Trump's crypto cheer lifts Bitcoin, but core risks still loom
Yet beneath the sheen of political legitimacy, nothing fundamental has changed about cryptocurrencies' essential nature.
The irony in Trump's embrace of crypto is hard to miss. The proposed 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and US Digital Asset Stockpile" will apparently consist entirely of assets seized from criminals. In other words, the US government's official cryptocurrency holdings will be digital assets once used for ransomware, money laundering, drug trafficking, and other illicit activities. It's rather like announcing a strategic reserve of stolen goods as proof of their virtue.
This detail neatly captures crypto's central problem. Despite all the technological sophistication and political endorsements, it remains the payment method of choice for criminals worldwide. Every major ransomware attack, dark web marketplace, and cross-border money laundering network gravitates to crypto for the same reasons enthusiasts celebrate it—anonymity, irreversibility, and freedom from traditional oversight.
Political enthusiasm can't fix these structural flaws. Governments seeking to legitimise crypto are, in effect, blessing a system designed to bypass governmental authority. The contradiction is glaring: regulators tout an asset class while acknowledging that their strategic reserves will be filled mainly by seizing it from criminals.
The ease with which fraud and theft occur in crypto remains staggering. Consider the 'socialised loss" strategy, where a major Indian exchange, after losing customer funds to hackers, decided everyone should share the pain, a perfect example of the Wild West ethos. When exchanges profit, it's capitalism; when they're robbed, suddenly everyone's a socialist. The frequency of such episodes would be comical if they didn't wipe out life savings.
These aren't isolated mishaps or growing pains; they're built into a system that operates outside traditional financial protections. When a bank is robbed, deposit insurance protects you. When a crypto exchange is 'hacked", often a euphemism, you're on your own. The very decentralisation crypto champions means there's no safety net when things go wrong.
Trump's enthusiasm also underlines another uncomfortable reality: an anti-establishment movement has been fully co-opted by the establishment it once vowed to disrupt. Wall Street, which Bitcoin was meant to circumvent, is now its biggest backer via ETFs and institutional products. The so-called revolutionary currency depends on the same traditional finance for its legitimacy.
Political endorsement carries psychological weight. When governments and big institutions adopt a position, it creates an illusion of safety and permanence. Past crypto bubbles fed on tech mystique and get-rich-quick dreams; this cycle adds political validation, which could make it more dangerous for ordinary investors mistaking political backing for sound investment.
For Indian investors, the temptation to chase this apparent legitimacy will be strong. Domestic taxation has curbed much local speculation, but political developments in the US could encourage some to seek workarounds. The 'don't miss out" narrative, wrapped in patriotic American rhetoric about financial dominance, could be persuasive.
Yet the math hasn't changed. Crypto produces nothing, earns nothing, and represents no underlying asset. It serves no economic purpose that existing systems can't fulfil more efficiently. Its price is driven purely by speculative sentiment, whether fuelled by tech hype, celebrity endorsements, or presidential tweets.
The most telling part of crypto's political embrace is how quickly its advocates abandoned anti-government principles in exchange for government approval. Those who once railed against fiat currencies and central banks now cheer politicians promising to hoard their preferred tokens. It's a striking shift from revolutionary idealism to conventional rent-seeking.
Short-term price predictions are futile, speculative bubbles can inflate far beyond reason. But knowing what you're buying matters. Political theatre and presidential applause can't turn speculation into investment, gambling into wealth-building, or criminal infrastructure into legitimate finance. However much hot air gets pumped into this bubble, the fundamentals remain unchanged.
Dhirendra Kumar is founder and chief executive officer of Value Research, an independent advisory firm. Views expressed are personal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Chilling past, warm present
On August 15, U.S President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin concluded a historic summit in Alaska. After friendly greetings and two-and-a-half-hour-long talks at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, they left without announcing any deal, but claimed to have made progress on many issues. The selection of Alaska as the backdrop for this summit, the first since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, was significant in more than one manner. Alaska was under Russian control for 125 years before being sold to the U.S. in 1867. Alaska is separated from Russia by a distance of 88 km, while the Russian Island of Big Diomede is located just 4 km from the U.S. Little Diomede Island, with the Bering strait separating the two. Also read: Trump-Putin Alaska Summit Highlights Alaska has been populated by Indigenous peoples, including the Athabaskans, Unangan (Aleuts), Inuit, Yupiit (Yupik), Tlingit, and Haida, for centuries. In the early 18th century, Danish explorer Vitus Bering was pressed into service by Russian Tsar Peter the Great to explore the regions to the east of Russia's border. In 1728, Bering sailed through the strait separating the Russian mainland and North America (the strait is now named after him). During his second voyage in 1741, Bering spotted the peak of Mount St. Elias, part of an Alaskan mountain range, from his ship St. Peter. His 'discovery' of Alaska was confirmed later during the voyage of Englishman Captain James Cook, who mapped the area in 1778. Trading outposts Russian traders — the Promyshlenniki — soon set up outposts in Alaska, interested in seal-hunting and otter fur trade. The first Russian colony was set up in 1784 on Kodiak island at Three Saints Bay. In 1799, Tsar Paul I established the Russian American company, and in 1806, their capital was moved from Kodiak to Sitka. The Russians had to contend with opposition from the Alaskan natives, including an armed battle in Sitka in 1804 between Tlingit and Russian forces. British and later American trade interest in the region was also a challenge to the growth of 'Russian America'. Over decades, overexploitation of seals and sea otters in Alaska meant that their populations shrank, gutting profitability for Russian traders. Further, Russia was defeated by the British in the Crimean war (1853-1856). Viewing Alaska as a hard-to-defend territory which was also becoming economically untenable, Tsar Alexander II decided to give it up. Despite British interest, the U.S. emerged triumphant in its bid for Alaska in 1867. Russia sold the parcel of land, measured 665,000 sq. miles, to the U.S for $7.2 million, in a deal brokered by U.S. Secretary of State William Henry Seward. The deal, dubbed as 'Seward's Folly', was widely criticised, since Alaska was viewed as a barren frozen wasteland. The subsequent discovery of natural gas reserves and rare earth minerals, however, changed the public perception. In 1896, gold was found in Yukon and prospectors arrived to seek their fortunes in the Klondike gold fields. In 1959, Alaska officially became the 49th State of the U.S. Traces of its Russian past persist in Alaska till day. Several Orthodox churches, with characteristic ornate decor and onion-shaped domes, dot the region. The Orthodox diocese in Alaska is reportedly the oldest in North America, and it maintains a seminary on Kodiak island, the site of the first Russian settlement. Local dialects, now fast-vanishing, arose from a melange of Russian and local indigenous language, and persisted in regions surrounding Anchorage. Russian, too, is taught in some areas, such as the Kenai peninsula. Alaska is also a strategically important region. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, the site of Friday's summit, was a forward front of American defence during the Cold War. Given the region's imperial Russian past, it was hardly a surprise that Anchorage was picked as the venue for the Putin-Trump meet — an American town acceptable for the Russians. When Mr. Putin met Mr. Trump on the tarmac of the joint base, he greeted him, saying, 'Good afternoon, dear neighbour.'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Putin's Jet!': Alaska Becomes the Center of the Universe for One Weekend
ANCHORAGE, Alaska—Nearly two decades ago, when the presidential nominee John McCain selected then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his Republican running mate, this Far North metropolis was swarmed with media, political consultants and other outsiders. It turns out that was merely a warm-up act. Anchorage now finds itself in a global spotlight, having hosted the much-anticipated summit between President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. 'I thought we had sunk back into obscurity,' joked the veteran Alaska pollster Ivan Moore, referring to the end of the Palin frenzy. Instead, Trump-Putin mania has gripped Anchorage, with hotel rooms and car rentals sold out, and buzz about the historic moment sweeping through tourist destinations, including salmon-fishing spots and the Alaska Railroad depot, where visitors await the scenic ride to Denali National Park and Preserve, famed for its grizzlies and high peaks. Reactions have varied. Some are outraged Alaska would host Putin after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Others hope this marks a step toward peace. But most everyone agrees on one point. This summit—with the deadly war at stake—is perhaps the most notable event to happen in Alaska in modern memory. 'All eyes are on Anchorage,' declared a headline in the Anchorage Daily News, while Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy told a local news station that the event 'puts Alaska on the world map—where we should be.' 'This trip is very big,' said Mike Porcaro, a radio talk show host who said calls about the event flooded his conservative program. 'There have been other high-level meetings, but not of this magnitude.' 'Bucket list' On Friday morning, onlookers gathered on a pier, beneath the flight path to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, to see the plane carrying Putin, and Air Force One, land there. A website for the base, in the wooded outskirts, recommends that new arrivals enjoy a 'bucket list' of experiences including the Moose Run Golf Course and beluga whale watching. But the chance to see the rare joint landings of two world leaders topped that. 'Putin's jet!' local resident Cheryl Shroyer, 73, shouted from an overlook as a large plane believed to be carrying the Russian leader appeared first as a black dot against the snow-capped Alaska Range. The big jet grew larger, gliding over the Cook Inlet before disappearing as trees blocked the view of the base's airfield. At 10:17 a.m. local time, Shroyer shouted again: 'There it is, Air Force One!' as Trump's plane emerged from the clouds. (As it turned out, Putin's plane was another one, which came in after Trump.) Though Anchorage has nearly 300,000 people, it feels like a small town. Many locals drive pickup trucks, and the airport greets visitors with taxidermied grizzly, Kodiak and polar bears. Some Alaskans feel more kinship with Canada than the 'Outside,' local lingo for the Lower 48 U.S. states. Of course, Russia has long ties to Alaska. Once Russian territory, Alaska was sold to the U.S. in 1867 for $7.2 million. Palin, as McCain's running mate, drew late-show ridicule for reportedly saying, 'I can see Russia from my house.' (She actually said Russia is visible from the Alaskan island of Little Diomede island, which is about 2.5 miles from the Russian island of Big Diomede.) As hundreds of reporters and officials descended on Anchorage for the summit, local entrepreneurs seized on the surprise windfall. Some proprietors said it had been a challenging summer, with tourism hampered by a slowdown in foreign travel. David Liles, manager of the Ramada by Wyndham in downtown Anchorage, said occupancy jumped from 60%, with rooms running about $300 nightly, to fully booked, with rooms temporarily between $500 and $1,000. (Among those not getting hotels? Some Russian journalists who arrived as part of Putin's press pool Thursday night and slept on beds inside a sports stadium on the campus of the University of Alaska.) The Ramada price was nothing compared with what the owner of an Airbnb tried to charge: $7,000 a night after canceling a previous offer of $1,500. 'Some people are getting greedy ' Liles said. Autumn hues on the tundra on the Chugach peaks above Anchorage signal the approaching long winter. 'People who make money off tourists only have three months to do it in, so any publicity that brings extra people here is good for the economy,' said Kirill Gashenko, who rents out used cars. They were in hot demand. Cheers and jeers America's political divisions were on full display across Anchorage. 'We're really distraught that Putin is allowed on our soil, period,' said Janice Bunting, 65, watching for planes with her husband, Glenn, from lawn chairs beside a Ukrainian flag. Standing nearby, Jeff Henson, a 61-year-old Air Force veteran, disagreed. He said talking is the only way to resolve the conflict. 'The previous administration had three years,' said Henson, a Trump supporter accompanied by his husky mix, Leo. As the two presidents huddled, hundreds of Putin critics converged on a park near downtown Anchorage and unfurled a 132 foot by 65 foot Ukrainian flag—one of the largest in the world, organizers said. 'I can't think of a bigger F U to Trump and Putin,' organizer Erin Jackson-Hill said over a microphone to cheers. Minutes earlier, a lone man taunted the crowd with shouts of 'U.S.A.! U.S.A.!,' to which a demonstrator, Courtney Moore, shot back, 'Bootlicker!' A giant Ukrainian flag was unfurled at Delaney Park Strip in the heart of Anchorage. For her part, hotel clerk Amber Rookard just wanted the whole summit to go away. 'It just makes everybody uneasy,' said Rookard, who said three FBI agents came in and asked her if she had seen any 'unusual people.' Confused, she answered, 'I see a lot of unusual people.' Still, most locals seemed supportive. Soon after Anchorage was announced as the summit venue, Ivan Moore's Alaska Survey Research conducted a poll of 848 registered voters that found 59% said it was appropriate that Putin was invited to participate in the summit on U.S. soil—even if only 6% gave Putin a favorable rating. Unfortunately, there was little time for the two leaders to enjoy the outdoor adventures for which Alaska is revered. The incoming planes passed a line of fishermen at a creek known for its salmon. That might have caught the eye of Putin, who has been pictured fishing shirtless. At the Alaska Railroad depot, Steve Richmond, an Oregon resident visiting with his wife, suggested that Trump and Putin follow the group and see the park's famed wildlife. 'They should take advantage of being in this area,' Richmond, 74, said, as the train whistle blew nearby in preparation for departure. Write to Jim Carlton at
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Did Trump cave to Putin during Alaska Summit? Shocking report out as Zelensky, EU left scrambling
Did Trump cave to Putin during Alaska Summit? Shocking report out as Zelensky, EU left scrambling
