logo
Former Russian minister ‘shocked' to learn he was subject to sanctions in UK

Former Russian minister ‘shocked' to learn he was subject to sanctions in UK

Independent25-03-2025
A former Russian minister told police he was shocked to learn he was subject to sanctions in the UK, a court has heard.
Dmitrii Ovsiannikov, 48, the former mayor of Sevastopol in illegally annexed Crimea, is facing seven counts of circumventing sanctions between February 2023 and January 2024.
He is said to have deliberately avoided sanctions by opening a Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) account on or before February 2023 and having tens of thousands of pounds transferred to it by his wife, Ekaterina Ovsiannikova, 47.
Ovsiannikova is facing four counts of breaching sanctions by assisting with the payments.
Ovsiannikov's brother, Alexei Owsjanikow, 47, has denied circumventing sanctions to buy him a Mercedes Benz worth £54,500, as well as spending £41,027 on fees at the Royal Russell School in Surrey for Ovsiannikov's children.
Body-worn footage played to the jury showed National Crime Agency (NCA) officers arresting Ovsiannikov in a residential street on January 22 2024 on suspicion of breaching UK financial sanctions.
During an interview he answered no comment, before telling officers that he 'hoped no one knew that he had left Russia and he had spent a number of years' making it possible to leave, prosecutor Lyndon Harris summarised at Southwark Crown Court on Tuesday.
The EU designated Ovsiannikov on November 21 2017, restricting him from entering and accessing funds in member states.
It said his work had compromised or threatened the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
EU sanctions ceased to apply in the UK after Brexit and the country created its own regime, the Russia Regulations 2019.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) designated Ovsiannikov under the Russia Regulations in December 2020 and he remains a designated person.
His name was on the UK Sanctions List public website from December 31 that year. At that time he did not have a British passport.
On August 1 2022, Ovsiannikov travelled from Russia to Turkey and three days later applied online for a UK passport.
It was issued in January and he arrived in the UK on February 1 2023.
That month, he was removed from the EU sanctions list following a previous ruling by the the Court of Justice of the European Union.
On February 7, he emailed the FCDO a form to review his sanctions in the UK.
In March, solicitors Peters and Peters LLP wrote to the same Government office on his behalf about his designation.
During the January 2024 NCA interview, which Ovsiannikov elected to do without a Russian translator, he suggested he had thought he was no longer a designated person in the UK.
A transcript was read to jurors, in which Ovsiannikov said: 'I believed one year ago that the decision in the European Union, when you were inside the European Union when I applied, and (the) European Court said that my designation was unlawful since September 2020, when the United Kingdom was the member of the (European) Union (sic).
'And when I came I found out, it was a shock for me, I didn't know'.
He was asked what he gave for the good character requirement on his UK visa application, and responded he was 'not a criminal and was a positive person for the United Kingdom', Mr Harris told jurors.
He declined to give the pin for either of his phones, stating that they contained privileged legal information.
An investigating NCA officer, who gave evidence behind a screen and was given the alias Alex, told jurors that officers worked out the Pin for one device using CCTV to see where Ovsiannikov tapped the screen.
Most of the uncovered messages between him and Ovsiannikova were about their children and 'ordinary household matters'.
There were none before March 8 2023 about Ovsiannikov being subject to an asset freeze or being unable to bank in the UK.
Messages did not mention concerns about whether he could enter the UK or how they would live while he was designated.
Ovsiannikova was questioned voluntarily about her involvement in the alleged offences eight days later.
She described being 'horrified' by the situation and denied knowing her husband was at the time subject to sanctions.
'I was aware my husband had been sanctioned but this had been overturned in the EU, and I had no knowledge that he was subject to an asset freeze in the UK and I don't think he knew either', she said.
Halifax bank notified her in March 2023 that it would close her account, she told officers.
She added that she was able to move some funds but had 'a few thousand pounds remaining' which she withdrew in cash for day-to-day living expenses such as food and clothes.
Ovsiannikova said 'I'm really upset about this situation and the impact on my children', adding that she would never have transferred funds to her husband 'if I wasn't allowed to', the court heard.
The trial continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them

Daily Mirror

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them

A 'failure of public policy' under the Tories saw former immigration minister Robert Jenrick brag about how fast he was securing hotel rooms as the asylum backlog grew and grew The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out. ‌ On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues. ‌ Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation. ‌ In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms. He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more." The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew. Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year. ‌ Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system". Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed. "It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people. ‌ "And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea." And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well. "We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda. "The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."

Is this where Putin and Zelensky talks could be held?
Is this where Putin and Zelensky talks could be held?

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Is this where Putin and Zelensky talks could be held?

Talks of a breakthrough in Russia's war in Ukraine have rumbled before – but now the prospect of Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky sitting face to face no longer feels entirely out of reach. Geneva – a historic venue for peace talks – is emerging as a contender to host the high-stakes summit. After all, the Swiss city witnessed the historic handshake between Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and US president Ronald Reagan, which was the first step towards ending the Cold War. Emmanuel Macron was the first to raise the possibility of a peace summit being held in Europe, in 'a neutral country, maybe Switzerland'. The French president said in an interview on LCI: 'I am pushing for Geneva.' He added: 'Or another country. The last time there were bilateral discussions, it was in Istanbul (Turkey). For Russia and Ukraine, a meeting in the city would be more than symbolic. If confirmed, it would be the first time that Putin and Zelensky would face each other since the start of the Russian invasion in an attempt to sketch out the mechanics of a peace deal. The Russian leader is also a subject to an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant for war crimes, so entering Switzerland should – technically – result in his arrest. Macron added t hat 'we must make ' an exception for Putin if the meeting takes place in a country that recognizes the ICC. He said: 'The work of justice must come, we are ourselves signatories to these treaties. 'But he is the sitting president, he has a principle of immunity. Peace must move forward, so we must find a place.' Swiss foreign minister Ignazio Cassis told a press conference that, under certain circumstances, Putin would be allowed to set foot in Switzerland. Last year, the Swiss government defined 'the rules for granting immunity to a person under an international arrest warrant.' Cassis explained: 'If this person comes for a peace conference, not if they come for private reasons.' He added that Switzerland was fully prepared to host such a meeting and highlighted the militarily-neutral country's long expertise in the field. Yesterday, important talks took place in Washington with the President of the United States and European leaders. This was truly a significant step toward ending the war and ensuring the security of Ukraine and our people. We are already working on the concrete content of the… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 19, 2025 Neighbouring Austria has also been flagged as a possible arena for the summit. More Trending Chancellor Christian Stocker said should peace talks take place on its soil, it would get in touch with the ICC 'to make it possible for Putin to attend'. He said he had already offered Vienna as a possible venue for negotiations to Zelensky during the Ukrainian president's visit in June. He added: 'Our capital has a long tradition as a place of dialogue.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Vienna is one of Europe's most expensive cities, but I know how to do it on the cheap MORE: Eurovision Song Contest 2026 date and host city revealed MORE: What could happen if Zelensky and Putin actually meet?

Nato defence chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees
Nato defence chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees

Western Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Nato defence chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees

Italian admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of Nato's Military Committee, said that 32 defence chiefs from across the alliance would hold a video conference as a US-led diplomatic push seeks to end the fighting. US general Alexus Grynkewich, Nato's supreme allied commander in Europe, will take part in the talks, Mr Dragone said on social platform X. US president Donald Trump met last Friday with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and on Monday hosted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Last night, a drone strike on Okhtyrka in the Sumy region injured 14 people. A family with wounded children – 5 months, 4 years, and 6 years old – sought assistance after the attack. In Kostiantynivka, Donetsk region, a glide bomb strike damaged five apartment buildings, and at… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 20, 2025 Mr Trump is trying to steer Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky towards a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbour, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia will not mount another invasion in coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Mr Zelensky said in a Telegram post on Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, have signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the US might play in is unclear. Mr Trump has ruled out sending US troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept Nato troops in Ukraine. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Mr Zelensky said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store