Israel's Netanyahu vows to block Iran 'nuclear weapon' as he declares victory
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared a "historic victory" on Tuesday after agreeing a ceasefire with Iran and insisted that his country's arch-foe would never achieve a nuclear weapon.
The premier's comments, delivered in an address to the nation, came after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme.
Pezeshkian insisted, however, that Iran would continue to "assert its legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy.
"Iran will not have a nuclear weapon," Netanyahu said after the ceasefire ended 12 days of deadly air and missile strikes between the arch foes.
"We have thwarted Iran's nuclear project. And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt."
Israel's strikes eventually drew in the United States, which on Sunday hit Iran's underground nuclear facilities with powerful "bunker-buster" bombs that Israel lacked.
After Iran retaliated with a missile attack Monday night targeting a US base in Qatar, President Donald Trump called for de-escalation, announcing the contours of a truce deal hours later.
In a phone call Tuesday, Pezeshkian told his Emirati counterpart "to explain to them, in your dealings with the United States, that the Islamic Republic of Iran is only seeking to assert its legitimate rights".
"It has never sought to acquire nuclear weapons and does not seek them," he was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency, adding that Iran was "ready to resolve the issues... at the negotiating table".
Israel has said its war, which began on June 13, was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran has consistently denied.
Israel's military said that its strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme "by years" and that the campaign against the country was now "entering a new phase".
After Trump angrily berated both sides for early violations of the truce on Tuesday, Tehran announced it would respect the terms of the deal if Israel did the same, while Israel said it had refrained from further strikes.
- Claims of victory -
Before Netanyahu spoke, Israel's government said its military had removed the "dual existential threat" of Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes.
"We've set Iran's nuclear project back by years, and the same applies to its missile programme," Israel's chief of staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said in a later statement.
Iran's top security body, meanwhile, said the Islamic republic's forces had "compelled" Israel to "unilaterally" stand down.
Its Revolutionary Guards also hailed a last-minute missile salvo fired at Israel as "a historic and unforgettable lesson to the Zionist enemy".
- Strikes on US base -
Israeli strikes hit nuclear and military targets -- killing scientists and senior military figures -- as well as residential areas, prompting waves of Iranian missile fire on Israel.
While Iran and Israel have been locked in a shadow war for decades, it has been by far the most destructive confrontation between the arch-foes.
The war culminated in US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites using massive bunker-busting bombs, followed by an Iranian reprisal targeting the largest US military facility in the Middle East.
Trump shrugged off that response as "weak", thanking Tehran for giving advance notice and announcing the outline of the ceasefire just hours later.
- 'Everyone is tired' -
Some Israelis on Tuesday welcomed the prospect of a truce.
"Everyone is tired. We just want to have some peace of mind," said Tel Aviv resident Tammy Shel, voicing hope for a lasting ceasefire. "For us, for the Iranian people, for the Palestinians, for everyone in the region."
In Iran, people remained uncertain whether the peace would hold.
Amir, 28, fled from Tehran to the Caspian Sea coast and told AFP by phone, "I really don't know... about the ceasefire but honestly, I don't think things will return to normal."
Israeli strikes on Iran have killed at least 610 civilians and wounded more than 4,700, according to the health ministry.
Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 28 people, according to official figures and rescuers.
The international community reacted with cautious optimism to the truce.
Saudi Arabia and the European Union welcomed Trump's announcement, while Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia hoped "that this will be a sustainable ceasefire".
But French President Emmanuel Macron warned there was an "increased" risk that Iran would attempt to enrich uranium secretly following the strikes on its nuclear sites.
During their talks, Iran and the United States had been at odds over uranium enrichment, which Tehran considers a "non-negotiable" right and which Washington has called a "red line".
After the truce was announced, Israel's military chief Zamir said Israel's focus would now shift back to Gaza.
The Israeli opposition, the Palestinian Authority and the main group representing the families of Israeli hostages all called for a Gaza truce to complement the Iran ceasefire.
burs-dcp/kir
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Investors bet the fragile ceasefire would hold
The ceasefire between Israel and Iran appears to be holding. In yesterday's newsletter, we talked about how a blitzkrieg of missile-led diplomacy seemed to help de-escalate tensions. The flipside of that strange path to a truce is that missiles, well, are fundamentally weapons. Mere hours after both countries agreed to the ceasefire, Israel said its longtime rival had fired missiles into its borders — an accusation which Tehran denied — and was preparing to "respond forcefully." Probably with more missiles. U.S. President Donald Trump — who reportedly brokered the ceasefire with Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani — expressed frustration with those developments. "I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with Iran either but I'm really unhappy if Israel is going out this morning," Trump told a reporter pool en route to the NATO summit in the Netherlands. His admonishments seemed to work. There is now a fragile armistice between the two countries. Oil prices fell and U.S. stocks jumped. Reuters uploaded a photo of Israeli residents playing frisbee at the beach on June 24. Flights at Israel's Ben Gurion Airport are resuming, and Iran's airspace is partially open, according to flight monitoring firm FlightRadar24, CNBC reported at around 3 a.m. Singapore time. Three hours after that update, NBC News, citing three people familiar with the matter, reported that an initial assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency found the American strikes on Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday left "core pieces … still intact." And so it goes. Israel-Iran ceasefire holds, for nowThe fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran, announced by Trump on Monday, appears to be holding. Israel on Tuesday said it would honor the ceasefire so long as Iran does the same. Earlier in the day, both countries accused each other of violating the truce, and said they were ready to retaliate, prompting Trump to say he's "not happy" with them. Stay updated on the Israel-Iran conflict with CNBC's live blog here. Markets jump as traders bet on truceU.S. stocks jumped Tuesday on expectations that the Israel-Iran ceasefire would hold. The S&P 500 gained 1.11% to put it just 0.9% away from its 52-week high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.19% and the Nasdaq Composite climbed 1.43%. The Nasdaq-100 rose 1.53% to close at an all-time high. Europe's Stoxx 600 rose 1.11%. Travel stocks were some of the best performers, while oil and gas stocks fell the most. Oil prices slump for a second dayOil prices tumbled Tuesday, its second day of declines, as the market bet that the risk of a major supply disruption had faded. U.S. crude oil settled down 6% at $64.37 a barrel while the global benchmark Brent fell 6.1%, to $67.14 during U.S. trading. Prices closed 7% lower on Monday. Earlier Tuesday, Trump said China can keep buying oil from Iran, in what seemed like a sign that the U.S. may soften its pressure campaign against Tehran. Powell says Fed is 'well positioned to wait'At a U.S. congressional hearing Tuesday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the economy was still strong. But he noted that inflation is still above the central bank's target of 2%, and the Fed has an "obligation" to prevent tariffs from becoming "an ongoing inflation problem." In combination, those considerationsmake the Fed "well positioned to wait" before making a decision on interest rates. U.S. is committed to NATO: Secretary-GeneralThere is "total commitment by the U.S. president and the U.S. senior leadership to NATO," the military alliance's Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Tuesday morning, as the summit kicked off in The Hague, Netherlands. But America expects Europe and Canada to spend as much as the U.S. does on defense. Ahead of the summit, members agreed to increase defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. [PRO] Not 'bullish enough' on rally: HSBCThe S&P 500′s rally off its April lows has brought it back to roughly 1% off its record high in a very short time. It's an advance that has perplexed many investors, who worry that another pullback is on the horizon. But Max Kettner, chief multi-asset strategist at HSBC, said he worries he's not "bullish enough" on the current rally. Strait of Hormuz GPS jamming remains major security issue, tanker CEO says Despite a tentative ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Tuesday, security issues in the Strait of Hormuz continue for shipowners. According to Angeliki Frangou, a fourth-generation shipowner and chairman and CEO of Greece-based Navios Maritime Partners, which owns and operates dry cargo ships and tankers, vessels in the Strait of Hormuz are still being threatened by continuous GPS signal blocking. "We have had about 20% less passage of vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, and vessels are waiting outside," Frangou told CNBC. "You are hearing a lot from the liner [ocean shipping] companies that they are transiting only during daytime because of the jamming of GPS signals of vessels. They don't want to pass during the nighttime because they find it dangerous. So it's a very fluid situation," Frangou said.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Dems struggle to respond as Trump's Iran strikes sow chaos
Democrats are scrambling to respond to President Donald Trump's unilateral attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. It's another high-stakes move by the president that could present a major political opening — but the party has, so far, appeared fractured in its public messaging. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) quickly called for Trump to be impeached, but most House Democrats on Tuesday voted down Rep. Al Green's (D-Texas) resolution to do so. Other Democrats have supported Trump's strike, including Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), who said the president was 'right' to bomb Iran. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin posted 'no new wars' on X, while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries vented that Trump 'failed to seek congressional authorization.' It's the kind of disjointed and, at times, contradictory message that's become emblematic of the Democratic Party that's been locked out of power in Washington, cut out of the loop, and left without clear party leadership during Trump's second term. Where Democrats were once reflexively #Resistance-driven during the president's first term, giving them clear anti-Trump positions on much of what he did, they're now more nuanced, sometimes circumspect, on Trump's controversial moves on trade, immigration and now, foreign policy. Democrats often unify on arguments about process and rules, including on the Iranian strikes, when they've primarily attacked Trump for failing to seek congressional approval. Multiple War Powers Resolutions — which would prevent Trump from further engaging in hostilities against Iran without congressional approval — are in the works. But that response, so far, is 'a classic Democratic messaging problem,' said Morgan Jackson, a top Democratic strategist based in North Carolina, who said that Democrats 'should be making two points, clearly and consistently that's broadly adopted: Trump is dragging us into a war, which he said he'd never do, and he's making Americans less safe.' 'When we debate the process, war powers vote, impeaching him because he didn't ask Congress — voters don't care about that,' Jackson added. 'When we have a message about process versus a president who took action, [then] that's a losing message.' Or as a Democratic consultant said when granted anonymity to speak frankly about the party: 'Our response is to push our glasses up our nose and complain about the illegality of it? Come on. We can't just bitch about the process.' Democrats' jumbled answer to the United States' strikes in Iran, so far, is also the product of a specific challenge, several House Democrats said: They're operating without much information. The Trump administration postponed a closed-door congressional briefing on the Iran strikes Tuesday afternoon, drawing the ire of Democrats who questioned whether the administration was trying to obfuscate its intelligence, and Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, said he first heard about the attack on social media. 'There's no official party line' because 'you need the facts,' said Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.). That's left Trump and Republicans to dominate the public messaging around a rapidly changing situation. After Trump signed off on a trio of bombings on Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday, he claimed the strikes 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capabilities, but his own military leaders walked back that assessment. Trump floated the possibility of regime change in Iran, then backtracked by Tuesday, telling reporters he wants 'to see everything calm down as quickly as possible.' The president helped to broker a ceasefire deal between Iran and Israel, but it's already been tested and it's unclear how long it may hold. That constant uncertainty is at the core of Democrats' defense for their constitutionality argument. Himes, who has introduced one of the War Powers Resolution measures, warned that he 'would be willing to bet my next paycheck that a ceasefire is not likely to remain in effect for very long,' so 'I think the Constitution to which we all theoretically subscribe should be enforced.' House Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) said it was 'completely unacceptable that Congress has not been briefed on this in a timely fashion,' adding that 'launching an attack without congressional authorization is wrong' and 'launching a potentially unsuccessful attack without congressional authorization would be an administration-defining failure.' Potential 2028 Democratic presidential contenders, from California Gov. Gavin Newsom to former Secretary Pete Buttigieg to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, have largely focused their responses to the Iranian strikes on public safety and concern for military personnel. Otherwise, they've largely stayed quiet. 'Our challenge is, yes, we have no clear leader but, just as important, everyone is still trying to figure out what's going on,' said a Democratic operative who is advising a potential 2028 candidate and was granted anonymity to describe private conversations. 'Donald Trump sows so much chaos and confusion into the process that Democrats can sometimes get distracted and respond to all of it, rather than having a coherent overall message.' The muddled Democratic message on the Iran strikes is particularly notable because there is a clear political opening. A majority of Americans disapprove of the president's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, while six in 10 said the strikes will increase the Iranian threat to the United States, according to a CNN poll released Tuesday. The DNC has urged Democrats to capitalize on that opening, even if it's not yet the loudest message emanating from their own party. A messaging guidance memo from the DNC, and obtained by POLITICO, described Trump's actions as 'unconstitutional, dangerous and hypocritical.' Of the six messaging points detailed as pushback to it, only the last one focused on process, arguing that Trump 'must bring his case before Congress immediately.' The other five ticked through safety, broken campaign promises and lack of public support for the strikes. Republicans have also been divided on Trump's actions, with some explicitly urging Trump not get involved further in the conflict. Trump ally Steve Bannon cautioned against the United States pushing for regime change in Iran, warning it could lead to more American military involvement. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) had initially joined Democrats in pushing for a measure to block American involvement, but he said he wouldn't back it if the ceasefire between Israel and Iran held. It's frustrated some Democrats who wish the party would take better control of the moment, but Pete Giangreco, a longtime Democratic consultant, said Democrats might end up benefiting politically regardless of their current messaging. 'We're a party without a head. We don't have a Speaker, we don't have a nominee for president yet, so we have this cacophony of voices in these moments. … But that matters less here because we just need to get out of the way because the story here is MAGA is at war with MAGA,' Giangreco said. 'Donald Trump did something that only 17 percent of Americans agree with, so the Democratic response, even if it is messy, doesn't matter this time.'
an hour ago
Iranian human rights organization calls for end of strikes
Roya Boroumand, director of the Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran, joins ABC News' Linsey Davis to detail how Iranian civilians have been impacted by Israeli strikes.
