Political solution without Palestinian statehood is 'cynical and illegal', says ICJ lawyer
That two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, however, cannot be reached without recognising Palestine as a state, Ardi Imseis, a professor of law at Queen's University in Canada, told The National.
Mr Imseis is a former UN official and has represented states before the International Court of Justice, which last year found Israel to be under an obligation to end its unlawful presence in the occupied Palestinian territory and make reparations for the damage caused.
"Recognition is a political prerogative of states," he said.
They can urge for a political resolution to the problem without recognising one or the other states, Mr Imseis said, although that "does not make sense".
"This is because if you have a two-state solution, one would assume you would need to have two states be part of that solution," he said.
Under international law, the Palestinian people have the right to self-determination in a state of their own.
"This right is peremptory and inalienable," he said. The international community has an obligation to help Palestinians realise that right, he added.
"However, if states make the emergence of a Palestinian state contingent on successful negotiations with Israel, then, in effect, that places Israel in a position of holding a veto power over the exercise by the Palestinian people of their right of self-determination," he said.
"It's a cyclical, cynical and ultimately illegal policy."
Mr Imseis said that Israel was a "bad faith illegal occupier" with no intention to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Following France's announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at French President Emmanuel Macron and said that a Palestinian state would create a "launch pad to annihilate Israel".
France, the US and the UK are three of the five members of the UN Security Council with veto power, if and when the next vote comes to admit the state of Palestine to UN membership.
The US used its veto the last time such a vote took place, on April 18, 2024.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is under increasing pressure from 220 Members of Parliament who wrote to him urging him to recognise a Palestinian state, said he does support the move.
But, he said, it should be part of a "wider plan" which results in security for Palestinians and Israelis.
At least 140 out of the world's 193 members of the UN General Assembly recognise Palestine as a state.
In 2012, the General Assembly gave Palestine non-member observer state status.
"That means, that within the UN system, the state of Palestine already exists," Mr Imseis said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Rebalancing economy: Egypt's shift toward private sector-led growth
In recent years, Egypt has embarked on a transformative journey aimed at rebalancing its economic landscape. A cornerstone of this ambitious endeavor is the strategic imperative to expand the role of the private sector significantly while reducing the state's pervasive presence in various economic activities. This shift is not merely an ideological preference; it is a pragmatic response to pressing economic realities and a forward-looking vision for sustainable growth. Private Sector Dominance: Why Imperative Now? For years, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) operating across numerous sectors have created an uneven playing field for private businesses. While the government has recently taken steps to level the competition for all firms, private enterprises frequently face challenges. These challenges are mainly in securing financing, largely due to banks' overwhelming preference for lending to the government. This is according to 2024 economic surveys on Egypt by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In this regard, Ahmed Fawzy Hussein, a PhD holder and an assistant professor of economics, tells Arab finance: 'The historical entrenchment of the state within the Egyptian economy has engendered several structural inefficiencies. Chief among them is the crowding-out effect, where public sector dominance in key sectors has marginalized private initiatives, stifled competition, and impeded productivity growth.' 'This has often led to a misallocation of resources, where investment decisions were driven by political or social imperatives rather than economic rationality. Furthermore, SOEs frequently operated under soft budget constraints, enjoying implicit state guarantees that discouraged efficiency and innovation. The cumulative effect has been a distortion of market dynamics, reduced foreign investor confidence, and an underdeveloped entrepreneurial ecosystem,' Hussein added. However, the Egyptian government is actively working to expand the role of the private sector in the national economy. Egypt has cultivated robust relationships with international institutions and development partners, strategically leveraging these alliances to channel development finance, particularly towards the private sector. This concerted effort, coupled with ongoing economic and structural reform measures, has yielded a significant increase in financing volumes. By the end of 2024, financing for private sector businesses reached approximately $4.2 billion, notably surpassing government financing for the first time, as revealed by the Ministry of Planning, Economic Development, and International Cooperation last June. With the efforts exerted, there are promising sectors for private investments in Egypt. Ahmed Ghaly, a trade economist, tells Arab Finance: 'There are several high-potential sectors that are aligned with both Egypt's economic priorities and the broader regional and global investment landscape. Energy, especially renewables like solar and wind, stands out as a priority area. Logistics and transportation also offer significant opportunities.' Other promising sectors include fintech and manufacturing, while sectors with less obvious opportunities include healthcare services, pharmaceuticals, and education, especially EdTech, Ghaly highlights. He adds, "Water desalination, renewable infrastructure services, and circular economy sectors are also emerging as strategic areas where the private sector can play a leading role, especially as Egypt intensifies its focus on sustainability and climate resilience." The State Ownership Policy Document: A Blueprint for Change In December 2022, Egypt finalized and issued the State Ownership Policy Document. This document outlines the government's approach to SOEs and aims to increase private sector participation in the Egyptian economy. 'The State Ownership Policy Document is a landmark in Egypt's economic policymaking. It is the first time the government has clearly defined the sectors in which it intends to exit, reduce its role, or retain a strategic presence,' according to Ghaly. 'By publicly committing to increase private sector participation in total investment to 65% within a few years, the document sends a strong message to both local and international investors that Egypt is serious about rebalancing its economic structure,' he says. To meet the aspirations of Egyptians, the State Ownership Policy Document seeks to elevate economic growth rates by boosting investment rates to between 25% and 30%. This is projected to increase the economic growth rate to a range of 7% to 9%, thereby generating sufficient job opportunities to reduce unemployment rates. Ghaly adds, 'The document outlines a three-tier approach: full exit, partial presence, and strategic retention. It identifies over 60 sectors and subsectors where the state's role will change.' The State Ownership Policy Document further aims to empower the Egyptian private sector and diversify its opportunities across all economic activities. This is crucial for significantly increasing its contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP), investments, employment, exports, and government revenues. Moreover, the document also aims to focus government investment in asset ownership on key, state-confined sectors, particularly those the private sector is hesitant to enter. Developing these strategic sectors will directly enhance the overall business environment for private enterprises. Furthermore, the document seeks to improve the governance of the state's economic presence by establishing clear criteria for government involvement. This signifies a shift from direct institutional management to a focus on managing state capital, achieved by defining clear mechanisms for the state's exit from both the management and ownership of its assets. Although the document aims to achieve competitive neutrality, it might not be the only means. Hussein explains, 'Competitive neutrality is indeed a cornerstone for ensuring a balanced economic environment where private enterprises can compete fairly with SOEs. Achieving this in Egypt requires a comprehensive regulatory overhaul, including transparent governance frameworks for SOEs, the elimination of preferential access to finance and land, and the imposition of uniform taxation and compliance standards. Equally important is the reinforcement of independent regulatory bodies to ensure impartial oversight across sectors.' 'While the State Ownership Policy Document signals a commendable policy direction, confidence in its effective implementation hinges on political will, institutional capacity, and the establishment of clear timelines with measurable benchmarks. Without these, reforms risk being superficial or selectively applied,' he adds. Meanwhile, Ghaly explains, 'The document's clarity is welcome. However, the key challenge now is operationalizing this policy. Investors will need to see concrete timelines, clear criteria for public-private partnerships (PPPs), and governance reforms in how state-owned enterprises are managed and divested. Transparency in asset valuation, open bidding processes, and consistency in messaging will be critical to building trust.' Sustainability of Private Sector-Led Growth Egypt's efforts to empower the private sector and ensure its sustainable growth do not stand only at the State Ownership Policy Document. 'Egyptian government has undertaken several initiatives beyond the document to attract private and foreign direct investment (FDI). Notable among these are the new Investment Law No. 72 of 2017, which provides a range of fiscal and non-fiscal incentives, particularly in underdeveloped regions, as well as guarantees against nationalization and arbitrary decisions.' 'Additionally, the push towards the Golden License system aims to streamline licensing procedures for strategic investments, reducing bureaucratic hurdles significantly. Furthermore, ongoing efforts to liberalize the exchange rate and enhance financial inclusion through digital transformation are pivotal in restoring investor confidence,' according to Hussein. With efforts to boost private sector contributions in Egypt, investments are starting to see good results. During the third quarter of FY2024/2025, private investment, at constant prices, surged by 24.2% year-on-year (YoY), marking the third consecutive quarter it outpaced public investment, constituting 62.8% of total implemented investments (excluding inventory). However, this growth was insufficient to counteract the substantial 45.6% YoY contraction in public investment (at constant prices). Consequently, the overall contribution of investment to GDP growth was negative, diminishing the aggregate growth rate by approximately 2.44 percentage points, as revealed by the Ministry of Planning, Economic Development, and International Cooperation in June 2025. Yet, more needs to be done to ensure better results in the future. Hussein points out, 'The sustainability of the incentives [taken by the government] depends critically on addressing underlying issues of regulatory predictability, judicial efficiency, and macroeconomic stability.' Ghaly notes, 'Global investors are closely watching Egypt, but to attract long-term investment, reforms must shift from plans to credible, actionable policies. Strengthening the private sector is no longer just an economic choice; it is a necessity for resilience, innovation, and job creation.' Egypt's economic trajectory is at a pivotal point, marked by a determined shift towards empowering the private sector as the primary engine of growth and development. The historical dominance of state-owned enterprises has created structural inefficiencies, stifled competition, and led to resource misallocation. Recognizing these challenges, the government has strategically committed to fostering a more level playing field, attracting investment, and driving sustainable job creation. The path ahead requires sustained effort, but the strategic direction is clear: a dynamic private sector is indispensable for Egypt's long-term economic aspirations.
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Shaikha Al Nowais meets with President of Congo to explore future partnerships in culture, tourism, and sustainable development
Democratic Republic of the Congo: H.E. Shaikha Nasser Al Nowais, Secretary-General-elect of UN Tourism for the 2026–2029 term, met with H.E. Félix Tshisekedi, President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, to discuss avenues for future cooperation between UN Tourism and the Congolese government in the areas of culture, tourism, and sustainable development. The meeting focused on strengthening partnerships to advance shared priorities, while addressing the challenges facing the cultural sector. Discussions also explored opportunities to elevate the Democratic Republic of Congo's status as a leading cultural and tourism hub in Africa. Her Excellency also held a bilateral meeting with H.E. Yolande Elebe Ma Ndembo, Congolese Minister of Culture, Arts, and Heritage, during which both sides explored prospects for collaboration aimed at enhancing cultural infrastructure and developing public policies to safeguard intellectual property and promote the rights of artists. The meeting underscored the vital role of culture and tourism in rebuilding national identity and empowering local communities, highlighting the need for inclusive and forward-looking policies in both sectors. World Music and Tourism Festival The meetings took place on the sidelines of H.E. Shaikha Al Nowais's participation in the inaugural edition of the World Music and Tourism Festival, organised by the Congolese Ministry of Tourism in collaboration with the UN Tourism in Kinshasa. The Festival's aim is to support sustainable cultural and tourism policies and highlight the role of music and the arts in promoting intercultural dialogue through diverse tourism and cultural activities. Held under the theme 'The Rumba Route for Peace,' the Festival brought together prominent cultural leaders and tourism policymakers from around the globe, along with African artists and creative institutions. It featured live musical performances, high-level institutional dialogues, and field visits, serving as an unprecedented international platform that blends culture, tourism, and community development. Significance of culture and music in creating tourism opportunities H.E. Shaikha Al Nowais emphasized that music serves as a universal language that fosters understanding, tolerance, and solidarity among cultures. She underscored the vital role of investment in cultural and creative industries as powerful drivers of social and economic empowerment, particularly for youth. Her Excellency also noted that music transcends borders and reflects shared human values, making it a powerful tool for promoting cultural awareness and unlocking sustainable tourism opportunities across continents. 'Musical Villages Across Continents' initiative During her participation in the festival, H.E. Shaikha Al Nowais announced an international initiative titled 'Musical Villages Across Continents,' set to officially launch in 2026. The initiative aims to establish creative community centres in both Africa and Latin America to nurture local musical talent, promote cultural exchange, and encourage the creative economy in both rural and urban communities, in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Roundtable on tourism as a tool for cultural diplomacy H.E. participated in a high-level roundtable discussion titled 'Transatlantic Rhythms for Peace: Advancing Advocacy and Policy Strategies for International Connections.' It brought together ministers and international policymakers from Africa, Latin America, and Asia to discuss the growing role of music tourism as a tool for cultural diplomacy, peace-building, and equitable development. Participants included H.E. M'pambia Musanga Didier, Minister of Tourism of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and H.E. Yussif Issaka Jajah, Deputy Minister of Tourism, Culture and Creative Arts of the Republic of Ghana. Visit to the Symphony Orchestra School On the sidelines of her participation in the festival, H.E. Shaikha Al Nowais visited the Kimbanguist Symphony Orchestra School, where she met with young musicians and learned about the school's training and arts academic programs. -Ends- For further information, please contact: Orient Planet Group (OPG) Email: media@ Website:
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump's strategy for Middle East 'peace' is built on Israeli dominance. It will fail
The Trump administration is attempting to reshape the Middle East after launching strikes on Iran last month, adopting a strategy characterised by "peace through strength" and "commerce, not chaos". While this approach is presented as pragmatic, it risks destabilising the region in favour of maximising US and Israeli military and economic advantage. President Donald Trump considers himself an "expert dealmaker", believing that calculated military strikes create leverage for diplomatic gains - particularly by pressuring Iran back to the negotiating table. His strategy emphasises overwhelming but short-term military force to achieve defined goals, avoiding prolonged entanglements or "forever wars". It also marks a rejection of nation-building, shifting the burden of regional stability onto local partners. Though the strategic value of Middle Eastern energy resources has declined for the US, the region remains crucial - perhaps even more so under the current administration. As Med This Week reports, three primary factors shape recent US actions. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The first is the ideological alliance between far-right governments in the US and Israel, which transcends the traditional "special relationship" and reflects a deeper political and strategic alignment. The administration also views Israeli hegemony as a vehicle for regional stability, envisioning a dominant "Greater Israel", backed by overwhelming US support, capable of unilaterally enforcing peace and marginalising Iran. At its core, the Trump doctrine envisions a Greater Israel, backed by US power, enforcing peace and sidelining Iran Finally, personal financial interests - particularly those of Trump and his family - were prominently on display during his recent Gulf visit. The immediate objective of the 12-day war was to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Trump declared key sites "destroyed" or "shut down", hailing the campaign as a critical blow against a perceived existential threat. (A recent US intelligence report found that only one of the three targeted nuclear facilities was completely destroyed, with the others expected to be operational again within months.) These military operations have significantly reshaped regional power dynamics, pushing forward the Trump administration's regional strategy: normalising relations between Israel and Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, and potentially extending to Oman, Indonesia, Qatar and even Syria. Yet this pursuit of realignment remains constrained by Israel's ongoing war on Gaza. A ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages are seen as prerequisites for advancing and expanding normalisation. Israel: A hegemonic power? The US has demonstrated its willingness to act unilaterally with overwhelming force - particularly through the use of "bunker-buster" bombs on Iranian nuclear sites. This was portrayed as a show of unmatched American might, aimed not only at Iran but also as a deterrent to rivals like China and Russia. America's costly backing for Israel is enabling China's unstoppable rise Read More » Meanwhile, Israel has sought to project itself as a formidable military force with deep intelligence reach into Iran's nuclear and security infrastructure. Some Israeli officials have even claimed the country has joined the ranks of global powers, though the strikes, which killed large numbers of civilians, have drawn widespread criticism and raised questions about the legitimacy of such claims. Yet the question remains: can Israel truly become a hegemonic power in the region? Despite its recent operations and short-term tactical gains, Israel faces structural and political barriers to sustained dominance. It remains heavily reliant on US military, diplomatic and economic support. Deep-rooted regional conflicts persist, particularly the unresolved Palestinian issue, which continues to inflame public opinion and obstruct meaningful diplomatic engagement. Key regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are unlikely to accept Israeli expansionism or hegemony. Meanwhile, Iran's political will to pursue its nuclear ambitions appears undiminished, with some analysts suggesting that the recent strikes may ultimately accelerate, rather than deter, its nuclear development. Iran's leadership, especially Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is unlikely to negotiate from a position of perceived weakness. The recent military escalation follows the US "maximum pressure" campaign and its hostile stance towards Iran after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, in 2018. Together, these developments have reinforced Iranian mistrust and further narrowed the space for diplomacy. Furthermore, there is no credible assessment that the recent strikes have permanently crippled Iran's nuclear programme. Many analysts believe any setbacks will last only months, not years, and that Iran will simply shift operations deeper underground. Roadblocks to dominance The unresolved Palestinian question remains the greatest obstacle to expanding the Abraham Accords and achieving regional peace. Saudi Arabia has made its position clear: it demands an unambiguous commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. Yet the Netanyahu government - shaped by ultra-right forces - prioritises military dominance over meaningful negotiations, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders. Without a clear post-war vision for Gaza and a comprehensive ceasefire, Israeli dominance is unsustainable. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Regional actors, especially in the Gulf, fear appearing complicit with a state widely viewed as violating Arab rights. Israel's prolonged war in Gaza and lack of a political roadmap have tarnished its global image, leading to growing international condemnation and even weakening support from traditional allies like the EU (though it declined to take any action). Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders The erosion of diplomatic support for Israel - alongside the continued refusal to hold it accountable for its war crimes - has only furthered its isolation, undermining any bid for genuine regional leadership. Meanwhile, Israeli national security doctrine under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu relies on military superiority as the only guarantee of peace. But even claimed military "victories" come at staggering human and economic costs - both for Palestinians and for Israelis. Even if external military actions temporarily consolidate internal support - as seen in Iran - they often fail to trigger regime change or long-term stability. Decades of foreign interventions have shown that externally imposed political transitions are more likely to produce chaos than lasting peace. Regional and internal pressures have compounded the challenges facing Israel's hegemonic ambitions. Gulf states, wary of Iranian collapse, fear the resulting chaos, humanitarian crisis, refugee flows and nuclear proliferation. Domestically, Netanyahu faces mounting pressure amid public frustration over his failure to secure a full ceasefire in Gaza or release all hostages - exposing internal fractures that challenge any coherent long-term strategy. Crucially, Israel has not established a legitimate Palestinian governing authority to assume control of Gaza, nor has it succeeded in imposing external or co-opted leadership. The result is chaos and the emergence of new resistance movements - mirroring US failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regional defiance Saudi Arabia has remained unwilling to embrace Israeli ambitions, insisting that any normalisation must be preceded by a concrete commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. However, Israel's aggression has made further agreements politically untenable. Gulf states must act to avoid Israel's war on Iran spiralling into chaos Hadi Kahalzadeh Read More » Some Gulf countries are reassessing their approach to Israel, questioning whether its actions foster stability or provoke further conflict. Many now prefer a long-term weakening of both Iran and Israel, rather than a decisive victory for either, to reduce threats to their own regimes. Saudi and Emirati strategies of hedging - including outreach to Iran - suggest a desire to avoid taking sides in regional conflicts, reducing their willingness to join an anti-Iran alliance led by Israel. Turkey, too, is unlikely to accept Israeli regional dominance. What was once a "golden age" of cooperation in the 1990s has devolved into mutual suspicion. Turkish leaders have grown increasingly vocal in their condemnation of Israel's actions, particularly in Gaza, and Ankara views Israel's deepening alliances with Greece and Cyprus as a threat. Turkey continues to build its own military and missile capabilities and asserts regional influence in Syria. It also positions itself as a potential mediator in Israeli-Iranian tensions - an indication of its desire to act independently. A fragile vision Trump's military campaign may have weakened Iran's nuclear ambitions and its regional allies, but long-term regional stability remains elusive. The current "peace" is more accurately described as a fragile truce than a durable shift. At its core, Israeli military superiority has failed to deliver political solutions. Without addressing the Palestinian question, stabilising Gaza, and navigating complex regional rivalries, lasting peace is impossible. Even if armed groups are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures Even if armed resistance groups such as Hezbollah or Hamas are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures. Israel may maintain its military edge, but it will continue to struggle for legitimacy and leadership in the Middle East. As violations of international law by the US and Israel mount, the message appears clear: "Only the weak follow the rules." Such a precedent erodes collective security and undermines any meaningful regional consensus. Real, enduring peace will not come through dominance alone - it demands diplomacy, justice, and the courage to confront the root causes of conflict. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
