logo
'Abundance' is all around us - just look at all our empty buildings

'Abundance' is all around us - just look at all our empty buildings

Irish Examiner3 days ago
A recent best-selling book, Abundance, written by US columnists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, respectively, has captivated policymakers worldwide.
The treatise for enabling 21st-century infrastructure argues that there are societal and bureaucratic regulations stultifying growth that must be tackled head-on if cities and municipalities are to achieve their targets whether it be in housing, energy or other fields. In order, 'to have the future we want', the authors argue, 'we need to build and invent more of what we need'.
To combat the twin threats of scarcity and supply bottlenecks the duo mention that 'we need a new theory of supply' and 'a new way of thinking about politics, economics and growth'.
The authors spotlight California as a prime example of regulatory gridlock, where, they say, environmental mandates and bureaucratic hurdles impede vital infrastructure projects. They highlight the stalled high-speed rail of the kind mastered by China in the mid-2000s, delayed by extensive environmental reports, stakeholder conflicts, and cost overruns.
Readers here in Ireland can sympathise with this situation given our own experience of the infamous Children's Hospital which was due to be completed by 2020 but is now delayed to 2026 at a cost of over €2bn, having initially had a modest price tag of €650mn. Ditto MetroLink, which is expected to be constructed by 2028 if we're lucky.
Speeding up the planning process as fast as those high-speed rails sounds appealing to those who wish to see our cities and towns scale up. However, behind the veneer of a noble initiative to kickstart desperately needed infrastructure lies a well-funded industry of interests that seek to re-imagine neoliberalism with progressive aesthetics.
Far from being a mere book title, the 'Abundance' movement has been pioneered by various think-tanks propped up by oligarchic vested interests. Having managed to branch out beyond policy papers into the very halls of power, these movers and shakers are making headlines day in and day out.
From Tesla CEO and former White House staffer Elon Musk's efforts to slash red tape via the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE to Stripe CEO and Limerick native Patrick Collison's push for deregulated 'charter cities', several public figures are associated either directly or peripherally within the wider movement.
One example of a think-tank tied to this movement is the Mercatus Centre. Based in George Mason University (GMU) in the US State of Virginia, it was funded by Charles and David Koch known collectively as the Koch Brothers.
These US-Libertarian oil mogul siblings spearheaded attempts across the US to roll back hard-won rights for workers by backing union-busting candidates and legislation via think-tanks such as the Cato and Manhattan Institutes, respectively. The Mercatus Centre is headed by the Libertarian columnist, author and former GMU Professor Tyler Cowen who has advocated for free markets but greater state involvement in so-called mega projects.
'Abundance' in Ireland
While some may think this Libertarian ideology is confined to tech bros in the US, the Abundance movement has reached Ireland via the think-tank Progress Ireland. Stripe's Patrick Collison and Cowen have shared platforms, co-written articles and co-ordinated in funding projects.
Progress Ireland, funded by Collison and whose executive director is Sean Keyes, formerly of the online business publication The Currency, has influenced policymakers intending to 'connect Ireland to the best of international policymaking in three areas: housing, infrastructure, and innovation.'
The recent amendment to the planning bill to allow exemptions for detached cabins or modular-style structures at the back of properties, described colloquially as beds in sheds, is the brainchild of this Abundance-adjacent think-tank following a meeting between Progress Ireland and Taoiseach Micheál Martin's policy adviser Alan Ahearne in government buildings.
The planned Ashton Court residential development on a five-acre site overlooking the River Blackwater Estuary in Youghal, Co Cork remains derelict, at the former Loreto Convent and residential services. File picture: Larry Cummins
According to the group's housing policy director Seán O'Neill McPartlin, over 300,000 of these garden sheds could be built which will 'allow for a younger person to live independently of the family home" and provide parents with the option to "right-size within their own community while maintaining the support of their family in close proximity".
While some were quick to point out the unfortunate situation of people being forced to move out of cabins built without planning permission, the failure to provide adequate long-term, affordable housing solutions has undeniably left us wide open to this sort of unorthodox proposal. But where did the beds in sheds idea come from?
What were originally coined as Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) or granny flats built in parts of America and New Zealand, saw homeowners apply for a permit to construct small, inconspicuous homes in gardens that families could rent out. In 2021, ADUs accounted for over a fifth of Los Angeles's new rental homes.
The first call to implement this scheme in Ireland came from a group named the Better Planning Alliance, where O'Neill McPartlin had previously worked, which was funded by Emergent Ventures via Mercatus's Tyler Cowen. For its part, Emergent Ventures provides grants to entrepreneurs, and was initially backed by the Libertarian CEO of Palantir Technologies, Peter Thiel.
But while Irish ADUs may allow for 'intergenerational movement', the law of unintended consequences may see house prices increase even further. According to Architect Mel Reynolds, if ADUs are rented out house prices could rise between €150,000-€200,000. This will only make it harder for young people to explore the second-hand market, thus benefiting existing homeowners - the very opposite of its stated intention.
Another study from Australia titled We Zoned for Density and Got Higher House Prices: Supply and Price Effects of Upzoning Over 20 Years, found that the relaxation of planning rules to allow for higher density development not only failed to increase supply but also led to higher prices. Other empirical evidence suggests that modular housing can also face cost overrun difficulties with such homes for Ukrainians rising from €200,000 when first floated to over €400,000 per unit - a rise of 120%.
The attempts to relax planning regulations within properties comes off the back of a more recent announcement around kickstarting the building of apartments by deregulating standards. Under the Planning Design Standards for Apartments, Guidelines for Planning Authorities (2025), new guidelines:
will permit the minimum size of a studio apartment to be reduced from the current 37sqm to 32sqm;
the requirement of no more than 10% of small two-bedroom apartments permitted in a development will be jettisoned;
and the minimum amount of apartments that must have dual aspect windows has also been reduced.
In a move that all but eliminates the pretence of ensuring community formation within developments, the government has also removed mandatory 'communal, community and cultural facilities' for individual apartment schemes. What emerges is an image of a vast array of brutalist structures filled with shoe boxes with little to no neighbourly bonds between its occupants.
Decrying the attempt by central government to override local development plans, Green Party Councillor Claire Byrne stated that the plan was 'a vicious attack on local government and our city development plan processes'. This announcement follows several pleas from lobbying groups such as Irish Institutional Property (IIP) whose head Pat Farrell has long argued for lower standards for apartments.
But while the government is more than happy to meet with well-funded think-tanks and property lobbyists, the refusal to meet with any tenant groups or even consult the public beforehand was denounced as "disquieting" by the Irish Planning Institute (IPI).
Describing themselves as 'the very professionals that will have to interpret and implement the changed guidelines', President of the IPI Gavin Lawlor mentioned that far from improving the housing situation, this 'market-led approach' risks exacerbating legal issues. 'This, and allowing changes to already permitted developments, also risks introducing more legal unpredictability,' he said.
Ireland's dereliction
The truth is that Ireland already has an abundant number of homes. The idea that the State needs to embrace the foreign concept of "abundance" is ludicrous when examining what we already have.
As I have written previously in this publication, county councils in Ireland are currently sitting on around 4,400 vacant homes. Indeed, data from An Post shows that in Dublin alone there are well over 14,000 empty residential and commercial properties with 4,000 located in the city centre.
The rush to increase supply - any supply, whether it be garden sheds or small apartments - bears all the hallmarks of the supply rush Ireland experienced during the boom in which supply exceeded immediate needs.
Instead of rushing to repeat old mistakes, the State should take an active role in revitalising empty units, allowing homeless families and young people to move in.
Choosing between a bed in the shed or a shoe box is a dilemma I don't ever want to experience - but it seems like those are the only options being sold to my generation by a government devoid of imagination.
Read More
Next budget gives State chance to prove young people are a genuine priority
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reducing Vat rate a blunt and costly policy instrument for hospitality
Reducing Vat rate a blunt and costly policy instrument for hospitality

Irish Examiner

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Reducing Vat rate a blunt and costly policy instrument for hospitality

Less than a week on from its publication, one of the fundamental assumptions underpinning the summer economic statement has changed with the agreement of the EU-US trade deal. This will have implications for October's budget and a potential reduction in the overall budgetary package outlined by the Government just a week ago. Of the total budget package detailed in the summer economic statement, €1.5bn has been allocated to a "tax package". The Government identifies the narrowness of Ireland's tax base as a cause of concern in the summer economic statement, noting that income tax, corporation tax, and revenue make up the bulk of Ireland's tax base. At a time of heightened global economic uncertainty, increased tariffs for Irish exporters, a growing and ageing population, increasing demand for and pressure on services, a further narrowing of Ireland's tax base in the budget would seem at odds with the programme for government commitment to maintain a broad tax base "to guard against the need for counter-cyclical fiscal policy in the event of a downturn" and prepare for demographic change. Much of the subsequent discussion on the so-called "tax package" has been the commitment in the programme for government to support the hospitality sector through changes to Vat and its implications in terms of the space available for any income tax changes in the budget. According to the Department of Finance, a reduction in the Vat rate for the hospitality sector to 9% would cost almost €900m a year This discussion fails to look at the broader context, the impact to date of "tax packages" introduced by the previous government from 2020-2025, and the precariousness of Ireland's tax base. Looking at budgetary policy of the last government, income gaps have opened up between working households, and the gap between people and households at the bottom and middle of the income distribution and those at the top has grown. This has been driven by the skewed nature of income tax reduction choices which prioritised higher earners and provided relatively little to low income workers paying income tax at the standard rate. This was further compounded by the concentration of temporary cost-of-living measures among lower income households, supports that will fade away. The tax packages contained in those budgets are permanent, costly, and have not reached those working households who have been most impacted by rising costs. Ireland's tax base is narrow, dominated by three revenue streams, and our over exposure in terms of corporation tax is a major concern Rather than looking at how to build a broad and sustainable tax base, recent discussion has focused on the "tax package", the cost of the aforementioned Vat reduction for the hospitality sector, which would narrow Ireland's tax base further, and how much this would leave for an "income tax package" which — if modelled on previous budgetary policy — will see the income gaps between working households grow further. Softening demand Looking at Vat, it accounted for 23% of Ireland's total tax revenue last year. At present, the hospitality sector is subject to the reduced 13.5% Vat rate. The sector was subject to the lower rate of 9% from 2011 to 2018, and again from late 2020 to mid-2023 at an estimated cost of €3.6bn. The sector has identified high energy costs, softening demand, labour market challenges, increased cost of inputs, and a lack of hotel capacity as the main challenges facing the industry and the rationale for a return to the 9% VAT rate. However, a recent Department of Finance examination of the Vat reduction for the hospitality sector since 2011 concluded that the reduction was not always passed on to customers in the form of lower prices, it was highly regressive in that it benefitted higher income households more than lower income households, and it was very costly. It is clear that parts of the hospitality sector are under significant pressure, but other parts of it are doing very well Reducing the Vat rate is a very blunt and costly policy instrument. It will not lower energy costs, it will not increase demand, nor will it address the challenge of full employment or produce more hotel capacity — the very issues that the sector itself has identified as major challenges. The Government and the sector must look at other available sustainable measures to support the industry, including measures used in other EU member states to support hospitality and tourism. Calls for new tax breaks, or the return of old ones, are a feature of most periods of economic and social recovery. However, their provision involves great cost to the State and the unequal allocation of these resources to small groups of beneficiaries. Few of these initiatives have proven to be worthwhile in the past — in particular the opportunity cost of using the revenue in a better way is frequently overlooked. As the first of the kites are flown in advance of Budget 2026, the Government should turn its attention to those who have been most impacted by persistent rising prices, and use the resources available to ensure that vulnerable households are protected and supported through adequate social welfare rates, and that growing income gaps between working households are closed. It must deliver on the commitment to progressive budgets and build a broad and sustainable revenue base that can meet the needs of a growing and ageing population This requires developing progressive policies and measures in a fair taxation system, and working with the hospitality sector to identify sustainable ways to fund the maintenance of the hospitality and tourism industry. A reduction in Vat for the hospitality sector is costly and it won't address the challenges the sector faces. It didn't address these core issues in the 124 months that it was applied between 2011 and 2023, and there is no evidence to suggest that it will do so if applied again in Budget 2026. Michelle Murphy is a research and policy analyst at Social Justice Ireland

Government to discuss impact of EU-US trade deal
Government to discuss impact of EU-US trade deal

RTÉ News​

time5 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Government to discuss impact of EU-US trade deal

A meeting of the Government's Trade Forum will be held today to discuss the impact on Ireland of the EU-US trade deal. Officials from the Department of Finance are due to give a preliminary analysis of what impact the 15% tariff will have on the Irish economy. It is also expected that a joint statement could be issued today by the EU and US giving more details of the framework agreement. Today had been set as the deadline for reaching a trade deal, but following a breakthrough in talks last Sunday, an agreement was reached on a 15% levy on most EU exports to the US. The implications of the levy on Irish businesses, jobs and the economy will be the focus of this morning's meeting at Government Buildings. It will be the seventh meeting of the forum, which includes State agencies, business groups, unions and senior ministers, to map out Ireland's response to the trade deal. Speaking in advance, the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade said the deal between the EU and the US "means that the higher tariffs that had been threatened will not now take effect and that the EU will not impose its own countermeasures." Simon Harris said the framework agreement will provide "much needed certainty for Irish, European and American businesses who together represent the most integrated trading relationship in the world." "While the baseline tariff is 15%, we are still awaiting full details and will have to analyse these when received to understand the full implications," he added. The forum will receive an update on the government's recently agreed Action Plan on Market Diversification. The Action Plan, which has been developed jointly by the Departments of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, is aimed at enhancing Ireland's trading relationships with existing, new and emerging markets. The Tánaiste will also brief the forum on the ratification EU-Canada trade deal, known as CETA. Simon Harris said: "The proposed amendment to the Arbitration Act 2010 is an essential enabling condition for the ratification of CETA and other similar Free Trade Agreements with third countries that include investment protection provisions, including Singapore, Vietnam, Chile and Mexico." "As such, this work is an important part of Ireland's diversification strategy, reducing concentration risk among our trading partners," he added.

Eu Us Trade Deal Presents Further Challenges to Farm Families
Eu Us Trade Deal Presents Further Challenges to Farm Families

Agriland

time6 hours ago

  • Agriland

Eu Us Trade Deal Presents Further Challenges to Farm Families

The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) has said that the proposed EU-US trade agreement that was announced at the weekend will present further challenges to Irish farm families. The trade agreement will see a 15% tariff on the majority of EU exports to the US. "While the proposed tariff of 15% is lower than the threatened 30% rate, it still represents a significant challenge for the Irish agri-sector on a number of fronts," IFA president Francie Gorman said. "We are still awaiting the finer details of the agreement, but given Ireland's reliance on the US market, both in agriculture and beyond, its impact will be significant on Irish farm families both directly and indirectly. Ireland exported around €1.9 billion worth of food and drink products into the US market in 2024. The country accounts for around 11% of our total food and drink exports. Within the €1.9 billion figure, dairy at €830 million and drinks, predominantly whiskey, at €900 million, accounted for 91% of what we exported. We also export pigmeat (€23 million last year), beef (€8.8 million last year) and seafood (€3.8 million last year). "Prior to the introduction of tariffs by the Trump administration in April, Irish butter was subject to a tariff rate of about 16%. Initial reports indicate that the proposed new 15% tariff rate will be a replacement for existing tariffs and will not be 'stacked' on existing tariffs," according to Gorman. "Should this be the case, it would reduce the impact of the proposed new tariffs in the Irish dairy sector significantly." The IFA said that it is currently unclear what level of tariff will be imposed on other products, such as Irish whiskey and liqueurs, where a 15% tariff rate would be "quite challenging given they previously operated on the basis of zero tariffs". "The trade deal will create many other indirect challenges as well. The UK, which struck a 10% tariff deal, now benefits from a lower tariff than Ireland, making them more competitive in the US market compared to Irish goods," Gorman said. The IFA president added: "It also means a differential tariff between exports north and south of the border. Furthermore many farm households rely on employment from US multinationals which may also be negatively impacted by these new tariffs." "From an Irish and European farmers perspective, the cost of any additional tariff will ultimately be borne by the primary producer. "It's against the backdrop of a potentially devastating Mercosur trade deal along with plans to massively cut the EU CAP [Common Agricultural Policy] budget. Yet again we are left with the potential for farmers to be the fall guys on the back of EU trade and policy developments," Gorman said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store