logo
Think you won't live to 100? You might be wrong, and it'll cost you.

Think you won't live to 100? You might be wrong, and it'll cost you.

Yahoo28-05-2025

Who wants to live to 100? Not a lot of us, as it turns out.
America's century club is getting larger, and reaching 100 is a realistic goal for a growing population of retirees. Longer life is a reward for improvements in exercise, diet and medical care.
Yet, it's a club that only one in four Americans wants to join.
Nationwide Retirement Institute, a division of the Nationwide insurance and financial services company, surveyed more than 1,000 Americans to gauge their thoughts on living a really long time. Most of us, they found, approach the topic with a mix of wonder and fear.
Just 29% of adults said they want to live to 100. Among older workers, ages 55 to 65, only 23% voiced enthusiasm for the century club.
Most Americans see living to 100 as a blessing, rather than a burden, the survey found. But the thought of actually living that long invokes a long list of worries: Declining health. Loss of mobility. Outliving loved ones. Running out of money.
'A lot of people would say, 'If I can live to 100 in good health, that's amazing, but if I'm going to live to 100 and be in poor health for the last 10 years, I'm not sure I'm up for that,'' said Catherine Collinson, CEO of the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies.
Centenarians are outliers in American retirement, but the odds might not be so long as you think.
An American man who retires in good health stands an 8% chance of reaching 100, according to research by the American College of Financial Services, released in May along with the Nationwide survey.
For a healthy female retiree, the chance of reaching 100 rises to 13%. For a healthy couple, there's a 20% chance that one partner will make a century.
'If you're a relatively healthy adult by the time you're 60 or 65, you're probably looking at 30 years of retirement,' said Kristi Martin Rodriguez, senior vice president of Nationwide Financial Marketing.
Life expectancy rises with age. At birth, an American can expect to live between 70 and 80 years. By the time you reach 70, however, your expected longevity rises to at least 85.
Most Americans underestimate the length of their retirement -- in other words, how long they will live.
In a 2023 survey, the American College asked thousands of older adults how long a man of 65 could expect to live. Only 27% of respondents gave the correct answer: 20 years.
'I think a lot of people just look to their parents and their grandparents when they're thinking about how long they're likely to live,' said Michael Finke, professor of wealth management at the American College. 'But the reality is, half of men smoked back in the 1950s and early 1960s. People are taking better care of themselves. Survival rates for cancer are higher now than they were even 20 years ago.'
The reality of American longevity has dire implications for retirement planning.
The average over-50 worker expects to retire at 67, according to Transamerica research.
But the average worker actually retires at 62, according to survey data from Transamerica and the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
A worker who expects to retire by 67, and to die by 80, might plan for a 15-year retirement.
That would be a mistake. Going back to those longevity statistics: A man or woman who retires at 62 can expect to reach 83 or 86, respectively. That would be at least a 20-year retirement.
And that's the average. When you plan for retirement, experts say, you should plan for every scenario, including the one in which you live to 100.
Many retirement planners assume a 30-year retirement. That span is the basis for the 4% rule: Plan to withdraw 4% of your retirement savings to cover your annual living expenses, adjusting the figure for inflation each year.
The 4% rule prompts many financial planners to suggest Americans should aim to save $1 million for retirement.
(Of course, millions of workers retire with much less, and many seem to be doing just fine.)
If a retirement stretches to 35 or 40 years, however, the 4% rule starts to fall apart.
'Let's say you have a million dollars, and in the first year, you start taking out $40,000 to support your lifestyle,' Finke said, following the 4% rule. 'A very high percentage of the time, you're still going to have money in the bank after 30 years. But that drops very sharply after 35 years.'
Worried you might live to 100? Here are some expert tips on how to prepare.
The easiest way to write a retirement plan is with a retirement planner, who will know all about longevity rates and the 4% rule and the 30-year (or longer) retirement horizon.
You can also do the work yourself. For a start, AARP and others offer retirement calculators.
'We ask how people have estimated their retirement savings needs, and if they have used a calculator, and most have not,' said Collinson of Transamerica.
Americans can claim Social Security at 62. But that's pretty early, when you weigh the odds of living to 100.
Consider working longer, and claiming Social Security later. There's a considerable financial reward for waiting until 70.
A Stanford University study found that delaying retirement by just three to six months has the same impact on retirement savings as raising your 401(k) contribution rate by a full percentage point for 30 years.
Commercial annuities, sold by insurance companies, deliver a guaranteed income stream in retirement, generally until death.
The annuity industry has a mixed reputation. But recent legislation empowered employers to offer high-quality annuities as part of a 401(k) plan.
That could be a game changer, said Surya Kolluri, head of the nonprofit TIAA Institute.
'In the corporate world,' he said, 'the move toward providing an annuitization option throughout your career is just beginning.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Think you won't live to 100? You might be wrong.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024
YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024

YouTube released a report on Tuesday that shows just how influential the creator economy has become. YouTube says that its creative ecosystem contributed over $55 billion to the U.S. GDP and supported more than 490,000 full-time jobs, according to research by Oxford Economics. When YouTube talks about its creative ecosystem, it's not just talking about creators. This includes anyone who works with YouTube creators (video editors, assistants, publicists), as well as people who work for creator-oriented companies (Patreon, Spotter, Linktree, etc.). But these figures continue to grow, even in a time when venture capitalists are no longer pouring money into the industry like they were about four years ago. In 2022, YouTube and Oxford Economics reported that its creative ecosystem created about 390,000 jobs and contributed over $35 billion to the U.S. GDP, meaning that these 2024 figures jumped by 100,000 jobs and $20 billion. These numbers are so large because YouTube provides the most consistent and lucrative opportunities for creators. Those who qualify for YouTube's Partner Program can earn 55% of revenue earned from ads; even for mid-range creators (not the MrBeasts of the world), that can amount to several thousand dollars a month. While TikTok and YouTube Shorts have tried to monetize their platforms, the industry hasn't figured out a way to reliably distribute ad revenue among short-form creators. As both a fast-growing and often misunderstood sector, creators have been advocating for American institutions, from banks to the government, to better serve their industry. Some creators struggle to qualify for business credit cards or get certain business loans, regardless of their demonstrable financial solvency. These issues have become common enough to draw attention. Just last week, U.S. Representatives Yvette Clark (D-NY) and Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) announced their bipartisan Congressional Creators Caucus to support and recognize the potential of the creator economy. Sign in to access your portfolio

EU could impose Russian oil price cap without US support, Kallas says
EU could impose Russian oil price cap without US support, Kallas says

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU could impose Russian oil price cap without US support, Kallas says

The European Union can impose an additional price cap on Russian oil without U.S. support, EU High Representative Kaja Kallas said at the Brussels Forum on June 11. "If you think about the oil going through the channels, it's mostly Europe, it's via the Baltic Sea, it's via the Black Sea. So even if the Americans are not on board, we can still do it and have an impact," Kallas said. The EU's 17th package of sanctions against Russia came into effect on May 20. The bloc is already working on its next wave of sanctions. The 18th EU sanctions package will include additional restrictions on energy, banking, oil, and other areas, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on June 10. "What the intelligence tells is that, now the sanctions will (harder hit) the supply chains of Russia needed to really fund this war," Kallas said. "Of course, it is important the United States... is together with us, and we have been operating together for quite some time," she said. Kallas noted the Group of Seven (G7) oil price cap was previously agreed upon to be 5% below the market price. "It is important, of course, what we do together, but it is also equally important for us what we do alone, because we alone are also a player," Kallas said. Kallas noted the EU is still an ally to the U.S., but recognized the dynamic between the two powers is changing. "We still value the relationship... I think with the Americans we are not growing apart, but growing up in our relationships," Kallas said. The upcoming G7 summit will take place in Alberta, Canada. A wide range of topics, including Russia's war against Ukraine, are expected to be discussed at the annual event. President Volodymyr Zelensky previously confirmed he would be attending the G7 summit after receiving an invitation from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Read also: 'Ukrainians have been stripped of illusion of control' — Filmmaker Kateryna Gornostai on Russia's war, cinema and reclaiming the narrative We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs
Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs

Nearly 80% of Americans think food and nutrition should be covered by insurance to address chronic disease NEW YORK, June 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- New polling data from The Rockefeller Foundation shows that more than four in five adults in the United States – across demographics, income levels, party affiliations, and geographies – support integrating Food is Medicine (FIM) programs into U.S. healthcare. The survey, conducted by Hattaway Communications, highlights high interest but low public awareness of FIM programs, which aim to treat and manage chronic disease by increasing access to nutritious foods. The research underscores the perceived benefits of Food is Medicine programs, with 79% of respondents reporting that FIM programs would personally help them eat better after they received a definition of the intervention. "Americans want nutrition and food solutions to help them eat better, improve their health, and save money," said Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation. "We know that these programs are effective in helping patients manage diet-related chronic disease and are cost-effective too. Now, it's even clearer that there is a huge opportunity to improve Americans' health outcomes by investing in low-cost, individualized Food is Medicine solutions that are both proven and popular." Chronic diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease, impact an estimated 133 million Americans—more than 38% (or one-third) of the total U.S. population—and cost the United States $1.1 trillion per year (equivalent to what the U.S. spends on food itself). The vast majority of chronic conditions are diet-related: In the United States alone, poor diets contribute to 500,000 deaths annually. Modeling on medically tailored meals shows that investing in FIM programs could save an estimated $32.1 billion a year, significantly reducing Americans' healthcare costs. Even still, only 13% of Americans polled said they knew about FIM programs, which include interventions such as medically tailored meals and prescriptions for accessing fruits and vegetables, coupled with nutrition support. When presented with the definition of what they entail, survey respondents (84%) resoundingly supported the efforts. Some of the key findings include: More than 4 in 5 Americans believe U.S. healthcare should offer more food and nutrition programs to treat and manage illnesses. Nearly 9 in 10 patients would prefer to rely more on healthy eating than on medications to manage their conditions. Nearly 4 in 5 Americans think that Food is Medicine programs should be covered by both public and private insurance, including 85% of self-identified Democrats and 78% of Republicans. 84% of respondents believed FIM could help improve the overall quality of health in the United States. 79% of respondents said FIM programs could help them personally. 49% of the American public and 67% of healthcare workers view high costs of nutritious food as the single largest barrier to eating well. "We are seeing a growing awareness of diet-related diseases and their consequences in the U.S.," said Devon Klatell, Vice President for the Food Initiative at The Rockefeller Foundation. "This polling data shows that Americans want more support to eat well and live well. Food is Medicine programs are one tool that health care practitioners and providers must be considering as they work to address chronic disease in America." The Rockefeller Foundation commissioned Hattaway Communications to conduct the survey, which polled respondents across all 50 states between February 28 and March 11, 2025. The survey sampled 2,271 respondents, including 1,135 patients and 399 healthcare workers. The sample was weighted by gender and education to align with the actual proportions within the population and is representative of racial demographics across the U.S. Since 2019, The Rockefeller Foundation has supported Food is Medicine programs and invested in research to improve their effectiveness and understand the benefits and costs. As part of this effort, The Foundation announced its $100 million investment to expand access to Food is Medicine, including supporting vital research like the American Heart Association's Health Care by Food Initiative. The Foundation also initiated partnerships with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to speed the integration of Food Is Medicine into health systems. In February 2025, The Rockefeller Foundation announced $3.5 million in grant funding to support small and mid-scale U.S. farmers, improve health outcomes for people with chronic disease, mitigate rising health care costs in California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., and advance state-based efforts to include FIM interventions as a medically covered benefit under Medicaid programs. About The Rockefeller FoundationThe Rockefeller Foundation is a pioneering philanthropy built on collaborative partnerships at the frontiers of science, technology, and innovation that enable individuals, families, and communities to flourish. We make big bets to promote the wellbeing of humanity. Today, we are focused on advancing human opportunity and reversing the climate crisis by transforming systems in food, health, energy, and finance. For more information, sign up for our newsletter at and follow us on X @RockefellerFdn and LinkedIn @the-rockefeller-foundation. Media Contact:Ashley Chang, The Rockefeller Foundation: media@ View original content: SOURCE The Rockefeller Foundation Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store