UK government, museums urged to stop display of ancestral remains, repatriate them
For centuries, African ancestral remains, such as mummified bodies, skulls and other body parts, were brought to Britain and to other former colonial powers, often as "trophies" or as commodities to be traded and displayed.
There are growing calls worldwide for such remains, as well as looted art, to be repatriated to their communities or countries of origin.
Although some efforts have been made to confront the long-standing issue, African remains are still held in various institutions across the country, such as museums and universities.
"We cannot allow the dehumanisation of our ancestors," Connie Bell, from the 'Decolonising the Archive' project, said at an event on Wednesday organised by a cross-party parliamentary group on reparations, chaired by Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy.
In November 2024, Ribeiro-Addy brought the issue to parliament, saying colonial-era remains were being listed for sale by auction houses, on e-commerce platforms and social media.
A month before Ribeiro-Addy's remarks, an auction house in Tetsworth, Oxfordshire, withdrew a sale of such remains, including skulls from West Africa's Ekoi people, following criticism by native by local communities and advocates.
UK's deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said it was horrifying to hear Ribeiro-Addy's account, and agreed to further discuss the issue. A meeting with the culture minister will take place soon, Ribeiro-Addy said on Wednesday.
The cross-party group will present to the government 14 policy recommendations, including making all sales of remains illegal "on the basis they are not commercial objects but human beings".
The policy brief, produced by the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD), said the government should close loopholes in the Human Tissues Act 2004, which covers the removal, storage, use and disposal of human tissue.
The act does not, however, cover activities related to remains of people who died over a century ago, which excludes most ancestral remains held by museums and other institutions, AFFORD said.
AFFORD said the act should be amended to make public display of human remains an offence if done without consent. It also said a national restitution policy should be adopted, a body should be created to handle repatriation claims and collections of human remains should be mapped out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
A 'failure of public policy' under the Tories saw former immigration minister Robert Jenrick brag about how fast he was securing hotel rooms as the asylum backlog grew and grew The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out. On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues. Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation. In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms. He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more." The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew. Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year. Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system". Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed. "It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people. "And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea." And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well. "We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda. "The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia, under war spending pressure, set for more austerity, tax hikes
MOSCOW, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Moscow is preparing to raise taxes and cut spending as it tries to maintain high defence expenditure with Russia's economy creaking under the weight of financing the more than three-year war in Ukraine, officials and economists say. President Vladimir Putin has rejected suggestions that the war is killing Russia's economy, but the budget deficit is widening as spending mounts, while revenue from oil and gas is declining under pressure from Western sanctions. Highly anticipated talks between Putin and his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump in Alaska last week did not yield a ceasefire, giving Moscow, which would prefer to move straight to a peace settlement, a strategic boost, but a spending headache. Russia's economy is cooling, with some officials warning of recession risks, and though interest rates are starting to come down from 20-year highs, its budget deficit has widened to 4.9 trillion roubles ($61 billion), suggesting Russia will struggle to fulfil its current obligations and keep financing the war at its current pace. "Given the more pessimistic estimates of economic indicators and the decline in oil and gas revenues, we will need to urgently start fiscal consolidation," Anatoly Artamonov, head of the upper house of parliament's budget committee, said in late July. Budget spending has almost doubled in nominal terms since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, a significant fiscal injection that fuelled inflation and forced the central bank to hike rates to as high as 21%, sharply raising corporate borrowing costs. Combined spending of 17 trillion roubles on defence and national security in 2025 is at its highest since the Cold War, accounting for 41% of total spending and making the defence sector the primary driver of economic growth as civilian output declines. Putin said in June that Russia plans to reduce military spending, but for now, officials still expect an increase. "We cannot cut spending on national defence and ... in all likelihood, we will have to increase it," Artamonov said. The 2025 budget, to be presented in September, provides for defence and security spending at 8% of GDP, but a Russian government source said the actual figure was slightly higher. There will be no reduction in defence spending in 2026, the person said, but a decline is possible in 2027 should hostilities cease, as other spending areas fight for resources. "Even with a ceasefire, shells and drones will still need to be made, but on a slightly smaller scale," the person said, noting that Moscow will need to keep up with higher Western defence spending. "There will be no return to the level that existed before the 'special military operation'," the person said. Artamonov, writing for the RBC daily, suggested Russia may need to reduce non-defence spending by 2 trillion roubles each year until 2028 and redirect those savings to the defence budget. "In the next three years, we will not have enough means to live as comfortably as we do now," Artamonov said. This year is the first when total education and healthcare expenditure at the federal and regional level is noticeably decreasing as a share of GDP, said Sergei Aleksashenko, former deputy governor of Russia's central bank and a senior fellow at the NEST Centre in London. Aleksashenko said he expects tax rises and a spending cut in real terms by indexing expenditure on things like pensions below the inflation rate, which the central bank forecasts at 6-7% this year. The government source said raising taxes was unavoidable: "Otherwise, we simply won't be able to make ends meet, even with a reduction in defence spending. Oil and gas revenues are falling and the economy cannot fully compensate for this." Finance Minister Anton Siluanov hinted at austerity measures as early as April, advising government colleagues "to be modest in their desires" regarding spending. Deputy Finance Minister Pavel Kadochnikov in July said spending on soldiers fighting in Ukraine and their families was the priority and that Russia should consider "eliminating" non-priority spending. Budget consolidation ultimately puts more pressure on Russia's economic growth, although a low net debt-to-GDP ratio of around 20% gives Moscow some wiggle room. "Russia's economy is struggling under the weight of high interest rates and the ongoing war effort," said Liam Peach, senior emerging markets economist at Capital Economics. "A prolonged period of weak growth lies in store." Analysts expect Russia's budget deficit, which exceeded the full-year target in January-July by over 1 trillion roubles, to be wider than planned. The government source estimates this year's deficit at around 5 trillion roubles, or 2.5% of GDP. CentroCreditBank economist Yevgeny Suvorov said the deficit could stretch to 8 trillion roubles as Moscow's spending would require an almost 20% year-on-year real-terms cut in August-December to meet the 2025 spending target of 42.3 trillion roubles. "The central bank is in no hurry to lower the key rate, including because the budget deficit may be higher than planned," said a senior source familiar with finance ministry plans. Last week, Putin called Russia's current budget situation stable. ($1 = 80.3500 roubles)
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia says its forces advance in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region
MOSCOW, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Russian forces have advanced in the east of Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, taking the village of Novoheorhiivka close to the Donetsk region, Russia's defence ministry said on Wednesday. Russian forces said in July that they had taken their first village in Dnipropetrovsk, and U.S. estimates of the battlefield indicate Russian forces control less than 1% of the region. Dnipropetrovsk is not one of the five regions of Ukraine that Russia has claimed as its own territory. "Soldiers of the 57th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade pushed out the enemy from Novoheorhiivka in the Dnipropetrovsk region," Russia's defence ministry said. Reuters could not independently confirm the battlefield report. Russia controls nearly 114,500 square km (44,600 square miles) or 19% of Ukraine, including Crimea and a major chunk of territory in the east and southeast of the country, according to open source maps of the battlefield. Russia's defence ministry also said its forces had hit port infrastructure used to supply fuel to Ukrainian forces and a plant used to assemble drones. The statement didn't name the port. Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskiy said earlier that Russia had struck a gas distribution station in the southern region of Odesa. Russia's defence ministry also said that its forces had captured the settlements of Pankivka and Sukhetse in eastern Ukraine.
