I'm always going to be growing, I think I'm always going to be learning about things. "I think I'm always going to look back at certain things and be a little bit mad at myself, or then have to let go of things, and I think that being able to talk about it really frankly and openly was just, like, helpful, just to hear it out loud." Cynthia Erivo's new album, I Forgive You, was released on Friday.
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Zoe Saldana 'collapsed' after Oscar win
Zoe Saldana "collapsed" shortly after winning an Oscar. The 46-year-old actress – who has twins Cy and Bowie, 10, and eight-year-old Zen with husband Marco Perego – picked up the Best Actress in a Supporting Role prize for her work on Emilia Perez at the Academy Awards in March, and she's now revealed she had a strong reaction in the aftermath that left her desperate to go home and "cry". Speaking on Live with Kelly and Mark, she said: 'It was all beginning to become a blur, it was such a beautiful journey leading up to the Oscars. I don't think I was there as myself [that day], my 13-year-old self was there." Co-hosts Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos recalled interviewing Zoe backstage at Los Angeles' Dolby Theater shortly after she won, and how she had been sick. Zoe admitted: 'I collapsed right after. I lost my voice within an hour after I won the award. 'I couldn't stand on those heels that I had. All I wanted to do was crawl in bed and maybe cry. I don't know why, I needed to cry. "Your body is running on pure adrenaline, so you know that your immune system is in optimal condition, but once you know you tell your body that it's over, then everything sort of collapses.' The Avatar actress admitted her children saw her victory as "sort of like a soccer tournament," with her youngest son showing his "competitive" side. She laughed: "My youngest did ask me, because he's a little more competitive than the other ones, 'But this was for supporting actress, right?' " Zoe recently revealed she has been 'trying' to encourage her sons to dance because of the long-term mental health benefits - but their reactions had been mixed. She told W magazine: "I'm trying. I'm not going to give up. Studies have shown that it is so therapeutic for men to take any form of dance at a very early age or throughout their lives because they carry so much tension and emotion. "At least my twins are tapping. My younger one, he couldn't give a s*** who is dancing. He wants to be Cristiano Ronaldo; he wants to be Lionel Messi. "But my twins are very much like, 'Yo, girls are in there? They're dancing hip-hop?' And they'll dance."
Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
'Fewer pimples, more pronouns': Cinema's classic coming-of-age genre suffers most in Hollywood's shift to woke storytelling
When did going to the cinema start to feel like attending an HR seminar? And how did we go from plot twists and real dialogue to one-dimensional characters regurgitating ideological talking points? Somewhere along the line, Hollywood clearly handed the writers' room over to political activists. Films were no longer about escapism, but about productions more interested in moralising and telling you no longer sells dreams. It peddles guilt, replacing characters we once cared about with vacuous mouthpieces who speak in hashtags. This shift, although underway for a while, gained momentum during the infamous #OscarsSoWhite scandal in 2015. It triggered a full-blown identity audit across the industry, with film houses tripping over themselves to 'out-woke' each other. By 2020, a complete overhaul was underway. It led to diversity checklists, which, in the case of the Academy, determined whether films could even qualify for Best Picture. 'Diversity', as we once knew it, had been boiled down to a person's race and/or genitalia. And true creativity suffered in the writers second-guess every joke, plot twist and character flaw, for fear of causing offence. Instead of leaning into what makes stories compelling (i.e. tension, conflict, and the messy bits of humanity), we get glossy morality tales that no one asked for. Hollywood, the long-standing epicentre of debauchery, addiction, opportunism and every other human vice you can think of, has now become too scared to explore the human condition. Isn't it ironic? It no longer tells timeless stories of love, jealousy, power, addiction or conflict. Every love story has to be 'modernised' and told through the lens of feminism and the impact of the patriarchy. Even protagonists and antagonists have to be clearly good or indefensibly bad. It's ridiculous. Yet no genre has suffered more from this shift in storytelling than coming-of-age films. It's now practically extinct, like cinema's equivalent of the dodo bird. Films like 'The Breakfast Club', 'Stand By Me', and 'Dazed and Confused', which captured the awkwardness of adolescence with honesty and humour, would never get made today. Modern replacements are now all about introspection and identity politics. Fewer pimples, more pronouns. Teenage angst is no longer worthy of storytelling because it's not seen as progressive enough. Unless, of course, it's the angst of a one-eyed, trans-identifying Muslim teenager called Sandra. Meanwhile, Eastern cinema is picking up where Hollywood left off. Films like 'Parasite', 'RRR', and 'Shoplifters' have succeeded not because they're diverse, but because they tell damn good stories. They treat audiences like grown-ups, not mentally challenged misfits. Something that used to be Hollywood's job. Is it any surprise that audiences are now looking elsewhere in search of raw storytelling power? Of course, Hollywood has always been political to some extent. From 'Gentleman's Agreement' to 'Guess Who's Coming to Dinner', it never shied away from difficult themes. But it did so with nuance and craft, things which are nowhere to be found. So people are returning to the classics not just for nostalgia, but because they're starved for universality. From 'Rocky' to 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'Gone with the Wind', these stories endure because they speak to something timeless. In today's climate, they wouldn't make it past a pitch meeting. They'd be too problematic, too white or too male. Even 'The Wizard of Oz' would be binned for its lack of intersectional munchkin representation. That is the era we've entered now, where cultural self-censorship is flattening the vibrancy of criticism isn't what it used to be anymore. Instead of lively debate based on plot, pacing and cinematography, it has now become a moral tribunal. The only question that matters is whether the message of the film aligns with a particular virtue, not vision. We no longer ask, "Was it good?". But rather "Was it correct?" Industry jobs, too, are not being lost for poor scripts, but for poor optics. White, male writers are being quietly dropped. Agents whisper that 'they had to hire a diversity candidate.' And no one dares to push back because it's become easier, and safer, to stay silent. Those willing to put their heads above the parapet are saying similar things. Quentin Tarantino argues that ideology is trumping art. And Mike White admits people are too scared to speak freely. How can we expect anything decent out of Hollywood when creatives are writing with a fire extinguisher pointed at their faces? Take 'Woke', for example, a series that was meant to satirise the very culture it ended up drowning in. Black writers who wanted to push boundaries were shut down. The show lost its voice, its viewership and had a Rotten Tomatoes score so low that it ended up becoming the quintessential cautionary tale of what happens when ideology micromanages art. Even the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures managed to erase the Jewish immigrants who built Hollywood from the ground up. Diversity, apparently, has its limits. A story about resilience, talent, and the American dream apparently didn't fit the vibe they were going for. In the rush to elevate new voices, Hollywood has forgotten to honour the ones who laid its foundation. Hollywood once thrived on the belief that talent could come from anywhere. It didn't matter where you were from, as long as you could write, act, direct, or produce. That meritocracy is now under siege. Your identity matters more than your ideas. What used to be an industry obsessed with innovation is now paralysed by be clear: representation matters. But not at the expense of quality. And not if it means filtering every story through the same narrow ideological sieve. We need to separate the art from the artist, stop demanding that every film be a political statement, and let flawed characters be flawed. Art isn't meant to make us comfortable. It's meant to make us feel something; sometimes joy, sometimes discomfort, but always something real. Otherwise, audiences will keep leaving. If Hollywood is going to survive, then it's time to bring back the Hollywood that used to say, 'here's something to think about', not 'here's what to think'. Esther Krakue is a British commentator who has regularly appeared on Sky News Australia programs, as well as on TalkTV and GB News in the UK. She launched her career with Turning Point UK, with whom she hosted a show featuring guests including Douglas Murray and Peter Hitchens
