National Assembly passes several dept budgets despite objections from most opposition parties
On Wednesday, the National Assembly was voting on each of the 42 departmental budgets as it tries to get the Appropriation Bill over the line at another marathon House sitting at the Cape Town International Convention Centre.
The bill is the law that gives the government the green light to apportion public funds for departments and government services.
ALSO READ
• BOSA's Maimane wants Ramaphosa to mandate SIU to probe corruption claims within SAPS
• Failure to finalise budget will hurt SA's vulnerable members of society the most - Masondo
The first vote to come before members was for the Presidency, which was supported by most parties, who also noted how the Presidency was not an implementing department.
Patriotic Alliance (PA) Member of Parliament (MP), Marlon Daniels, urged parties to vote in favour of all budgets to ensure the smooth running of government.
"Why must we support all these votes? Simply because the appetite to turn things around in South Africa does not rely on one department only, but cuts across all different departments."
Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs committee chairperson, Zweli Mkhize, reminded members of the need to support the R410 billion budget, which supports municipalities.
"We have to ensure that there's accountability, consequence management, as well as the turnaround of these municipalities."
The voting continues and will wrap up once the final vote for land reform and rural development has been passed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
R4bn Question: Can UIF sustain its core mission amid job creation push?
The UIF Labour Activation Programme's mandate is to mobilise resources, partnerships, and implementation capacity to drive sustainable job creation, retain existing jobs, and support unemployed and vulnerable groups. Image: Supplied SOUTH Africa stands at yet another crossroads where political expediency challenges institutional integrity, as the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) assumes an unprecedented role in funding a job creation programme traditionally financed by the National Treasury. The Department of Basic Education (DBE), in partnership with the Presidential Employment Stimulus (PES) initiative under the Presidency, has turned to the UIF for R4 billion to fund the Teacher Assistant Programme — a short-term intervention aimed primarily at unemployed youth. According to the DBE's April 2025 CareersPortal document, the Teacher Assistant Programme, now in its fifth phase, aims to create about 200 000 positions for young unemployed people aged between 18 and 34. Participants receive monthly stipends of R4 000, plus R30 airtime, for six months of practical work experience in schools across South Africa. President Cyril Ramaphosa confirmed the programme's scale and significance during a June 2 statement. 'Today marks the 'first day at school' for about 200 000 young people at over 20 000 schools nationwide. They are participants in the fifth phase of the Basic Education Employment Initiative (BEEI), the largest youth employment programme in South Africa's history.' Ramaphosa further emphasised that the initiative is funded by the UIF Labour Activation Programme alongside national government contributions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Lala Maje, director for initial teacher education, stated: 'This initiative comes as South Africa continues to battle high levels of youth unemployment and an education system that is stretched and overburdened during these difficult economic conditions. Phase five of the BEEI, a component of PES, offers a timely intervention.' However, this funding model starkly contrasts with the UIF's core statutory mandate. The UIF is 'a statutory social security mechanism' funded by contributor deductions and owes its duty solely to those who have been previously employed and have made contributions. The UIF Labour Activation Programme's mandate is to mobilise resources, partnerships, and implementation capacity to drive sustainable job creation, retain existing jobs, and support unemployed and vulnerable groups. It is designed to complement and accelerate PES's broader economic recovery and inclusive growth objectives. The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), which has been appointed as the paymaster for the programme, confirmed receiving an advance disbursement of R2 billion — half of the total requested R4 billion — from the UIF. Questions sent to the UIF, DBE, and the Office of the Presidency were unanswered at the time this report was compiled. The UIF recently came under fire in Parliament for delaying payments to workers who became unemployed or were unable to work. The Fund is reportedly plagued by persistent service delivery challenges, payment delays, and limited accessibility for vulnerable workers, which exacerbates the hardships experienced by those it is meant to protect. The Fund briefed the Parliamentary Select Committee on Economic Development and Trade on its budget and strategic plan, as well as its annual performance plan. MPs stated that the UIF was failing workers who became unemployed or were unable to work due to various reasons. The Labour Party of South Africa has condemned the 'diversion' of UIF funds to the PES, describing it as 'economic injustice' that violates the fund's mandate. 'The UIF was never designed to be a general job creation fund,' the party said, emphasising that PES beneficiaries did not contribute to the scheme. The party highlighted the R2 billion advance payment made to PES programmes, lamenting that retrenched workers would wait months while billions flowed unchecked to 'political programmes'. The party warned that paying non-contributors higher stipends than UIF beneficiaries risked collapsing the fund. The UIF and PES operate under distinctly different mandates, frameworks, and funding models that reflect fundamentally divergent labour market roles. This situation raises critical questions about whether the PES is effectively encroaching on the UIF's mandate by sourcing funding — including advance payments — in ways inconsistent with UIF's legal and operational principles. The UIF, established by the Unemployment Insurance Act, is legally empowered to register all employers and employees in South Africa for unemployment insurance benefits. It primarily provides short-term unemployment relief to eligible contributors who have formally paid into the fund. The UIF functions under strict governance and financial protocols — its payments were intended as a stopgap during times of crisis, such as the Covid-19 lockdowns, to provide relief for a limited period until economic recovery could resume. Payments are disbursed monthly based on verified claims, and advance payments are strictly prohibited to protect the fund's sustainability and accountability. In contrast, the PES is funded directly from the National Treasury and designed as a temporary economic relief initiative targeting short-term employment, especially among youth, and to stimulate the economy through multiple exit strategies. The reported R2bn PES advance payment already made marks a significant departure from UIF norms, exposing the fund to financial risks and contradicting social insurance principles. Meanwhile, the UIF attributed delays in Labour Activation Programme stipends to 'administrative discrepancies and attempted fraud' by partner companies. It promised improvements via stricter invoice verification and a new electronic payment system to resolve backlogs. Jacky Molisane, acting director-general of Employment and Labour, warned beneficiaries against protests, stating: 'The Department reserves the right to take legal action against those undermining processes.' She confirmed that there was sufficient budget allocation for current stipend payments. Tshepo Ramodibe, IDC Head of Corporate Affairs, assured that the funds would be managed in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), with oversight from internal audit and subject to external audit. Ramodibe clarified that the IDC's role is strictly as a pay agent for BEEI, distinct from an implementation agent with autonomy. He firmly denied any claims that political or executive pressure influenced IDC's acceptance of this role. South Africa's youth face a persistent unemployment crisis that limits their economic independence and future prospects. Initiatives like PES and the UIF Labour Activation Programme have the potential to be transformative if implemented effectively. The UIF focuses on accredited training and sustainable job creation, offering structured pathways into formal employment, while PES provides essential short-term relief and work experience. Nonetheless, fundamental questions remain: Is the PES pushing the UIF out of its core mandate? Is the use of UIF funding in this manner undermining the fund's sustainability, legal integrity, and governance standards? Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
ConCourt sets date for MK party's case against Ramaphosa over Mchunu
Former President Jacob Zuma and the MK party are seeking to invalidate Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave. The Constitutional Court has set down a date to hear the MK party's urgent application against President Cyril Ramaphosa to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave. Former President Jacob Zuma and the MK party are seeking to invalidate Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave of absence and appoint Wits law Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister. They are also challenging Ramaphosa's establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate allegations of corruption in the police. 'Applicants must file heads of argument by Sunday, 27 July 2025, at 14h00. Respondents must file heads of argument by Monday, 28 July 2025, at 14h00,' the court directed. The matter has been set down for Wednesday, 30 July at 11am. ALSO READ: Zuma says Ramaphosa has no constitutional power to suspend Mchunu Allegations KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Provincial Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi made explosive allegations during a media briefing this month, accusing Mchunu and Deputy National Commissioner for Crime Detection, Shadrack Sibiya, of political interference in police operations. In Ramaphosa's answering affidavit on Wednesday, the president argued that the constitution gives him 'a wide berth as to how to deal with ministers' 'It is clear that I am empowered to place a minister on special leave when there are serious allegations… so that those allegations can be properly investigated,' said Ramaphosa. However, Zuma argues there's no express constitutional power allowing Ramaphosa to impose special leave on Mchunu. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa motion of no confidence: MK party requests secret ballot Zuma challenge Zuma said there are details in Ramaphosa's affidavit that Mchunu will not return as minister of police after the commission of inquiry. 'There is nothing said in the president's affidavit which justified placing Minister Mchunu on 'special leave' and thereby causing him to retain his ministerial title, salary and other perks or privileges at the expense of the long-suffering taxpayer'. Feroz Cacahlia Zuma said Ramaphosa 'openly dodges' the clear distinction between the power to appoint a minister and the different power to appoint an acting minister. 'The two are plainly not the same. The obfuscatory reference to the credentials of Prof Cachalia is nothing but deflection. For the record, no issue is taken against the professor's credentials… The issue is whether he was constitutionally qualified to be appointed by the president. The answer is that he was not.' Zuma also challenged Mchunu's version of events, portraying it as 'evasive and legally flawed', saying the minister's affidavit is a 'masterclass in evasion – it skirts the core allegations and offers no constitutional basis for the executive's conduct.' ALSO READ: Here's why Zuma's MK party wants Ramaphosa removed in 'urgent' motion of no confidence
eNCA
14 hours ago
- eNCA
Incoming US tariffs to cut jobs in SA key sectors
JOHANNESBURG - The soon-to-be-imposed US tariffs will shake up South African exporters. For years, the African Growth and Opportunity Act has provided South African agricultural products preferential access to the US market. However, the uncertainty surrounding AGOA's future and the new tariffs threaten to unravel years of progress. The agriculture and automotive sectors are mostly likely going to be the ones that are going to be greatly affected by the tariffs that are expected to kick in on first of August. Experts say the country cannot be surprised if it sees a shutdown of big automative manufacturing plants due to the fact that the US is such a major market vehicles like BMW and Mercedes. This means workers will be laid off as job losses will definitely take place. While President Ramaphosa says South Africa needs to mine new markets when the US tariffs kick in, experts suggest this won't happen overnight.
