logo
German parliament questions legality of US-Israel attacks on Iran

German parliament questions legality of US-Israel attacks on Iran

Russia Today09-07-2025
Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last month were likely in breach of international law, according to a report by German parliament experts cited by dpa news agency on Sunday.
Israel claimed its pre-emptive attack was aimed at preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. The US followed up with strikes on Iranian nuclear infrastructure after nearly two weeks of hostilities between the Middle Eastern countries, before pushing both sides to agree to a ceasefire.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz publicly endorsed the initial attacks, calling it 'the dirty work that Israel is doing for all of us.' Iran has consistently denied any military aim for its nuclear program. Countries including Russia and China condemned the Israeli and American actions, arguing they undermined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which protects the right of signatories to pursue nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.
Legal experts from the Bundestag's Research Services argued that 'the vast majority of international lawyers' do not consider Israel's actions to be a valid exercise of self-defense under the UN Charter, according to dpa. Their findings were compiled in a 54-page report reportedly shared with the news agency.
To legally justify the strikes, Israel would need to demonstrate that Iran had both the intent to deploy a nuclear weapon and immediate capability to produce one, the experts stated. The report also noted that the US could not claim the right of collective defense if Israel's initial strike was itself unlawful.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused Western countries of complicity in what Moscow calls a US-Israeli breach of international norms. He claimed that the UK, Germany, and France pressured the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to use imprecise language in a report on Iran's nuclear program presented to the UN nuclear watchdog's board by Director General Rafael Grossi just weeks before the escalation.
'The Europeans took a purely imperialist, neocolonial position,' Lavrov said. 'They pushed Grossi to use highly ambitious and negative phrases in the document, which he did.'
Israel launched military action right after the board accused Tehran of breaching its obligations under the NPT.
The Bundestag's legal analysis was commissioned by lawmaker Ulrich Thoden of The Left party. Thoden called the findings 'a slap in the face for the German government' and criticized its alignment with Israel and the US during the crisis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China will resist US sanctions on buying Russian oil
China will resist US sanctions on buying Russian oil

Russia Today

time4 hours ago

  • Russia Today

China will resist US sanctions on buying Russian oil

China remains committed to buying Russian oil despite the threat of US tariffs, Washington's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said. Speaking after two days of US-China trade talks in Stockholm on Tuesday, Bessent acknowledged that Beijing has stressed that it would defend its energy sovereignty, should lawmakers in Washington ratify new wide-reaching sanctions. On Monday, US President Donald Trump cut his 50-day deadline for a Ukraine peace deal to just 10–12 days, warning of sweeping sanctions if no agreement is reached, including 100% secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian exports. Russian officials have criticized Trump's threat, claiming that it undermines efforts to achieve peace in Ukraine. Bessent said proposed legislation currently before Congress that would authorize President Trump to impose tariffs of up to 500% on buyers of sanctioned Russian oil could prompt US allies to adopt similar measures aimed at choking off Moscow's energy revenues. 'I think anyone who buys sanctioned Russian oil should be ready for this,' Bessent told reporters. Chinese officials, however, made it clear during talks that Beijing considers energy a matter of national sovereignty and will continue buying Russian oil based on internal policy priorities. 'The Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously. We don't want to impede on their sovereignty, so they'd like to pay a 100% tariff,' Bessent said. China remains the largest buyer of Russian oil, importing over 2 million barrels per day—nearly 20% of its total crude imports—followed by India and Turkey. Western sanctions imposed three years ago reshaped global energy flows and prompted Moscow to pivot eastward. Since 2022, both China and India have sharply increased their Russian oil purchases. In May, India became the second-largest buyer of Russian fossil fuels, with imports estimated at $4.9 billion, about 72% of which was crude, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air.

White House allows workers to display Bibles
White House allows workers to display Bibles

Russia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Russia Today

White House allows workers to display Bibles

US federal employees have been authorized to display Bibles and discuss their religious beliefs in the workplace, according to a White House memo released on Monday. Officials said the move reinforces protections for religious liberty already guaranteed under federal law. Shortly after returning to office in January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing a task force to investigate alleged anti-Christian bias in government. He accused the previous administration of a widespread 'anti-Christian weaponization of government.' Earlier this year, the State Department invited staff to report suspected incidents of religious discrimination. According to the guidance issued by the Office of Personnel Management, the federal government's human resources agency, public employees have the right to discuss religion, participate in 'communal religious expressions,' and display religious items such as Bibles, crucifixes, or mezuzahs on their desks. 'During a break, an employee may engage another in polite discussion of why his faith is correct and why the non-adherent should re-think his religious beliefs,' the document states. 'However, if the non-adherent requests such attempts to stop, the employee should honor the request.' The memo emphasizes that religious discussions must not be 'harassing in nature.' Current guidelines from the Department of Labor also specify that staff 'who seek to proselytize in the workplace should cease doing so with respect to any individual who indicates that the communications are unwelcome.' The latest memo, however, makes no mention of Islam or Muslim practices. Critics such as the Freedom From Religion Foundation claim that the guidance could disproportionately benefit evangelical Christians and enable workplace evangelizing, raising concerns about unequal treatment and the erosion of religious neutrality. 'These shocking changes essentially permit workplace evangelizing, but worse still, allow supervisors to evangelize underlings and federal workers to proselytize the public they serve,' said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the non-profit. In 1997, the administration of President Bill Clinton affirmed that federal employees could share and discuss their religious views at work, provided they stopped if a colleague asked them to.

EU ‘bent the knee' before Trump
EU ‘bent the knee' before Trump

Russia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Russia Today

EU ‘bent the knee' before Trump

The EU effectively 'bent at the knee' before US President Donald Trump, White House official Sebastian Gorka has claimed, after Brussels accepted a sweeping new trade deal that includes steep tariffs and major investment commitments to the US. The deal, finalized on Sunday during a meeting between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, imposes a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the US. In addition, Brussels pledged to invest $600 billion in the US economy and purchase $750 billion worth of American energy over three years. No reciprocal tariffs were imposed on US goods. Gorka, who serves as senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council, said the agreement marks a geopolitical victory for Washington. 'Even for somebody like me who has known the president for a decade now, it is hard to believe that the whole European Union bent at the knee of America First and said: 'You got us, President Trump, and we are going to surrender to a 15% tariff,'' Gorka told Newsmax on Monday. 'I'll just be very blunt with you… if you don't understand that President Trump is engineering tectonic shifts in geopolitics that are of a global effect, that will change the world for the next 50 to 100 years, you are just an imbecile,' he added. The agreement has been widely criticized across Europe. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said: 'Donald Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast.' French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou condemned the deal as a 'submission' to the US. Marine Le Pen, a prominent opposition leader in France's National Rally party, called it 'a political, economic, and moral fiasco.' Italian opposition figures also denounced the deal, despite Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's attempt to present it as a positive development. Giuseppe Conte, the head of the Five Star Movement, said, 'There is a winner – US President Trump – and a loser, or rather two: The EU and Giorgia Meloni.' Von der Leyen attempted to defend the deal as 'the best we could get,' noting that the compromise averted a looming 30% tariff Trump had threatened to impose.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store