Lululemon opens first European airport store in London
The new 103-square-metre store offers passengers travelling through Heathrow access to Lululemon's range of leggings, yoga gear, travel-friendly layers and accessories.
'We are thrilled to welcome lululemon to Heathrow, their first airport store in Europe,' said Fraser Brown, retail director at Heathrow.
'As we strive to make every journey better, the launch of lululemon in Terminal 5 will give passengers the opportunity to enjoy their travel experience with added comfort and style. lululemon has amassed a cult following for good reason, and we are excited to welcome such an iconic activewear brand to Heathrow.'
As part of the launch, Heathrow Rewards members will also receive double points when they spend £100 or more in the new store over the next two weeks.
The store opened on Friday, strategically timed ahead of the peak summer travel season.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Tax on ultra-rich: 'France has the opportunity to lead the way,' say Nobel Prize-winning economists
This op-ed was signed by Daron Acemoglu (MIT), 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics; George Akerlof (Georgetown), 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics; Abhijit Banerjee (MIT), 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics; Esther Duflo (Collège de France and MIT), 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics; Simon Johnson (MIT), 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics; Paul Krugman (CUNY), 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics; Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia), 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics. They have never been so wealthy and yet contribute little, relative to their ability to pay, to the public coffers: From Bernard Arnault to Elon Musk, billionaires have lower tax rates than the average taxpayer. Pioneering research conducted in partnership with tax authorities in several countries demonstrates it: Ultra-wealthy individuals pay around 0% to 0.6% of their wealth in individual income tax – around 0.6% in a country like the United States and 0.1% in a country like France. When including all other mandatory levies (corporate taxes, social security contributions, consumption taxes, etc.) and expressing their tax payments as a fraction of income, their effective tax rates turn out to be lower than those of middle-class or upper-middle-class taxpayers. How did we get here? In short, because the ultra-wealthy can easily structure their wealth to avoid income tax, which is supposed to be the cornerstone of tax justice. In European countries, this optimization is achieved through the creation of family holding companies, in which dividends accumulate sheltered from taxation. In the US, the use of holding companies to dodge taxes has been prohibited since the 1930s, which explains why the wealthy are more heavily taxed there than in Europe – though some have still managed to find workarounds. Fortunately, this situation is not the result of a natural law or some ancient fate: It stems from human decisions and political choices. There is no inevitability here. Not only is it necessary to impose a stronger burden of justice on billionaires, but more importantly, it is possible.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
EU-China tensions escalate over medical device trade restrictions
Beijing announced on Sunday that it will restrict government purchases of medical devices from the EU valued at over 45 million yuan (approximately €5.3 million) as a direct response to the European Commission's decision to limit Chinese firms' access to the bloc's public procurement market. Under the Commission's previous move last month, Chinese companies are barred from bidding on public contracts for medical devices in the EU single market exceeding €5 million. Additionally, winning bids must contain no more than 50% of components sourced from China. In a statement, China said it had 'no choice but to implement countermeasures". A spokesperson for China's ministry of commerce added that Beijing has repeatedly expressed, through bilateral dialogues, its willingness to address differences with the EU through dialogue, consultation, and bilateral procurement arrangements. 'Unfortunately, the EU has ignored China's goodwill and sincerity and continues to impose restrictive measures and build new protectionist barriers,' the statement read. This latest escalation follows Beijing's announcement last week of anti-dumping duties of up to 34.9% on European brandy imports for the next five years. The pattern of reciprocal trade actions continues to define the EU-China economic relationship. In recent weeks, China extended its anti-dumping investigation into EU pork imports by six months, while the EU imposed tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). These developments come at a sensitive time in EU-China relations, which are undergoing a cautious diplomatic reset. A key milestone in the evolving dialogue will be the upcoming EU-China Summit, scheduled to take place in Beijing in the second half of July 2025. Concerns from Europe MedTech Europe, the EU's medical devices industry association, expressed regret over China's latest decision, saying it further restricts access to the Chinese public procurement market. 'Measures of this nature risk deepening trade tensions and ultimately deny patients timely access to indispensable medical technologies,' the group said in a statement. 'We urge both the European Union and China to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve current challenges to market access and to uphold fair, predictable, and reciprocal trading conditions.' The European Chamber of Commerce in China echoed these concerns, warning that the announcement increases uncertainty for European businesses operating in the country. In particular, the lack of specificity in the new restrictions raises the risk that local authorities managing public tenders may enforce the measures in an overly stringent manner. This could exclude even highly localised European medical device manufacturers from bidding for contracts, according to the Chamber. For instance, although the Chinese government has indicated that European-invested enterprises in China will be exempt from the restrictions, the notice does not clarify what qualifies as a 'European-invested enterprise'. According to the European Chamber, it also remains unclear whether volume-based procurement tenders, which often exceed the threshold, will fall under the new rules.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Brussels AI ambitions risk fuelling Big Tech dominance, watchdog warns
As European governments rush to invest in artificial intelligence (AI), hoping to support European champions like Mistral, a new report warns they may be playing into the hands of Big Tech. Research published this Monday by the Dutch non-profit SOMO shows that the world's leading AI start-ups, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Mistral, are deeply dependent on a small group of powerful US tech companies for the hardware, infrastructure and platforms they need to operate. 'On the surface, these start-ups look like fresh challengers,' said Margarida Silva, author of the report. 'But scratch a little deeper and you'll see they're built on foundations laid by Nvidia, Amazon, Google and Microsoft.' Start-ups dependency of Big Tech Training advanced AI models requires huge computing power, most of which runs on Nvidia's specialised chips. According to the report, 11 out of the 12 top generative AI start-ups rely on Nvidia's hardware to build and run their systems. The chipmaker now dominates the global market, not just because of its hardware but also due to its proprietary software, which makes it difficult for competitors to catch up. Start-ups don't just need chips, they need access to massive cloud infrastructure to train and deploy their models. SOMO found that 10 of the 12 firms in its study rely on cloud services provided by Microsoft, Amazon or Google. In return for access to this computing power, Big Tech companies often strike deals with start-ups that give them exclusive rights to distribute their AI models. Microsoft, for instance, invested heavily in French start-up Mistral and now has first access to its models through the Azure cloud. This move raised strong critics in the European Parliament as the EU Act just adopted sought to buffer European players from dependency on Big Tech. Gatekeepers to the market Even when it comes to selling AI products, SOMO said that Big Tech companies are in control. Nine of the 12 start-ups analysed host their models on platforms run by Amazon, Microsoft or Google, making them the main gateways to businesses and public bodies that want to use AI. An example is the European Parliament, which chose the Claude model developed by Anthropic to manage its digital archives. The choice was limited to models available through Amazon Web Services, which holds an EU contract. AI sovereignty in question The report raises serious questions about Europe's strategy to compete in the so-called 'AI race'. While the EU and several member states are investing billions to develop local AI capabilities, much of that support could end up reinforcing US dominance. 'Europe wants to build its own AI capacity, but the foundations are still controlled by a handful of American companies,' Silva said. SOMO is urging EU and national competition authorities to act quickly by investigating cloud contracts, limiting market concentration, and ensuring that switching providers is possible. Without intervention, the report warns, the AI industry could follow the same path as previous tech shifts, where a few companies became gatekeepers for entire markets.
