logo
Are Robot Lawn Mowers Worth the Price? Here's What You Need to Know

Are Robot Lawn Mowers Worth the Price? Here's What You Need to Know

CNET19-05-2025

With robot vacuums becoming an increasingly common addition to people's homes, the idea of using a robot lawn mower to maintain your yard doesn't feel so far-fetched anymore. Just like robot vacuums, robot lawnmowers can save you time and energy on mowing the grass and give you back more time in your day. It's an appealing idea, but with the price of robot lawnmowers ranging from anywhere between $1,000 to $3,0000, depending on the make, model and features, many people still think of them as an expensive novelty.
Robots can make life easier, but you're more likely to find the one on the left taking care of your yard than the one on the right.
Honda
As with any serious investment, you'll want to be well educated before you go dropping thousands of dollars. Don't worry, though -- CNET experts have done all the homework for you in our buying guide. In this article, we'll look at some key things you should know before shelling out your hard-earned money on robot lawnmowers.
What are robot lawn mowers and how do they work?
It's possible you've only recently been introduced to the concept of robot lawn mowers and you're wondering what exactly they are, and how they manage to provide a hands-free lawn mowing experience.
Put simply, robot lawn mowers are small, autonomous lawn-care units that map out and mow your lawn entirely on their own, with no labor required on your part. They typically rely on mapping technology, GPS, or limiting systems like perimeter wires to determine the extent of your property, and then they pass over your lawn in patterns, mowing as they go.
New innovations have made them more accurate, more efficient and more likely to negotiate the obstacles of your unique lawn without getting into trouble. And though they've hardly entered the realm of impulse purchase, prices have inevitably started to come down as manufacturers begin to produce them at greater scale.
The Lymow One has tank treads to traverse uneven yards and mulching blades to turn leaves into lawn fuel.
Lymow
New navigation tech means its easier to use
Recent advancements have made robot mowers even more precise and useful. According to Chris Price, senior manager of robotics engineering at Husqvarna (a leading robot mower manufacturer), the newest models no longer need to rely so heavily on older navigation tools like buried perimeter wires.
"Precision satellite navigation with RTK technology, such as Husqvarna's EPOS system, revolutionized the robotic mower space by eliminating the need for physical boundary wires," Price told CNET.
This new nav tech has unlocked advantages beyond just more-precise mowing and mapping. According to Price, the new tech, available in Husqvarna's latest iQ series of mowers, enables "incredibly efficient mowing patterns that can double the area capacity, reduce the installation time and maintenance" and leave your lawn looking perfectly striped in a way only traditional mowers have previously been capable of.
Husqvarna/CNET
Robot lawn mowers vs. traditional lawn mowers
Most robot lawn mowers are battery powered, meaning you don't need to worry about refueling them the way you do many traditional push or riding mowers. After they've completed a mowing cycle, they'll return to a charging dock, much the way robot vacuums do, and refill their battery while waiting for the next call to action. Many models, particularly on the high end, include sophisticated apps that let you modify the mower's behavior, including manually altering the coverage area or indicating that the mower should return to the dock automatically if it detects rainfall.
Aside from the freedom from fossil fuels, robot mowers have a number of advantages over traditional mowing. The most obvious is that they save you time: Instead of spending hours yourself each week, pushing or driving a traditional mower around your yard, you can lounge around in the sunshine deckside or attend to other chores while your robot buddy does your landscaping for you.
They're also significantly quieter than traditional mowers, especially the gas-powered variety with their deafening engines (though they're also quieter than even electric push mowers, which have larger, noisier blades and other components). And because of their size, robot mowers can get into smaller areas than some larger traditional mowers can. That said, they're not without their weaknesses.
With the properly sized robot lawn mower for your yard, your grass cutting days are behind you.
Chris Wedel/CNET
Pros and cons of robot lawn mowers
We've contrasted robot mowers with traditional mowers above, but they have some other advantages that may not be immediately evident.
Pros of robot lawn mowers
Environmentally friendly
Because robot vacuums almost universally are electric, they don't put out all those emissions you find with gas-powered lawn-care devices. Not only is this better for the environment as a whole, it can also make your personal environment a lot more pleasant. Your house and yard won't be suffused with the lingering stench of the exhaust belched out of a gas-powered mower, and you won't have to change out of gassy-smelling clothes to avoid repelling people.
Can improve your lawn's health and appearance
Robot lawn mowers aren't just convenient, they can actually be better for your lawn. Because you can mow more frequently with a robot than you're likely to do yourself, you won't have those days when your lawn starts to look shaggy or unkempt. More importantly, frequent mowing can encourage lateral grass growth, which results in a denser, healthier lawn. The same effect can choke out weeds, leading to a more uniform and appealing-looking lawn.
Lawn maintenance even while you're away
With a robot mower, you also won't need to worry about hiring landscapers or paying a neighborhood kid to mow your lawn while you're on vacation. Just set a regular schedule, or manually trigger a mowing cycle through the app, and your grass will look as meticulously tended as if you'd never left.
No annoying grass clippings to deal with
Robot mowers don't collect grass clippings, so you won't have to worry about disposing of giant bags of yard waste. And because they can mow more frequently, clippings are smaller and should decompose quickly, so they shouldn't be littering your lawn and you won't have to spend extra time raking them up.
Savings over time
Though robot mowers represent a fairly steep initial investment, they can save you money over time because you never have to worry about buying gas to fuel them up, paying for oil changes, or shelling out to a landscaping company for lawn maintenance.
Chris Wedel/CNET
Cons of robot lawn mowers
There are some downsides to robot mowers.
High up-front cost
You may ultimately save money over time, but you'll still need to put together a tidy sum to buy a robot mower in the first place. Though cheaper models can be had for $1,000 or less, a high-quality option will run you between $4,000 and $6,000 (or more).
Can struggle with mowing complicated lawns
Navigation tech has certainly improved, but it isn't perfect by any stretch of the imagination. A robot mower can still struggle with complex lawn structures that involve a lot of slopes, oddly shaped obstacles or other impediments.
Maintenance costs
You may not be buying gas or paying for oil changes, but robot mowers still require maintenance. This can include everything from replacing the blades to installing a new battery, and some of those replacement costs can be fairly steep. That said, new adaptive mowing technologies may reduce overall maintenance costs, with many new robot mowers able to change speed and mowing height on the fly to reduce wear on the unit.
May struggle with fine edge cutting
Another consequence of imperfect mapping is that a robot lawn mower may struggle to get close to edges, especially if the edge in question is irregularly shaped. This means you may need to do a cleanup pass after your mower is finished to get a uniform, sharp edge around your property.
Are robot lawn mowers worth the money?
Tyler Lizenby/CNET
With all that in mind, is a modern robot lawn mower worth the money? The answer is a qualified yes.
A robot mower will be more valuable to some homeowners (or renters required to maintain a yard) than others. Of course if you're the type who genuinely enjoys yard work, you're likely in a need-not-apply position in regard to smart lawn tech, especially if you already own a push or riding mower you're happy with.
Robot mowers also aren't an ideal fit for anyone with a complicated lawn that has lots of uneven surfaces, changes in elevation or large obstacles. This applies if you're someone with kids who often leave toys in the yard or if you have portable play structures regularly set up behind your house -- you may spend as much time clearing the way for a robot mower and making sure its mapping is still correct as you would mowing the lawn yourself. Also, if you have a really small yard that takes only a few minutes to mow, spending thousands on a robot to do the work for you probably isn't a great investment.
iGarden
But if you have a large yard, and particularly if it's got lots of broad, flat spaces without many obstacles, a robot lawn mower can be a time saver. This is especially true for small businesses with large grassy areas -- they'll appreciate the savings-over-time aspect of a robot mower that sees lots of regular use. If you're constantly pumping ever-pricier fossil fuels into a traditional mower, the cost savings will make an immediate impact.
A robot mower is also a no-brainer for anyone who's extremely busy during the week and doesn't want to burn their precious weekend hours doing boring manual labor. In the same vein, anyone who's not often home during daylight hours -- like folks with an especially long commute or who typically work longer daytime shifts -- can reclaim some of those precious sunny hours with a robot mower purchase.
Segway/CNET
The future of robot lawn mowers
We're finally hitting the point where broad adoption of robot mowers looks more likely. Improvements in communication between mower units and GPS systems; better and more accurate boundary marking; and better built-in lidar or camera systems mean mapping improvements and more-accurate mowing. At the same time, more-efficient drive and power units mean that even smaller robot mowers may soon match the power of some of the current push and riding options. So though some people might decide now's the time for a robot mower, others may choose to wait for lower prices and improved tech.
Ultimately, the decision to invest in a robot lawn mower comes down to your individual needs, so consider carefully whether the up-front cost is worth the convenience, time-savings and potential long term savings a high-tech lawn buddy can provide.
FAQ: Robot lawn mowers
What is the best robot lawnmower?
At this time, we're still testing a variety of robot lawnmowers, including the Lithely, Eufy mower and Husqvarna iQ series, so we can't rule on the best one just yet, but we'll have an update soon.
Where does the grass go in a robot lawnmower?
For most robot lawnmowers, grass clippings aren't collected. Just like a regular electric lawnmower, the grass lays where it is cut. That's not really a problem, since the grass will simply decompose and act as natural fertilizer for your lawn.
How much do robot lawn mowers cost compared with traditional mowers?
Prices of robot lawn mowers can vary, with some mowers as affordable as $699, like the Husqvarna Automower 115H, and others running as much as $1,299, like the Segway Navimow Robot Mower i110N . That's still quite a bit more expensive than electric lawn mowers, which cost as little as $89 for a very basic Black and Decker push model or $250 for a Litheli U20.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices
Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

CBS News

time31 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

Desire Godfrey said it was time for a vehicle upgrade. The Lancaster mother had her eye on a Lexus. "I had a baby, so I'm looking for something reliable for me and a baby," Godfrey said. She searched online and found what she thought was the right vehicle at The Reserve Auto Group in The Colony. She described the sales process in May 2024 as a positive experience. Warranty and GAP insurance issues But an unexpected oil change six months later changed everything. Godfrey, 33, said a Lexus dealership informed her the vehicle was not under warranty. She also discovered her GAP insurance policy didn't exist. "They (Reserve Auto Group) never paid the warranty company the money they were supposed to pay to activate this warranty and this GAP insurance," she said. Car loan charges continue Godfrey said the costs were included in her car note. She filed a report with The Colony Police Department — and she's not alone. Police said they received their first complaint on Jan. 31. According to a news release, police have been investigating multiple fraud claims connected to the dealership since 2023. The business shut down in December 2024, but complaints continue to come in. Alleged auto fraud pattern Investigators said customers were allegedly instructed to write separate checks for aftermarket warranties or GAP insurance policies. Those payments were supposed to go to third-party providers, but police said the dealership allegedly cashed the checks and never forwarded the money — leaving customers without coverage. Another victim comes forward A second alleged victim, who spoke to CBS News Texas anonymously, said she and her husband also bought a Lexus from the dealership. She provided a non-activation letter from DOWC Administrative Services LLC, a company that offers GAP insurance and warranties. The letter stated: "Please be advised that Reserve Auto has failed to remit payment to Us as the Administrator and Provider for your Contract. Consequently, the Contract was not activated in our system." Investigation still ongoing Police have not made any arrests or publicly identified anyone associated with the allegations. Officers said they are continuing to vet additional alleged victims. CBS News Texas is not naming the person listed as the dealership's owner, as police have indicated he did nothing wrong. He spoke briefly by phone, saying he wanted to schedule an appointment to discuss the claims further because he believed "we did not have all the facts." When asked for clarification, he said he didn't have time to explain. Legal team responds Two emails followed the call, and attorneys from Herrin Law introduced themselves. "We have no comment at this time. Thank you for your interest in our client's side of the story," attorney Benjamin Palatiere said. He requested that all future inquiries be directed to him. Buyer left without coverage Meanwhile, Godfrey said the vehicle itself has not had any issues. But she continues to pay for a warranty and insurance that don't exist. "So nobody wants to refinance the loan. Nobody wants to give me GAP insurance," she said. "It's just more so like I'm going to take it or leave it. If I wreck the car, then I would have to figure out a way to pay that car off." Godfrey said she hopes to recover the money one day.

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel
Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

CBS News

time41 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday halted lower court orders that required the White House's Department of Government Efficiency to turn over information to a government watchdog group as part of a lawsuit that tests whether President Trump's cost-cutting task force has to comply with federal public records law. The order from the high court clears DOGE for now from having to turn over records related to its work and personnel, and keeps Amy Gleason, identified as its acting administrator, from having to answer questions at a deposition. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. "The portions of the district court's April 15 discovery order that require the government to disclose the content of intra–executive branch USDS recommendations and whether those recommendations were followed are not appropriately tailored," the court said in its order. "Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity's ability to persuade. Furthermore, separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal executive branch communications." The Supreme Court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for more proceedings. Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily paused the district court's order last month, which allowed the Supreme Court more time to consider the Trump administration's bid for emergency relief. A district judge had ordered DOGE to turn over documents to the group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, by June 3, and for Gleason's deposition to be completed by June 13. The underlying issue in the case involves whether DOGE is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW argues that the cost-cutting task force wields "substantial independent authority," which makes it a de facto agency that must comply with federal public records law. The Justice Department, however, disagrees and instead claims that DOGE is a presidential advisory body housed within the Executive Office of the President that makes recommendations to the president and federal agencies on matters that are important to Mr. Trump's second-term agenda. DOGE's agency status was not before the Supreme Court, though the high court may be asked to settle that matter in the future. Instead, the Trump administration had asked the justices to temporarily halt a district court's order that allowed CREW to gather certain information from DOGE as part of its effort to determine whether the task force is an advisory panel that is outside FOIA's scope or is an agency that is subject to the records law. The judge overseeing the dispute, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, had ordered DOGE to turn over certain documents to the watchdog group by June 3 and to complete all depositions, including of Gleason, by June 13. Mr. Trump ordered the creation of DOGE on his first day back in the White House as part of his initiative to slash the size of the federal government. Since then, DOGE team members have fanned out to agencies across the executive branch and have been part of efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter entities like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Institute of Peace. DOGE has also attempted to gain access to sensitive databases kept by the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and Office of Personnel Management, prompting legal battles. In an effort to learn more about DOGE's structure and operations, CREW submitted an expedited FOIA request to the task force. After it did not respond in a timely manner, CREW filed a lawsuit and sought a preliminary injunction to expedite processing of its records request. The organization argued that DOGE was exercising significant independent authority, which made it an agency subject to FOIA. Cooper granted CREW's request for a preliminary injunction in March and agreed that FOIA likely applies to DOGE because it is "likely exercising substantial independent authority much greater than other [Executive Office of the President] components held to be covered by FOIA." He then allowed CREW to conduct limited information-gathering, which the watchdog group said aimed to determine whether DOGE is exercising substantial authority that would bring it within FOIA's reach. A federal appeals court ultimately declined to pause that order, requiring DOGE to turn over the documents sought by CREW. In seeking the Supreme Court's intervention, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said CREW is conducting a "fishing expedition" into DOGE's activities. He warned that if Cooper's order remains in place, several components of the White House, such as the offices of the chief of staff and national security adviser, would be subject to FOIA. "That untenable result would compromise the provision of candid, confidential advice to the president and disrupt the inner workings of the Executive Branch," Sauer wrote. "Yet, in the decisions below, the court of appeals and district court treated a presidential advisory body as a potential 'agency' based on the persuasive force of its recommendations — threatening opening season for FOIA requests on the president's advisors." But lawyers for CREW told the Supreme Court in a filing that the Justice Department's position "would require courts to blindly yield to the Executive's characterization" of the authority and operations of a component of the Executive Office of the President. They said adopting the Trump administration's approach to DOGE would give the president "free reign" to create new entities within the Executive Office of the President that exercise substantial independent authority but are shielded from transparency laws. "Courts would be forced to blindly accept the government's representations about an EOP unit's realworld operations, unable to test those representations through even limited discovery," CREW's lawyers wrote. "It is that extreme position, not the discovery order, that would 'turn[] FOIA on its head.'"

How the Cybertruck Came to Embody Tesla's Problems
How the Cybertruck Came to Embody Tesla's Problems

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

How the Cybertruck Came to Embody Tesla's Problems

The bromance between Elon Musk and President Trump is ending at a difficult time for Tesla TSLA 3.67%increase; green up pointing triangle. The electric-vehicle maker lost roughly $150 billion of market value Thursday—its biggest ever drop—after the Tesla CEO and Trump traded insults. Sales of Teslas have slumped this year. Tariffs could disrupt the supply of key components. The sprawling Republican tax-and-spending bill would end tax credits for EV buyers. And Tesla's Cybertruck has been a disappointment. Musk set high expectations for the Cybertruck, telling investors it would be Tesla's 'best product ever.' The angular, stainless steel pickup was supposed to generate buzz for Tesla by showcasing new technology and unlocking the lucrative truck market. Instead, it has become synonymous with Musk's polarizing stint in politics, exposing some owners to graffiti or middle fingers from other drivers. And its reputation has been tarnished among Tesla fans because of a spate of recalls and manufacturing issues that have resulted in cycles of repairs. In the U.S., the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks in 2024—well below Musk's ultimate goal of 250,000 a year. In the first quarter of 2025, Tesla sold around 7,100 Cybertrucks in the U.S., according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility. Ford's F-150 Lightning pickup outsold it. In an effort to boost sales, Tesla has rolled out lower-price versions of the truck and started offering buyers incentives such as 0% financing and free upgrades. Almost as soon as the $100,000 Cybertruck hit the road, quality problems began to multiply. Reports on social media cited cracked windshields and spotting from so-called rail dust, orange discoloration similar to rust. In its first year, Tesla recalled the truck seven times to fix dangerous defects. In March, with large metal panels falling off the trucks, the tally rose to eight. Some of the quality problems were known and documented internally before the truck went on sale, including issues with the accelerator pad and windshield wiper that later triggered recalls, said former employees who worked on the Cybertruck. But there was pressure inside Tesla to get the truck to market quickly, according to these employees. Tesla didn't respond to requests for comment. 'Elon Musk will tell you the biggest professional mistake was the falcon doors on the Model X,' said David Fick, a longtime Tesla owner who got his Cybertruck in March. He referred to the complex door design that opens upward and hinges at the roof. 'I believe that the Cybertruck is going to go down as an even bigger corporate stumble.' The retired banker in Boynton Beach, Fla., chose to wait more than a year to buy his Cybertruck, hopeful that many of the biggest issues would be identified before he drove his off the lot. 'They do a lot of bleeding-edge stuff where they rush to the market and then you're a beta tester as an owner,' Fick said. He paid about $72,000 for the car, plus $7,300 for window tinting and a custom wrap for exterior trim panels known as cant rails, covering his new car in a metallic maroon color. Soon after, Tesla recalled cant rails because they could become unglued. 'I've had tons of recalls on my Teslas over the years,' said Fick, who added that the cars are worth the hassle. 'Eighty percent were fixed by [software] updates, but these are physical things we are dealing with now.' Musk unveiled the prototype for the Cybertruck in 2019. At the time, he said it would cost $39,900, with a battery range of up to 500 miles—an ambitious combination that would be a stretch for any EV maker. Work on the vehicle was delayed a couple of years, leaving engineering and manufacturing teams with only a few months to do final testing before the trucks went to customers, former employees said. Musk tried to temper expectations around how quickly Tesla could increase production, given its unique design. 'There is always some chance that Cybertruck will flop, because it is so unlike anything else,' he wrote on social media in July 2021. Still, he promoted some of its most unusual features, including his dream of making the car amphibious. Former employees said they took Musk's social posts as orders, but the engineering proved difficult. By 2022, it was clear internally that Cybertruck wouldn't be able to meet all Musk's criteria, so engineers scrapped an early design and started over—developing a smaller, landlocked version of the truck, the people said. After about a year and a half of testing, Tesla delivered the first Cybertrucks to a dozen or so customers in late November 2023. An early version of the truck started at $100,000 and had an estimated range of 318 miles. Two months later, Tesla issued its first recall on the vehicle: a software update that required the company to increase the size of the font on a warning system used across its fleet. It was the first of three recalls that Tesla addressed on the Cybertruck through over-the-air updates to its software. Cybertruck's problems couldn't be fixed by software updates alone. In April 2024, Tesla issued a recall for the accelerator pedal. The company had received a notice from a customer complaining that the accelerator had gotten stuck. Tesla found that the pad attached to the long pedal could dislodge and get stuck in the trim above the pedal, causing the car to accelerate. An internal investigation found the issue was the result of an 'unapproved change,' in which Tesla employees used soap as a lubricant to attach the pad, according to the recall notice. Inside Tesla, the accelerator pad had been a known issue starting with the prototype, according to an employee who worked on the part. The manufacturing team also identified the part as problematic, this person said. Tesla also had problems with the Cybertruck's expansive windshield, which measured nearly 6 square feet. Sometimes the heavy glass would break, two employees said. The glass either arrived cracked from the supplier in Mexico or from handling at the Austin, Texas, facility, they said. Some owners took to social media to describe the glass cracking as soon as they drove off the lot, or while they wiped the inside of their windshield. The windshield required a large windshield wiper measuring 50 inches long. In June 2024, Tesla issued a recall on the wipers, whose motors Tesla found had been overstressed by testing. The wiper had been flagged nearly a year before, two people who worked on the Cybertruck said. It was one of the first issues identified on the vehicles, at which point it was classified as a 'gating issue,' which meant that it needed to be resolved before production could move forward. Reid Tomasko, a 25-year-old YouTube creator, took his Cybertruck on a cross-country trip, during which it performed perfectly, he said. Then came winter in New Hampshire. He was driving near his home in Lebanon, N.H., in February when a metal panel flew off the side of his truck. In March, Tesla issued a recall affecting most of the Cybertrucks it had produced—more than 46,000. The problem involved adhesive that could become brittle in extreme weather, causing exterior trim panels called cant rails to dislodge. Inspecting his truck, Tomasko said he found loose connections on almost every panel that used the adhesive, including the large pieces of stainless steel over the rear wheels, the front fender and the front doors. 'I was wondering, why are they not recalling the other panels?' Tomasko said. After replacing several panels, Tesla offered to buy back Tomasko's truck for nearly all of the $102,000 that he paid, he said. He accepted. 'I am planning on getting a newer one for cheaper soon,' he said. Write to Becky Peterson at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store