USDA secretary speaks about Nebraska changing food stamp guidelines
LINCOLN, Neb. (KCAU) — On Tuesday, the US Department of Agriculture spoke out about Nebraska's waiver to ban soda and energy drinks from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Secretary Brooke Rollins said she wants the states to be innovative when it comes to food stamps. On Monday, Nebraska became the first state to get a federal waiver to ban those drinks under food stamps.
The state's ban begins on January 1 and is set to impact about 152,000 low-income people in Nebraska enrolled in SNAP.
'We should not be spending taxpayer dollars for lower income Americans on sugary drinks. That, if the taxpayers are going to fund a nutritional program, a Supplemental Nutritional Program, SNAP. That in fact, it should be healthy, nutritious foods to really focus on those at the lower end of the socioeconomic ladder,' said Rollins.
Story continues below
Top Story: 35th Saturday in the Park Main Stage, Abe Stage headliners announced
Lights & Sirens: Family suing Sioux City over death of son
Sports: Sydney Affolter rejoins Hawkeyes as Graduate Assistant
Weather: Get the latest weather forecast here
Six states, including Iowa, have also submitted requests for waivers that ban particular foods and drinks or expand access to hot foods. Rollins said Governor Reynolds submitted a 'great plan,'adding more announcements on the waivers are coming.
Also, a Nebraska bill to impose a sales tax on soft drinks and candy failed in the first round of voting. Lawmakers voted 30 to 15, and the measure needed 33 to pass. The legislation is not expected to be discussed again in this legislative session. The bill would have placed a 5.5% state sales and use tax on almost two dozen currently exempt services.
The measure would have funded an additional $100 million in property tax relief a year under the school district property tax relief act.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's net approval rating is negative on a range of issues except immigration, a new poll shows. According to political analyst and statistician Nate Silver, writing in his Silver Bulletin Substack, Trump has a net negative approval rating on trade, the economy and inflation but a slightly positive rating on immigration. Why It Matters Taking the temperature of the nation, approval ratings are good measures of the public's response to Trump's policies and his actions as president. In the first few months of his second term, Trump's popularity has fluctuated, with some polls more favorable than others. Sustained backlash to his policies could persuade the president to change his approach. Trump, who made immigration a central part of his campaign, has vowed to crack down on border security, carry out mass deportations and end federal benefits for people residing in the country illegally. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What To Know Silver aggregated dozens of recent polls and found that Trump's approval rating on immigration was +2.5 percent. The president did not fare as well on other issues, with a -9.5 percent approval rating on trade, -11.3 percent on the economy and -17.5 percent on inflation. May polling conducted by Verasight U.S. for Strength in Numbers found similar results, with Americans disapproving of the president's handling of all the policy areas they were asked about except border security. That poll also found that 49 percent disapproved of his immigration policy, while 47 percent approved. Overall, Silver found that when analyzing the polls, Trump had a -5.4 net approval rating. An RMG Research/Napolitan News poll, conducted between May 14 and 21 among 3,000 registered voters, showed Trump's approval rating at 48 percent, with 50 percent disapproving. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Other polls have found a more positive response to the president. According to a recent Rasmussen survey, 53 percent of respondents said they approved of Trump, while 46 percent said they disapproved. What People Are Saying Scott Lucas, a professor in international politics at University College Dublin, previously cautioned against reading too much into any one poll, telling Newsweek: "Opinion polls have their own biases." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 20: "We are, together, going to make America bigger, better, stronger, wealthier, healthier, and more religious, than it has ever been before!!!" What Happens Next The midterm elections, scheduled for November 2026, may offer a clearer indication of voters' attitudes toward the president's policies.
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
The ‘Medicaid moderates' are the senators to watch on the megabill
The Senate's deficit hawks might be raising the loudest hue and cry over the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' But another group of Republicans is poised to have a bigger impact on the final legislative product. Call them the 'Medicaid moderates.' They're actually an ideologically diverse bunch — ranging from conservative Josh Hawley of Missouri to centrist Susan Collins of Maine. Yet they have found rare alignment over concerns about what the House-passed version of the GOP domestic-policy megabill does to the national safety-net health program, and they have the leverage to force significant changes in the Senate. 'I would hope that we would elect not to do anything that would endanger Medicaid benefits as a conference,' Hawley said in an interview. 'I've made that clear to my leadership. I think others share that perspective.' Besides Hawley and Collins, other GOP senators including Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Jerry Moran of Kansas and Jim Justice of West Virginia have also drawn public red lines over health care — and they have some rhetorical backing from President Donald Trump, who has urged congressional Republicans to spare the program as much as possible. Based on early estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, 10.3 million people would lose coverage under Medicaid if the House-passed bill were to become law — many, if not most, in red states. That could spell trouble for Majority Leader John Thune's whip count: He can only lose three GOP senators on the expected party-line vote and still have Vice President JD Vance break a tie. Republicans already have one all-but-guaranteed opponent in Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky so long as they stick to their plan to raise the debt limit as part of the bill. They also view Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson as increasingly likely to oppose the package after spending weeks blasting the bill on fiscal grounds. Meeting either senator's demands could be enormously difficult given the tight fiscal parameters through which House leaders have to squeeze the bill to advance it in their own chamber. That in turn is empowering the senators elsewhere in the GOP conference to make changes — and the Medicaid group is emerging as the key bloc to watch because of its size and its overlapping, relatively workable demands. Heeding those asks won't be easy. Republicans are counting on savings from Medicaid changes to offset hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts, and rolling that back is likely to create political pain elsewhere for Thune & Co., who already want to cut more than the House to assuage a sizable group of spending hawks. At the same time, Speaker Mike Johnson is insisting the Senate make only minor changes to the bill so as to maintain the delicate balance in his own narrowly divided chamber. Thune and Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) have already acknowledged that Medicaid, covering nearly 80 million low-income Americans, will be one of the biggest sticking points as they embark this month on a rewrite of the megabill. They are talking with key members in anticipation of difficult negotiations and being careful not to draw red lines publicly. 'We want to do things that are meaningful in terms of reforming programs, strengthening programs, without affecting beneficiaries,' Thune said, echoing language used by some of the concerned senators. Crapo voiced support in an interview for one pillar of the House bill — broad new work requirements for Medicaid beneficiaries — but rushed to add that he's 'still working with a 53-member caucus to get answers' to how the program can be overhauled: 'I can only speak for myself.' Complicating their task is the fact that some in the group — namely Collins and Murkowski — have a proven history of bucking their party even amid intense public pressure. The pair, in fact, helped tank the GOP's last party-line effort on health care, in 2017. Leaders view them as unlikely to be moved by the type of arm-twisting Republicans are planning to deploy to bring enough of the fiscal hawks on board. And then there's Hawley, who is playing up Trump's own warnings to congressional Republicans about keeping their hands off Medicaid. Hawley and Trump spoke shortly before the House passed its bill, with the senator recounting that the president said 'absolutely categorically, 'Do not touch Medicaid. No Medicaid benefit cuts, none.'' Hawley, like Crapo, has indicated he is comfortable with work requirements, but he is pushing for two major tweaks to the House language: undoing a freeze on provider taxes, which most states use to help finance their share of Medicaid costs, and new co-payment requirements for some beneficiaries that he has been calling a 'sick tax.' The provider tax changes would present an issue with multiple senators, who fear it would exacerbate the bill's impact on state budgets and slash funding that helps keep rural hospitals afloat. Justice, a former governor, called it a 'real issue.' 'They haven't done anything to really cut into the bone except that one thing,' Justice added. 'That's gonna put a big burden on the states.' Moran grabbed the attention of his colleagues when he warned in a pointed April floor speech that making changes to Medicaid would hurt rural hospitals. A 'significant portion' of his focus, he said, 'is to make sure the hospitals have the capability and the revenues necessary to provide the services the community needs — Medicaid is a component of that.' Collins, who is up for reelection in 2026, has also left the door open to supporting work requirements, depending on how they are crafted. She has also raised concerns about the provider tax provision, noting that 'rural hospitals in my state and across the country are really teetering.' Murkowski, meanwhile, isn't as concerned about the provider tax, because Alaska is the only state that doesn't use it to help cover its share of Medicaid spending. But she has expressed alarm over the House's approach to work requirements, including a decision to speed up the implementation deadline to appease House hard-liners. She said it would be 'very challenging if not impossible' for her state to implement. As it is, any effort to water down the House's Medicaid language will face steep resistance in other corners of the GOP-controlled Senate, where lawmakers are pushing to amp up spending cuts, not scale them back. Some senators, in fact, want to further tighten the House's work requirements or reduce, not just freeze, the provider tax. 'I'd be damned disappointed if a Republican majority with a Republican president didn't make some reforms,' said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). 'The provider tax is a money laundering machine. … If we don't go after that, we're not doing our jobs.' Ron Johnson and a few others are continuing to push to change the cost split for those Medicaid beneficiaries made eligible under the Affordable Care Act. The federal government now picks up 90 percent of the cost, and House centrists nixed an effort by conservatives to reduce it. One idea under discussion by conservatives is to phase in the change to appease skittish colleagues and state governments, but that is still likely to be a nonstarter for 50 GOP senators. Hawley warned that 'there will be no Senate bill if that is on the table.' Adam Cancryn contributed to this report.
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
IRS Tax Refund Timeline: June 2025 Schedule
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millions of Americans are anticipating their 2025 federal tax refunds, and throughout June the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will be reviewing and handing out payments via direct deposits and mailed checks. Why It Matters Despite budget constraints and potential processing delays, most taxpayers who filed in May should receive their refunds in June—particularly if they filed electronically and opted for direct deposit. The IRS began processing refunds after the April tax deadline. With an average refund hovering around $2,950, this annual injection of funds can be significant for many households. However, the actual arrival date of a refund depends heavily on how and when the return was submitted. When Will Tax Refunds Arrive? The IRS has laid out specific refund timelines depending on the filing date and method. Taxpayers who submitted returns electronically with the option of direct deposit between May 1 and May 15 can expect their refunds to arrive from May 22 up to June 4. If those returns were filed electronically but opted for a mailed check, refunds were expected to arrive between May 29 and June 11. For paper filers in this window, refunds may arrive as late as July 10. Those who filed between May 16 and May 31 can anticipate their refunds between June 6 and June 19 for direct deposits, June 13 and June 26 for mailed checks, and July 11 to July 25 for paper filings. The IRS encourages all taxpayers to use its Where's My Refund? online portal to track their payment status. This tool provides updates on whether a return has been received, approved, or sent. File photo of the Internal Revenue Service headquarters in Washington D.C. File photo of the Internal Revenue Service headquarters in Washington D.C. J. David Ake/AP How Much is the Average Refund? The average refund amount for 2025 is approximately $2,939. That figure is slightly higher than last year's average amount of $2,869, though individual refunds vary based on earnings, withholding, tax credits, and deductions. Those eligible for refunds are generally taxpayers who overpaid their 2024 tax liabilities. It represents the excess amount withheld or paid during the year compared to what was owed. However, errors in tax filings, missing documents, or incomplete forms can delay processing. The IRS's reduced staffing and budget are also contributing to longer wait times—especially for paper returns, which require manual review. The IRS recommends that taxpayers ensure all documents are complete, accurate, and that direct deposit information is correct to minimize delays. Tracking and Delays The filing method continues to be a major factor in refund speed. E-filing with direct deposit is the fastest method and is typically processed within 21 days, barring issues. Meanwhile, paper filers must account for potential delays of several additional weeks, particularly if their return requires manual correction or verification. Taxpayers with questions about their refund status or experiencing a delay beyond the standard processing window are advised to use the IRS's online tracking tool or contact the IRS directly if the refund has not arrived after 21 days from e-filing, or six weeks from mailing a paper return. As a reminder, the IRS began accepting individual returns in January, and the deadline for most taxpayers was April 15, 2025. Those who filed for an extension have until October 15, 2025, to submit their returns, though payment was still due by the April deadline. With these expectations in place, many Americans should see their 2025 refunds arrive before the end of June, provided all submission details were in order.
