Which Company Is The "Darling" of UK Fintech?
At this year's Innovate Finance Global Summit (IFGS) we threw out a controversial question to attendees: 'Which company is the darling of UK fintech?' – and the answers certainly didn't disappoint.
Some were unapologetically biased, like the devotee of YouLend, while others highlighted key success stories like Equals Group, trumpeted for its journey from a phone-based FX provider to a full service fintech and solutions partner for others in the fintech ecosystem.
Moneybox received love for the work it has done in financial inclusion and wealth tech, demonstrating that doing good and doing well aren't mutually exclusive.
In terms of brand recognition, Monzo, Starling and Revolut remain at the forefront — praised for their role in radically changing banking from the straightforward user experience first digital customers have come to expect, in stark contrast to traditional banks.
Other popular mentions included Tide, the darling of SME focused fintechs, and EPS, lauded for their consistent positive contribution to the sector.
Of course, some found it impossible to choose – a sign of just how thriving and competitive the UK fintech landscape has become.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why getting married abroad could land you with a HUGE bill from the taxman
Couples marrying abroad could be landed with a huge inheritance tax bill if their foreign wedding is not legally binding, a couple has warned. Antonia Medlicott, 49, and Tim Pindar, 44, tied the knot in 2009 in the wedding of their dreams in Spain. The couples families flew out for a 'big Catholic wedding' on the continent, but were unaware that they had 14 days to register their marriage at the town hall, they told The Telegraph. The priest who officiated the wedding had tried to warn the couple that their marriage would be null and void, but the couple did not understand Spanish and the priest did not speak any English. The couple found out their marriage was not legally binding some months later, but decided to ignore it for the next 13 years. However in 2023 the couple were forced to remarry, after discovering they could be set to lose a huge amount of money if one of them passed away. The spousal exemption allows married couples to avoid paying inheritance tax when passing assets to their wife or husband when they die. Unmarried couples however, do not have the same privilege and those who leave assets worth over £325,000 have to pay 40 per cent inheritance tax on the amount over the allowance. Unmarried couples may soon lose out on pension savings too if their partner dies, under new plans by Rachel Reeves. Pension savings can currently be left to an unmarried partner without any inheritance tax being paid, but this is set to end in 2027. Ms Medlicott and her husband discovered that they could be set to lose thousands after speaking to a lawyer about their wills. She said: 'He pointed out that if something happens to either one of us, there's a massive inheritance tax bill coming our way. So we decided we would have to just get on with it.' The couple estimated they would have had an £80,000 inheritance tax bill on their house alone. With potentially more coming from pensions, savings and a business owned by Ms Medlicott. If the worst had happened, the surviving spouse would have been forced to sell their family home to cover the bill. Far from their extravagant Spanish wedding in 2009, the couple opted for a quieter affair in 2023. They described their second wedding as 'bare bones' costing around £1,000 all in - including a bottomless bunch with six friends. Ms Medlicott wore a brown dress and borrowed boots from a friend as the couple finally officially tied the knot at a civil wedding in their local registry office. Claire Trott, head of advice at St James's Place, said: 'Getting married for tax purposes isn't a new concept, particularly in the world of pensions. Many defined benefit schemes have restrictions on who death benefits can be paid to, sometimes depending on when a couple marries. 'My own father married my stepmother just before his defined benefit pension came into payment, because under the scheme rules, death benefits were only payable to the spouse at the date of retirement. Had they married after that point, even after 30 years together, she wouldn't have been entitled to anything.' She said that marriage could soon become an even more valuable planning tool to deal with inheritance tax, particularly with pensions being brought into the scope for the levy. Ms Medlicott said she felt 'resentful' about having to remarry just to save thousands of pounds. She said that marriage 'isn't for everyone' and felt it was 'ridiculous' that a piece of paper could be the difference between huge sums of money for couples.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Fears for Britain's elderly over digital landline switchover...as minster admits he can never get hold of his father on the phone
A government minister has warned he cannot guarantee that all elderly and vulnerable people will be safely switched over to digital landlines - as he revealed he can never get hold of his own father on the phone. Minister for the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology Sir Chris Bryant exclusively told MailOnline he'd be 'fibbing' if he promised every household will be transferred to internet-based landlines safely, with telecare devices still working. His comments coincide with a new government campaign aimed at raising awareness about the switchover, to encourage vulnerable and elderly people to get in touch with their landline provider for assistance. Telecoms firms including BT, Sky and Virgin are currently switching every household in Britain to new internet-based landlines, as ageing copper wires are increasingly unreliable and at risk of failure. The transition is expected to be completed by early 2027. The tech giants are moving to the final phase of turning off the UK's old copper wire system, and forced migrations to a new digital service have resumed. After previously telling MailOnline the fear of people being left with telecare devices - alarms that call for help in the case of an emergency - kept him up at night, Sir Chris says he is now more confident the correct support systems are in place to transition people safely. Asked if he could guarantee everyone would always be able to call emergency services after being switched over to the new phone line, he said: 'I can't guess what terrible set of circumstances there might be in one particular street. 'Sometimes if you're in an area where mobile connectivity is very poor, and obviously some older people won't have a mobile phone. I can never persuade my father to have a mobile phone which is really irritating, it makes him very difficult to get hold of. 'I can't say 100 percent, I'd be fibbing, but what we've tried to do is put in as many different measures to make sure that as many different people in as many sets of circumstances are protected. 'It might be that the cable's down, or all sorts of different things that might arise, and you want to mitigate against all of those, but it's impossible to get to 100 percent.' He added that his department had written to every local authority to request details of vulnerable people in their area to be passed onto telecoms firms - and that 95 percent have provided this information. This leaves five percent of councils which have not. In 2023, telecoms firms were forced to halt non-voluntary upgrades following several incidents of personal alarms failing in emergencies. Some 1.8 million people in the UK rely on life-saving telecare devices to sound the alarm in the case of a medical emergency or fall. The devices function by being linked to a wearer's landline or mobile phone. There have been concerns for years over the transition to digital as, while traditional landline phones continue working in the case of a blackout or internet outage, internet-based phonelines do not. Ofcom, the industry regulator, ruled that telecoms firms must provide a back-up to the landline lasting at least one hour to all vulnerable people in case they need assistance during an outage. But Sir Chris said this is not enough, and the majority of firms have agreed to provide between four and seven hours. But amid data published last year that revealed millions of people still have no idea about the ongoing transition, he added that he doesn't think elderly people 'actually need to understand' what is being done to their landline, as long as it happens. The minister said: 'Two thirds of people have already been done. And probably they don't even know that that's what's happened. 'I don't care about that, what I care about is whether the telecare device around somebody's auntie's neck still works when they go from one system to another. 'That's what I care about and that's what we're making sure happens. And it may be that some elderly people don't actually need to understand what's happening to the cable outside their home as long as the system works.' He told MailOnline the firms 'needed help' with the transition: 'On almost day one of me arriving in post I said [the switchover] is one of the things I want to focus on, and within weeks we had a meeting of all the operators and they were really responsive. 'I think they all wanted to move together, they wanted a sense of where government wanted them to go, they needed some help actually. 'They wouldn't know who the vulnerable people are with telecare devices, the only people who know that are the social care departments of local authorities. 'I could help get that information so we could work together and I think it felt like a very productive round table that we had.' But the minister also warned that severe weather events and local disasters could still pose a major risk to vulnerable people who rely on landlines. 'A few years ago in one of the big storms, we had big flooding in one of my areas in the Rhondda. 'Now in that situation you're not going to have any kind of electricity, nothing's going to work, it's probably going to be out for several days and there's nothing you can do about that.' He told how, before the last election, a lorry drove straight into a telephone cabinet in his constituency, knocking out services for a week. 'I was very angry just as a constituency MP, this was before the last election, I didn't feel that the operators were actually sorting that out, responding quickly enough. But that was a massive accident, the lorry had gone straight into the cabinet, and the entire village was out. 'And I know there was an incidence there where somebody was not able to make a phone call to get an ambulance.' A checklist - which telecoms giants are understood to have signed up to during Sir Chris' first meeting with firms last summer - means all 'vulnerable' customers will be able to have an engineer visit their household to support them through the transition. The engineer will then test any telecare devices before leaving to ensure they are still working. If any issue occurs, there is the option to return the household to their old landline until this can be fixed, if no alternative is available. And vulnerable households will be given back-up devices to protect them in the case of a power cut or internet outage - with firms pledging to ensure this exceeds Ofcom's minimum recommendation that such devices provide one hour of battery power. Firms have been instructed to ensure that no telecare user will be migrated to digital landline services without the communication provider, the customer, or the telecare service provider confirming that the user has a compatible and functioning telecare solution in place.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight
The fierce battle over artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright - which pits the government against some of the biggest names in the creative industry - returns to the House of Lords on Monday with little sign of a solution in sight.A huge row has kicked off between ministers and peers who back the artists, and shows no sign of abating. It might be about AI but at its heart are very human issues: jobs and highly unusual that neither side has backed down by now or shown any sign of compromise; in fact if anything support for those opposing the government is growing rather than tailing off. This is "unchartered territory", one source in the peers' camp told me. The argument is over how best to balance the demands of two huge industries: the tech and creative sectors. More specifically, it's about the fairest way to allow AI developers access to creative content in order to make better AI tools - without undermining the livelihoods of the people who make that content in the first sparked it is the uninspiringly-titled Data (Use and Access) proposed legislation was broadly expected to finish its long journey through parliament this week and sail off into the law books. Instead, it is currently stuck in limbo, ping-ponging between the House of Lords and the House of bill states that AI developers should have access to all content unless its individual owners choose to opt out. Nearly 300 members of the House of Lords disagree. They think AI firms should be forced to disclose which copyrighted material they use to train their tools, with a view to licensing Nick Clegg, former president of global affairs at Meta, is among those broadly supportive of the bill, arguing that asking permission from all copyright holders would "kill the AI industry in this country". Those against include Baroness Beeban Kidron, a crossbench peer and former film director, best known for making films such as Bridget Jones: The Edge of says ministers would be "knowingly throwing UK designers, artists, authors, musicians, media and nascent AI companies under the bus" if they don't move to protect their output from what she describes as "state sanctioned theft" from a UK industry worth £ asking for an amendment to the bill which includes Technology Secretary Peter Kyle giving a report to the House of Commons about the impact of the new law on the creative industries, three months after it comes into force, if it doesn't change. Mr Kyle also appears to have changed his views about UK copyright once said copyright law was "very certain", now he says it is "not fit for purpose".Perhaps to an extent both those things are Department for Science, Innovation and Technology say that they're carrying out a wider consultation on these issues and will not consider changes to the Bill unless they're completely satisfied that they work for creators. If the "ping pong" between the two Houses continues, there's a small chance the entire bill could be shelved; I'm told it's unlikely but not it does, some other important elements would go along with it, simply because they are part of the same bill. It also includes proposed rules on the rights of bereaved parents to access their children's data if they die, changes to allow NHS trusts to share patient data more easily, and even a 3D underground map of the UK's pipes and cables, aimed at improving the efficiency of roadworks (I told you it was a big bill).There is no easy answer. How did we get here? Here's how it all started. Initially, before AI exploded into our lives, AI developers scraped enormous quantities of content from the internet, arguing that it was in the public domain already and therefore freely available. We are talking about big, mainly US, tech firms here doing the scraping, and not paying for anything they hoovered they used that data to train the same AI tools now used by millions to write copy, create pictures and videos in seconds. These tools can also mimic popular musicians, writers, artists. For example, a recent viral trend saw people merrily sharing AI images generated in the style of the Japanese animation firm Studio founder of that studio meanwhile, had once described the use of AI in animation as "an insult to life itself". Needless to say, he was not a has been a massive backlash from many content creators and owners including household names like Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa. They have argued that taking their work in this way, without consent, credit or payment, amounted to theft. And that artists are now losing work because AI tools can churn out similar content freely and quickly Elton John didn't hold back in a recent interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg. He argued that the government was on course to "rob young people of their legacy and their income", and described the current administration as "absolute losers".Others though point out that material made by the likes of Sir Elton is available worldwide. And if you make it too hard for AI companies to access it in the UK they'll simply do it elsewhere instead, taking much needed investment and job opportunities with opposing positions, no obvious compromise. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
