'Small' number of special classes will not go ahead due to 'drop off' in expected level of need, Dáil hears
The National Council for Special Education (NCSE) has advised minister of State Michael Moynihan this is mainly due to a 'drop off' in the expected level of need for these classes.
It is expected that these classes may be required for the 2026/2027 school year subject to the local level of need, Mr Moynihan said.
In response to a parliamentary question put to him by Sinn Féin TD Sorcha Clarke, Mr Moynihan said additional new special classes have been sanctioned.
Mr Moynihan also confirmed he has directed a school in Kildare this year to open two special classes under Section 37A of the Education Act 1998.
It is the third time these powers have been used by a minister, and for the first time outside Dublin.
Mr Moynihan previously told the Irish Examiner that schools would be compelled to open special classes if reluctance to do so continues.
Just over 400 new special classes are still being provided for the coming school year, he said in response to Ms Clarke.
'My department and the NCSE are committed to delivering an education system that is of the highest quality and where every child and young person feels valued and is actively supported and nurtured to reach their full potential.'
Sorcha Clarke said she knows of at least two schools that were sanctioned to open a special class for September.
"It's now the middle of July, parents need to know where their children are going to school in September," she said.
In places where classes have been suppressed, the minister and the NCSE need to be incredibly clear as to why this happened.
A number of families have initiated legal proceedings in a bid to secure appropriate school places for their children for this September.
Sinn Féin education spokesman Darren O'Rourke is due to raise issues around the provision of special education places with education minister Helen McEntee in the Dáil before its summer recess.
He has previously called on the minister and the NCSE to confirm how many children are without a school place for this September.
The Oireachtas education committee previously heard that as many as 260 children could still be without a school place for the new term. An official figure was not provided.
Ms McEntee previously told the Dáil that 92% of the students notified to the NCSE had been allocated a school place.
"Parents and families feel like they are being gaslit in relation to this," Mr O'Rourke said.
We know that last year 126 children were left without school places, and all of the indications at the minute are that there are far in excess of that without a school place currently. We really need to have some transparency and accountability, and more importantly, action to ensure there are places for these children come September.
Meanwhile, Early Childhood Ireland is calling on Government to bring pay for early years and school-age care graduates in line with primary school teachers.
The advocacy group has urged for a date to be introduced for when graduates will be brought within public sector pay and conditions.
Early Years and school-age care graduates are educated and trained to the same level as their peers in primary education.
'Guaranteeing public pay and conditions for early years and school-age care graduates would mark a turning point for the system," said the group's director of policy Frances Byrne.
"As things stand, we are losing too many talented educators to sectors offering better pay and greater security.'
Figures show that the national average staff turnover rate stands at 25%, rising to 54% in some areas.
Read More
'Catch-all' special schools will leave some children with nowhere to go
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cork County Council is only local authority without language policy for Gaeltacht housing
Calls have been made to amend the County Development Plan to ensure Irish speakers are allocated a guaranteed percentage of new council and private houses that are built in the region's Gaeltacht areas. Cork County Council is currently the only local authority in the country which to date has not adopted such a policy in its planning conditions, despite the fact that an act was passed 25 years ago which allows councils with Gaeltacht areas to do this. The issue was raised at a meeting in County Hall by Fianna Fáil councillor Gobnait Moynihan, a fluent Irish speaker who lives in the Mhuscraí Gaeltacht. That area encompasses a number of small villages in the Mid-Cork region such as Cùil Aodha, Baile Mhuirne, Cill na Martra, Réidh na nDoirì and Béal Àtha nGhaothaidh. The other Gaeltacht area in the county is Oileàn Cléire off the West Cork coast. Ms Moynihan said the council is planning to build some houses in Baile Mhuirne and it should reserve a percentage of these for those who speak Irish on a daily basis. Ms Moynihan said the Planning and Development Act 2000 gave councils the green light to place language conditions on housing developments in Gaeltacht areas. 'All other councils with a Gaeltacht area are tackling this issue, except for Cork County Council. Take Donegal County Council, for example, where any housing development must have a minimum of 85% of the units allocated to Irish speakers,' she said. A Gaeltacht only exists because a percentage of people in the particular area speak Irish daily. The Gaeltacht status could be lost quickly if the level of daily Irish language speakers falls. "We know from the last census that there was a 2.4% drop of daily Irish speakers in the (Mhuscraí Gaeltacht) location already. For this reason the language conditions on such a housing development is paramount in preserving the Gaeltacht and for the growth of the language. At least other councils are tackling the issue, but to date Cork County Council is not,' Ms Moynihan said. Fianna Fáil councillor Gearóid Murphy said it was unfortunate that Cork County Council appeared to be the only local authority which hadn't adopted the terms of the 2000 Act, while fluent Irish speaker Fianna Fáil councillor Gillian Coughlan also voiced her support. Mid-Cork based Fine Gael councillor Michael Creed also said there has to be a commitment from the council to provide houses for Irish speakers in Gaeltacht areas. Council chief executive Moira Murrell said that a review is to take place shortly of the current County Development Plan and officials will give consideration to what the councillors had asked for when this happens.
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Sarah Harte: Proud revolutionary history of the GPO deserves better than shops and offices
Against the backdrop of increased 'Ireland for the Irish' protests, the story of who we are feels more pertinent than ever, which is why developing the GPO to include offices and retail spaces is a crummy idea. It demonstrates a depressing lack of cultural confidence, which isn't a surprise because the British were so adept at separating us from a sense of pride and culture that we ended up a nation of property developers. Nothing wrong with property developers. As someone who is pro-business, I have the utmost respect for visionary businesspeople who take risks and make things happen, but in their lane. If the French had a GPO with a comparable history, would they have partially developed it as shops and offices? They would deem the idea 'sauvage'. Is it too much to ask that the New Ireland be more confident? Last Saturday, Sinn Féin organised a hands-off our rebel history protest against the development of the GPO into office and retail space. Just over nine years ago, around 500,000 people lined the streets of Dublin on Easter Sunday to commemorate the Easter Rising and what some view as the genesis of the modern independent republic. On both days, people who turned up will inevitably have different perspectives on the Easter Rising. This was also true at the time of the rising, with a plethora of different reactions to the five-day event, which subsequently grew either more hostile or more sympathetic from those who had initially viewed it as a 'putsch without popular support.' When WB Yeats wrote his famous political poem 'Easter 1916', Maude Gonne wrote him a tetchy letter from Passy in Paris telling him how much she disliked it, telling him that 'above all it isn't worthy of the subject.' She sternly told him that MacDonagh, Pearse, and Connolly were 'men of genius, with large, comprehensive, speculative and active brains.' Certainly, our history has never been straightforward and cannot be explained by simplified narratives. Yet, the revisionist line that the signatories to the proclamation were a bunch of bloodthirsty psychopathic terrorists without an electoral mandate who set themselves up as a provisional government and should not have been commemorated at all in 2016 is one that is at best reductive, with an inherent, tedious bias that is markedly telling. A view from the kind of people who get excited at the sniff of the word Royal and see us as a kind of empire affiliate, people who would now happily rejoin the Commonwealth (in a poll last year, 40% were persuadable) and think an honours system here would be great. A South Dublin medic once told me that Chelsea was the epicentre of the cultural world. I greatly enjoyed the laugh that this gave me (head thrown back territory actually), but I suppose one man's feast is another woman's famine. We are all prisoners of our past. Myths are how we explain ourselves to ourselves on the level of family, community and country. The past is shaped by who's telling the story, and that story can never be scientific in its accuracy; it shifts like grains of sand and is always personal and ideological As Richard Cohen, author of Making History: The Storytellers Who Shaped the Past, wrote: 'Every man of genius who writes history infuses into it, perhaps unconsciously, the character of his own spirit. His characters ... seem to have only one manner of thinking and feeling, and that is the manner of the author.' A consideration moving forward is not only how we choose to view and celebrate the past, but also how we honour who we are now. These questions are closely connected. An engagement with the past should dictate an investment in the future, but what do we mean when we say 'invest'? Cultural, intellectual, religious and political influences are increasingly more diverse here. This inevitably means an expanding definition of what it means to be Irish. This necessitates guarding against polemical utterances on who is Irish, because we have new mythmakers who peddle hate and sow dissension, who appropriate the Tricolour for their hollow strains of ethno-nationalism. The shattered remains of the General Post Office after the Easter Rising. Picture: Getty Images As it happens, there is already an interpretive centre in the GPO which narrates our past. We could add to this curation and preservation of our history a place of artistic excellence, intellectual exchange and education that would honour the idealism and bravery of previous revolutionaries. And I don't just mean the signatories to the Proclamation. I mean all the men and women who fought for Ireland in 1916, in the War of Independence, in the Civil War, regardless of what side they were on, who made sacrifices, were sometimes forced into brutal acts, but who had a dream of which we are the beneficiaries. A dream that went beyond shops, offices and high-end apartments for pension funds. They are turning in their graves In other words, in a bullet-riddled historic building, we make new history with a range of voices for a new, confident Ireland, in a broadened culture. We support theatre, dance, art, music, poetry, photography, and literature through artist residencies in dedicated spaces because, in a new Ireland, the cultural ideals on which a claim of nationality rests need to develop. Una Mullally in The Irish Times has written repeatedly and persuasively about the opportunity inherent in developing the GPO and O'Connell Street 'that can inspire and facilitate generations to come'. She's on the nose, although the founder of the Little Museum of Dublin, Trevor White, considers the cultural development of the GPO to be a performative virtue-signalling soporific one. His solution involves converting part of the GPO into owner-occupied apartments, with the proceeds then used to develop social and affordable housing in affluent suburbs. On paper, this might sound plausible, except experience tells us that development for a niche market rarely leads to affordable social housing. Ultimately, this is a well-intentioned pipe dream. To paraphrase him, it's gentrification on steroids. It's beyond the word count of this column to analyse the outcomes of the Part V rules, which compel developers to hold back 10% of a development for social housing. They have been in force since 2000, and saying they haven't been a success is an understatement. I don't disagree with White that people should live on O'Connell Street and in the city centre, but which people? Regardless of your perspective on what 1916 signifies, or even if you miss the days when Ireland was run from Dublin Castle and you continue to tug what you view as your metropolitan forelock to Blighty, our colonisation is undeniable as the defining event of who we are. This feels more germane than ever as we witness imperialist adventures in Ukraine and Gaza, which, as historian Professor Jane Ohlmeyer of Trinity College Dublin points out, are 'legacies of empire'. As the Irish Examiner editorial wrote on Monday, 'We can learn well or badly from history ... we have a duty of care, not only to our own descendants but the wider world we'd like to see.' The marked idealism that characterised the run-up to and aftermath of 1916 is in woefully short supply. That 'wider world' or vibrant civic culture will never be achieved by building more shops and offices, or, for that matter, high-end apartments. Spare us.
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
'Small' number of special classes will not go ahead due to 'drop off' in expected level of need, Dáil hears
A 'small' number of special classes sanctioned for this September will not now proceed, the minister of State for special education has confirmed. The National Council for Special Education (NCSE) has advised minister of State Michael Moynihan this is mainly due to a 'drop off' in the expected level of need for these classes. It is expected that these classes may be required for the 2026/2027 school year subject to the local level of need, Mr Moynihan said. In response to a parliamentary question put to him by Sinn Féin TD Sorcha Clarke, Mr Moynihan said additional new special classes have been sanctioned. Mr Moynihan also confirmed he has directed a school in Kildare this year to open two special classes under Section 37A of the Education Act 1998. It is the third time these powers have been used by a minister, and for the first time outside Dublin. Mr Moynihan previously told the Irish Examiner that schools would be compelled to open special classes if reluctance to do so continues. Just over 400 new special classes are still being provided for the coming school year, he said in response to Ms Clarke. 'My department and the NCSE are committed to delivering an education system that is of the highest quality and where every child and young person feels valued and is actively supported and nurtured to reach their full potential.' Sorcha Clarke said she knows of at least two schools that were sanctioned to open a special class for September. "It's now the middle of July, parents need to know where their children are going to school in September," she said. In places where classes have been suppressed, the minister and the NCSE need to be incredibly clear as to why this happened. A number of families have initiated legal proceedings in a bid to secure appropriate school places for their children for this September. Sinn Féin education spokesman Darren O'Rourke is due to raise issues around the provision of special education places with education minister Helen McEntee in the Dáil before its summer recess. He has previously called on the minister and the NCSE to confirm how many children are without a school place for this September. The Oireachtas education committee previously heard that as many as 260 children could still be without a school place for the new term. An official figure was not provided. Ms McEntee previously told the Dáil that 92% of the students notified to the NCSE had been allocated a school place. "Parents and families feel like they are being gaslit in relation to this," Mr O'Rourke said. We know that last year 126 children were left without school places, and all of the indications at the minute are that there are far in excess of that without a school place currently. We really need to have some transparency and accountability, and more importantly, action to ensure there are places for these children come September. Meanwhile, Early Childhood Ireland is calling on Government to bring pay for early years and school-age care graduates in line with primary school teachers. The advocacy group has urged for a date to be introduced for when graduates will be brought within public sector pay and conditions. Early Years and school-age care graduates are educated and trained to the same level as their peers in primary education. 'Guaranteeing public pay and conditions for early years and school-age care graduates would mark a turning point for the system," said the group's director of policy Frances Byrne. "As things stand, we are losing too many talented educators to sectors offering better pay and greater security.' Figures show that the national average staff turnover rate stands at 25%, rising to 54% in some areas. Read More 'Catch-all' special schools will leave some children with nowhere to go
