Trump's strategy for Middle East 'peace' is built on Israeli dominance. It will fail
While this approach is presented as pragmatic, it risks destabilising the region in favour of maximising US and Israeli military and economic advantage.
President Donald Trump considers himself an "expert dealmaker", believing that calculated military strikes create leverage for diplomatic gains - particularly by pressuring Iran back to the negotiating table.
His strategy emphasises overwhelming but short-term military force to achieve defined goals, avoiding prolonged entanglements or "forever wars". It also marks a rejection of nation-building, shifting the burden of regional stability onto local partners.
Though the strategic value of Middle Eastern energy resources has declined for the US, the region remains crucial - perhaps even more so under the current administration. As Med This Week reports, three primary factors shape recent US actions.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The first is the ideological alliance between far-right governments in the US and Israel, which transcends the traditional "special relationship" and reflects a deeper political and strategic alignment.
The administration also views Israeli hegemony as a vehicle for regional stability, envisioning a dominant "Greater Israel", backed by overwhelming US support, capable of unilaterally enforcing peace and marginalising Iran.
At its core, the Trump doctrine envisions a Greater Israel, backed by US power, enforcing peace and sidelining Iran
Finally, personal financial interests - particularly those of Trump and his family - were prominently on display during his recent Gulf visit.
The immediate objective of the 12-day war was to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Trump declared key sites "destroyed" or "shut down", hailing the campaign as a critical blow against a perceived existential threat. (A recent US intelligence report found that only one of the three targeted nuclear facilities was completely destroyed, with the others expected to be operational again within months.)
These military operations have significantly reshaped regional power dynamics, pushing forward the Trump administration's regional strategy: normalising relations between Israel and Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, and potentially extending to Oman, Indonesia, Qatar and even Syria.
Yet this pursuit of realignment remains constrained by Israel's ongoing war on Gaza. A ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages are seen as prerequisites for advancing and expanding normalisation.
Israel: A hegemonic power?
The US has demonstrated its willingness to act unilaterally with overwhelming force - particularly through the use of "bunker-buster" bombs on Iranian nuclear sites. This was portrayed as a show of unmatched American might, aimed not only at Iran but also as a deterrent to rivals like China and Russia.
America's costly backing for Israel is enabling China's unstoppable rise Read More »
Meanwhile, Israel has sought to project itself as a formidable military force with deep intelligence reach into Iran's nuclear and security infrastructure.
Some Israeli officials have even claimed the country has joined the ranks of global powers, though the strikes, which killed large numbers of civilians, have drawn widespread criticism and raised questions about the legitimacy of such claims.
Yet the question remains: can Israel truly become a hegemonic power in the region?
Despite its recent operations and short-term tactical gains, Israel faces structural and political barriers to sustained dominance.
It remains heavily reliant on US military, diplomatic and economic support. Deep-rooted regional conflicts persist, particularly the unresolved Palestinian issue, which continues to inflame public opinion and obstruct meaningful diplomatic engagement.
Key regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are unlikely to accept Israeli expansionism or hegemony. Meanwhile, Iran's political will to pursue its nuclear ambitions appears undiminished, with some analysts suggesting that the recent strikes may ultimately accelerate, rather than deter, its nuclear development.
Iran's leadership, especially Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is unlikely to negotiate from a position of perceived weakness.
The recent military escalation follows the US "maximum pressure" campaign and its hostile stance towards Iran after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, in 2018. Together, these developments have reinforced Iranian mistrust and further narrowed the space for diplomacy.
Furthermore, there is no credible assessment that the recent strikes have permanently crippled Iran's nuclear programme. Many analysts believe any setbacks will last only months, not years, and that Iran will simply shift operations deeper underground.
Roadblocks to dominance
The unresolved Palestinian question remains the greatest obstacle to expanding the Abraham Accords and achieving regional peace.
Saudi Arabia has made its position clear: it demands an unambiguous commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. Yet the Netanyahu government - shaped by ultra-right forces - prioritises military dominance over meaningful negotiations, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank.
Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders. Without a clear post-war vision for Gaza and a comprehensive ceasefire, Israeli dominance is unsustainable.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
Regional actors, especially in the Gulf, fear appearing complicit with a state widely viewed as violating Arab rights.
Israel's prolonged war in Gaza and lack of a political roadmap have tarnished its global image, leading to growing international condemnation and even weakening support from traditional allies like the EU (though it declined to take any action).
Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders
The erosion of diplomatic support for Israel - alongside the continued refusal to hold it accountable for its war crimes - has only furthered its isolation, undermining any bid for genuine regional leadership.
Meanwhile, Israeli national security doctrine under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu relies on military superiority as the only guarantee of peace. But even claimed military "victories" come at staggering human and economic costs - both for Palestinians and for Israelis.
Even if external military actions temporarily consolidate internal support - as seen in Iran - they often fail to trigger regime change or long-term stability. Decades of foreign interventions have shown that externally imposed political transitions are more likely to produce chaos than lasting peace.
Regional and internal pressures have compounded the challenges facing Israel's hegemonic ambitions.
Gulf states, wary of Iranian collapse, fear the resulting chaos, humanitarian crisis, refugee flows and nuclear proliferation.
Domestically, Netanyahu faces mounting pressure amid public frustration over his failure to secure a full ceasefire in Gaza or release all hostages - exposing internal fractures that challenge any coherent long-term strategy.
Crucially, Israel has not established a legitimate Palestinian governing authority to assume control of Gaza, nor has it succeeded in imposing external or co-opted leadership. The result is chaos and the emergence of new resistance movements - mirroring US failures in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Regional defiance
Saudi Arabia has remained unwilling to embrace Israeli ambitions, insisting that any normalisation must be preceded by a concrete commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. However, Israel's aggression has made further agreements politically untenable.
Gulf states must act to avoid Israel's war on Iran spiralling into chaos
Hadi Kahalzadeh Read More »
Some Gulf countries are reassessing their approach to Israel, questioning whether its actions foster stability or provoke further conflict. Many now prefer a long-term weakening of both Iran and Israel, rather than a decisive victory for either, to reduce threats to their own regimes.
Saudi and Emirati strategies of hedging - including outreach to Iran - suggest a desire to avoid taking sides in regional conflicts, reducing their willingness to join an anti-Iran alliance led by Israel.
Turkey, too, is unlikely to accept Israeli regional dominance.
What was once a "golden age" of cooperation in the 1990s has devolved into mutual suspicion. Turkish leaders have grown increasingly vocal in their condemnation of Israel's actions, particularly in Gaza, and Ankara views Israel's deepening alliances with Greece and Cyprus as a threat.
Turkey continues to build its own military and missile capabilities and asserts regional influence in Syria. It also positions itself as a potential mediator in Israeli-Iranian tensions - an indication of its desire to act independently.
A fragile vision
Trump's military campaign may have weakened Iran's nuclear ambitions and its regional allies, but long-term regional stability remains elusive. The current "peace" is more accurately described as a fragile truce than a durable shift.
At its core, Israeli military superiority has failed to deliver political solutions. Without addressing the Palestinian question, stabilising Gaza, and navigating complex regional rivalries, lasting peace is impossible.
Even if armed groups are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures
Even if armed resistance groups such as Hezbollah or Hamas are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures.
Israel may maintain its military edge, but it will continue to struggle for legitimacy and leadership in the Middle East.
As violations of international law by the US and Israel mount, the message appears clear: "Only the weak follow the rules." Such a precedent erodes collective security and undermines any meaningful regional consensus.
Real, enduring peace will not come through dominance alone - it demands diplomacy, justice, and the courage to confront the root causes of conflict.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
25 minutes ago
- Zawya
Shares mixed, euro dips as tariff costs counted
LONDON - Wall Street futures pointed to a buoyant open on Tuesday ahead of earnings reports from a number of companies and the Federal Reserve's policy meeting that starts later in the day. S&P 500 futures ticked up 0.3%, while Nasdaq futures added 0.5%, riding on hopes for upbeat results from mega caps this week that include Apple, Meta Platforms , Microsoft and Amazon. The dollar index climbed 0.4% to 98.951 after the rush out of short dollar positions lifted it 1% overnight, while it eased a one-week high on the yen to stand at 148.69 . Yields on 10-year Treasuries inched up 3 basis points to 4.392%, having crept higher on Monday as markets braced for another steady decision on interest rates from the Federal Reserve. Futures imply a 97% chance the Fed would keep rates at 4.25%-4.5% at its meeting on Wednesday and reiterate concerns that tariffs will push inflation higher in the short term. Analysts also assume one, or maybe two, Fed officials will dissent in favour of a cut and supporting wagers for a move in September. The odds could change depending on a slew of U.S. data this week including gross domestic product for the second quarter, where growth is expected to rebound to an annualised 2.4%, after a 0.5% contraction in the first quarter. Figures on job openings are due later on Tuesday that will help refine forecasts for the crucial payrolls report on Friday. "The equity rally has narrowed, valuations are stretched and market internals are flashing caution, and consumer data -particularly around housing and retail - show signs of fatigue," said Bruno Schneller, managing director at Erlen Capital Management, Zurich. "This is the start of a 'show-me' phase - for both policymakers and corporates. Markets will demand confirmation: from earnings, from macro, and from the Fed," Erlen added. Canada's central bank also convenes on Wednesday and again is widely expected to hold rates at 2.75%. TARIFF ECHOES U.S. equity moves follow record closing highs for the S&P and the Nasdaq on Monday in volatile trading after the U.S. struck a trade agreement with the European Union, while the Dow remained just about 200 points short of an all-time high. The U.S.-EU trade deal, announced on Sunday, halved threatened 30% U.S. tariffs on EU imports to 15% and bolstered expectations that more such agreements will follow ahead of President Donald Trump's looming August 1 deadline. Trump also flagged a "world tariff" rate of 15%-20% on all trading partners that were not negotiating a deal, among the highest rates since the Great Depression of the 1930s. "While the worst-case scenario was averted, the implied EU tariff increase from 1% in January is a significant tax increase on EU exports," wrote economists from JPMorgan in a note. "This is a very big shock that unwinds a century of U.S. leadership in global free trade," they said. "While we no longer see a U.S. recession as our baseline from this shock, the risk is still elevated at 40%." The euro fell 0.4% to $1.1543, after retreating 1.3% overnight in its largest drop since mid-May. European shares recovered after Monday's sell-off. Europe's broad STOXX 600 was up 0.6%, helped by some positive reactions to quarterly earnings. French and German stock indexes rose over 1%. Novo Nordisk, one of Europe's biggest companies by market cap, named Maziar Mike Doustdar as its new chief executive after the abrupt removal of its previous CEO in May. Shares in the company were down as much as 29.8% by 1149 GMT, wiping off over 80 billion euros in market cap at one point. An air of caution saw MSCI's broadest index of world shares tick down about 0.2% after China stocks ended higher on Tuesday as a new round of Sino-U.S. trade talks continued, while Japan's Nikkei lost 0.8%. A further risk to world growth came from a sudden spike in oil prices after Trump threatened a new deadline of 10 or 12 days for Russia to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine or face tougher sanctions on oil exports. In commodity markets, prices for copper and iron ore were under pressure while gold was roughly flat at $3,316 an ounce . Brent was about 20 cents higher at $70.22 a barrel, while U.S. crude up 17 cents to $66.90. (Editing by Sam Holmes, Bernadette Baum and Mark Heinrich)
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Mideast Stocks: Earnings drag Saudi, Abu Dhabi down, while lifting Dubai amid cautious trade outlook
Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi edged lower on Tuesday on lacklustre second-quarter results, while Dubai advanced, bucking major Gulf peers, supported by strong corporate performance and optimism around future positive earnings announcements. Saudi Arabia's benchmark index <.TASI> eased 0.6%, pressured by a string of disappointing earnings across key sectors. Arabian Drilling < plunged 10% after posting a sharp drop in second-quarter profit, well below analysts' expectations, and announcing a suspension of cash dividends for 2025. Arabian Pipes < fell more than 3.5% after missing quarterly estimates, while Jamjoom Pharmaceuticals < dropped nearly 5% as its shares traded ex-dividend. Dubai's benchmark index <.DFMGI> rose 0.2% to hit over a 17-1/2-year high, logging its fifth consecutive session of gains, as hopes remain high ahead of key earnings, mainly from the real estate sector. Gains were driven by a 1% jump in toll operator Salik maintaining the same stretch of wins. Elsewhere, Dubai Taxi Company climbed nearly 7.5% after its second-quarter results topped market expectations and it announced a higher half-year dividend than last year. The Abu Dhabi index <.FTFADGI> edged down 0.2% as mixed corporate earnings offset optimism from the previous week's strong performance that was expected to sustain momentum. Abu Dhabi's largest developer, Aldar Properties , slipped over 3% after announcing a marginal second-quarter revenue decline sequentially, despite reporting a record order backlog of 62.3 billion dirhams as of the end of June. Among other laggards, IHC-owned investment firm Multiply Group sank 3.3% after its quarterly profit halved year-on-year. Qatar's benchmark index <.QSI> fell 0.6%, weighed down by broad-based sectoral declines, as investors booked profits following a multi-year rally, with Qatar Islamic Bank losing nearly 2%. Investors remained focused on global trade risks following the U.S. and European Union's weekend deal, which reduced the threat of a 30% tariff to a 15% levy on most EU imports. While the agreement eased immediate fears, sentiment remained cautious as markets weighed the higher duties against the 1% to 2% level before Trump returned to the White House. Trump's ongoing tariff policies continue to fuel worries over global growth, with potential slowdowns in trade and consumption threatening energy demand and the fiscal stability of oil-dependent Gulf economies. Outside the Gulf, Egypt's blue-chip index <.EGX30> was flat following a recent record peak. (Reporting by Amna Mariyam in Bengaluru; Editing by Vijay Kishore)
The National
an hour ago
- The National
IMF raises 2025 world growth forecast to 3% on tariff front-loading
The International Monetary Fund has revised its global growth projection for this year higher although uncertainty remains high due to US President Donald Trump's shifting tariff agenda. The world economy is now estimated to expand by 3 per cent in 2025, 0.2 percentage points faster than the previous forecast, the Washington-based fund said in its latest World Economic Outlook released on Tuesday. The fund projects global growth to hit 3.2 per cent in 2026, 0.1 percentage points higher than its April forecast. IMF's latest projections come roughly three months after Mr Trump first unveiled his sweeping universal tariff policy on almost all major trade partners, as well as harsher so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of other countries. The fund said the shift reflects stronger-than-expected front-loading in anticipation of tariffs, lower average US tariff rate on partners than previously announced, a weaker US dollar and fiscal expansion in some major economies. 'This modest decline in trade tensions, however fragile, has contributed to the resilience of the global economy so far,' said IMF chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. However, this resilience, Mr Gourinchas said, is 'tenuous'. High uncertainty despite tariff talks Mr Trump's tariffs shook the world economy following his April 2 Liberation Day announcement. Although the effective tariff rates are lower than the ones announced, the fund said uncertainty remains elevated, which could weigh on economic activity. The implementation date for those reciprocal tariffs were delayed until August 1 following an initial bond-market rout, while the US administration has looked to secure trade deals with trading partners. The White House has touted trade agreements struck with some of those partners, including Japan and the EU as major achievements. On Monday, Mr Trump suggested he is considering increasing the blanket tariff rate between 15 per cent and 20 per cent on imports from countries that have not reached a trade deal with the US. The rate would be in line with what he has recently announced with Japan and the EU. It would also represent a higher tariff rate for the UAE, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries that have neither reached a trade agreement with the US nor received a so-called trade letter from Mr Trump. Meanwhile, trade tension between the US and China – a major source of concern for the global economy – also somewhat cooled when the two announced a trade truce, lowering their reciprocal tariffs. 'Despite these welcome developments, tariffs remain historically high, and global policy remains highly uncertain,' Mr Gourinchas said, noting the few trade agreements reached since April. US and China officials resume talks in Sweden this week to extend the temporary truce by three months, ahead of an August 12 deadline. Revisions mask weaker prospects Global growth this year should also be seen a consequence of tariff distortion rather than underlying robustness, the IMF said. The latest growth forecasts are lower than what the fund predicted in 2024 (3.3 per cent) and the pre-pandemic historical average of 3.7 per cent. 'While the trade shock could turn out to be less severe than initially feared, it is still sizeable, and evidence is mounting that it is hurting the global economy,' Mr Gourinchas said. The US economy is estimated to expand at 1.9 per cent this year, 0.1 percentage points higher than the fund's April forecast, before picking up to 2 per cent in 2026, owing to a near-term boost from Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Act Bill. It contracted by 0.5 per cent in the first quarter this year due to an import surge ahead of tariffs. The US government is due to release second-quarter gross domestic product figures on Wednesday. The tariff episode has also led to the dollar depreciating by 8 per cent this year, which has magnified the shock of levies on other countries' competitiveness, Mr Gourinchas said. China received the biggest revision of countries listed in the fund's latest release. IMF now expects the world's second-largest economy is now projected to grow by 4.8 per cent this year, up from the fund's previous 4 per cent estimate. The revision reflects the significant reduction in US-China tariffs and stronger-than-expected activity in the first half of 2025, the fund said. Growth in the Middle East and Central Asia is estimated at 3.4 per cent this year and 3.5 per cent in 2026, while India's growth forecast has been revised slightly upwards at 6.4 per cent in 2025 and 2026. Euro-area growth is expected to pick up to 1 per cent in 2025, 0.2 percentage points higher than previously estimated growth that the IMF attributed to strong GDP out-turn in Ireland. Growth in the euro area is projected to be 1.2 per cent in 2026. The IMF also projects relatively stable growth in sub-Saharan Africa at 4 per cent this year, while growth in Latin America and the Caribbean is expected to slow to 2.2 per cent this year before bouncing back to 2.4 per cent next year. Inflation trade-offs Global headline inflation is projected to fall to 4.2 per cent in 2025 and 3.6 per cent in 2026, unchanged from April but with mixed patterns across economies. The fund anticipates tariffs to eventually pass through to US consumer prices and creep into inflation data in the second half of this year. Elsewhere, tariffs could be a negative demand shock and lower inflationary pressures, while inflation dynamics in the euro area are expected to be more subdued, the IMF said. Mixed inflation data has led to major central banks taking different approaches towards rates this year. The Federal Reserve has been the focus of Mr Trump's anger for keeping its target range on interest rates steady this year at 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent. The European Central Bank on the other hand has cut rates three times this year to its current 2.25 per cent. Central banks could face difficult trade-offs due to tariffs and geopolitical tensions, warned the fund. The Israel-Iran war, for instance, led to a brief spike in oil prices before they settled around at the current price point of roughly $69 a barrel. The IMF said escalating tensions in the Middle East and Ukraine could lead to lower growth and rekindle inflationary pressures. 'Central banks could face more difficult trade-offs when they are already grappling with challenges from the trade environment,' the fund said.
